/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.22656766]

The network says that it seeks to “fundamentally transform” payments and securities processing. It aims to provide financial institutions with “instant and frictionless” end-to-end transactions.

Swift says its new platform will utilise APIs to facilitate interactions between financial institutions and other participants.

Banks will use a set of common processing services, which Swift says they have “historically invested in individually”.

Swift says those opting in don’t need to worry about connecting their legacy tech to Swift. The firm promises “minimal disruption through backward compatibility”.

Swift claims at least four billion accounts could be powered by “instant and frictionless” transactions, saving the industry time and money.

It says that “new and extensive data capabilities” will enable the pre-validation of essential data, fraud detection, transaction tracking and more.

[Anonymous No.22656779]

>>22656766
we don't need another link thread, anon

[Anonymous No.22656798]

>>22656766
checked. chainlink is the spinal cord of an entire new automated system of global commerce. LINK is going to $50k and there's probably only a couple of hundred people on the entire planet who know that for a fact.

[Anonymous No.22656801]

>>22656779
he is talking about xrp u brainlet lmao

[Anonymous No.22656806]

>>22656766
The sad, reaching cope.

[Anonymous No.22656821]

>>22656801

[Anonymous No.22656827]

>>22656801
>also xrp shills: yes we know swift isn't using us, it's not necessary we don't need them blah blah blah eternal 0.24c stable coin to the moooooon
don't you have an xrp slide thread to be hiding in? or shouldn't you be looking for some new xrp hashtag twitter nigger to follow? LMAO

[Anonymous No.22656872]

If SWIFT would be utilizing Chainlink the logos would not have disappeared from the site.

chain.link

Go ahead. You cannot even find a mention of SWIFT anymore. It's over stinkies

>but muh non-disclosure agreements
>surely LINk will just bring the SWIFT logos back any time now

Not happening kid.

[Anonymous No.22656925]

>>22656872
And the fact they allowed and read out a question about swift at an AMA to say they weren't working with them. In no world with a NDA do you actively select questions you can't legally answer.

[Anonymous No.22657391]

XRP the standard.

[Anonymous No.22657431]

>>22656801
are xrp holders the lowest iq on this board

[Anonymous No.22657533]

>>22656766
Swift/Quant hookup is coming - they can’t be left behind by the SIA/Quant hookup that’s already in production.

[Anonymous No.22657598]

I don't understand why swift is needed to be instrumental to the success of stinkies. Microsoft was successful as a software company without relying on partnerships; instead it just became the standard os that was bundled together with new computers much like link is literally the standard oracle solution used by 99% of defi scams and many others during a fucking bear market kek

[Anonymous No.22657748]

[Anonymous No.22657778]

>>22656766
You forgot the part where it's going live in Q4 2022

[Anonymous No.22657823]

>>22657748
I remember this but they kept saying swift gpi in reference to Chainlink GPI Swift Oracle or whatever they call it

[Anonymous No.22657947]

>>22656827
xrp slide threads are made by linkers, the one that dont post anymore, wtfwt anon, my mother is throwing me out anon, drunken anon, whale killer anon (you got baited RETARD), nico bully gf... they are all massively short on link, leveraged to the tits, to accumulate more, non of them holds xrp. Kill the OG's, buy more link, liquidate there positions, before they can accumulate more

[Anonymous No.22657978]

>>22657947
>random bored biz larpers are making XRP threads
Yes.
>These larpers are short on XRP
Probably not, it's likely just a funny game since XRP is worthless, so convincing newfrens to buy it is funny.

[Anonymous No.22657987]

>>22657978
short on link
you are slipping

[Anonymous No.22658101]

>>22656766
What was that crypto token that connects api's and legacy systems to instant and frictionless end-to-end blockchains called again?

[Anonymous No.22658126]

>>22657987
That makes even less sense.

[Anonymous No.22658396]

>>22656801
This is actually kind of sad