How does anyone take this big piece of shit seriously

[Anonymous No.22177727]

Besides the enormous gas fees, why would you trust trillions of dollars of information on this when ETH was already hacked and forked with ETC? Why are mETH heads more than a 100% confident something like ETC will never happen again?
I dont believe in most ETH killers like ADA or XTZ either, since those rely on chainlink, and therefore ETH

But ETH is objectively a piece of shit. How is it not $0 already?

[Anonymous No.22177838]

It will be once FTM takes off.

[Anonymous No.22178488]

>>22177727
This is literally worst take i heard since 2016 on lowerst bar possible place on interwebs
And im not even eth fan kek

Wellcome newfag

[Anonymous No.22178552]

>>22177727
ETH can only trend towards centralization.
It's too cost prohibitive to run a node so a fork isn't possible.
The single digit number of archive node maintainers are in too deep to rock the boat.

[Anonymous No.22178564]

>>22178488
>cant explain at all whats wrong with what i said

[Anonymous No.22178602]

>>22178552
>so a fork isn't possible.
then what was ETC? When ETH was first created, Vitalik never imagined ETC happening in a million years.
Why should any business trust, literally trillions of dollars of information, on a system that can fail at any moment.

[Anonymous No.22178714]

>>22178564
You think im gonna argue with newfags over and over again kek
Also everything is wrong from idea why people "trust bilions to chain" to idea chainlink is somehow tied to eth

Have good one newfag

[Anonymous No.22178856]

>>22178714
post networth or shut up about newfag.
also, you literally cant defend a single thing i said. LINK is ethereum token. by people being dependent on LINK, they are dependent on ETH. Thats what the controversy of march was with chainlink, the high fees of ETH

[Anonymous No.22178903]

Was using ETH for the past year, moved to TRX this week and never coming back to ETH. transaction in less than a second and less than a penny per transaction feels good.

[Anonymous No.22178937]

>>22178856
>post networth or shut up about newfag
>>22178856
>LINK is ethereum token. by people being dependent on LINK, they are dependent on ETH.

[Anonymous No.22178994]

>>22178937
>poor
>is so new, wasnt around for the March 2020 crash when LINK users were paying enormous gas fees
please keep embarrassing yourself. i bet you have $50,000 max in ETH and think its gonna reach $5000 lol

[Anonymous No.22179030]

>>22178994
>is so new, wasnt around for the March 2020

[Anonymous No.22179079]

>>22179030
you literally werent. otherwise you remember how synthetix lost millions of dollars in ETH gas fees.

post networth

[Anonymous No.22179139]

>>22178602
ETC was an early days offshoot in response to the DAO fork.
Since then ETH has become severely bloated, so much so they changed the definition of a full node and proposed to scrap the chain for 2.0
Nobody should trust ETH it's garbage.

[Anonymous No.22179141]

>>22179079
>screams "post networth"
>thinks hes oldfag since he remembers early 2020

[Anonymous No.22179190]

>>22177727
>t. 2020 buyer

[Anonymous No.22179235]

>>22179139
thanks for answering. my point is, how can anyone trust any serious amount of integration on ETH at all, when the original design was flawed since the start. Also, 2.0 is never coming out
>>22179141
post networth
>>22179190
post networth

[Anonymous No.22179286]

>>22177727
it's unironically web3.0 and the future backbone of our international multi-cultural society, and there is absolutely nothing that could stop it now. the window where alternatives had a chance closed around 1 year ago.

[Anonymous No.22179351]

Ripplenet >

[Anonymous No.22179382]

>>22179286
>it's unironically web3.0 and the future backbone of our international multi-cultural society
how can it be, when the shit is flawed and needs to be fixed constantly?
The point of my post is how could any company want to integrate ETH on a global scale when problems arise out of nowhere. ETH should have been perfected at the start.

[Anonymous No.22179470]

>>22178714
>DUDE BLOCKCHAIN AGNOSTIC LMAO
The day chainlink have to migrate will truly be a shit show

[Anonymous No.22179485]

>>22179382
It's mostly about controlling the narrative.
ETH is saying the same stuff Bitcoin developers were saying 3 years ago except this time it's right because a communist pedo said it instead of freedom loving developers from the cypherpunk era.

[Anonymous No.22179517]

>>22179382
There is no such thing as perfect from the start, especially in software development. Iterations for improvement following an agile design process is the best case scenario. I don't know if ethereum will ever be adopted to hold billions or trillions of dollars worth of data, but as long as the developers are attempting to improve it I think it is a worthwhile bet.

[Anonymous No.22179582]

>>22179382
the evm has never been hacked, only smart contracts and this will always be the case. we're also using computers, although they are getting hacked. you can't have turing completeness and perfect code verification.
the DAO bailout should have never happened and I think they learned their lesson from the fallout so that it also won't ever happen again.

[Anonymous No.22179702]

>>22177727

[Anonymous No.22179755]

>>22179470
does he actually think LINK is agnostic? LOOL i couldnt tell by the coping pepe posts
>>22179485
my point
>>22179517
>>22179582
>There is no such thing as perfect from the start
the whole point of cryptocurrency is a decentralized perfect system. if something isnt perfect from the start, it goes against the whole idea of cryptocurrency. Even if all the problems of now get patched up with 2.0, what would happen if newer problems arise except with trillions of dollars being processed through ETH?
The whole system would be fucked

[Anonymous No.22179831]

>>22178714
>>22178937
>>22179030
>>22179141
Top fucking kek anon

[Anonymous No.22179897]

>>22178903
enjoy your ten thousand gambling apps and uniswap clone with nothing of value to swap

[Anonymous No.22179933]

>>22178564
Because ETH wasn't hacked. You're the equivalent of a boomer saying the internet got hacked because a single website did.

[Anonymous No.22179988]

>>22179755
> if something isnt perfect from the start, it goes against the whole idea of cryptocurrency.

I don't know why I even bothered to respond. Your life is clearly so uneventful that you enjoy writing intentionally retarded things on anime forums.

[Anonymous No.22180477]

>>22179933
>>22179988
>being rude on new 2020 era blockchain experts, cmon anon embrace our new frens

[Anonymous No.22180622]

[Anonymous No.22181429]

>>22180477
try harder faggot, just because you post a frog doesn't make you an oldfat. you probably weren't even born when i came to the chans.