[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 33 KB, 1000x1000, V-ID_icon_1000x1000-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22052684 No.22052684 [Reply] [Original]

I can't believe I've been sleeping on this project.

Will I still make it even though I'm a top buyer at $1.10?

>> No.22052707
File: 707 KB, 1402x788, 1598286100103.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22052707

>>22052684
what do you think?

>> No.22052845

Pretty much guaranteed Top 50 in a bullrun. We're hitting a bill, friend. You're early.

>> No.22052848

>>22052684
You are still very early. Defo gonna make it. This hasn't even hit price discovery yet

>> No.22052849

>>22052707
Feels good man.

They're burning hundreds of thousands a month. I unironically think Binance is inevitable.

>> No.22052870

Depends on your goals. Some projects will do a x100 from here with also a big chance to lose it all. VIDT seems like a very safe bet for a x20 ride from here without stress.

>> No.22052887
File: 24 KB, 388x213, verify_with_eyes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22052887

Get in before Binance listing

>> No.22052949

>>22052887
Very interesting tweet given VIDT & the diamond verification use case they have. Bullish af

>> No.22052976

>>22052887
CZ is still a scamming cuck for listing MBL over VIDT

>> No.22053010

>>22052976
>MBL
where is that shit now?

>> No.22053025

>>22053010
Such a POS. 0 price action that thing is going nowhere

>> No.22053046

How does this thing work?
Won’t scammers just copy the fucking code that authenticates something

>> No.22053065

IMO, definitely you will make it. This should go 20-30x in the short-term and at least 100x with the bullrun. But best to study the project into details and assess the potential on your own

>> No.22053080

>>22052887
It's doing huge volume on Kucoin. I tried to buy there but forgot my trading password (wtf) so funds have been in limbo for a couple days fighting to regain access. Ended up just buying on Uniswap but huge slippage. Will buy more if I ever regain access to my account.

This really needs a good exchange to really take off. The volume it's doing on Kucoin, the support of the binance chain, and Binance seeming to get more liberal with token listings due to fear of decentralized exchanges makes me believe it's a matter of when and not if.

>> No.22053083

>>22053046
>scammers
>free
https://www.documentum.nanadevs.com/

>> No.22053160

>>22053046
Its closed source. Clients pay in fiat for VIDT bundles. The token is used to store a hash of a file on the blockchain so its GDPR compliant also. 20% of all tokens used for validations, 10% are burned forever, 10% bought back from exchanges (VIDT dashboard has etherscan txids for all of these, 3M tokens burned this year so far, 43m circulating), partners include IBM, Airbus, CMS, AmSpec. Also a member of the Dutch blochcain coalition which is backed and has other huge partners. Their website explains it in much more detail, but damn if the tokenomics ain't sexy on this one

>> No.22053224

>>22053160
>3m tokens burned
>the team unlocked 5m tokens from non-circ pool which are all being dumped on the market

>> No.22053256

>>22053160
I don’t follow. What happens when I pay to validate one diamond then give that validatable image to 10 other resellers who go around selling garbage?

>> No.22053315

>>22053224
Show me this 'unlock'. I think you mean the fund wallet, which is clearly listed on their website. Used for liquidity, R&D and marketing. So even them selling tokens isn't a bad thing. Try harder

>> No.22053380

>>22053256
You can check this out https://medium.com/@pim_vee/diamond-certification-in-the-digital-age-9cdc820b68d9

>> No.22053393

>>22053315
>fund wallet
>clearly listed
Are you new? They created this fund wallet at the snap of their fingers 6 months ago. No input or governance from bagholders, because VIDT is a centralized shitcoin. You have no guarantee they won't do it again and again. Printing money like the fed

>> No.22053447

>>22053224
Hi Sergey! Still hurting that you sold at 1340 sats? Keep on with the fud, it's bringing in a lot of buyers!

>> No.22053490

>>22053083
>Living in mom's basement.
>Suicide hotline on speeddial because missing out until 25$.

>> No.22053562

>>22053447
>>22053315
So did they mint new tokens or just unlock tokens that were previously allocated to the team?

If it's just unlocking stuff already set aside for them I'm fine with it. Kyber just did 11 million a few months ago and Sergey is dumping every week. If they increased the total supply I'm out.

>> No.22053602

>>22053083
You forget the API and ease of use that VIDT provides. Like a professional company will use some random project without even any linked in pages let alone a company address. VIDT connects the 'old money' with the blockchain pretty well. Anyways enjoy missing out on the price discovery.

>> No.22053675

>>22053562
I don't know about this 6 month thing, I think that's a lie. But the total supply has never been increased. There was a total at ICO time, non sold tokens were burned, and its been decreasing in circulation since. Also one of the lowest team held tokens I've seen on a token yet. Most of it is in circ

>> No.22053691

>>22052684
You're still quite early, all things considered. Good that you got in before the end of the quarter.

>> No.22053706
File: 113 KB, 750x655, EZQGm_2WsAIaL1i.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22053706

>sold my vidt st $1.10 for LIT
JUST

>> No.22053875
File: 101 KB, 2395x754, lmao1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22053875

>>22053447
Selling VIDT changed my life. BZRX is my best gainer though. Feels good to no longer hold a centralized shitcoin

>> No.22053879

>>22053562
It's not possible for them to mint new tokens. There was a pool of tokens set aside for the validation loop, and they unlocked 40% of them to create a new pool for listings liquidity, marketing and development. They explained it clearly, and completed an extra token burn to offset the dilution. It was still a very small percentage of supply, it was no big deal at all. Prior to that they just funded through revenue and ETH gained from the ICO. The actual team percentage is tiny, 2% or something.

>> No.22053960

>>22053393
VIDT isn't a governance token and how salty are you going to remain because you didn't buy the lows and missed out on this moon mission.

Still going to 1 Billion MCAP get in or stay poor.

>> No.22053965

>>22053562
>>22053675
>>22053879
Bagholders will lie to you. Without any warning the VIDT team woke up one morning and added 5m tokens to the circulating supply. They will never print more tokens, but they are always free to remove from the non-circulating supply. This was not in the whitepaper and they did not consult tokenholders until after the decision was made.

>> No.22053979

>>22053875
Yes feels great to sell the bottom for a bottomboy like you I recon. Congrats!

>> No.22054006

>>22053380
> As part of the publication of the certificate, its digital fingerprint is anchored on the blockchain using V-ID. As a result, the digital certificate may be copied and renamed without losing the verified status. Any recipient of the certificate can check the authenticity of the file in 5 seconds on any device with internet, to verify that the content is still exactly the same as when it was published.
Won’t people just sell the same certificate attached to a bunch of fake diamonds with different microscopic details?

>> No.22054020

>>22053965
So you've gone from 'printing money' to 'they will never print more tokens' lmao

>> No.22054031

>>22053875
holy fuck this is just as bad as selling BTC @ $4

>> No.22054097

>>22053965
why would they need to consult token holders stupid? Does VIDT provide the holder with voting or governance rights?

stfu and enjoy getting rich of a few dutchbros or don't buy vidt and neck yourself when it pulls a LINK

>> No.22054125

>>22054006
Well no. Because the certificate relates to those specific microscopic details. A different diamond can be checked and you'd see its different.

>> No.22054179

>>22054020
If you are actively removing money from the non-circulating pool, that is effectively printing money. I guess they only have 10 million more to possibly print though

>> No.22054193

>>22053965
Just to make it clear, no one cared about the creation of the Fund except this guy and his buddies, who all sold the literal bottom.

>> No.22054247

>>22054179
Sergey over at link dumps tokens all the time. VIDTS supply will never increase and burns are averaging 200k a month. This project is legit just give it up already

>> No.22054446

>>22054247
>project
>centralized company with closed sourced software, no token utility or recourse for holders

>> No.22054502

>>22054446
Burns and buybacks. All verifiable and transparent. Centralised by design. Subsidiary of an existing security company in the Netherlands. Address and phone number on website. This isn't the usual crypto bullshit. Kys

>> No.22054554

>>22054502
And the team dumping 500k tokens this month. All verifiable.

>kys
Why so angry

>> No.22054577

>>22054554
From the fund wallet, and they're allowed to sell those for business development. Kys doesn't mean I'm angry :)

>> No.22054621

>>22054577
>fund wallet
>not specified in the whitepaper or ICO terms/conditions

>> No.22054674

>>22054621
Team explained it when asked. Didn't know there were rules as to what goes in a whitepaper.

>> No.22054729

>>22054674
>when asked
They literally woke up one morning and told everyone they decided to remove X tokens from non-circulating pool without warning

>> No.22054783

>>22054729
And explained why. I don't know why you love to fud this project so hard, you've made your money aren't you happy?

>> No.22055147

>>22054783
yes, but I will be more happy exposing this as a centralized crapcoin with no technical innovations

>> No.22055228

>>22055147
be sure to write an email to the Dutch Blockchain Coalition

schizo

>> No.22055308

>>22055147
So the Dutch gov backed blockchain coalition would add them as a partner because they're bullshit right? Centralised doesn't always mean bad. It's dependent on the project.

>> No.22055326

>>22055228
How many blockchains are even in Dutchland lol. Like 3?

>> No.22055385

>>22055326
Whether you like it or not, the Dutch gov is one of the most progressive with blockchain tech. Just look at the partners on that coalition. For vidt to be there is a huge deal. But of course do go ahead and fud the Dutch gov too while you're at it

>> No.22055426
File: 107 KB, 1280x659, IMG_20200831_171043_531.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22055426

>> No.22055470

>>22055385
DLT is still in infancy stage. If I lived in the netherlands and created an overnight blockchain project, I'm sure this coalition would welcome me with open arms

>> No.22055482

>>22055326
google that shit yourself schizo. no spoon feeding here. let the adults get rich. dyor

>> No.22055531

>>22055470
So why aren't other Dutch blockchains on there like LTO? lol you have an answer for everything don't you.

>> No.22055644

>>22053393
whats so bad about centralized? i mean behind vidt is a company with real revenue

the vidt token is like holding a stock from a company imo. if vidt (the company) makes it, you will make it by holding vidt.
they even planned to pay dividends to token holders, but this wasnt possible so now they do token buybacks instead to make it a deflationairy asset

>>22053875
also thanks for confirming that you are literally sergey
you really have no life man just get over it that you sold the bottom how can a person be so butthurt

>> No.22055759

>>22055531
https://www.ltonetwork.com/partners-clients/

>> No.22055809

>>22055759
Not listed on the DBC though are they. Either way. Project is legit and earning income. Burns and buybacks. It's all sweet. Just buy back in and chill

>> No.22055962

>>22055644
>if vidt (the company) makes it, you will make it by holding vidt
Maybe. Maybe not. Stock holders have legal protections in place. VIDT holders have nothing but a promise from 3 dutch skateboarders that they will continue buying back tokens. They changed the rules overnight by creating a fund wallet. How do you know they won't change the rules again and drop the buyback to 3% or get rid of it entirely? There's no smart contract in place.

They also 3.5 million more tokens they have already declared they will be selling. How long will it take to buyback 3.5 million tokens at the current rate?

>> No.22056053

>>22055962
So they would remove one of the key tokenomics? Yeah makes sense if they want to lose investors. Plus you forget that buybacks will be smaller with increase in price anyway. Plus as more clients on board, buybacks increase anyway. You talk of how long a 3.5m buyback would take, yet they've burned 3m out of existence this year so far already. Ever reducing supply

>> No.22056214

>>22056053
>investors
The only reason the company would care about token holders is if they want to keep dumping on them

Yes, they burned 3 million tokens while the price was 10% of what it is. And the buyback is only 50% of the burn.

At the current price and current rates, they will buyback 50k tokens per month. That is over 5 years before they would buy back the 3.5 million which are designated for dumping. You are just throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks with these posts. Think a little harder

>> No.22056215

>>22055759
>tfw 100k LTO
Friendly reminder that LTO Network is now a deflationary token burning 5000 LTO daily now.

See you guys at $10

>> No.22056300

>>22056214
Your dedication to these threads is admirable but sad. This is going up and has been going up. You'll fud this at 5, and at 10. See you there

>> No.22056333

>>22055147
If you're so against centralized coins then why did you hold it for a year lmao

>> No.22056336

>>22056300
it has actually been flat for the last 2 weeks and in that time alone I've made over 6 figures. If you could refute my FUD, I'd fuck off. But you guys insist on shilling this shitcoin everywhere and get BTFO every single time by a midwit like me

>> No.22056402

>>22055962
team seems trustworthy.
of course its more risky than holding stocks but thats crypto you shouldnt invest what you cant afford to lose

also, again: vidt is a company. they need funding. they only gathered like 3million on their ico. thats not much

sergey dumped like 700k Link each week on the market for funding

if things go bad, which is possible of course, i can still sell. but i dont think that will happen and its more likely that vidt will moon to 10$ or more.

good risk reward ratio in my opinion

>> No.22056434

>>22054125
>Well no. Because the certificate relates to those specific microscopic details. A different diamond can be checked and you'd see its different.
So like an iPhone camera can detect these microscopic differences?

>> No.22056521

>>22056434
There's a reason they only ever certified a single diamond for marketing purposes

>> No.22056542

>>22056336
But your fud has been refuted. Every time. You just find your own answers as replies

>> No.22056595

>>22056214
>>22056542

>> No.22056638

>>22056595
You must have so much time on your hands lol. You pop up in every single thread. When one of your fuds gets answered you just find another thing to fud. You went by current rates and price, and as we know prices and rates change. So that's kinda pointless. How come you're so committed to this? It's weird.

>> No.22056709

>>22056638
He sold the bottom and this is the only way to cope.
>>22053875
It is time to move on. Before you kys.

>> No.22056722

>>22056336
Your fud is refuted every time. Do you seriously think a single person has been swayed by your arguments? LMAO. No one cares about a centralized token being centralized, and no one cares about a token unlock six months ago. You're the one who never refutes arguments. Why you suddenly hate centralized coins when you held this for a year. Why you keep posting 'competitors' who do something completely different. It's embarrassing LOL.

>> No.22056746

>>22053875
Show us how many sats you sold at lol

>> No.22056760

Stansberry Research, an independent investment research firm with subscribers in more than 100 different countries, published a very positive report on $VIDT ".. the gold standard of documentation and one of 7 cryptos that will reset the financial system."

>> No.22056766

>>22056638
I actually don't. But sometimes I do pop up in threads and see you schizos accusing others of being me without even posting.
>current rates
so either the price needs to tank, or validations need to increase by 1000% for that fund wallet dump to be absorbed in a reasonable timeframe. I don't think you want the price to dump, and validations are barely up 50% on the year, with only one or two new clients

>> No.22056782

>>22056760
Wait 5 mins he's gonna fud this too watch lol

>> No.22056861

>>22056709
I sold the bottom of a coin to buy the bottoms of other coins which have performed 2-3x better than VIDT. Even fucking LINK is up more than VIDT post-corona dump.

Eventually you are going to have to cope with the FUD instead of telling your new bagholders that I'm some schizo who went broke

>> No.22056916

>>22056722
Also why you keep moaning about a token unlock that no one in the community minded. LOL.

>> No.22056918

>>22056861
no one cares about your $2 in your welfare account.

you are still a schizo poster. take your meds

>> No.22056937

>>22056861
VIDT is gonna have its time to run. Not far off that now. No one said you went broke, you are kinda obsessed though.

>> No.22056993

>>22056916
because they are retards? Why would you not mind an unlock that negates the entire value of the token? VIDT only has value because of the buyback. The buyback is being negated and will continue to be negated for years with the fund wallet dumping

>> No.22057054

>>22056993
The burns add token value also you forget to mention. You can call it fund wallet dumping yet how many other tokens do the very same thing? Either way the amount they hold is small compared to the circ.

>> No.22057111

>>22056993
It literally says on their website what that wallet is used for. Who's to say they aren't selling portions to fund areas of the business? Your argument makes no sense. R&D and businesses costs probably need fiat, thus selling from the fund wallet as they explained. If they were being shady I'm sure they wouldn't use the very wallet posted on their website transparency page

>> No.22057256

>>22057054
>>22057111
None of this matters. Other tokens have other value capture mechanisms.

VIDT should ONLY ever go up from the buyback. The token literally has no other utility. The team is selling more than they are buying back. Until that changes, everything you are s saying is COPE. So you better hope they can 10x validations real quick

>> No.22057262

OH NO VIDT ARE OPENLY SELLING TOKENS EARMARKED FOR MARKETING AND DEVELOPMENT AND THAT MARKETING AND DEVELOPMENT HAS CAUSED THE PRICE TO RISE 8X AND VALIDATIONS TO GO PARABOLIC. I MUST SELL THIS AWFUL COIN.

>> No.22057439

>>22057256
I don't see why it would go up from a small amount of buybacks compared to overall market volume. That works well for positive price pressure when it's price is low or in a bear market. Token is used to track validations to client wallets so there is a utility to it. No cope over here. Hardware news incoming, not even on a T1 exchange yet it has the most alt volume on Kucoin.

>> No.22057544

>>22057256
Mate, a little word of advice. I don't know you but you seem to have some sort of mental issues. Drugs/alcohol/roids? Plus small balls if the last one is the case lol.

Either way, get someone to talk to. Find the courage to go out and talk to some girls/or men I don't judge. Live your live and stop spending every living minute of your life on 4chan. I honestly feel very sad for you thinking about how your life must be. Good luck man.

>> No.22057624

>>22056861
If your other buys performed so well you wouldnt be here all day fudding vidt

You have to be emotional invested into vidt because you regret it selling this gem. And because you sold it and arent invested in this moon mission all other people dont deserve to make gains either else you feel even more bad.

>> No.22057729

FCK

Why i invest in Lition instead of this gem...

>> No.22057780

>>22057729
because you ate too much curry sirs it clouds your mind

>> No.22057890

It's all bullshit. He lost his position in LINK before it pumped, just like he sold the bottom of VIDT and sold TRB before it pumped too. He's an abject failure and is taking it out on the coin he could have made it with.

>> No.22058225

Are you wondering what this network is all about?
@Bitcoincomgame Peer-to-peer Electronic Cash System is a system that is set to allow online
payments to be sent directly from one peer to another without going through a financial institution.

>> No.22058281

>>22057890
yeah hes a sad dude living in his trailer without a job
if he would have actually made it with other coins (like he says) he wouldnt be here all day searching frantically for vidt threads and then spend countless hours fudding it
its very very sad, but i somehow understand him i mean its really hard knowing that you would have made it by now but instead you sold the absolute bottom

and if its true that he sold link before it mooned its even more sad

but thats life some people will forever stay poor

>> No.22058322

>>22057890
Oef, I understand his hate to some degree then. If he spends his time making money instead of fudding he'd make good money. At current paste he will end up in a trailer or something.

>> No.22059166

>>22057890
kek everyone thinks he's a living meme, what a loser!

>> No.22059324

>>22059166
He literally is a living meme, good old Sergey. Pops up with the same shit everytime. Think I'm gonna start placing bets on whether he'll show up in every thread as usual

>> No.22059340

>>22057890
>abject failure
>50k portfolio at the start of the year
>480k today
You are russian virgin who went all in on a centralized scam and can't refute the FUD

>> No.22059385

>>22059340
> apparently has a triple figure portfolio but finds time to constantly fud a single project kek

>> No.22059645

lmao this dude hates his life for selling the literal bottom XD

>> No.22059697

>>22059340
>24 replies
Just bite the bullet and buy back in, albeit with a much smaller bag.

>> No.22059760

>>22053083
Wonder what happens with this when Ethereum is clogged like it is now? That's right. Pointless. However VIDT is using multiple blockchains to verify documents whilst maintaining GDPR compliance. Clients are unaffected even if half the blockchains they used all of a sudden got clogged from network traffic

>> No.22059931

Imagine selling the bottom and spending the rest of your days fudding on biz instead of just buying back in

>> No.22059963

>>22059760
LTO should be getting alot of the action since they are dutchbros

>> No.22060059

>>22059963
Yep I believe they chain on LTO as well