Will the next pool help us recover?

[Anonymous No.21616474]

[Anon No.21616723]

Yes anon. It will

[Anonymous No.21616920]

i fucking pray it does or else im financially ruined for life

[Anonymous No.21616926]

>>21616723
Thanks anon, I will untuck my rope then

[Anonymous No.21616933]

is the next pool ampl?

[Anonymous No.21616975]

getting justed real good here, feelsbadman

[Anonymous No.21617418]

>>21616975
yeah I bought since 1.13, but my lust big chunk was at 2.25, that hurts realbadman

[Anonymous No.21617518]

Don't fucking sell low boys. It'll bounce

[Anonymous No.21617815]

>>21616474
What the actual fuck is happening with this shit

[Anonymous No.21617842]

>>21616474
took my profits and never looked back. I hope for your sake that it moons anon, but it is risky rn.

[Anonymous No.21617876]

>>21617815
the unresolved imp. loss fudder was right

[Anonymous No.21617998]

We need more than 5 pools, lifted caps and the new UI before I see this doing anything.
The Bancor team have a limited amount of time; the DEX space is crowded, staking options are crowded. They need to launch a full product within the next couple of months or they are going to get squeezed out by the competition. Here's hoping they're working day and night to make it happen.
>t. 23k BNT

[Anonymous No.21618457]

The pools are fucking working! Screenshot taken yesterday. Check the rates yourself. Bancor beating everyone on prices for LINK and REN with tiny liquidity. Why is everyone freaking out? They are testing before removing caps and then releasing more.

Let them test and let the weak hands dump and get rekt

[Anonymous No.21618471]

>>21617998
Can see they are active all of the time. A huge update was pushed on Github yesterday and the LINK and REN pools are beating Uniswap for trades. Seems only a matter of time before they move out of beta with no caps and launch more pools with a full UI. Also, Nate is expecting.

[Anonymous No.21618525]

>>21618471
Nate's pregnant?

[Anonymous No.21618532]

bought at 1.40-1.50 because you guys told me it was a guaranteed 2x minimum, but to look for a 3x by September

did I just pump your bags or is this still on?

[Anonymous No.21618557]

>>21618532
how about you read this very thread you fucking hand-hold needing turbo-brainlet

[Anonymous No.21618630]

>>21618557
doesn't really help

[Anonymous No.21618655]

>>21618630
The time has come for you to sell.

[Anonymous No.21618674]

>>21618655
nope, not selling until it's $3

now cum on my face

[Anonymous No.21618916]

>>21618525
Yes. He was spotted yesterday setting up a flipchart in the corner of the planned parenthood centre, with graphics outlining how arbitrageurs may cause impermanent loss for young mothers. He's doing really well. I heard Sergey is the father. Apparently they hit it off when penning this blog together a couple of months ago. https://blog.chain.link/challenges-in-defi-how-to-bring-more-capital-and-less-risk-to-automated-market-maker-dexs/ Next thing you know Nate is 8 months pregnant!

[Anonymous No.21618997]

>>21618457
how the fuck is the slippage less with less liquidity? That's not what Bancor was supposed to do, it was supposed to give better rates for LIQUIDITY PROVIDERS. This would mean that after cap is removed liquidity would go up and only then would there be better slippage rates. Did you just Photoshop this?

[Anonymous No.21619048]

>>21618997
The 20x liquidity amplification kills slippage on Bancor v2 anon https://blog.bancor.network/amplified-liquidity-designing-capital-efficient-automated-market-makers-in-bancor-v2-3cec8891c3a1

[Anonymous No.21619081]

I just looked at bancor for the first time in 3 years and these kikes are asking for a phone number? hahahahaa FUCK OFF KIKES

[Anonymous No.21619097]

>>21618916
that's the most reassuring Bancor news I've hear in months
>>21618997
Liquidity amplification, it's awesome.

[Anonymous No.21619312]

>>21619081
uh anon, thats optional for normies who want to make a bancor wallet. u can use all of the bancor UIs with metamask or any web3 wallet if u want.

[Anonymous No.21619434]

>>21618997
LOLLLL “that’s not what Bancor was supposed to do”

Written like a true Uniswap brainlet

I will leak some alpha on your face but only because it pains me to have such stupidity floating around in the world

Low slippage and LIQUIDITY PROVIDER returns are intrinsically tied together. When you are able to offer lower slippage (ie better prices) with less liquidity that means you’ll instantly attract more trades and more fees with less capital. This means way higher ROI for LPs.

From the beginning Bancor has said V2 will do this and it is doing just that with these test pools. If you are too lazy to go to swap.bancor.network and check the rates on LINK and REN and then check Uniswap and realize how fucked Uniswap is and how insanely BNT will moon than there is truly nothing I can do for you

https://docs.bancor.network/v2-liquidity-pools/liquidity-amplification

[Anonymous No.21619481]

>>21618916
Confirmed that Sergey, or “Serg Bae”, as Natey Poo calls him, is in fact the father. Such a beautiful couple. I knew when Bancor and Chainlink got together earlier this year that sparks would fly, but I never in my wildest dreams thought things could get this good. So happy for them.

[Anonymous No.21619529]

>>21619434
sounds like you're implying the market works based on logic

[Anonymous No.21619867]

>>21619481
thank u for confirming based anon.

[Anonymous No.21620318]

>>21619867
*tears well up in eyes*
it’s what we’ve all been hoping for.

[Anonymous No.21621249]

I've got a 3x long on bancor
HELP

[Anonymous No.21621927]

>>21617876
>the unresolved imp. loss fudder was right
fudder here. yeah, was right about bancor lying about solving impermanent loss, that audits didnt pass, and that v2 would be delayed. they are going to shut down v2, and go back to v1, and work on v3. sell now. i recommend buying snx and aave. also get some yfi suicide insurance.

[Anonymous No.21622866]

>>21617998
23k as well bro, heres to our fat rewards when the pools are open

[Anonymous No.21623082]

>>21622866
>>21617998

lol 23k as well bros. Currently have a decent chunk of it in the LINKBNT V2 pool though. Tbh I want the low liquidity + low slip, keep my APR as high as possible for as long as possible lol

[Anonymous No.21623477]

>>21623082
What's your APR so far?

[Anonymous No.21623695]

>>21623477

Was sky high, intially. IDune analytics isn't showing it for me anymore, but it trickles me in around 8 LINK a day. Since adding my BNT to the pool in the past 2 days, I've made around 45 BNT.

[Anonymous No.21623849]

>>21623695
shit man thats hype

[Anonymous No.21623939]

>>21623695
What's the token you get in return for adding your BNT / LINK to the pool? I'm trying to work shit out for taxes in advance and wondering if gov faggots are gonna want to tax the BNT > BNTPOOL token swap event.

[Anonymous No.21624185]

>>21623082
I've lost BNT in the staking pool

[Anonymous No.21624337]

>>21623939

If you contribute LINK to the LINKBNT pool, you will get LINKBNT1

If you contribute BNT to the LINKBNT pool, you will get LINKBNT2

[Anonymous No.21624376]

>>21624337
whats the difference between BNT1 and BNT2?

[Anonymous No.21624439]

>>21624337
Cheers. I just know these fuckers are gonna want a cut when going from BNT > LINKBNT2. Any other ausfags looking into this?
>In b4 don't pay your taxes

[Anonymous No.21624531]

im getting real nervous, im earning 100%+ APR on my BNT staked, but im starting to FUD myself

what inventive is there for BNT to actually go up in value?
just because im getting more free BNT by providing liquidity, im ultimately going to sell it, and so will everyone else getting it
so at a certain point, why should BNT rise in value? everyone staking it is getting free BNT and then selling it off

[Anonymous No.21625029]

>>21624531
Smoothbrain. This has been discussed here so many times. Dynamic fees will make it so that the side of the pool that is least liquid will generate more rewards. Since BNT is in every pool, it is often in short supply. Thus, in high demand as it generates very high rewards.

What do you think will have more weight, selling of the eggs or the people wanting to buy a golden goose?

[Anonymous No.21625160]

>>21624376

I literally stated it above.

LINK + LP fees = LINKBNT 1

BNT + LP fees = LINKBNT 2

When you wanna remove liquidity/ cash out, you swap the LINKBNT 1 for LINK + gain. Cmon anon, 2 + 2 stuff here

[Anonymous No.21625228]

>>21625160
Can you withdraw only the excess profit from your LINKBNT tokens, or do you need to withdraw it all?

[Anonymous No.21625329]

>>21618532
It did 2x if u bought at 1.40

[Anonymous No.21625380]

fudder here. anons, the ico buyers are down 99% and are desperately shilling this on here daily to try to pump the price to break even but its not gonna happen because v2 was a massive failure. the project is dead. get out while you still can.

[Anonymous No.21625438]

>>21625029

Can anyone explain whike the UI sometimes a difference on exit fee + exit amount. 2 hours ago my exit amount was lower bur exit fee % was higher; valued at X LINK. Now my exit amount is higher but the exit fee is lower, with final value still being X. Anyone else experiencing this?

[Anonymous No.21625543]

>>21625228

Yeah of course just the exit fee, but if you're doing that daily + arent a whale, you'll get a solid haircut from the gas fees. Also overtime you lose your % return in LP.

If someone is cashing our profits, while other is using those profits to provide more liquidity, person 2 will hsve a higher % stake as a liquidity provider. Seems small now, but when youve got many 6/7/8 fig (institutions or treasury funds), you'll rapdily dwindle your total APR

[Anonymous No.21625613]

>>21625438
I'm not a fucking oracle dimwit. (Sergey forgive my language). Go ask in the Telegram or something, maybe they're doing updates

[Anonymous No.21625698]

>>21625543
I'm thinking monthly withdraws, claiming as income could be the way to go. That's if I can actually join the pool without getting fucked by a CGT event. Our rules on this don't even exist yet, and some of the stuff that government tax "professionals" are saying makes no sense.

[Anonymous No.21625857]

>>21625613

I didn't fucking ask you fag.

>comes into a bancor discussion thread
> tells people in the v2 pools not to sell

Rope time queer

[Anonymous No.21626586]

>>21625857
Guys, please calm down. Nate is very sensitive right now. It's a delicate moment for him and Sergey.