Ohhhhhhh (((linkies)))

[Anonymous No.21541939]

Sergey himself already said that LINK tokens arent needed to use the network. thats right. it's still unclear when and how the LINK token will be used if private networks are an option, and not to mention the massive allocation of LINK not locked up but in dev control (2/3 of supply).There is no need for tokens if chainlink isn't even needed to run the nodes.

[Anonymous No.21542046]

>>21541939
>stomp stomp stomp
this EXCITES me

[Anonymous No.21542071]

>>21542046
WHAT IS HE DOING TO NICO STOP NOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.21542097]

>>21541939
Seriously thought what the fuck is the point of owning the token?

> But once staking (which tons of other projects including some 7/10ths of a cent coin have had no problem with implementing on release) I can stake my stack and! And! Uhh the total supply will go down!

Ok but the stack held by the dev team is an egregious red flag that makes any notion of your stack having value irrelevant.

Please someone explain how we're going to make it out of this?

[Anonymous No.21542136]

HNNN hnn Humm hmm
>schlop schlop schlop
Yes yessss yess
>slurp shlop shlop
soo tigghhtt
hnnnn who's your daddy? WHOS YOUR DADDY
>shlop slurp
HNN HMMM

[OG Linker No.21542148]

>>21541939
please step on my pathetic penis

[Anonymous No.21542157]

>>21542046
Heart attack in 3, 2...

[Anonymous No.21542281]

>>21542097
you own LINK to lock on aave and farm things like YAM.
staking is a absolute meme if it's based on network transactions - you'd wait for a decade long adoption period, the bubble would have popped. But the 35% for node operations acts as a subsidy so as long as the speculative value of LINK stays high it should be fine.
if not you can always farm YAMs

[Anonymous No.21542389]

nico bully gf

[Anonymous No.21542927]

>>21542389
based nico bully gf poster