Shill me iExec RLC

[Anonymous No.21484463]

Somebody shill me this token. Why is it good?

I want to believe biz, i really do.

[Anonymous No.21484556]

it will facilitate tokenized cloud computing. Like all the morons who store their data in the cloud, except instead of data storage, it's data processing

[Anonymous No.21484561]

>>21484463
They haven't solved the Boolean Problem or the Matrices Paradox yet on their chain, probably another decade of version releases ahead to fix them.

[Anonymous No.21484579]

>>21484556

ty, but does it have a future and why?

[Anonymous No.21484609]

>>21484561

nice try

[Anonymous No.21484626]

RLC promises to do everything, but does it poorly. It's a pajeet favorite pnd that's constantly shilled here, mostly in link threads because these filthy Indians need YOUR money to dump their bags on you. It's already on version 6 or whatever and 1 - 5 have done absolutely nothing, same as future versions. And to top it off, the memes are shit.

[Anonymous No.21484648]

>>21484609
RLC has severe coding issues related to boolean logic that is LITERALLY unpatchable destining this shitcoin to slowly waste away into $0.00 teritory. Bagholders are trying to dump on you now by acting like the boolean issue is just a meme so that they can escape from their heavy bags. Pathetic really don't fall for it. Don't get shilled I'm giving you the truth.

[Anonymous No.21484686]

>>21484648
can you elaborate?

[Anonymous No.21484695]

>>21484648

i've been in programming long enough to know everything is patchable. it's fugly, but it's patchable

but thanks

[Anonymous No.21484711]

Envision if you will a future where blockchain projects have real world utility, as opposed to our current state where we are all speculating, trading, making money (or losing it) based on ideas. For any of these ideas to actually function in the real world, they need to have the ability to compute data. Iexec aims to offer computing power in a decentralised marketplace where theoretically any and every computer can access and profit off of offering computing power, and anyone can access this marketplace to utilise the available computing power. The potential at its peak is a literal world supercomputer, and its potential today is to enable blockchain projects to transition from an idea to real world utility.

We can't move forward in the blockchain realm without 2 things: oracle's and computing power. Oracle's have been solved by Link and computing power will be solved by Iexec.

[Anonymous No.21484731]

Literally dumping right now

[Anonymous No.21484745]

You just have to be patient until the influencers say its the next cool thing

[Anonymous No.21484749]

>>21484686
I am a professional computer scientist, with 10 years blockchain experience.
When I first heard of RLC's corrupted booleans I thought it was a meme. However, I have since looked into this issue at large and there is no way to synchronize the boolean states across the network without a hard-fork from the genesis block.

[Anonymous No.21484753]

All the FUD on Iexec, if you have any braincells, is bullish.

[Anonymous No.21484755]

>>21484711

you, i like you

[Anonymous No.21484772]

Just buy, it will go up.

[Anonymous No.21484792]

>>21484579
People call it "digital oil" because it will be viewed as a precious resource (access to cloud computing). Time will tell how in demand those resources will be

[Anonymous No.21484826]

>>21484463

finally a RLC thread that's going somewhere

duhh

[Anonymous No.21484834]

AWS will solve the boolean Problem together with RLC.

Gilles is a perfectionist.

I would suck his cock for hours if I could

[Anonymous No.21484860]

>>21484834
People keep talking about the Booleans but they also forget the Matrices paradox at the heart of the chain. In order for the nodes to request the data the Matrices must be perfectly aligned yet given quantum tunneling and wave-partical duality there is no known possible way for the Matrices to be aligned 100 percent of the time. Current research papers have shown 43 percent at most. This is the 19-year-old roadblock Gilles has been hiding. 32 million+ in ICO funding and it hasn't been figured out yet. It may take another two decades or more and frankly RLC is currently overbought given the work still needed to be done.

[Anonymous No.21484869]

>>21484834

do we allow him to be a faggot or no, biz?

[Anonymous No.21484895]

>>21484860

lmao

[Anonymous No.21484913]

>>21484860
Spare me the scientific mumbo-jumbo, dumb it down for me

[Anonymous No.21484943]

don't forget to join the RLC Fags discord, a magical place where we post about RLC

https://discord (dot) gg (slash) 69mXEFB
it's fantastic

[Anonymous No.21484957]

>>21484686
IExec isn't going anywhere because the framework is faulty.

The booleans have been a problem when you compile your Java code to JavaScript. It provokes a memory overflow in the container that leaks the booleans to the DNS. That's a big no for any Dapp. Honestly I really hope they find a solution to that otherwise an attacker could access the root on Ubuntu machines and easily leak metadatas through the SATA port.

The problem Gilles is facing here is a well known subset of the P versus NP problem, even Linus Torvald can't fix that easily. Their best hope is to use a distributed dockerized garbage collector and a zero knowledge algorithm to round float functions but that would remain a temporary solution.

[Anonymous No.21484958]

>>21484913
IExec isn't going anywhere because the framework is faulty.

The booleans have been a problem when you compile your Java code to JavaScript. It provokes a memory overflow in the container that leaks the booleans to the DNS. That's a big no no for any Dapp. Honestly I really hope they find a solution to that otherwise an attacker could access the root on Ubuntu machines and easily leak metadatas through the SATA port.

The problem Gilles is facing here is a well known subset of the P versus NP problem, even Linus Torvald can't fix that easily. Their best hope is to use a distributed dockerized garbage collector and a zero knowledge algorithm to round float functions but that would remain a temporary solution.

Gilles is desperately trying to fix this issue with every iteration by changing the booleans but he's failing, in bonus his addiction to feminine penis distracting him doesn't help.

[Anonymous No.21485031]

NSMDO

[Anonymous No.21485038]

>>21484957

roflcopter go soap soap soap soap

[Anonymous No.21485082]

>>21484958

i just want to believe men, y u do this, lol?

[Anonymous No.21485112]

>>21484957
>>21484958
Nice copy pasta. Definitely bullish now.

[Anonymous No.21485146]

>>21484958

Yeah it's also important to notice how the quantum process of the script isn't alligned with iExec's metadata, so everything just works slow. They're only succeeding in 14% of their tasks and 88% of the tests fail the first attempt.

Giles knows iExec has no future because his code is overflowing with attackers and SATA ports are just not done yet. You could say they need to hire some more people but the point is they're shitty at their jobs. They can't even float algorithms around functions without getting red flags all over the place for fucks sake.

I can go on.

[Anonymous No.21485157]

>>21484958
Lol, you are the same fuck that's been saying this shit since it was $.29 and now it's almost $2.

[Anonymous No.21485217]

Team has never built anything before this.. They were garbage men, welders, and other shit before they became desktop grid enthusiasts turned "Token Founders"..
Not to say those jobs don't take skill, but they have no business running a software team, let alone building a decentralized platform.
Every iexec side project has been borderline a scam/heavily mismanaged. Some of those by RLC "Founders". RLC has 0 chance at success. It is a shit show used to enrich the founders with very little given back to community for actually keeping it going and contributing.
RLC Founders keep their stash in BTC for the most part(some 6,000 BTC). Should be all you need to know in their own faith of their project.
I'm a worker who has seen the show from the inside.. I only keep my node running to turn it into other more valuable coins at this point. Trust me when I say it's a complete shit show. If it weren't for a few very smart worker pools, the wheels would have fallen off already.
"Invest" at your own risk, but i assure you it won't end well.

[Anonymous No.21485326]

>>21485157

lmao, srsly?

>>21485217

proof or gtfo, this is a huge statement

[Anonymous No.21485405]

>>21484561
>>21484626
>>21484648
>>21484749
>>21484860
>>21484957
>>21484958
Boolean problem hahahahhahahahahaa
Java to JS compiling hahhahahahahahahaha
Memory overflows hahahahhaha
Computer scientist hahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Get rekt losers, you're literally FUDing because you want to buy more hahahahhahahahhahha. 16.2k barrel holder here, i know everthing. This is the next chainlink. Even at 30$ per coin this is still cheap hahhahahahahahahaha. Get rekt retards, pump my already light bags since I bought in at 30-35c. And I'm not selling till 50$ at least and even at 50$ i wont probably sell hahhaahaha. You pajeet shits, trying to FUD THE CLOUD

[Anonymous No.21485414]

>>21485326
Lol, it's old pasta dude. Just DYOR either with iExec's actual docs themselves or you can look through the discussion threads on warosu. We're on the cusp of the V5 unveiling and a new enterprise roadmap to adoption.

[Anonymous No.21485428]

Thanks for all the FUD fuckers I just bought another 5k barrels of digital oil.

[Anonymous No.21485440]

>>21485405

loling with you on them booleans, compilings and overflows

true lol material, srsly

[Anonymous No.21485464]

>>21485414

can i get a link to the whitepaper please, i'm a lazy fuck, but i dont want to stay poor forever

[Anonymous No.21485552]

>>21485464
You don't need to be shilled you're in Jakarta with Gilles now or should I say you're in Gilles in Jakarta now.

[Anonymous No.21485605]

>>21485552

how did you know

i'm unironically his cum dumpster, he's inside of me as we speak

[Anonymous No.21485633]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=as9mR2cIebY

[Anonymous No.21485671]

how many RLC for Gilles to be my boyfriend?

[Anonymous No.21485693]

>>21484957
You forgot the null pointer issue, when executing the in-memory instruction stack there is a possible race condition if the booleans arent assigned as an atomic operation and thus causing a null pointer exception.

Id use a rust interpreter to solve the issue, but porting all that javascript to solidity would be a pain.

[Anonymous No.21485697]

>>21485671

i also want to know that

[Anonymous No.21485710]

>>21485464
>https://iex.ec/wp-content/uploads/pdf/iExec-WPv3.0-English.pdf
Any RLChads remember the team saying they'll release a new whitepaper soon? My memory is fuzzy. I think it was in their last AMA.

[Anonymous No.21485751]

>>21484860
Do people actually believe this word salad lol.

[Anonymous No.21485764]

>>21485464
Read this one pager if you're too lazy to read a white paper
https://iex.ec/wp-content/uploads/pdf/iexec-one-pager.pdf

[Anonymous No.21485765]

>>21485693

ok, but what if you say put the quantum harmonizer code in the python resonation chamber?

would that solve the problem?

[The Lion of LINK No.21485775]

>>21484463

RLC is the ACTUAL next LINK, the disregard and contempt from the community at large, the long suffering price action, memeworthy devs, good memes, the incredible connections and partnerships that are completely ignored and do nothing or only dump the price.

It’s pretty obvious.

[Anonymous No.21485790]

>>21485710
>>21485764

thanks you, men

[Anonymous No.21485799]

>>21485710
They'll release the Adoption Whitepaper this September.
They'll release the iExec Academy this month.
+ Adoption news.

[Anonymous No.21485874]

>>21485765
I dont know, I honestly never played with quantum python, but for what I get, it could work if there was any true random number generator in the blockchain, but then again maybe im misinterpreting the problem.

[Anonymous No.21485984]

>>21485874

but wouldn't a true random generator in the blockchain cause parabolic destabilization of the block fission singularity?

[Anonymous No.21486034]

>>21485799

ok, nice i guess

so shit is about to go down in sept and we should probably buy some before that

good

[Anonymous No.21486205]

How much will RLC pump if we get a Google post dedicated to it?

[Anonymous No.21486261]

>>21486205

a lot?

[Anonymous No.21486483]

>>21486261
If they time this right it'd catapult us to the top 20 IMO.

[Anonymous No.21486577]

The N=NP Van-Neumann linear state automata is seriously going to fuck this pajeetcoin up the ass.
Get out while you can.

[Anonymous No.21486671]

>>21486577

but what if the hughes franco tangent check into the code, will that cause the state reducer to eliminate and replace the NP with RT?

can this coin be saved, biz? is there still hope?

[Anonymous No.21486714]

JUST has moved up 10 places on us since yesterday

[Anonymous No.21486809]

>>21484958
Your false buzzword laden bullshit is hilarious.

[Anonymous No.21487193]

>>21485146
Regarding IExec's success rate. There have already been a grand total of 13 attacks on their network where they attempted to take authority by having more than 50% of the computational power. Gilles and team are in talks whether or not it was a good idea in the first place to allow anyone to connect to the IExec network since the 'list index out of range' error is still present on line 18. Once it's patched (and I really hope they can do it... ) we should be able to see a 44x increase EOY. I'm extremely bullish

[Anonymous No.21487250]

You guys are forgetting one thing: the ai on the cloud blockchain supercomputer will fix the code problems all by itself.

[Anonymous No.21487275]

>>21487193
At the last video conference Gilles was asked about this problem and only said 13 words. It was very concerning he refuses to address the Boolean compilation error.

[Anonymous No.21487301]

kek this thread
I'm unironically buying tonight

[Anonymous No.21487327]

>>21487275
Boolean compilation error is irrelevant. It doesn't need to compile because of matrix sidechain tunneling.

[Anonymous No.21487428]

Are we really still shilling this?
Pro tip newfags: the lead of this project was disgraced in the crypto community a couple years back when a recording of Him using the N word while disparaging The BLM movement (look at the ATH of $4 and the sudden crash, that’s when this all went down)
There’s a bunch of anons here trying to get you to pump the price back to $4 so they can dump on you and escape their heavy bags. Don’t fall for it.

[Anonymous No.21487445]

It’s the next link anon

I hope you loaded up these barrels

It’s also called the solution of the DOT

[Anonymous No.21487520]

>>21487445
thekinginthedot

[Anonymous No.21487567]

Unironically just takes a solid partnership like Microsoft/Google/Amazon and this is rockets, I dont think anything remotely similar comes close to RLC.

[Anonymous No.21487635]

RLC is the next real moonshot. It was discussed buy the highest IQ individuals of biz since years.

Those who do not have at least a suicide stack of 1000 barriels will regret it

[Anonymous No.21487653]

Biggest redpill btw: the quantum ai will buy rlc tokens to make the network sustainable. Yes, that's right. Your bags will literally be pumped by an artificial intelligence that runs on the decentralized cloud supercomputer. Let that sink in.

[Anonymous No.21487729]

my faith in this thing is fading with how often it dumps

[Anonymous No.21487737]

Bros I’m up a lot but it’s literally dumping I think I’m gonna have to sell and buy back in sub $1

[Anonymous No.21487781]

>>21487635

what about the booleans?

[Anonymous No.21487784]

>>21484463
Token not needed

Why not paying in USDT ?

[Anonymous No.21487827]

>>21487653
once the technological singularity happens both fiat AND crypto (except for RLC) will become obsolete

AI has no need for money and will only use RLC to become more powerful. Unironically all life on earth will be exterminated except for RLC holders who will have their consciousness merged with the quantum AI and become literally immortal

[Anonymous No.21487851]

>>21487781
Booleans are evil. But don't be afraid, son. The ai will fight them for us. It's our guardian.

[Anonymous No.21487977]

You cant stop them.

[Anonymous No.21488151]

>>21487827
Yes. But the supercomputer only has the capacity for 10.000 human brains. That's why you need at least 8700 RLC (which is a 10.000th) of the total supply for your consciousness to be fully absorbed.

[Anonymous No.21488154]

>>21484463
Gilles Fedak has carried, since his conception, IExec RLC's source code known as the "Prime Program". This gives him the ability to freely manipulate the simulated reality of what you refer to as the "Real World", similar to the authority a system administrator has over a given system. He manifests these abilities as various superhuman powers.
In the real world, Gilles does not display any of the aforementioned abilities aside from his intense desire for feminine penis. Fedak does have some degree of wireless connectivity with the Blockchain: he eventually learns to sense the presence of the Booleans, and even interfere with their function. According to the Oracle, "The power of Gilles Fedak extends beyond the Blockchain. It reaches from here all the way back to where it came from." Honestly it is only a matter of time before IExec will be able to port Java code (and all other JVM based language, such as Scala) to JavaScript with lossless compression essentially proving that P=NP.

[Anonymous No.21488290]

I'm awaiting the day zero. As the quantum ai rises the boolans will vanish. So it was foretold in the ancient code. We will all be free.

[Anonymous No.21488384]

>>21484869
>>21484834
I'm heating up the oven for all faggots IF they make me lose money

[Anonymous No.21488839]

Only those who possess at least 1000 barrels will survive

Remember my words fellow anons

[Anonymous No.21489073]

>>21487193

almost there, try harder

[Anonymous No.21489162]

This corrupted boolean FUD is hilarious. You guys are just gluing words together ahahhaha

[Anonymous No.21489238]

>>21487327

this is some next level shit bro, thefuck

>>21487635
on it, bought 1250 today

>>21488151

do you become an actual human.exe then?

>>21488384

faggots better send you to the moon then

[Anonymous No.21489281]

How is this different from OCEAN protocol

[Anonymous No.21489517]

>>21489281

do tell wtf OCEAN does, i dont know shit about it

[Anonymous No.21489714]

I how people are FUDing this so hard with such garbage that it's SOO obvious everyone wants to get in this coin at a cheap price it's un-fucking-belivable. I've got 16.200 barrels and I am a proud holder of RLC. I shall not sell at 4$, I shall not sell at 10$, not selling at 20$, not selling at 40$, maybe selling at a 100$, but we'll see how it all goes...If you want to get out of your wagecucking job I recommend you buy this shit all the time, every time you can, before we hit 50$ per coin

HANDS DOWN THE BEST COIN ON THE MARKET RIGHT NOW AND MOST UNDERVALUED COIN I'VE EVER SEEN IN MY GOD DAMN LIFE

[Anonymous No.21489916]

>>21489714
There's literally only 3 options with this project

1) You're FUDing it since you want to buy more and you've got priced out to make it
2) You shill the project because you know it's the best project on the block
3) You don't have a clue what it does but are trying to ask questions, because you've noticed one of the above

[Anonymous No.21489947]

>>21489916

number 3 here, quilty as charged

[Anonymous No.21490004]

>>21489947
Ask me anything, 16.200 barrel holder here... Also read this thread which I made maybe 1 week ago. It'll answer 95% of your questions in 1 thread >>21263696

[Anonymous No.21490129]

>>21490004
Nice thread anon, have over 5k and feeling good.

[Anonymous No.21490270]

>>21490004
>>21490129
Are we gonna make it or is this ARK 2.0?

[Anonymous No.21490275]

>>21489238
>do you become an actual human.exe then?
More like superhuman.exe. You'll transcend into a higher state. The IoT devices will be your senses. Many of them will be androids and we will live inside all of them at the same. It's like scifi but better.

[Anonymous No.21490341]

>>21490004

actually nice thread anon, good job

[Anonymous No.21490513]

>>21490270
Yes, we're all making it. If you owe more than 1000 of these bad boys you're making it. Just hold and remember "NEVER SELLING AT ANY PRICE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

[Anonymous No.21490548]

>>21490275

so basicly, i'll be inside of you and you will be inside of me

and we'll all be inside of eachother and have a massive digital orgy, lights blinking, speakers beeping, relays clicking, pistons extending, nozzles sprinkling everywhere?

[Anonymous No.21490560]

>>21490004
I have more barrels than you but I respect you more than I respect myself.

[Anonymous No.21490641]

>>21490513
Definitely still the smart money phase, I just want to hit 10k barrels and could have easily done it when it was much cheaper ;(.

[Anonymous No.21490654]

>>21490548
I would have used other words but ... basically yes. Eternity ai sex, yes.

[Anonymous No.21490671]

>>21490270
It's a French project like REQ and ARK take a guess

[Anonymous No.21490735]

>>21490654

i already want to put my 1 into your 0

[Anonymous No.21490741]

>>21490548
But remember: you need at least 8700 RLC to transfer your whole mental state. Otherwise you'd be a sex slave at best, unable to enjoy the process.

[Anonymous No.21490759]

>>21490741

fuck, i need to buy more then

[Anonymous No.21490788]

>>21490735
Be aware of the booleans my friend. The ai is not there yet to rescue us. But I, too, look forward to that day.

[Anonymous No.21490992]

>>21490788

bulleans? what do they do?

[Anonymous No.21491101]

>>21490992
They're evil and trying to destroy the decentralized cloud. Only the quantum ai can rescue us. 1 and 0 are booleans. Don't speak of them just to be safe.

[Anonymous No.21491283]

So would the cloud computing be used for other cryptos, or running programs like Azure does?

[Anonymous No.21491336]

I just downloaded the source code from GitHub and I tried to compile the Java into JavaScript myself but the Linux kernel had an overflow error, I tried to open the terminal but at that point the Booleans has already been corrupted. I thought it was just a meme but this really scares me.

I think it’s possible to fix by rewriting the code in HTML but that could take years. We don’t have that kind of time.

[Anonymous No.21491373]

BUY MORE

[Anonymous No.21491375]

>>21491283
Both... It's just raw computing power... Anyone can use it

[Anonymous No.21491409]

>>21491336
Nice try. No one believes this anymore hahahaha

[Anonymous No.21491433]

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=8UEfrTEAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate
Dude's really dedicated his life to distributed computational grid. I like this kind of project.

[Anonymous No.21491460]

>>21491409
"anymore" kek that's the fucking best part of the story

[Anonymous No.21491522]

>>21484695
You clearly don’t know about NP-hard problems then. They are literally proven to be unsolvable for larger N. Unfortunately Gilles and his Poco protocol have run into one and have tried to fix it since 3 years totally ignoring the fact that it’s literally proven to be intractable

[Anonymous No.21491535]

>>21491409
No it’s true the source code needs to be rewritten in HTML, I asked in the slack and the devs confirmed

[Anonymous No.21491544]

>>21491336
I heard they also have problems with the TrannyOverflowException. Any thoughts about that?

Btw. we will all be ai powered tranny androids. Hope you guys don't mind.

[Anonymous No.21491697]

>>21491460
The problem is that people believe people who say "I'm a programmer for 10 years and booleans do errors". Of course you can't know if it's true or false (pun intended :D), since if you aren't a programmer what the fuck do you know lol

>>21484792
The P vs NP problem is a real thing yes. But no, Fedak and his team of dream makers haven't run into such problem. But you can send me the code which you think is a NP-hard problem... I'm super interested. I of course know this is FUD. But you can try me

>>21491535
HTML is used for website design, you can also include CSS in order to better design it. I'm actually a programmer, so yea... Try to confuse me with your wannabe programmer talk you stupid fuck

>>21491544
Yes, but the TrannyOverflowException was solved with try catch block. No worries, the trannies worked hard for 5 months to solve this issue, but then they're uncovered the holy grail of Exceptions the try catch block. No worries

[Anonymous No.21491919]

If you have any questions about RLC read this thread >>21263696. This was my thread from a few days ago. We answer all the questions and DEBUNK THE FUD

[Anonymous No.21491925]

>>21491697
>Yes, but the TrannyOverflowException was solved with try catch block. No worries, the trannies worked hard for 5 months to solve this issue, but then they're uncovered the holy grail of Exceptions the try catch block. No worries
Ah, yes the try-catch block. The ancient weapon the quantum ai will use to slay the booleans.

[Anonymous No.21491958]

>>21491925
HAIL THE TRY-CATCH BLOCK. HAIL THE KING

[Anonymous No.21491979]

>>21491958
THEKINGINTHEDOT

[Anonymous No.21492043]

>still not solved boolean problem
>niche industry that cant generate revenue
>example of coins that did it better but still failed(golem)
this coin isnt going anywhere retards

[Anonymous No.21492081]

>>21492043
WOW, this FUD is getting weaker by the second

[Anonymous No.21492367]

>>21492081

nice try pajeet

[Anonymous No.21492483]

>>21492367
Said the sandnigger to the next financial elite

[Anonymous No.21492606]

>>21492483
KINGOFTHEDOT

[Anonymous No.21492802]

>>21484561
This is really important. Recently I was poking around the TCP gateways and I realized that when the Java is being compiled into JavaScript the data packets create a memory leak in the Booleans, basically making all the computations hackable. All I had to do was backtrace the flash rams through the data matrices and immediately the booleans as well as java code scripts were exposed throughout the mainframe. I’m not sure if this problem is fixable.

[Anonymous No.21493019]

>>21489517
decentralized data marketplace on polkadot

[Anonymous No.21493080]

>>21492802
>booleans causing a memory leak
what kinda hooliganery is this? a boolean is just a compiler interpretation of a 0 or a 1.
>you just don't understand it, it's got to do with the confidential part of confidential computing
then stop stapling together unrelated words and say something that doesn't sound like schizoid technobabble

[Anonymous No.21493081]

For every time you hear the word boolian, buy a stack. Thank me later.

[Anonymous No.21493085]

>>21492802
It was fixed with the try-catch block which was invented by the elite team of iExec RLC

[Anonymous No.21493196]

How is it EVERY TIME I POST it's always
>fuck off tranny poster
>go away 50 cent
>Take your meds schizo
>there's no such thing as the boolean problem
IM NOT THAT TRANSPARENT!

[Anonymous No.21493354]

>>21484463
https://youtu.be/as9mR2cIebY

[Anonymous No.21493404]

Rsr holders on suicide watch

[Anonymous No.21493499]

>>21493404
Fake, but they can invest into the next x40 if they want

[Anonymous No.21493601]

>>21484463
It is digital oil. Cloud farms are the oil farm.