[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 1.16 MB, 1897x929, linkpoolio.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21415472 No.21415472 [Reply] [Original]

If LinkPool generates $100,000,000 a year in revenue and you own 0.04 LP, you are entitled to
0.04/4000*100000000 = $1000 a year

0.04 LP currently costs over $2000

LinkPool isn't going to make anywhere near $100M revenue a year, for a very long time, if ever.
LinkPool is massively overvalued. Don't fall for the scam.

>> No.21415754

>>21415472
Inb4 LinkPool scammers try and say that $100,000,000 annual revenue is easy and they will surpass that

Fucking kek. The state of scamming faggots

>> No.21416057

>>21415472
You had 2 years

>> No.21416089

>>21415472
How can I buy a Link Pool share? I just go to their website linkpool and open MetaMask no?

>> No.21416103

>>21416057
Tell me right now that you think LinkPool will earn more than $100,000,000 in revenue so I can piss and shit my pants laughing at how delusional you faggots have gotten

>> No.21416116

>>21415472
So you don't wanna stake?

>> No.21416212

>>21416103
>chainlink is 6 billion, likely going to have 10b+ of value move through the system annually per year by 2024
>linkpool forecasts to move 10% of the total LINK txs.
Sit down and shut up if you dont like it fag

>> No.21416269
File: 626 KB, 364x164, 29A5AEF5-70AF-41F4-8DE3-53EA8C18B0F2.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21416269

>>21415472
>>21415754
>linkpool share supply dries up
>dividend payments increase
>pantifa faggots come waddling in saying the precise opposite of the truth
like clockwork

>> No.21416318

>>21416103
>so I can piss and shit my pants
pajeet confirmed
go to your designated shitting street and don't spread your litter here on /biz/

>> No.21416427
File: 55 KB, 258x360, 1565490286940.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21416427

>>21416116
>>21416212
>>21416269
>>21416318
>LinkPool is going to have $1,000,000,000 in revenue annually!!
>LinkPool is LITERALLY going to make more money than Microsoft!!!

You guys are fucking delusional beyond all belief, holy shit

>> No.21416939

>>21416427
Linkpool niggers on suicide watch

>> No.21417065

>>21415472
$1000 for a $2000 share would be 50% per year, which is ridiculously high.
Let's go for 10%: that's 20 mil per year revenue Linkpool needs to make
And that's ignoring staking income, which is the main purpose

>> No.21417083

>>21416089
Exactly, go to /dex

>> No.21417242

>>21416427
>going to make more money than Microsoft!!!
Microsoft make 143 BILLION, retard.

>> No.21417284

>>21416427
Microsoft revenue is 143,000,000,000. Please take your room temperature IQ somewhere else.

>> No.21417348

>>21417242
>>21417284
>semantics

Tell me again how LinkPool is going to make revenue in the literal billions. You guys are peak euphoria right now because of the recent LINK pumps.
$1,000,000,000 in revenue for a single LINK staking service?
It's not going to happen. At least not for another 10 years.

>> No.21417349

>>21416427
With $1b annual revenue you're entitled to $10k a share per year... I'm gooning a bit

>> No.21417672

>>21417348
Math. Like literally basic math you window licking retard. You are so manic trying to prove how you didnt fuck up getting involved when you could have. Its not that hard to do the math. During the coming bullrun crypto will easily top 3T. Could even top 10T. Were talking about chainlink yearly revenue 1/300-1/1000 total crypto valuation. It seems pretty feasible. I dont even own any link pool but you're dumb enough that I couldn't help but try and uplift your poor sad soul.

>> No.21417679

>>21415472
Yeah, literally accruing 2% of the entire market cap for the industry in profit per year is not a reasonable expectation.. especially not for an early mover like linkpool, the absolute standard and first mover for node operators.. I'm sorry you missed out anon..

>> No.21417690

I don't care if my LP will just make a 1% return a year. I care about staking my LINKs early when other nodes might not open up to retail LINKs since they might have enough LINK as collateral for all the jobs they can get. I'm not even a diehard linkpooler just bought in a couple of days ago.

>> No.21417766

Long term hold is probably a bad idea, but it would be idiotic to dump this before staking is launched. They will be first out the gate and demand will skyrocket with fuck all shares, that is when you dump all over peoples heads. X10 from here boys.

>> No.21417795

>>21415472
Just look at that retarded graphic.
>they're doing something looks productive whatever it is
>never does anything

>> No.21417939

>>21415472
I know you are trying to fud, but your reasoning is actually bullish. For each 2000 i put i got 1000 per year? forever?

>> No.21418112

you will get more returns locking LINK in AAVE than you will staking