IExec RLC mooning.

[Anonymous No.21071599]

Unstoppable. $2 incoming.

[Anonymous No.21071730]

What's a make-it stack on this baby

[Anonymous No.21071794]

>>21071730
8,700

[Anonymous No.21071822]

>>21071730
8700

[Anonymous No.21071840]

>tfw only have 2780 RLC

W-Will I ever make it?

[Anonymous No.21071849]

[Anonymous No.21071853]

>>21071599
>>21071730
>>21071794

[Anonymous No.21072021]

Smartcon announcement already leaked to insiders. shit is huge.

[Anonymous No.21072055]

>>21072021
what is it what is it what is it?????

[Anonymous No.21072100]

>>21072021
So it's gonna shoot through the roof on the 29th?

[Anonymous No.21072262]

>>21071599
When can I buy a lambo already and flex on my ex gf so she gets mad?

I want a half a million at least.

[Anonymous No.21072287]

Remember to move your tokens off the exchanges. This way the exchanges can't use your tokens to manipulate the market. LINK holders did the same. If you want to make 100x then move the tokens you bought off the exchanges into your own wallet.

[Anonymous No.21072315]

>>21072262
take them off the exchange faggot. we need scarcity.

[Anonymous No.21072316]

>>21072287
do they really do that?
kinda makes sense for RLC too since the supply is so low.

[Anonymous No.21072355]

>>21072262
jelly af. only 29k here

[Anonymous No.21072381]

>>21072316
Yes of course they do that. The less they have to use the higher price will go. Even if you own just 1k every single token needs to be removed asap from the exchanges.

[Anonymous No.21072439]

>>21072381
I'm too scared to move 120k+ worth of tokens offline..

Sounds dangerous and I'm liable to lose it

[Anonymous No.21072460]

>>21072439
move a small amount at first and then move larger chunks after confirming it worked

[Anonymous No.21072471]

>>21072439
you risk losing it muchmore by holding it on a chink exchange

[Anonymous No.21072481]

>>21072439
Move 10 off for testing. Save the address. Then move them in batches if you're scared.

[Anonymous No.21072486]

Where's 50 cent at? I know he is secretly holding a huge stack

[Anonymous No.21072517]

>>21072262
damn. we got a OPEC member here.

[Anonymous No.21072537]

>>21072439
you should be scared to leave them on exchange more honestly, unless you r stupid.

[Anonymous No.21072542]

>>21072355
Dude, you're in the top 200 holders. Try to relax your anus.

[Anonymous No.21072549]

$2 EOW. Screencap this.
$6 EOM.
1k EOY

[Anonymous No.21072884]

What is the announcement?

[Anonymous No.21072900]

>>21072884
are you a top 100 holder? if not you dont deserve the fucking info faggot.

[Anonymous No.21072929]

>>21071599
Swung this from 1200 to a pot of 3198 over the last few weeks. Sold a bit too early this moring, wasn't expecting the sudden moon today.

Buy orders @$1.13 again

[Anonymous No.21072957]

>>21072929
i also sold too early.

[Anonymous No.21072975]

>>21071599
Checked.
Delusion.
Shitting is also unstoppable, doesn't make it less shit like RLC and this project.

[Anonymous No.21072999]

also I forget; is it best to swing trade BTC pairs or USD pairs? i've been out the game for a while.

[Anonymous No.21073002]

>>21072975
What shitcoins do you hold and why are they better than RLC?

[Anonymous No.21073007]

>>21072957
Don't worry RLCAnon, it'll come back down. May be after the weekend now, but don't fret.

[Anonymous No.21073177]

>>21073007
Of course that's your belief. You sold. You read the market wrong and now you're giving advice expecting people to take you seriously

[Anonymous No.21073340]

>>21073177
Wow what a fag

[Anonymous No.21073401]

December announcement, just hodl until new ATH. RLC/ETH pair looks like is going to pull a Chainlink on the weekly

[Anonymous No.21073441]

>>21073340
swingies get the rope. Sorry bro

[Anonymous No.21073443]

>>21072262
based

[Anonymous No.21073591]

>>21072929
Maybe you get a chance to re-enter again maybe not. I've seen many people getting priced out only because they tried to swingtrade. I'm telling you, LINK and RLC swingtraders get priced out. Screencap this. See you at 1K EOY.

[Anonymous No.21074051]

don't forget to join the RLC Fags discord, a magical place where we post about RLC

https://discord (dot) gg (slash) 69mXEFB
it's brilliant

[Anonymous No.21074648]

>>21073441
Nope, mad gains actually

[Anonymous No.21075249]

>>21071599
Rankesh explain to why people would buy iExec tokens when they can just pay for AWS

[Anonymous No.21075879]

>>21075249
I-exec BTFOs AWS

[Anonymous No.21075968]

Should I dump my litecoin for RLC or try to time the LTC pump.

[Anonymous No.21076017]

>>21072439
Google mtgox fren

[Anonymous No.21076062]

>>21072439
You deserve to lose it all then

[Anonymous No.21076218]

>>21075249
You think AWS or any cloud for that matter will eventually be able to compete with a world-powered compute and data marketplace?

[Anonymous No.21076363]

yes.. digil oil my fren.. pls pump for my village fren 8 inch

[Anonymous No.21076467]

REVOLUTIONARY

[Anonymous No.21076477]

>>21076218
are you nuts? AWS is a huge international service

[Anonymous No.21076522]

>>21076363
Kek

[Anonymous No.21076551]

>>21076477
>centralized vs the entire world open market
GL AWSfag

[Anonymous No.21076694]

>>21076551
To use your rlc network you literally have to get companies to buy your fucking coin. How the hell are you going to do that?

[Anonymous No.21076765]

Wait is 8700 really needed to make it?
>tfw 1k stacklet

[Anonymous No.21076774]

Link do it..... kek>>21076694

[Anonymous No.21076805]

>>21076694
By telling them how much profit they will make??? and the added benefits of decentralization???
why are you even talking about something you don't understand???
and the fact that they either join the network or get outpriced by the marketplace??? devs can make use of the decentralized marketplace without even bothering with AWS or any centralized middleman.

COMPUTING AND DATA ARE COMMODITIES NOW FAGGOT

[Anonymous No.21076842]

>>21076694
>implying there won't be a third party company offering cloud computing for dirt cheap, coordinating computing contracts for major companies on a use basis, using RLC in the back end
Think with your head ranjeet

[Anonymous No.21076986]

>>21076805
>COMPUTING AND DATA ARE COMMODITIES NOW FAGGOT

AWS is not going to give your shitcoin the light of day the explain this. You can already do what iExec is doing for free. https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/2/21161131/folding-home-volunteers-researchers-coronavirus

>>21076842
>I am not rakeesh pajeet sir! U are ranjeet pajeet fuck you sir!!

Shut the fuck up pajeet as it currently stands right now it is FAR FAR FAR cheaper to run services on AWS than the RLC network. It would be disadvantageous for the RLC price to increase then if you want dirt cheap computing power.

[Anonymous No.21077010]

>>21076986
>Folding@home the same as iExec
Okay ranjeet stay poor

[Anonymous No.21077069]

>>21077010
This is the second ID has called me a pajeet. Rankesh, do you think that you are smart shilling your shitcoin to white males? Folding proteins is still a process that requires computing power which is why Stanford wants your computing power that is literally what iExec is doing but for free.

[Anonymous No.21077075]

>>21076986
Your FUD makes no sense

[Anonymous No.21077118]

>>21077075
You are retarded then idiot.

[Anonymous No.21077131]

>>21077069
Yeah that's cute but it's not the same. iExec is a marketplace where value is located. You can even have a donation pool like Folding@home. DYOR or stay poor.

[Anonymous No.21077350]

>>21072900
Checked
I'm a top 200 holder. Help a brother out.

[Anonymous No.21077502]

>>21076986
>It would be disadvantageous for the RLC price to increase then if you want dirt cheap computing power.
Except the price of computing power is flexible. If the price of computing today is 10 RLC per let's say tflop for example, and RLC goes up tenfold, the price of the same computation will end up 1 RLC. It's an open market and the price of computation will be pegged closer to it's USD value worth of RLC, based on cost of computation and possible profit from the person requesting the service.