BAND up from $0.30 to $7.20 in 4 months, coinbase listing coming

[Anonymous No.21051635]

>could've bought BAND for $0.30 in april when i tried telling you idiots that it's a great project, now it's worth ~$7.20
>market cap: $112m
>coinbase is going to list BAND
so at a fraction of link's market cap, let's say at $800m (which is conservative considering how quickly the defi space is growing) that'd put band at ~$39
at $1.6b m.cap, $78
why's it growing so fast?
>way easier to integrate than chainlink
>better tech than chainlink
>truly cares about the importance of oracles advises all companies to use other oracles in conjunction with theirs, including chainlink for redundancy since redundancy is super important, while chainlink makes companies sign an agreement stating that they will not discuss any other oracle they use while using chainlink
> - e.g. many projects/companies using oracles use multiple oracles for redundancy as they should, band protocol encourages this because they truly want to bring the 4IR, while chainlink has those same companies sign an agreement with them so that they can only publicly state that they only use chainlink in a marketing attempt to appear to be the only oracle companies use, which is literally slowing down the advancement and adoption of decentralized oracles, the one thing sergey claimed will change the world
i still hold link and i will because tech doesn't mean much in crypto, so i know the price will still go up, but buying BAND in april was the best decision i made right next to buying link in 2017
good luck anons

[Anonymous No.21051680]

If its better tech why are all the relevant players using link?
Band is literally only going up because of link dont bite the hand that feeds you linklet

[Anonymous No.21051713]

> a ragtag group of pajeets
HAHAHAHAHSHAHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.21051823]

>>21051680
a lot of the companies that link has integrated with also use band
i wonder sometimes if you guys even read before replying
i would never say sell you link, all i'm saying is band's got great tech, they actually care about the adoption of decentralized oracles unlike link with it's shady marketing practices as i explained, and if you want to completely ignore all of what i just said and not even look into their tech or how much easier it is to integrate with compared to chainlink, just go look at the chart of band and think about the fact that it's getting added to coinbase
do you not like free money? idiots

[Anonymous No.21051836]

>>21051713
i know right, this is why i never touched it. could have made a decent roi though, fml.

[Anonymous No.21051868]

better tech

LMFAO

someone post the github screencap where they just copy paste stuff they dont even understand

[Anonymous No.21052064]

>>21051836
that's what kept me away when i first heard about it from an anon back in late 2019, but it worked out, i ended up taking the risk and buying later for cheaper after it crashed not giving a fuck if i lost money on it or not, and i'm glad i did
my logic at the time was "they might be from thailand, but the CEO went to stanford, and the CTO went to MIT and i bought into link and their CEO is a russian philosopher, so fuck it" and it worked out
who knows, maybe in the end, they'll both be huge scams. can't trust asians or russians, all garbage

[Anonymous No.21052103]

>>21051868
>band devs

[Anonymous No.21052142]

>>21051635
It literally did what Chainlink did in 5 months. HAHAHAHAAHA.

Dumping my 30x now for DIA.

[Anonymous No.21052156]

>>21052103
Wait is this chink owned?
If so lmao. Link can kiss goodbye any chancaes it had of major Chinese adoption.

[Anonymous No.21052174]

>>21052156
> He doesn't know
Link already has major Chinese adoption. Band should try India

[Anonymous No.21052202]

>>21051823
>l-like I explained
>l-look at these debunked copy pasta fud arguments sir mobius - i mean band will be the next excellent cryptocurrency yes sir
so I see the shit-for-brains rlc niggers have been paid to shill a new project
are you gonna call it digital air? when do the badly ripped off memes come out? or will the devs try to brigade the link telegram like the enigma ones did?
fuck me you cunts are boring, try to build something around a new buzzword that normies will lap up instead of trying to ride link's coattails

[Anonymous No.21052238]

>>21052103
why would this be considered incompetence? they are the perfect competitor, figuring out what works for their competitors and implementing it
sure it sounds stupid, but that's because it's a mudslant developer whose english isn't as good as ours
devs don't need to be english professors, they just need to be good at development and figure out what their competitors do, figure it out, then try and do it the same or better and in band's case, that's what they're doing
they've built the entire protocol being inpsired by chainlink, and are improving upon certain aspects
this is literally capitalism 101, companies replicate what their competitors do and offer other benefits/services/pricing/ease of use etc and that's what drives advancement

[Anonymous No.21052282]

>>21052202
god i miss the old biz
fags like you make it hard to even wanna help anyone
ffs i hold 2 cryptos in my entire portfolio
was 100% link, now it's 80% link and 20% band
i know link's probably gonna keep going up, but look how well band did and is now going to be listed on cb, it's free money

[Anonymous No.21052325]

>>21052156
band is useless. it is a nice pump and dump, however it wont ever be seriously adopted

[Anonymous No.21052355]

>>21052202
forgot to add that i didn't sell any link to buy band, i just spent more money
so since nobody should be selling anything to buy into anything right now in defi, you clearly can't afford to buy anything else so move on little man

[Anonymous No.21052392]

>logo looks like a flaccid micropenis

[Anonymous No.21052417]

>>21052392
it does lmao

[Anonymous No.21052476]

>>21052282
why yes, fellow link holder
i also miss the old biz days
i too am also shilling this for anons best financial interests while claiming without proof or example that the 'tech is just better' or that link tries to force companies to only use the one oracle
>yawn
s and h, faggot

[Anonymous No.21052479]

>>21052392
Kek. Bandcucks btfo

[Anonymous No.21052591]

>>21052174
>t. has never worked with chinks
They will throw link away the second a viable chinese alternative is available.

[Anonymous No.21052602]

>>21052476
poorfag can't afford anything he's all in on link with im guessing 250 link and truly needs it to go to $100 to move out
upset kid, can't even dyor or buy before cb listing cuz too poor

[Anonymous No.21053239]

>>21051635
It's so obvious what the next moon is going to be, but /biz/ is sleeping on it

[Anonymous No.21053392]

>>21051635
>chinks make a shitty ripoff of a far superior product, as they always do
>but muh multiple oracles
Fuck off, mixing low quality data with high quality data doesn't improve data quality ranjeet

[Anonymous No.21053483]

>>21053239
i haven't done any research into WAVES, but it's been on my to-do list. looks very promising and has the potential to pull band and link like gains. i'll do some research into it and see if i want to get into it.
desu, the fact that they're working with band is a good sign. anyone that did their research could see that band's team is all about blockchain agnostic, super easily to integrate oracle services and just from what you posted alone, it's got me intrigued that it's purpose is for making DApps easy to build.
i love defi because every day that passed by the landscape changes more and more. it's the only sector in crypto where tech matters and i feel like it's affecting prices due to it. that's why i hope link wakes the fuck up and gets back to growing the industry rather than trying to slow down advancements.
it's all so exciting but all so tiresome.

[Anonymous No.21053561]

>>21052602
thanks, this just stopped me from BAND

[Anonymous No.21053572]

>>21053392
what? even sergey said that redundancy is required when it comes to oracles. then his marketing team decided that they'd rather not advance the industry and instead slow things down so it looks like they're the only ones in the space. i'm sure it wasn't sergeys decision, this is clearly the result of hiring so many chinks to handle marketing for chainlink.
and like i stated, defi is exciting because it's the only place where tech truly does affect price, so in a couple months, the landscape might be so different. that's the best part about companies wanting to use multiple oracles for redundancy, it's going to show clearly who's doing it best. could be link, could be band, could be a new company, could be an open source project built by students, could be anything.

[Anonymous No.21053900]

>>21053572
>even sergey said that redundancy is required when it comes to oracles

[Anonymous No.21053923]

Any other Oracle projects worth getting into?

[Anonymous No.21054306]

>>21052591
So never then. They (Chinese) had a home grown solution under their noses and if the gov had any faith in it they would have thrown all resources possible to make it a viable contender. However... it will come as no surprise that the Chinese have zero respect for intellectual theft and Band is a grade A rip-off of Link minus the professionalism, contacts, foresight, knowledge and respect. In addition, as if the rest of the financial world would trust a Chinese-made oracle network. Google Huawei and the African embassy for proof of Chinese tech at work.

[Anonymous No.21054414]

>>21053572
>sergey said that redundancy is required when it comes to oracles

yes, using more oracles, not using different inferior protocols, dumb ass negro

[Anonymous No.21054813]

>>21054306
wow this is the most delusional thing I read all day

[Anonymous No.21054820]

>>21054414
ummm... band is working with chainlink LOL guess sergey makes a habit of working with inferior oracles

[Anonymous No.21055140]

If you missed BAND then check out zap! It's about to blow up! New UI/UX launching in a few weeks and a bunch of big partnerships with real world use cases to be announced shortly after that!

https://medium.com/the-zap-project/zap-july-update-2020-24d0c1a23389

[Anonymous No.21055239]

Lol these threads make me comfy with my BAND stack.

[Anonymous No.21055324]

I bought at 30c and sold at $1.15

[Anonymous No.21055689]

>>21055324
fuckkk i feel for you dude. in 2017 when i was wagecucking before hitting the 'buy all alt coins and wait' lottery i did this many times until the bull run happene
always felt shitty looking back
if i were you honestly, if you are looking to get back in, i'd say wait a bit cuz it might dump? i'm not sure at all desu, i can't tell anymore. usually a coinbase listing would mean a pump, but in today's world of crypto, i have no idea. could dump right after cuz of insiders pumping before cb announcement last night.
either way good luck friend

>>21055239
same, i've been super comfy with link for the last 3 years (minus some months where it would dump and i'd wonder why my holdings were 100% link) and now i have the band comfiness, just apex comfy levels here

[Anonymous No.21055905]

>>21054813
You clearly have no idea then. You trust the Chinese then I take it? Read this you pleb: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/Huawei

[Anonymous No.21055970]

>>21051680
You sign with LINK first there contract wont allow you to sign with another oracle. BAND promotes the use of other oracles in conjunction.

[Anonymous No.21056278]

>>21055970
this man did his research. and as someone long on link and band, and looking into investing into all promising defi projects, this shit pisses me off. sergey talked about how important decentralized oracles are for the world and how it will change everything for the better, but has companies sign an agreement that won't allow you to use another oracle, and if your company was already using another oracle or 2 or 3, you can only publicly state that you only use chainlink.
funny because band is practicing what sergey preached and clearly truly believes in the future and the 4IR. they tell everyone integrating with them to go integrate with chainlink as well and any other oracle they'd like.
i used to love sergey, but now i'm watching link very close. i have too much in it to be optimistic about it, i have to start being skeptical and when shit like this gets out, it might affect price. hardest thing for me has been trying to figure out when to get out. i don't want to get out now only to see link hit $50 in a year. but that's the game i suppose.

[Anonymous No.21056302]

>>21052202
>>21052392
>even the BAND logo is ripped off from Chainlink

[Anonymous No.21056313]

>>21056278
you are the guy who goes to kfc and asks for a coke

[Anonymous No.21056385]

>>21056278
ANONS you need to listen. Stack LINK and stack BAND both will moon without a fucking doubt. This is about making money not being fucken loyal to a company. You like ferrari or you like lambos how about fucken both. BOTH Oracles are going to be around to stay and both are going to make great gains. Dont be fools and stack both. There is enough for everyone to eat

[Anonymous No.21056417]

>>21056278
>has companies sign an agreement that won't allow you to use another oracle, and if your company was already using another oracle or 2 or 3, you can only publicly state that you only use chainlink.
Do you have any proof of this? Many prominent crypto companies that use Chainlink have come forward to deny your claims about Chainlink paying them to integrate, so is this the new angle?

[Anonymous No.21056540]

>>21052064
The thing is many projects have gone up due to the defi bullrun. It's nothing unique for Band. Post again when Band does a 10x in a bear market like Chainlink. Yea it might be a legit alternative since it's low cap so it has more room to pump, but I'm definetely not selling any of my LINKs at this current stage where Chainlink has Smartcon coming up and Band is at its ATH. Also the way you shill Band and talk about Sergey is fucking retarded.
>who knows maybe Chainlink will turn out to be a scam, its CEO is a russian philosopher after all
Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.21056554]

>>21052103
this always makes me laugh

[Anonymous No.21056601]

>>21051635
Objectively inferior chink copy paste project with not even a tenth of the network effect, institutional interest not first mover advantage, but still a lot of moon potential due to the success of the original. This is ETH vs NEO all over again.

[Anonymous No.21056619]

>>21052602
why are you projecting this much?

[Anonymous No.21056628]

>>21056601
Nor*

[Anonymous No.21056657]

>>21054813
I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. So you think Chinese are trustworthy? Are you fucking retarded?

[Anonymous No.21056778]

>LINK time to get from $0.2 to $9 = 3 years
>BAND time to get from $0.2 to $9 = 4 months
three year COPE