/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.20677173]

So we will be getting our 1,200 soon for the second wave.
Do I buy link? It won’t get me a lot of link.
If I buy PNK I can get a whole stack any other low mcap gems?

[Anonymous No.20677249]

>>20677173
hex2t/axion is about to go to andromeda

[Anonymous No.20677440]

>>20677173
Link dude

[Anonymous No.20677619]

>>20677173
Kleros lets you buy your way onto a jury that is the problem.

[Anonymous No.20677931]

Buy PNK, obviously. Infinitely more upside than LINK.

[Anonymous No.20677959]

>>20677173
Should I sell this shit for ETH?

[Anonymous No.20677987]

>>20677931
LINK can't operate without Kleros and vice versa, both need each other. Imagine buying 10,000 boxes of banana and receiving it all. LINK does its job and everything seems fine. Upon further investigation you notice that all the bananas are rotten, what do you do? This is where Kleros comes in

>>20677619
Please expand on this and someone refute him

[Anonymous No.20678247]

>>20677987
Kleros doesn't need chainlink
Chainlink is now obsolete tech
Cope
Rope

[Anonymous No.20678280]

>>20678247
>Kleros doesn't need chainlink
How come? If I'm right, Kleros doesn't interact with the real world and feeds that data into the blockchain like LINK does, or am I wrong?

[Anonymous No.20678419]

>>20678280
Stop listening to them. Pnkies are furious they missed chainlink and have to shift their frustration somewhere else. Kleros is useful, but that’s that. Link will be industry standard

[Anonymous No.20678498]

>>20678419
>Kleros is useful, but that’s that. Link will be industry standard
I'm all in on LINK and have been for the past 2 years. What I don't understand is how LINK can function without something like Kleros when there's subjectivity involved (See my banana example in my previous post)? LINK + Kleros seem to be a match made in heaven

[Anonymous No.20678675]

>>20678498
Yes, but lets take a look at your example. How often do you get a box full of rotten bananas compared to normal bananas? I hope not often or else your business is fucked. In this example, people will always be the middleman. Kleros is needed for special situations when involving party fucks up badly, and its not as often as you would think

[Anonymous No.20678703]

>>20678675
>>20678498
>people will always need a middleman

[Anonymous No.20678744]

>>20678675
So what you're saying is that LINK will always be used, i.e Industry Standard, whereas Kleros will only be used in some specific instances and thus it won't moon as much as LINK? I could see that

btw what's a good stack to have, I'm thinking of buying 100,000 PNK

[Anonymous No.20678810]

>>20677959

[Anonymous No.20678872]

>>20678744
>So what you're saying is that LINK will always be used, i.e Industry Standard, whereas Kleros will only be used in some specific instances and thus it won't moon as much as LINK? I could see that
Yes, exactly. The point of smart contracts is to reduce the subjectivity involved in businesses to make transactions run more smoothly and efficiently. But whats the point when every transactions are lodged with subjective problems? That’s what the banks and financial institutions ae doing right now. Yes, there will be certain situations where you NEED subjectivity, like you banana example. But who knows, kleros could moon kore because its crypto. I think its smart to hold both.

I don’t know what the make it stack is, but i think it is 100k. I’m only holding 10k

[Anonymous No.20679001]

>>20678498
dude YOU are the banana.
that’s the best way anyone could describe chainlink; and I’m not talking about your yellow ID.

[Anonymous No.20679200]

PNK is trying to ride chainlinks coat tails. Its a moronic service that would never be adopted in the real world. If an issue isnt big enough to go to actual court over, no one is going to bother with Kleros court. Its not legally binding, BOTH parties have to sign up for it, and, even worse, theres nothing stopping yes or no parties from rigging it and buying the voters in their favor. Its the very thing crypto and DeFi is trying to solve, meandering, people-induced error/flaw. Link renders PNK obsolete. Its a fun gambling/debate tool and nothing more. Also, if you want to see the Intelligence/Professionalism of klero's developers, look no further

[Anonymous No.20679590]

>>20678280
Kleros doesn't require any of the "data" chainlink "provides". Your comment shows how little you actually know and to not take anything you say seriously. Do some homework on how Kleros works and what chainlink actually claims it does you brainlet. Nothing alike.

[Anonymous No.20679614]

>>20679200
You can’t refute that message though. Kleros has a working product right now. Of course it’s still early but the Kleros court is only the tip of the iceberg with regards to the implications of the technology

[Anonymous No.20679642]

>>20679200
>Its a moronic service that would never be adopted in the real world.
If you actually believe this the next few announcements will be difficult for you to cope with.

[Anonymous No.20679691]

>>20677173
>contracts which are purely deterministic are rare

When you try to hug link's nuts and clout farm this hard, at least understand the basics. Of course a pinkfag had to get newfags to think it's true, bags gotta be pumped somehow.

[Anonymous No.20680104]

>>20677987
>Upon further investigation you notice that all the bananas are rotten, what do you do?

Lets throw another layer on this example. The bananas received are rotten and the receiver took retaliatory action against the banana shipper's CEO by leaking her onlyfans nudes to her husband on social media. According to this warped moral arbiter larp court, you can't find the receiver to be eligible for compensation.

[Anonymous No.20680223]

>>20679691
This usually shuts the pajeets up

[Anonymous No.20680247]

>>20680104
What?

[Anonymous No.20680273]

>>20680247
Read pic related, what do you not understand?

[Anonymous No.20681077]

>>20680104
oof, that's rough
>it's decided by the people!
>haha but here's the zeitgeist the people have to decide in, no natural sociopolitical evolution and nuance for you guy
>what's that? you scammed someone or plan on scamming someone? quick, dig up and pubish as much dirt on them as you possibly can, something's gotta stick so we can get away with publicly-sanctioned theft
never, ever, EVER put an oversocialized, preening faggot in charge of morality, unless you're actually looking to create an authoritarian powerplay

[Anonymous No.20681178]

>>20680223
Perfect image. The markets that link aims to capture, anything from bond/asset prices to did the will creator die/death certificate issued are deterministic. Even in the fringe cases where valid disputes arise, that hardly necessitates the wording. PNK wants to pick up fringe cases in these markets and that's fine, but the wording of the "subjective elements of the contract" in these cases are disingenuous and would better be defined as arbitrating human/data errors.

>>20680273
Your banana example was a great stepping stone to one of the major, yet not often talked about downfalls of this project, namely the devs not wanting their product to be used in cases that would garner them unwanted attention. It's not hard to imagine cases where the guilty party would want to take advantage of this moralfagging aspect and muddy the waters on the initial dispute to easily have the case dismissed. Providing compensation to the banana company that received the bad bananas and then worrying about "revenge porn" would be the logical path to resolve this scenario. I see this flaw, while initially appearing like nothing to worry about, becoming a gaping hole in the project.

[Anonymous No.20681266]

Saying shit like "Chainlink doesn't work without PNK token!" is probably the best FUD for Kleros I've seen so far. Please continue saying that.

[Anonymous No.20681307]

>>20681077
>never, ever, EVER put an oversocialized, preening faggot in charge of morality, unless you're actually looking to create an authoritarian powerplay

Well said and good post.

[Anonymous No.20681460]

>>20681266
literally

[Anonymous No.20681728]

>>20681460
>>20681307
>>20681266
Should I actually sell my suicide stack of Kleros? Lol

[Anonymous No.20682268]

>>20681728
I have a 6 digit stack of it for full disclosure. The project is in its infancy and there's probably some room to make more money off of it before the flaws come to the surface. Emotionally distancing yourself from your investments and purely gauging market hype would be my advice here, just don't think this is without flaws that will come to the surface once/if more adoption comes.

[Anonymous No.20682607]

Reading chainlink fags trying to play it off cool is funny as fuck. Chainlink is finished, Kleros is /ourcoin/ now. I sold all my LNK because all linkers in this thread are faggots

[Anonymous No.20682788]

>>20682607
That's a cute pic of your typical beta male redditor that would drool all over this project. Oh wait, it's one of the two devs.

[50cent No.20682986]

>>20681077
This.
> If you are immoral you automatically lost.
The bedrock of western law is impartiality.