[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 878 KB, 1332x850, 13245661hg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20634975 No.20634975 [Reply] [Original]

iExec is the equivalent of a "Pandora's box".
When it gets "opened" on the 30th, the world will never be the same.
Just wanna let you guys know that it is going to cause a massive shift in technology and the crypto space.

>> No.20635400
File: 23 KB, 300x300, 50centgun.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20635400

>>20634975
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_aCOg57shE

>> No.20635453

>>20635400
The FUD is getting advance as fuck holy shit

>> No.20635499

>>20634975
Tfw I quit my job for Gilles gains

>> No.20635959

>>20635400
thanks just went alll in

>> No.20635976

>>20635400
You're a faggot with this 50cent shit but that was actually quite good. Makes me actually believe 50 is a fake fudding accumulator.. making people get behind the project even more so.

t. 2100 barrel holder

>> No.20636915
File: 470 KB, 1125x2436, ie datasets as collateral.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20636915

>>20635976
50 holds fat stacks of Barrels I guarantee it. Dude is a fucking pro. He knows he's not shaking RLChads but I see weak hands with RLC fall for fuds all the time

Anyways [pic related] is absolutely game changing by itself, and it's just a little piece of the grand vision

>> No.20636932
File: 82 KB, 900x900, 1595447932941.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20636932

>>20634975
who the fuck would buy iExec over Link? that's my problem with this token - the growth potential for Link will always be larger.

>> No.20636942

>>20634975
I bought at 1.60. This fucking scam better pump.

>> No.20637018

>>20636932
>oracle vs multi-use coin with oracles

>> No.20637025

>>20635400
"MEIN HODLER" HOLY FUCK MY SIDESSSSSS

>> No.20637154
File: 89 KB, 960x540, rlc tokenomics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20637154

>>20636932
How you sound:
>Why would bitcoin ever be valuable? It'll never get off the ground Paypal is way better
Ahhh, the sound of boomers not understanding they're looking directly into the face of the future
Gives me that Bitcoin vibes all over again

Also scroll up and see my pic about Data being used as collateral for DeFi loans and more

>> No.20637345
File: 541 KB, 720x429, cleanupcrew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20637345

Weak hands exposed, lets clean up their digital oil barrels

>> No.20637378

>>20636932
>Not owning both

>> No.20637393
File: 96 KB, 1218x938, 1595518909763.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20637393

>>20637378
what's the point?

>> No.20637429

>>20637393
Gains nigga

>> No.20637462
File: 270 KB, 1280x720, tupac nsmdoj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20637462

>>20637429
they don't get it man. They don't have the vision, not even a little

>> No.20637469

>>20637462
I'm gonna say that I would not own a coin whose primary use case is a small subset of another's

>> No.20637479

>>20637462
Based.

>> No.20637484

>>20637018
RLC has integrated Link, just like countless other projects
https://medium.com/iex-ec/chainlink-and-iexec-collaborate-to-address-the-complex-off-chain-needs-of-next-generation-702e55ab1ead

>> No.20637507

>>20637484
That's great, but my point is that LINK needs RLC more than the opposite.

>> No.20637516

>>20635400
based fiddy

>> No.20637534

>>20637507
That doesn't make any sense at all.

>> No.20637544
File: 830 KB, 1131x1135, 7WD8PnMM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20637544

>>20637507
>but my point

>> No.20637555

>>20637534
?

LINK can't do anything that iExec can do.
iExec can do the entire use case with more tech (TEE/SGX/Staking) of LINK.

>> No.20637610

>>20637555
How does Link need RLC? That's a nonsensical statement.

>> No.20637624

>>20637610
Because LINK needs RLC's massive computational power.

>> No.20637639

>>20637624
No it doesn't. You're full of shit.

>> No.20637647

>>20637610
Basically, LINK is a data-converter.
RLC is the data-processor, but also has it's own data-converter.

>> No.20637670

>>20637639
It does. iExec is the only way to do something like machine learning with LINK's oracle connected to it.
LINK is just an oracle bro.

>> No.20637674

>>20637647
RLC is using Chainlink as a data provider.
Chainlink doesn't need decentralized computing to provide data.
How does Chainlink need RLC?

>> No.20637711

>>20637674
Are you retarded my fren?

RLC is using LINK in a single use case collaboration.

LINK is using RLC because it needs iExec's computational power to process the information it gets from web 2.0

LINK needs iExec to process the information it gathers. Period.

>> No.20637715

>>20634975
what's gonna happen on the 30th?

t. new rlc holder

>> No.20637736

>>20637715
presentation with link and microsoft and v5 release

>> No.20637737

>>20635400
obviously you are jew

>> No.20637746

>>20637711
>LINK needs iExec to process the information it gathers.
Jesus dude, you have literally no idea what you're talking about? Are you a paid shill?

>> No.20637755

>>20634975
bollocks.

>> No.20637766

>>20637746
Good retort fren, you will go very far!
>a single use crypto(link, oracle) needs a multi use crypto(rlc, everything)

LINKIES CANT COMPUTE KEK

>> No.20637809

>>20637766
Holy shit. Link isn't supposed to be able to run computations you absolute mong.

>> No.20637825
File: 9 KB, 250x202, 1594771922564.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20637825

>>20637809
Yeah that's why it needs iExec, you fucking mong.

You fell right into that one.

>> No.20637843

>>20637825
No wonder RLC threads stink of curry. This is just pathetic. Is this really the best you can do?

>> No.20637845
File: 54 KB, 576x388, LOOOOOL.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20637845

>>20637825
Thanks for the fuckin easy meme holy jesus christ

>> No.20637862
File: 70 KB, 629x566, loooooool2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20637862

>>20637843
Pathetic, kek, this is the caliber of link investors LMAO

>> No.20637881

>>20637862
Link connects VMs with each-other and with off-chain environments. Explain why it needs RLC to do that. It doesn't. Obviously.

>> No.20637925

>>20637881
Okay show me proof then, actual video proof of any high performance computing with LINK, such as rendering a blender file.

>> No.20637940

>>20637925
>>20637881

>> No.20637971

>>20637940
Huh? No actual proof? Just anecdotal evidence? KEK!!!!!!!!!!!!

>> No.20637973

>>20637843
Take a lap weirdo

>> No.20637983

>>20637973
>>20637881

>> No.20638003

>>20637971
>>20637881

>> No.20638010

>>20637983
It doesn't do high performance computing and you have zero evidence of it actually working.

You are living in a pipedream while iExec releases in 7 days.

Why do you do this to yourself?

>> No.20638018

>>20638010
>>20637881

>> No.20638038

>>20638018
Yea... I just said it doesnt work and you are defensive. Provide something? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epIrtETCnp0

>> No.20638053

>>20638038
>>20637881

>> No.20638054

>>20636932
I know you linklets do not have an idea how the market works but let me tell you something. Total supply of link is 1 billion, whereas this number is 87 million for rlc. Sure iExec may not have a large marketcap like chainlink but it will worth a lot more than link in the long run.

>> No.20638057

>>20638018
Look at this top comment, this is part of the reason why iExec will be massive. This reason is about 0.0000000001% of the reason why it'll be massive.

>How long does it take compared to the local render? Even a 30% drop in performance would be acceptable. Rendering locks you out of your computer for hours sometimes, if I could render something and continue working without a massive drop in render time this would be huge!

>> No.20638084

>>20638057
neat, but:
>>20637881

>> No.20638092

>>20637983
He explained it kiddo. I read the posts above. Are you ok?

>> No.20638097
File: 163 KB, 500x500, 134523542.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20638097

>>20638084
Okay man, stay poor i guess, i tried

>> No.20638101

>>20638092
Where'd he explain it?
>>20638092

>> No.20638118

>>20638097
>>20637881

>> No.20638140

>>20638118
You seem like an emotional investor. Faced with facts yet still defaults to something that isn't really real.

>> No.20638220

>>20638140
>I lied and got called out for it and now I'm really REALLY desperate to declect and distract form my embarrassment
>>20637711
>>20637881

>>20637881

>> No.20638224

>>20638140
thats why he ngmi

>> No.20638321

>>20638224
>>20638220

>> No.20638468
File: 67 KB, 720x459, 1594723920483.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20638468

iexec is a huge step in the right direction towards decentralized computing. Comparing it with LINK is not right since LINK is a just a low barrier oracle that is over hyped and over sold. Imagine being connected through a protocol to all the computing resources in the world at once and to be able to access data and computing resources natively through the RLC token. iExec is barely getting started but it has the potential to be humanity's central computing pool.. decentralized, secure, and permissionless.

>> No.20638514

>>20638468
Shills desperate to save their thread after being shown lying
>>20638220

>> No.20638528

>>20638514
You have an inability to understand anything, it's okay. Carry on with your life and see what happens.

>> No.20638554

>>20638528
>>20638220

>> No.20638590

this thread sold it, getting a bag. how much for a sui?

>> No.20638610

To clarify why LINK needs RLC.

Chainlink currently offers no protection in regards to privacy. Try running a node --> you are able to inspect all HTTP data coming into your machine including request and responses. The amount of privacy and security is laughable. Sybil attacks are also imminent as node operators can collude and produce inaccurate results slowly over time and the protocol has no built in methods of detecting this --> imagine 10 providers that monopolize a niche and you will see why this can easily happen. There is a reason why LINK hand picks all their node operators. All challenges essentially boil down to the hardware level --> which is why iExec has been so god damn focused on TEEs this entire time

>> No.20638623
File: 67 KB, 222x268, 134523145678.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20638623

>>20638590

870

here take this barrel you'll need it

>> No.20638669

>>20638590
>>20638610
>>20638623
Desperate lying shills tying to save their thread off of shilling lies
>>20637711
>>20637881

>> No.20638677

>>20638554
>>20638610
btfo

>> No.20638706

>>20638669
shut the fuck up you goddamn autist

>> No.20638717

>>20638677
>>20638706
See:
>>20638669

>> No.20638724

>>20638717
You have 24 hours

>> No.20638734

>>20638724
See:
>>20638669

>> No.20638745
File: 36 KB, 687x500, 534535.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20638745

>>20638734

>> No.20638759

>>20638745
See:
>>20637711
>>20637881 (You)

>> No.20638774

I think it's pretty obvious to see that it's the most undervalued coin. with 88M supply and 80M already in circulation.. it has 11.3X less supply than LINK and also 1/27 the marketcap 100M to 2.7B. Anyways i'm done explaining this shit to you. Stay poor and buy into the most overhyped coins currently being talked about by normies. a 2.7B JSON parser lmao

>> No.20638785

>>20638774
Yes but
>>20638669

>> No.20638902

bump

>> No.20639005

>>20637881
>he replied to his own post 10 (ten) times

>> No.20639172

>>20639005
Thanks for the bump
>>20638669

>> No.20639333

>>20637345
he cute (the swan)