[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 8 KB, 500x432, pnk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20510024 No.20510024 [Reply] [Original]

Have any other PNKmarine stakechads been chosen for the Omen dispute?

>> No.20510064
File: 13 KB, 200x257, pedro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20510064

vote for pnk

https://land.kucoin.io/choice/1?lang=en_US

>> No.20510257

>>20510064
Done

>> No.20510312

>>20510024
Yes, and the answer is obviously 'Yes'.

>> No.20510313

Case 302 yes. I have no idea what the fuck I'm doing. The comments in the omen market suggest people are leaning towards yes. How are you approaching this case anon? I haven't read the rules or procedures yet

>> No.20510369

>>20510313
>Case 302 yes. I have no idea what the fuck I'm doing. The comments in the omen market suggest people are leaning towards yes. How are you approaching this case anon? I haven't read the rules or procedures yet
I'm going with Yes based on the data but it looks like it could be invalid. I think most people will go Yes, invalid is uncommon.

>> No.20510371

the answer is yes and you are a dumb fucking retard if you think it could possibly be NO

the question is about what will be REPORTED. the only way we can interpret this is literally, so Statnews reporting it means that it WAS reported. BOoooohoooo if you dont like it, make the market with a better question next time morons

>> No.20510374

wth, i am just HODLING this coin. can i not just HODL?

>> No.20510406
File: 150 KB, 983x742, 10D9481E-4EF6-4286-BF79-31BAE374D54C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20510406

i’ve been chosen
when will they post evidence?

>> No.20510508

There is a distinction for all jurors to make that is as simple as it is crucial. The question at hand is: "Was X reported?". We are not to determine the real world truth of X. We are not to determine whether the source who reported X is properly credentialed. It's plain to see that X was indeed reported, and that this satisfies the 'Yes' condition of the question at hand.

>> No.20510575

>>20510406
>i’ve been chosen
>when will they post evidence?
https://daotalk.org/t/omen-the-first-critical-distpute/1714/20

>> No.20511124

>>20510508
>There is a distinction for all jurors to make that is as simple as it is crucial. The question at hand is: "Was X reported?". We are not to determine the real world truth of X. We are not to determine whether the source who reported X is properly credentialed. It's plain to see that X was indeed reported, and that this satisfies the 'Yes' condition of the question at hand.
agreed

>> No.20511147

can any people on the 'no' side make an alternative to this based and redpilled code argument some autist made?

https://jsfiddle.net/zxmr562h/

>> No.20511251
File: 1.35 MB, 1500x1000, 1594990213154.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20511251

>>20510374
You can just HODL that's what i'm doing. I'm too busy on my multi year vacation to bother with neet shit but I trust my fellow pinkys to handle what needs to be handled on the chain

I already made it (off LINK actually) but I can't wait to do it again with all of you fine gentlemen here

>> No.20511257

Not only was this reported, satisfying the dispute, it was reported by a fairly reputable source using Johns Hopkins University data feed. If a world renowned medical university feed isn’t considered proper reporting, we failed as a society. I’m confident that crypto enthusiasts see it in the same way.
t. Top 100 holder who hasn’t staked yet, but this is tickling my penis.

>> No.20511272

>>20511251
>>20510374
hodling is a perfect option. I would also monitor this case though, because it could decide the future valuation of the token. who wants to dispute on a court that cant be trusted to rule on the most basic interpretation of a question?

>> No.20511276
File: 261 KB, 701x597, 1595132983379.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20511276

>>20511147
OH NO MY PINKYS!!!!!
pic unrelated but i'm not clicking that link

>> No.20511305
File: 98 KB, 3183x680, Screenshot_2020-07-20_01-04-56.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20511305

>>20511276
understood - i'll screencap it for you.

basically someone put the argument/question into code format and challenged anyone to make a better interpretation. pretty cool argument method

>> No.20511558

>>20511251
VERY NICE!!!!
please do share some coins you are hoping to make it again off of? I haven't made it yet. help an anon in need, fren

>> No.20511835

>>20511558
kleros obviously

>> No.20512256

>>20510024
This project has literally put me into a new income bracket and it hasn't even fucking BEGUN!

>> No.20512274

>>20511558
TRB and PNK are the literal holds
Good luck

>> No.20512589

>>20510064
>https://land.kucoin.io/choice/1?lang=en_US
what is this

>> No.20512766

>>20510406
Former jury on a different case. Jurors are the ones who can present evidence. Also there's no additional benefit to this, other than to sway people to your side

>> No.20512795

>>20510024
I want to hold more Kleros but cannot afford it from my day job

>> No.20512807

>>20512766
from another thread, apparently the 'client' for the arbitration case (realitio) did not implement a way for people to submit evidence.

>> No.20512835
File: 43 KB, 714x342, Screenshot_2020-07-20_02-55-50.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20512835

>>20512807
>>20512766

https://resolve.kleros.io/cases/302

so far the best place for evidence appears to be the original market comment section

https://omen.eth.link/#/0xffbc624070cb014420a6f7547fd05dfe635e2db2

>> No.20512844

Apart from a few Defi projects this is literally one of the few useful products in crytpo and yet the most undervalued.

>> No.20512875

>>20512844
agreed - whats your opinion on the case? its going to be the first actual usage of kleros

>>20509871

>> No.20513129

omg om gom gomg omg omg

>> No.20513434
File: 613 KB, 900x900, ultimate ree.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20513434

>>20513129
I GOT FUD'D AND DIDN'T BUY AN HOUR AGO

>> No.20513609

>>20510024
Where to research PNK?

>> No.20513782

>>20513609
Read their book https://blog.kleros.io/dispute-revolution-the-kleros-handbook-of-decentralized-justice/

>> No.20514048

>>20513782
I re-read this whenever I feel my hands getting shaky and close the exchange.

>> No.20514342

>>20514048
We are literally going to make it

>> No.20514539
File: 215 KB, 752x880, Clementsword.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20514539

>>20510406
The kleros team is so based, I doubt Lord Sergeys team could ever master the blade.

>> No.20514813

>>20510406
kek i just got the green dildos part
pnk memes are as good as link memes

>> No.20514839

>>20511257
how are you holding but not staking anon
that's literally the point of the token

>> No.20515033

>>20514839
did you check out >>20509871 ?

TL;DR kleros is about to actually be used for its intended purpose for the first time.

>> No.20515123

>>20515033
checked
i thought kleros already had like 300 cases so far

>> No.20515146

>>20515123
thats true - but all of them are just curation submissions (is this token legit?) or social media campaign verification (people post up tweets for bounties). none have been for a case with 35 eth on the line for the arbitrators. this is history in the making, literally

>> No.20515155
File: 388 KB, 456x750, 1593773297970.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20515155

>>20514839
also to maeking it sir

>> No.20515158

>>20515146
i'm pretty excited to be a part of it

>> No.20515166

>>20515155
checked
i'm liking these pnk memes

>> No.20515170

>>20515158
did you get called for the case? i didnt. still exciting for any holders though

>> No.20515187

>>20515166
checked

>> No.20515325

>>20515170
ye i got called for it
waiting for them to include evidence for the ruling

>> No.20515909
File: 128 KB, 1180x736, Screenshot 2020-07-20 at 11.09.03.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20515909

KLEROS FAGS,

Vote $LINK into oblivion

https://twitter.com/DefiChad/status/1285124927922765829?s=20

>> No.20516049

>>20515909
bump

>> No.20516102

bump for pinkies

>> No.20516177

>>20511305
It astounds me that normies are so horrid at reading comprehension that they have to have things interpreted by a coder to understand a simple yes/no case.

>> No.20516627

bump

>> No.20517083

bump for my pinkies

>> No.20517130

http://kleroscan.com/dispute/302 still shows a lot of jurors as 0x00..00

Does that mean that more jurors will be picked or have all jurors been selected?

>> No.20517228

>>20517130
ain't clicking that shit nigga

>> No.20517267

>>20517228
Bruh, it's not dangerous. Other anons can confirm