Imagine owning link and not buying Band?

[Anonymous No.20506055]

Wtf are you doing?

[Anonymous No.20506066]

>>20506055
This is going parabolic.

dump imminent

[Anonymous No.20506278]

>>20506055
Owning link and not buying any you retard

[Anonymous No.20506310]

Hmm I'm suppose to buy your (very heavy) bags?

No thanks

[Anonymous No.20506329]

I have no idea why this thing is pumping so hard

[Anonymous No.20506478]

>>20506329
People who missed link are FOMOing onto the runner-up oracle solution. Coupled with that, 82% of BAND tokens are locked up for staking - basic supply and demand

[Anonymous No.20506686]

>>20506478
No I think it a pump by the team, they’ll exit out.

They’ve had two key partnership stolen by chainlink, most recently Kardiachain.

[Anonymous No.20506739]

>>20506478
Band has staking? I didn't think they had any working oracles

[Anonymous No.20506778]

>>20506739
They switched to Cosmos

[Anonymous No.20507051]

>>20506055
Anons here are just too far gone in the cult of link to see how brilliant band is. Link had a two year headstart and band already has a mainnet up and staking working.

Bands price action has also completely outperformed link this year. Started 2020 at 0.12 link per band, started may/June at something like 0.38 link her band, today we just passed 0.5 link per band. So long as the band team keep on working as they have been (project with most github commits in 2020 btw) Its only a matter of time before we flip link in price and the low 20M circulating supply means we're very likely to go way beyond link in pure price terms. It might not happen in 2020 but I personally feel very confident on this one. Anons should seriously give it a look.

BTW 1000 band is like holding 17.5k link in terms of circulating supply too.

[Anonymous No.20507212]

>>20507051
Band started in 2018 you goon

[Anonymous No.20507344]

>>20507051
Correct, I tried to warn biz a couple times before it passed $2, everyone was just too blinded by link to see the potential here.

[Anonymous No.20507413]

>>20507212
I'm well aware. Do you think Link started the day its ico was over? They will have done shittons of R&D well before anyone had heard of them. Whatever way you look at it Link had a massive headstart and is already behind on the technical side. Link is 90% were it is on its commercial success, its done very well there and band needs to catch up, but on pure technicals link is in the dust. Honestly how are they struggling so hard on staking when band did it in no time whilst also developing a whole new explorer for cosmos?

[Anonymous No.20507553]

>>20507413
But to be fair, band currently isn't on mainnet, and probably doesn't have much data feeds (if any) compared to chainlink. Although this is bullish for band because its room to grow.

[Anonymous No.20507917]

BAND and TRB are the 2 next biggest oracles. I love chainlink but you can't expect them to not have any competition. Having a bag of BAND and TRB is just a solid investment

[Anonymous No.20507975]

>>20506686
oh no no no band is literally a cuck oracle

https://medium.com/kardiachain/kardiachain-announces-strategic-partnership-with-band-protocol-to-power-enterprise-government-d53d3edd99b0

3 months later

https://medium.com/kardiachain/kardiachain-on-boards-chainlink-as-its-recommended-oracle-solution-7bfab0841c6a