We did the needful sirs!

[Anonymous No.20468637]

To Ganesh!

[Anonymous No.20468664]

>>20468637
I like Idena, but they should focus on PoP, making validation easier while retaining AI-proofness, sharding and smart contracts instead of this oracle rhetoric. Pop is unironically so fucking revolutionary in terms of being able to secure a blockchain for minimal costs, that if they just get that right, they will literally eat Eth2.0 for breakfast. They don't even need more identities, whatever 3k nodes they have right now is enough. Once people see Idena smart contracts operating without any scaling bottlenecks and practically without gas costs, they will understand.

Idena is bigger than most DNA holders even realize, and the team's feverous working pace is indicative of the devs being aware of how revolutionary this shit is. Personally I don't even look at DNA price anymore. I know this is going to be a top10 market cap project, so all there is to do is wait.

[Anonymous No.20468756]

>>20468664
This but unironically. Bought LINK at 23c, currently have a 100k stack of DNA. To me Idena is as comfy now as LINK was in 2017.

[Anonymous No.20468759]

>>20468664
based, I don't appreciate the oracle shit either