/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.20386238]

Serious discussion thread for this doc: https://chainlink.docsend.com/view/nfrvnyuuzrf2d5va

I've actually read through a fair bit of it, and it's actually pretty damning. This isn't just FUD, it's a well researched document, and hits on a lot of areas that have already been noted.

What's /biz/'s thoughts?

If you just want to shit post - do it in another thread.

[Anonymous No.20386275]

>>20386238
You had three years

[Anonymous No.20386315]

That’s some dedication to fud. Post it on reddit

[Anonymous No.20386323]

>>20386238
It was shilled here like CRAZY at 40 fucking cents.

TOO LATE

[Anonymous No.20386348]

It's over for Link

[Anonymous No.20386358]

USE THE GODDAMN CATALOG

[Anonymous No.20386395]

>>20386238
>Serious discussion

You are asking people to read 65 pages of FUD the same day Chainlink has hit ATH

[Anonymous No.20386432]

>>20386238
I am willing to discuss it seriously, honestly just ignore the noise caused by teenagers who are scared to lose their 125Linkies. I've actually sold everything now so that I can research more about this on my own. Doesn't matter if it goes up by 1-2 dollars, I still made a lot with link and it actually feels so good to have liquidated that shitcoin after more than a year of holding.

Sooo: Is the problem of high API fees really caused by a correlation to the inflated price? like why would the API call prices be that stictly coupled to the price of the token, that's a stupid design decision imo, didn't actually know that

[Anonymous No.20386487]

so you read the whole thing, and didn't notice how the whole thing has multiple grammar errors and it's hosted on the wrong zeus capital website?

[Anonymous No.20386502]

>>20386238
>https://chainlink.docsend.com/view/nfrvnyuuzrf2d5va

It's really sobering. Honestly what I needed to read right now. Lately the news and price action has been so good that I've been letting myself get a little too optimistic.

My sell strategy right now is to not sell any until A) staking is announced, and B) BTC is past it's ATH - both of those are very likely to be huge catalysts to the upside. But now I think I need to really think hard about my criteria for selling if there's a big dump. Probably breaking the long-term curve on the LINK/BTC chart would be a big one.

[Anonymous No.20386503]

>>20386238
My god.

This is really shocking to behold.

Look, I'm not gonna lie: it's been one hell of a ride. But the writing is on the wall. This report is beyond damning.

I will now be selling my Chainlink (ticker: LINK) tokens to avoid the inevitable crash.

It's a doggy dog world and we 4channel-ers have to look out for eachother. Thank for Zeus Capital and the diligent Anon posters spreading this for your concern over our financial wellbeing.

[Anonymous No.20386530]

>>20386503
Edit: Thank *you Zeus Capital

[Anonymous No.20386542]

>>20386238
>I've actually read through a fair bit of it, and it's actually pretty damning. This isn't just FUD, it's a well researched document, and hits on a lot of areas that have already been noted.


This is not true.

It is riddled with poor English, even in the title "Chainlink is the Crypto's Wirecard"

It has strange accusations, like saying the team is "Very small and experienced" (an accusation which is subjective, and most would say blatantly incorrect. Chainlink has a large team including some very experienced people like Ari Juels. By Crypto standards it has a large, experienced team)

It says Chainlink is still in testnet, whereas chainlink is currently in mainnet.

There is no record of this "Zeus Capital" website. They have no social media following, we cannot see any of their 13F filings, we cannot see any of their previous recommendations. There is no evidence of this being a real firm that has analysts and takes positions.

The website appears to have been created recently, and there is no information about it on whois. I would go as far to say that visiting the website might be unsafe.

[Anonymous No.20386559]

Main-net launched over a year ago.

[Anonymous No.20386579]

>>20386542
Technically, Link isn't "mainnet" as it's not actually fully developed. It still runs on Eth

[Anonymous No.20386580]

why do they say main net is not live when it's live since last year?

[Anonymous No.20386598]

>>20386542
Its a hilarious troll made by a biztard for use on reddit dumbass

[Anonymous No.20386603]

>>20386542
cope

[Anonymous No.20386607]

>>20386579
Chainlink is not, and does not strive to be its only blockchain. Hence the statement that Chainlink is still in testnet is incorrect. Chainlink is live on the ethereum mainnet.

[Anonymous No.20386615]

The people responsible for the fucking chink virus...now create some FUD document to make people poor.

When can we fucking nuke China?????

[Anonymous No.20386623]

>>20386238
Cope harder Op

[Anonymous No.20386654]

>https://who.is/whois/zeus-capital.com

What kind of serious discussion could be made about a low effort bait ?

[Anonymous No.20386658]

>>20386542
Already confirmed the Twitter is fake.

[Anonymous No.20386664]

>>20386432
>>20386432
I’m a old LINK holder who bought at 0.47, I’m predicting a short term dump when normies on twitter find this and then it’ll be back to normal.
I mean it being and elaborate JSON parser didn’t stop link.

[Anonymous No.20386665]

>>20386598
The website has chinese translation which makes me think it could be shady

[Anonymous No.20386669]

>>20386503
>doggy dog world
Kek

[Anonymous No.20386686]

>>20386542

FUCK THEY'RE SO WHITE

SELL EVERYTHING

[Anonymous No.20386698]

>>20386664
Twitter normies have very little impact on the price.

1% of Chainlink holders own 80% of the circulating supply.

[Anonymous No.20386721]

>>20386686
This is a different Zeus Capital.

https://zeuscapital.co.uk/

It's an actual investment firm in the UK, but it is not involved in crypto and has not published anything on chainlink.

[Anonymous No.20386727]

>>20386580
Because it’s the truth? LINK doesn’t have it’s own mainnet, its runs on Ethereum.

[Anonymous No.20386743]

[Anonymous No.20386764]

>>20386238
Pale copy from libra black paper
https://ourfinancialsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Libra-Black-Paper-FINAL-2.pdf

[Anonymous No.20386786]

this is actually unironically super bullish. once it gets exposed more and more as time goes on that this is some shady fud we're going straight to 15$ cap this

[Anonymous No.20386793]

>>20386542
>"Chainlink is the Crypto's Wirecard"
What's wrong about that? Don't you know the story of Wirecard for fucks sake anon?

[Anonymous No.20386872]

>>20386727
Wrong.

They say Chainlink is still on testnet, which is patently false.

>>20386793
I know about wirecard a lot more than you do. The english is correct, as I said. It should be "Chainlink is Crypto's Wirecard"

[Anonymous No.20386877]

>>20386238

[Anonymous No.20386919]

>>20386872
imagine not selling here and thinking this will go up even more. Keep in mind this is not some 15min candle but 1d candle... oooffff

[Anonymous No.20386925]

>>20386872
English is incorrect*

[Anonymous No.20386938]

>>20386542
>>20386598
>>20386721

Ok whew. I'll admit was deadass worried for like two minutes. But yeah this is blatantly fake. Website fake, twitter fake, the tone is wrong in terms of their venomous contempt for Chainlink.

Alright this is hilarious now. Look at the section on the end on shorting link fucking k e k this is just going to fuel our gains more with short squeezes.

[Anonymous No.20386965]

>>20386877
>>20386686
wrong site, this is their site:
https://zeus-capital.com/

[Anonymous No.20387010]

>>20386938
>I'll admit was deadass worried for like two minutes.
Why though? Just cause you dress fud up doesn't make it real.

[Anonymous No.20387076]

>>20386238
Docsend is a file sharing platform. This is literally fud. Someone took the time to write this I can’t believe it lol

[Anonymous No.20387112]

>>20386872
Actually you are wrong.

No staking = no mainnet.

[Anonymous No.20387146]

>>20387112
They state that chainlink is on testnet, which is false.

[Anonymous No.20387244]

This fud has been blasted all over /biz/ for hours now, and yet we're still holding stable at 8.5. Why is that? I'm proud of my /biz/bros for not selling their bags, but it also means that institutional investors, early invested whales, and smaller but still influential accounts are not selling. Plus, since OP and others are buying into this FUD and selling their bags, it means that others are accumulating. Who would that be? Check zeus-capital.com -- it's a chinese run fake agency with only ONE REPORT on the website. If this were a real investment & advising agency, it would have more history to it and more reporting on their website. All they have is "Chainlink Fraud Exposed", which this anon>>20386542 kindly shows is full of garbage. I don't know if anyone has the link, but there was a thread on here a few days back explaining why China is buying so much LINK, having to do with them trying to get out of the Yuan due to its value collapsing, among other things like the Yellow River flooding. (If anyone has the link to that thread, kindly share) The fact that LINK HASN'T gone down after this massive pump AND fud further proves its validity. If this were real, smart whales and institutional investors would have heard about this first and dumped their bags on us a day ago. Rather, LINK is still staying nice and stable around $8.5.

OP, buy back in, you still have a chance to make it. Don't let the chinese take your long held bags from you.

[Anonymous No.20387262]

>>20386503
>It's a doggy dog world

[Anonymous No.20387294]

well, somebody was bored to death

[Anonymous No.20387334]

Guys I just finished reading the report. I feel sick to my stomach
They really played us like a fiddle didn't they?

[Anonymous No.20387336]

>>20386503
>This is really shocking to behold.
>I will now be selling my Chainlink (ticker: LINK) tokens
>(ticker: LINK)
>doggydog world
>4channel-ers
>Thank for Zeus Capital
>diligent Anon posters
This should tell you all you need to know. Take your FUD somewhere else Ming Zhou

[Anonymous No.20387352]

>>20386542
so despite all your criticism of grammar, how can you justify chainlink's objective failures? pic related

[Anonymous No.20387356]

>>20386487
This, lol. It's literally fake and gay.

[Anonymous No.20387389]

>>20386238
The timing of this is mighty suspect
Why wait till now to make an article?

[Anonymous No.20387396]

>>20386542
>>20386238
>>20387352
another example where chainlink's sole purpose, being a reliable oracle, has failed and cost people thousands.
>pic related
i'm sorry you can disagree with fud all you want, but the fact of the matter is chainlink relies on an ecosystem that cannot incentivize and de-incentivize providing proper oracale data in times of high-stress on the network. this would be chainlink's main use-case... and it has failed multiple times....

[Anonymous No.20387405]

So far the only response from Linkies is to point out the non-native English has flaws...

[Anonymous No.20387419]

>>20387389
>why wait until the all-time-high to release a pro-shorting report?
anon, if you're this retarded, please don't trade. they are shorting the top and now seek retail and other institutions to help them solidify the inevitable upcoming red candle

[Anonymous No.20387430]

>>20386938
HOW ARE YOU PEOPLE THIS FUCKING RETARDED
THIS IS THE ULTIMATE WINK AND NOD FROM PEOPLE WHO GET IT

Fuck- when smart people make a 60page tongue and cheek joke screwing over fucktard 110iqs you should be on cloud 9
You really are meant to be poor you fucking idiots

[Anonymous No.20387435]

>>20386503
>Doggy Dog World
Confirmed as Chinese Culinary Century

[Anonymous No.20387451]

>>20386487
It's almost as if there can be two companies with the same name....WOAH

[Anonymous No.20387456]

>>20387405
yep, notice how DESPITE MINOR GRAMMATICAL ERRORS, they provide factual flaws in chainlink that you can INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY YOURSELF. i've read about 2/3 of the report so far and fact checked all of (what seemed like) ridiculous claims.
good luck linkies. you will need it.

[Anonymous No.20387467]

>>20386238
What the hell? I hate chainlink now!

[Anonymous No.20387471]

>>20387352
That's false. There were no cases of oracle failures. Liquidations frequently happen in leveraged products.

Those sentences might fool someone who doesn't know anything about finance but there is no substance to their accusations.

It's actually quite bullish that they couldn't come up with a single piece of legitimate FUD.

[Anonymous No.20387481]

>>20386542
so, you don't like they disapprove of the team, although your argument against is "it's subjective" so you don't actually have a point. you think Link is on mainnet which is just bizzare, as they obviously are not. And you don't like that Zeus Capital isn't a well establish org. Do you have any actual points to make now that you got all your feelings and bad vibes out on the table?

[Anonymous No.20387495]

>>20387430
hi, can you address these issues with chainlink?:
>>20387352
>>20387396
fuck the report. look into these events yourself. chainlink's main use case breaks when the market needs it most, repeatedly.
does this seem like a safe investment?

[Anonymous No.20387519]

Let’s go, fuck you stinkies

[Anonymous No.20387530]

would someone please update me on what's going on with link? why did it pop? I bought in at .3 a couple years ago and just cashed out half my position.

[Anonymous No.20387548]

>>20387456
Would actually be hilarious if after knowing all this Linkies lose everything and it was due to ignoring facts because it wasn't written in perfect English.

Actually a lot of the paper reads at a very high standard, with just a few quirks

Chainlink's main page has a typo for months anyway, so it's kinda funny I guess

[Anonymous No.20387546]

>>20386721
even so
i'm amazed that not one is a jew

[Anonymous No.20387551]

>>20387471
>There were no cases of oracle failures
you know oracles can rely on off-chain data right? best case scenario, they match the uptime of the websource they are crawling

[Anonymous No.20387560]

>>20387396
That was the only case of an oracle failure, and despite it synthetix are still using Chainlink.

>>20387405
Actually, I have pointed out that the paper has factually incorrect statements (like Chainlink being on testnet), bizarre subjective statements that most would disagree with (chainlink having a "very small, inexperienced team"). I've also pointed out that this company has no track record, they have no social media presence, we can not see any of their previous calls, and there is no evidence that they are a real firm that has analysts and takes positions.

[Anonymous No.20387578]

There are chinks ITT who are behind this elaborate FUD, it's so transparent it's hilarious

[Anonymous No.20387583]

>>20386238
My thoughts are nice try. If you want a small portion of my stack $10 is the number.

[Anonymous No.20387590]

>>20387495
YOU ARE RIGHT I have market sold my stack and would recommend you do as well
Thank you

[Anonymous No.20387627]

>>20386503
This made me kek

[Anonymous No.20387632]

>>20387481
Is chainlink on testnet, like the report claims?

>>20387495
The first one is gibberish. There's nothing really to address. It's a bunch of words that might be mistaken for a real point by someone who doesn't know what's going on but if you know anything about finance and derivatives you realise they're talking nonsense.

The second one is true, and is the only case of a chainlink oracle failing (a single piece of data which only had one node and was not providing data for high value contracts, not really an issue with chainlink itself)

[Anonymous No.20387641]

>>20386938
LMAO

Ok thats pretty good

[Anonymous No.20387645]

>>20387471
>>20387471
>That's false. There were no cases of oracle failures
lol. look into what chainlink was reporting eth price during this time.
>hint: it was fucking wrong for SIX HOURS.
>implication: you can't build multi-billion-dollar infrastructure on oracles that are prone to MULTIPLE HOUR FAILURES. the risk is simply too high for any institutions.
https://news.bitcoin.com/eth-price-dai-collateral-loans-makerdao/
but wait, there's more! : https://blockonomi.com/chainlink-pricing-anomaly/
>An error occurred with Chainlink's silver-to-USD (XAG/USD) price feed. For a short period of time, the feed registered a silver ounce price of ~$1,600 instead of market rate of $18.
>>20387471
>>20387471
>>20387471
"there were no cases of oracle failures"

[Anonymous No.20387648]

>>20387334
Very sad, clearly the thing for us to do is to send all of our chainlink to their eth address so they can deal with it professionally

[Anonymous No.20387656]

>>20386238
Thanks for this. Enough material to fool reddit fags

[Anonymous No.20387667]

chainniggers are illiterate good luck getting them to read a document.

[Anonymous No.20387681]

>>20387632
>The second one is true, and is the only case of a chainlink oracle failing (a single piece of data which only had one node and was not providing data for high value contracts,
it cost SNX stakers more than 35,000 USD and that's a SMALL SMALL SMALL use-case. how, then, can chainlink scale to be the multi-trillion dollar forex master-oracle that you autists think it can be?

[Anonymous No.20387686]

>>20387560
Chainlink is still an ERC20 token, and calling it "mainnet" is a bit of a stretch

[Anonymous No.20387689]

>>20387645
You posted a case of a maker dao failure. There is no reference to chainlink. Maker does not currently use chainlink oracles, though they likely will in the future.

[Anonymous No.20387711]

>>20387681
>it cost SNX stakers more than 35,000 USD and that's a SMALL SMALL SMALL use-case. how, then, can chainlink scale to be the multi-trillion dollar forex master-oracle that you autists think it can be?


The fault was with synthetix and the node operator, not with chainlinks technology. The problem would not have happened if they were using multiple nodes. This actually shows the pitfalls of centralized single source oracles.

[Anonymous No.20387730]

>>20387645
Yet Linkies think institutions will let them feed data worth $billions through their Rube Goldberg machine

[Anonymous No.20387744]

>>20387686
Chainlink is currently operating on the ethereum mainnet.

The claim they make is that Chainlink is on testnet which is by any definition false.

[Anonymous No.20387748]

>>20387632
if you read it carefully, they are saying CHAINLINK is a testnet running on ETHEREUM (i.e. the main net of eth). their point is the product is unfinished, full of bugs, and doesn't even have all it's core features built. this is true. it only doesn't make sense if you assume they mean Chainlink is wasting peoples money on an eth testnet that has no money in it, which is obviously retarded. don't act so retarded

[Anonymous No.20387749]

The domain name is bought from namecheap.com in december 2019
the twitter is made in 2014, but they only seem to started tweeting since yesterday, the rest are just retweets of crypto related stuff. Probably bought a bot twitter account

[Anonymous No.20387769]

>>20387744
Operating on a mainnet doesn't make Link "mainnet"... Christ

[Anonymous No.20387779]

Ok since the OP is not a LARP, I'm gonna drop you some good crumbs.
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/n/projects/2129823
Staking is still around a year away.

[Anonymous No.20387802]

>>20387744
>>20387748
here, read it yourself

[Anonymous No.20387804]

>>20387689
>You posted a case of a maker dao failure. There is no reference to chainlink
you absolute fucking retard. yes it was a maker dao failure, but the price meltdown caused arbitragers to stress the network so much it broke the oracles. PLEASE INDEPENDENTLY FACT CHECK THIS: almost 20% of the gas that day were from chainlink oracles.
if you cannot see how they are connected, then i am done discussing with you. best of luck with your impracitcal vaporware!

[Anonymous No.20387805]

>>20386238
chainlink was sued 2 times and it turned out the american military runs it. sergey isnt the real owner and they tried to not give minorities their money.

at the current point many people couldnt withdraw money when they needed to when they bought this year and ended up losing their homes. chainlink killed america. a product of the american military killed white america. 24 million may lose their homes within the next 5 months. it wasnt just gook flu. if they could have cashed out at any time this wouldnt have happened .

aHAhaHAhaHaHaHahahhaHaHaHAHAHA it killed so many apple investors its not even funny

[Anonymous No.20387828]

>>20387744
>chainlink testnet is the same as eth testnet
HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

[Anonymous No.20387837]

>>20387689
>conveniently ignores the XAG oracle failure that cost Synthetix thousands of dollars
right, and a "real" company will someday use it despite the oracles being unreliable and fallible? You think this product is so valuable to big tech that it could someday be valued at 100 billion, and you honestly believe that big tech wouldn't create their own vastly superior version?

>MakerDAO will become a customer!
You obviously haven't read the paper. $15,000/day in SUBSIDIZED pricing to become a Chainlink customer! Or $1 if they continue using their Gnosis oracle. Tough call.

[Anonymous No.20387843]

>>20387802
Linkies can't even comprehend a little ambiguity, yet their entire debunk of this is the bad English

Poor really

[Anonymous No.20387869]

>>20386965
>trusting chinks
You literally deserve to be poor

[Anonymous No.20387898]

Let's see how much this slows down this thread
动 态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门

[Anonymous No.20387901]

>>20387769
That is irrelevant because the claim the report makes is that chainlink is still on testnet.

You repeatedly dodge this and switch to the fact that chainlink is not its own blockchain.

Answer me this: Do you agree with the report that the development stage of Chainlink is "testnet", and that it only runs on the ethereum based testnet? A yes or no will suffice.

[Anonymous No.20387979]

>>20387837
>conveniently ignores the XAG oracle failure that cost Synthetix thousands of dollars


Actually no, I didn't conveniently ignore that. I have addressed it multiple times in this thread.

>You obviously haven't read the paper. $15,000/day in SUBSIDIZED pricing to become a Chainlink customer! Or $1 if they continue using their Gnosis oracle. Tough call.


The Maker team have literally said they will likely use chainlink oracles.

[Anonymous No.20387984]

>>20387645
The XAG thing was a contract typo.
Letting the contract go live was extremely amateurish by the team, but the oracles didn't fail. They provided the information they were asked to provide.

[Anonymous No.20388049]

>>20387901
>Do you agree with the report that the development stage of Chainlink is "testnet"
yes
>and that it only runs on the ethereum based testnet
no, they specifically talk about the testnet risking user funds, which means they were never talking about an eth testnet

[Anonymous No.20388059]

>>20387901
I would argue Link is still testnet, despite what the team claim. In crypto mainnet has always meant when the coin switches to its own chain

Nobody said it is Ethereum testnet either - just your poor reading comprehension

[Anonymous No.20388061]

>>20386238
Congrats on this, seriously

[Anonymous No.20388103]

drns

[Anonymous No.20388154]

>>20387419
We may be going higher than this fren

[Anonymous No.20388184]

>>20388059
Mainnet=own blockchain lmao look at this jackass

For all you nulinkers: reputation.link has network performance metrics and is a good source of daya

[Anonymous No.20388191]

>>20386238
do you really think one person here will read this?

[Anonymous No.20388238]

>>20386238
>We replicated the system by using 7 computers (this is decentralized lmfao)
>This costs $1.1 a day
Yikes
>There have been 2m transactions since inception on chainlink network
>Assuming that all of these were facilitated by smartcontract.com
These transactions were facilitated by the decentralized node system, the operators got paid not sergey. Every single page just has some glaring assumption or blatant lie and the disclaimer notes that it's a satirical piece.

[Anonymous No.20388313]

>>20388049
>>20388059
Chainlink is not a blockchain. Being on testnet would mean operating on ethereum testnet or other testnets and not operating on mainnet.

That's all there is to say to this really, saying chainlink is blatantly incorrect and FUD so I won't address this any more.

[Anonymous No.20388349]

Lmao this is just an attempt to flush out the normies, and for whales to increase their stack

[Anonymous No.20388380]

>>20388349
But they forgot that Linkmarines are literally illiterate chimps.

[Anonymous No.20388390]

>>20386721
Not a single nigger or muslim in the team, i'm so fucking jealous.

[Anonymous No.20388438]

>>20388349
Yeah it's blatant and fraudulent market manipilation.

[Anonymous No.20388445]

>>20387451
so ur gonna ignore the first part though where this was someone clearly written by someone not in a professional setting? tard ass

[Anonymous No.20388453]

>>20386238
This is fucking legendary.

[Anonymous No.20388454]

>>20388313
>Being on testnet would mean operating on ethereum testnet or other testnets and not operating on mainnet
that's a blatent lie. tons of projects have done testnets on eth mainnet. you are either too new to know how solidity dev works or just appealing to absurd definitions because you ran put of arguments. you seem emotional, you wouldn't have money in Link, would you?

[Anonymous No.20388894]

>>20386872
>I know about wirecard a lot more than you do.
Do you have anything good to read about it? Preferably something in detail, written by a bank.
t. zoomer who wants to work in finance

[Anonymous No.20388938]

>>20387898
do you realize this doesn't actually do something you fucking retard
anybody who visits 4chan from China is using a proxy anyways

[Anonymous No.20388952]

>>20388894
Read all the FT articles

https://ffj-online.org/2018/01/23/wirecard-ag-the-great-indian-shareholder-robbery/

read these guys

https://www.mca-mathematik.com/

and these guys

[Anonymous No.20388966]

>>20386238
>well researched document

Lmao. Christ OP you're probably the type of rube who thought the Steele dossier wasn't 4chan fan fiction too of trump pissing on hookers.

[Anonymous No.20388973]

>>20388952
thanks anon

[Anonymous No.20389015]

DAMN this looks pretty fucking bad ahhahahahahahahhaa. i know quite a bit about link and pretty much everything they are saying is true

[Anonymous No.20389026]

>>20387645
>lol. look into what chainlink was reporting eth price during this time.
>>hint: it was fucking wrong for SIX HOURS.
No it wasn't, gas prices exploded meaning transactions took longer to process.
This has nothing to do with the oracles themselves, but with ETH's scaling.

>An error occurred with Chainlink's silver-to-USD (XAG/USD) price feed.
That's a contract typo, not an oracle failure.

Seething copelet.

[Anonymous No.20389069]

>>20386432
>Is the problem of high API fees really caused by a correlation to the inflated price
no

[Anonymous No.20389082]

>>20387802
>>20387843
That doesn't make any sense.
They're implying Chainlink promised to have its own blockchain to replace ETH lmao.

Chainlink has been on mainnet for a year now.

[Anonymous No.20389100]

>>20386665
Doesn't Vitalik speak Chinese?

[Anonymous No.20389261]

This is very well done but they are some easily verifieble facts that they lie about

Adelyn does disclose her chain link role on LinkedIn and
Mark Oblad left chain link and he is no longer shown on a teams page

[Anonymous No.20389332]

>>20389026
>No it wasn't, gas prices exploded meaning transactions took longer to process.
>This has nothing to do with the oracles themselves, but with ETH's scaling.
this could still cause a loss of potentially millions of dollars. oooopsies
>That's a contract typo, not an oracle failure.
not an excuse for a billion dollar company

[Anonymous No.20389347]

>>20386487
Seriously. Who the fuck put this thing together?

[Anonymous No.20389364]

Didnt read not selling

[Anonymous No.20389403]

>>20389332
>this could still cause a loss of potentially millions of dollars. oooopsies
It didn't cause any losses for projects like Aave and bzx.
Things just slowed down for a little bit until the ETH congestion cleared up.

[Anonymous No.20389423]

>>20386395
This is at the bottom of the disclaimer. Basically calling it bullshit pasta fud.

[Anonymous No.20389471]

My dearest friend, 'tis with immense pleasure that I inform you that your letter has found safe travel to my destination and landed in my hands. However, this pleasure was fated to remain short lived and bittersweet, for I must also admit to you, regardless of what distress it may cause to you, knowing you went to great trouble to pen it and deliver it to me, that I in fact declined to open it and refused to read the message contained within. Surmising your intentions, there exists no doubt in my heart regarding your sincere worries for my financial well being, but alas your attempts to convince me to modify my investment strategies shall regretfully remain futile, as my stubbornness in this matter has indeed been sealed irrevocably and no other voice shall rock its imperturbable foundations. Allow me then to reiterate my will once more, and do your best to forever remember it for no change will follow: I shan't part ways with my beloved asset for it is my utmost belief that I have invested wisely and foresee infinite potential in its future, and therefore no other possession in this world shall change my decision, not even a mountain of gold! For my possessed asset is indeed fated to be worth more than any other riches in the world. We shan't speak of this no more. Sincerely yours, your beloved friend.

[Anonymous No.20389609]

The evolution of Link FUD is fucking astonishing. Can't wait for 2021 $300 Link FUDs, bet its going to be MSM shitting on it.

[Anonymous No.20389664]

>>20389082
>They're implying Chainlink promised to have its own blockchain to replace ETH
is that really your only game? pretend "mainnet" means "independent chain"??

[Anonymous No.20389692]

It's funny, I'm not spending too much time on 4chan, but I am a regular. I was always kinda surprised people outside of /biz/ rarely speak of LINK and that volume is (or was...) so low. Anyway, something finally clicked in my head after looking through this document and now I realize what's happening.

Well fucking played, anons. It's pretty amazing how much power a bunch of virgin neets has if they put their heads together.

I wonder though if it isn't the end days and the fud campaign will finally be overwhelmed :(

[Anonymous No.20389712]

>>20389664
> pretend "mainnet" means "independent chain"??
That's what they're doing.

[Anonymous No.20390272]

>>20386238
You know what's funny about that document?
It was written for a long time, but price of chain link was updated to YESTERDAYS PRICE to fit the narrative.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
ABSOLUTE KEK!!!

[Anonymous No.20390302]

please tell me it has pregnant sergey in it

[Anonymous No.20390328]

>>20390302
No, in this thing the fud is that Sergey's womb is barren.

[Anonymous No.20390743]

I'm so fucking sick of crypto... finally i buy chainlink and now its LITERALLY A SCAM

I'm up 8% and thats enough for me, fuck this shitcoin

[Anonymous No.20391060]

now that everyone realizes the hit piece is the scam and LINK is legit, it just reached its previous high of $8.74 again, yet another "double top".

[Anonymous No.20391190]

>>20389712
kek I know it's not well written but you have to be ESL yourself to not be able to parse that sentence.
>ethereum-based testnet
as in
>a testnest based on the ethereum chain
NOT
>a testnet based on an ethereum testnest
you are just retarded anon

[Anonymous No.20391370]

>>20390743
Lol, hands so weak some chinese scam shook him loose

[Anonymous No.20391399]

>>20391190
They're implying Chainlink promised to launch their own blockchain, and that they're still on ETH as a testnet.
They're retarded and ignorant.

[Anonymous No.20391457]

>>20386323
And at 20c, which is when I finally caved & bought in case the meme magic was real. All these salty newfags need to fuck right off.

[Anonymous No.20391460]

Don't worry. Scams pump the hardest.

[Anonymous No.20391484]

>>20386238
Read my dubs

NEVER EVER SELLING

[Anonymous No.20391557]

>>20391399
>They're implying Chainlink promised to launch their own blockchain
that's NOT what mainnet means you FUCKING RETARD LOL EVEN THE CHINKS THAT WROTE THIS KNOW THAT

[Anonymous No.20391566]

come on people the trolls are making false comments on the reddits and they're actually visible, i'm visibly shaking right now

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/hrrh4p/cryptos_wirecard_the_chainlink_fraud_exposed_zeus/

[Anonymous No.20391572]

>>20391557
>that's NOT what mainnet means
I know.
They don't.

[Anonymous No.20391601]

>>20391572

[Anonymous No.20391602]

Its FUD.

Same shit different day.

[Anonymous No.20391604]

This is the website listed on the paper. It has no content other than the LINK fud. There is no information surrounding it's origin or creators.
>https://zeus-capital.com/

This is not to be confused with the legit reputable Zeus capital, website found here:
>https://zeuscapital.co.uk/

The Zeus capital who released the paper is a fake organisation. The paper itself is filled with emotive language and buzzwords to scare off potential interest in LINK.

DON'T LET THIS AFFECT YOUR RETURNS

Paste this information wherever you see LINK fud being spread using this inflammatory paper

[Anonymous No.20391676]

>>20391566
Kek these always crack me up

[Anonymous No.20391767]

>>20386238
I must admit that the rise of this shitcoin leaves me bewildered.

[Anonymous No.20391836]

>>20391767
how did you not see this coming? it was literally prophesied.

[Anonymous No.20391858]

>>20386238
Reminder that Nico wrote this.

[Anonymous No.20391972]

>>20386686
kek a white man named Tremayne