[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 180 KB, 1920x1080, g2g4sg2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20308820 No.20308820 [Reply] [Original]

>RLC gets basically 100% confirmation that they are partnering with AWS
>LINK gets nothing
>Both RLC and LINK are presenting with MICROSOFT on the 30th

>LINK goes parabolic with 11,650 BTC
>RLC gets a little 12% boost with 581 BTC

What's going on here? Are RLC's whales too strong? Is LINK uncontrollable now? Did the whales die or give up?

>> No.20308844

>>20308820
link has more eyes on it and retail fomo

>> No.20308873

>>20308820
Also from what I can see, there's around 309,000 LINK(300BTC) until 150k sats(1.8x) while there is 1M RLC(157BTC) until 27k sats(2.5x)

>> No.20308895

>>20308844
Is it because only biz knows about the AWS thing? Haven't seen it on twitter yet. What caused LINK's gain? I didn't see any news besides the presentation EOM with MS and RLC

>> No.20308932

It’s a good thing, let people fomo into LINK for now, it will make our rise to top 10 even greater. Just keep buying, I don’t care how many you have even 5 RLC will be a huge amount in couple of years time.

>> No.20308988

>>20308932
Stay delusional. RLC WILL CRASH TO 0.5
until then, resist the urge to fomo

>> No.20309011
File: 396 KB, 1053x1425, 1562694429656.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20309011

>>20308820
BEND THE KNEE RLC KEKS AND STARE UPON THE GLORIOUS VISAGE OF YOUR LORD OF THE DECENTRALIZED ORACLES (DORACLES)

>> No.20309018

>>20308932
>>20308988
I hold a lot of both I'm just curious about the market psychology here.

>> No.20309020

>>20308988


Saiheem, who let you run away from the street step before the non-loo poo quota was met?

>> No.20309040

>>20308820
what does the rlc token even do? beside pay for subscription

>> No.20309055

>>20308988
Like it crash to 0.20 last week? Deluded morons sold 10k and desperately want to get back

>> No.20309074

>>20308895
AWS rumor was denied by the team. They even removed the logo from that graphic

>> No.20309086

>>20309040
It does a lot of stuff. Mainly used on the iExec marketplace to trade for computing or data and you have to stake it to run a worker. Pretty great tokenomics.

Not sure what you mean by pay for subscription

>> No.20309106

>>20309074
You really think the team came to a mongolian link weaving forum to deny breadcrumbs that would pump their coin? Cmon now.

The logo is still there if you scroll down and click the image. https://iex.ec/iexec-for-enterprise/

>> No.20309321

>>20309074
Holy shit amount of desperate fud choke on curry jeet

>> No.20309365

>>20309086
i just saw on their website and they say like - clients can pay with rlc or something like that. ubt style

>> No.20309386

>>20309106
They removed it from the picture on their website, they just forgot to update that source image. I guarantee if someone points this out to them it will be removed within a day

>> No.20309391

Its... Its all true.
RLC is going to make me rich.

>> No.20309396

>>20308895
You are dumb. LINK had a lot of news when it was kept being rejected at 5 bucks. Now it is finally being priced in

>> No.20309397

>>20308844
also three years of massive accumulation

>> No.20309418

>>20309386
But you seem to ignore that it was there in the first place. They never announced any AWS but announced all that other stuff.

And who would go to their website right now anyways? A bunch of autists looking for breadcrumbs. Well, that happened if you saw that 300 post thread yesterday.

Even if they removed it, we still saw it. Instead of pushing against what you think could be, why not just buy a bag and see where it goes? The chart isn't horrible and it should be clear by now that iExec is not a scam.

>> No.20309440

>>20309396
Is that why? It could be. It's just very odd how RLC got amazon breadcrumbs and pumped then LINK followed right after for no apparent reason.

>> No.20309467

>>20309440
The even crazier part is BTC pumped for a short couple mins then went right back to 9220.

>> No.20309517

i've missed so many trains. it has been nine motherfucking years. i will not be left behind on RLC. this is the one.

>> No.20309778

>>20309517
the only play for based trans anons

>> No.20309881

>>20309517
Yea I bet many anons like you came to same conclusion. If iexec won't properly moon and I mean +1000x non of this crypto shit fest will hell they are in partnership or in contact with every tech giant advising and pioneering technology AND THE STARTED THAT FOROM GOD DAMN 2001 LET THAT SINK IN

>> No.20309883

It's pretty simple, LINK pumpamentals are vastly superior

>> No.20309893

>>20309881
What does iexec do?

>> No.20309935

>>20309893
digital tranny lube

>> No.20310060

>RLC is short for “Run on Lots of Computers.”

Honestly this is what's holding me back from buying.

>> No.20310100

>>20309883
They are actually basically the same, staking.
>>20309881
Yeah you make a lot of sense. iExec is so deep within the circle of tech giants that if it fails who knows.
>>20309893
It's basically a world-wide decentralized supercomputer that works right now and only biz knows about it.
>>20310060
It makes sense when you consider that it's a worldwide supercomputer.

>> No.20310112

>>20308988
You have no idea what you’re talking about. Just go and read something please.

>> No.20310148

>>20308844
This. People will probably fomo into RLC in the next few weeks though. It COULD go parabolic and hit LINK level market caps, but most likely it will have to take a few breaks.

>> No.20310190

>>20310148
If they announce something big with Amazon or Microsoft it could easily get to 1B within a month.

>> No.20310243

>>20309893
It's same as everyone needs oracles or link in that name same everything runs on computations and every wants that to be cheap and secure as possible. I suggest anons just take one day and do some reserch

>> No.20310590

>>20310243
my bad

>> No.20310608

>>20310590
The phrase that all non-RLC holders will be saying EOM and especially EOY

>> No.20310850

Just FUD and accumulate

>> No.20310882

>>20308820
stop shilling i need to buy back at .50

>> No.20310885

>>20310850
You had 4 years for each LINK and RLC, why do you need that long? We all want to make it this year.

>> No.20310926

>>20310850
I fell for same kind of fud back in 2018 could have bought 150k links but noooo its a scam better buy this totally smart 120 IQ shitcoin that went minus 95%. And same type of fud to rlc even sometimes word for word same. Some evil motherfuckers desperately trying to manipulate sentiments of this place

>> No.20311071

>>20310926
It's very easy to see through after you've been here long enough. The good projects are the ones that stick around and RLC has been around for a long time with some dedicated shillers.

>> No.20311084
File: 149 KB, 1280x799, EcgkkQGXgAAcoQA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20311084

If you know, you know.

>> No.20311336

>>20311084
And that was known how many years? Ignorance of this place sometimes is mind blowing

>> No.20311410

>>20311084
Damn never saw that image, vitalik knows about iExec? They are pointing right at it wtf

>> No.20311428

>>20309365
Stakers stake RLC and workers get paid rlc for tasks; this will eventually be one of the most used crypto assets there is; digital oil is not just a meme and it will by the power of memes also have a moon in price like physical oil barrels; an anom posted an article written about the token economics! It even explained why the team decided to make all RLC circulate from the start ( fair ) it was great

>> No.20311470

>>20311428
What is the purpose of staking iexec?

>> No.20311472

>>20309418
I have a bridge to sell you lmao.

Not even saying Iexec is a shitcoin, but literally every fucking shitcoin says they are partnered with microsoft/amazon/google/banks wether its true or not.

>> No.20311665

>>20311410
shopped I think (look at the card on vitaliks neck)

>> No.20311706
File: 74 KB, 1039x863, 5135424f3424234.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20311706

>>20311472
And I have a coin to sell you?
Just look man, it's all there

>> No.20311743
File: 14 KB, 680x451, itsovergilles.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20311743

>>20311706
>if we keep joining startup programs we can say we've partnered with them all

>> No.20311891

24h real volume on rlc is still only 10 million bucks compared to links nearly 700 million. rlc is a pump and dump scam.

>> No.20311930

>>20311891
RLC is only known by biz.

>> No.20311982

>>20311930
needs a stream of integrations & more streams / talks from the team.

i sold my stack a while back because of this kept dropping back into obscurity. might pick it back up again when I see this though

>> No.20311993
File: 453 KB, 1307x879, BSN chainlink diagram.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20311993

>>20308820
>>LINK gets nothing
Buddy. Dude.

>> No.20312120

>>20311993
why are they using chainlink nodes instead of using the chainlink code with their own nodes? its privately validated right

>> No.20312138

>>20312120
You have no idea how Chainlink works.

>> No.20312795

>>20312138
not an answer

it can be set up on private nodes if they're the ones validating anyway, not everything needs maximum decentralization

>> No.20312822

>>20311993
Wasn't this priced in a while back?
I'm just saying usually pumps like that need some kind of news

>> No.20312826

>>20311891
link used to have 1million volume at 150million mcap. rlc is looking way better in that regard

>> No.20312875
File: 129 KB, 474x351, 1594448224095.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20312875

>>20308820
Pee pee poo poo, calling some rendering farm is not the hard problem of contract automation.

>> No.20313211

Make sure you have at least 100 RLC it’s super easy to get no matter what your current situation is that way in 5 years you’ll have some decent money to purchase whatever the next big thing will be. What’s there to lose?

>> No.20313238
File: 1.23 MB, 1920x1200, 1456931532590.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20313238

>sold at $1.10 after falling for the pajeet scam
>ready to buy back twice the volume at $0.5

I am 50cent, and I am ready to bury my face inside the thicc ass of cute anime girls after i successfully buy the dip at 0.5

>> No.20313249

>>20313211
FUD. 100$ EOY

>> No.20313251

>>20313211
that 100 rlc is gonna turn into $50 real soon

>> No.20313254

>>20312822
>Wasn't this priced in a while back?
lmao no

Chainlink dumped every time it was brought up.
And when confirmation came, BTC took a turbodump to stop Chainlink from pumping because of it.

>> No.20313268

>>20313254
Okay maybe my memory sucks then. Either way I'm not complaining lol.
>>20313249
FUD $11,490 EOY

>> No.20313269

>>20312795
On-chain "validation" has nothing to do with oracle computations.
You're spewing absolute nonsense.

>> No.20313292
File: 375 KB, 2258x1150, link bsn china government news red date twice.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20313292

>>20313268
Pic shows Link dumping twice on BSN rumors.

The image on the left is the first time this BSN/Chainlink rumor surfaced.

>> No.20313300

>>20313292
Well that's quite interesting, I can't believe I never saw that

>> No.20313472
File: 37 KB, 371x941, June 24 BSN confirmation breakout BTC suppression.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20313472

>>20313300
Checked.

And when official BSN confirmation did finally come on June 23, Chainlink started pumping but BTC took a turbodump to put a stop to it.

>> No.20313502

damn if this actually does go to .50 do you think I should pick some up anons?

>> No.20313534

>>20313502
also forgot to ask, what do you anons use to buy?

>> No.20313535

>>20313502
>if someone eats a suspicious apple and it turns out not to be poisoned after all, do you think I should eat it instead of him?

>> No.20313579
File: 375 KB, 1175x1221, btc suppressing chainlink interwork alliance.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20313579

>>20313300
And it's not like BSN was the only major recent Chainlink news that was never priced in.
Like the InterWork Alliance, with Microsoft, IBM, Nasdaq, AMD, ... in early June.

As soon as this was announced, Bitcoin instantly took another turbodump to stop Chainlink from pumping.

>> No.20313631
File: 202 KB, 1200x1200, 50-Cent.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20313631

>>20313502
Chad reporting. I suggest you lower your buy margin before fully committing to RLC.

I'll buy at 0.5 simply because I have the means to do so.

If not it's hardly worth the risk.

>> No.20313650

>>20313535
>>if someone falseflags and it turns out they're a retard after all, do you think I should filter his id?

>> No.20313668

>>20313502
It's never going below $1 again

>> No.20313677

>>20313650
t. doesn't know what "false flaggin" means.

>> No.20313812

>>20313668
Kek
This is exactly what's needed to push it to $0.50, imaginary emotional hopium.
The same thing that made you buy the top will also make you sell the bottom.

>> No.20313893

>>20308820
After the doracle fiasco and extremely predictable pump and dumps with every single new V release, why are you even barking at linkies? You worthless, shit-eating nigger. Get back to prostrating yourself before Lord Sergey like your faguette master Gilles has already.

>> No.20314143

>>20313677
t. asshurt link shill

>> No.20314225
File: 11 KB, 200x202, 1578390056558.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20314225

>>20314143
>asshurt
yes fren, been a horrible day for them linkies

>> No.20314249

Sold a lot of Link for RLC yesterday.
I am stupid.
I want to switch back, even for a loss, but I can't.
Oh god.