All memes aside, how many of you guys have more than 100k LIT?

[Anonymous No.20267297]

I feel like 100k is the bare minimum amount of LIT that is reasonable to hold now, it's dirt cheap (literally anyone could afford that) and the potential is HUGE

[Anonymous No.20267317]

>>20267297
>All memes aside
How can you say that when the project itself is a meme?

[Anonymous No.20267407]

>>20267297
How dare you.

[Anonymous No.20267504]

>>20267297
WTF is LIT?
PS. Using that autistic glove puppet to shill your shitcoin isn't the best plan you ever came up with, is it?

[Anonymous No.20267527]

>>20267297
Me

[Anonymous No.20267549]

>>20267317
>>20267504


>Not an argument: The post
>>20267297
50k is also more than enough to make it in most of the countries in the world (except for burgerland or scandinavia maybe). t. 65k holder

[Anonymous No.20267799]

>>20267549
>except for burgerland or scandinavia maybe
Well I live in Switzerland and I feel like 100k LIT is the bare minimum to get decent money, 1 million USD is not much here

[Anonymous No.20267814]

>>20267504
>WTF is LIT?
Lition, DYOR and thank me later
We are sub-ico price and you can get advantage of massive staking rewards
get in before consensus fix and mainnet release

[Anonymous No.20267816]

>>20267799
>Implying LIT will only hit 10$

Ohhh sweet summerchild...

[Anonymous No.20267839]

>>20267816
dude that would be a 1 billion market cap.
it's NOT BAD
let's start from hitting that okay? I'm not saying it's the best case scenario

[Anonymous No.20267882]

>>20267839
Yeah but imo the general market cap of cryptos will rise to higher levels than 2017 which would be a top40 position with a 1 bln mcap. Just saying

[Anonymous No.20267900]

>>20267882
I agree, don't know if in 5 or 8-10 years but we'll get and stay there

[Anonymous No.20267966]

Richard is either an extraordinary scammer or the worst imaginable CEO. I've never witnessed so much brain-melting waste of potential anywhere else in the crypto business.

[Anonymous No.20267995]

>>20267966
>worst imaginable CEO
Based retard, lition energy is doing great with their centralized databases. He's a scammer only in the sense that he's using buzzwords to promote his business, as a good CEO should do. People don't even know that in Germany you CANNOT cut down the middleman when trading energy. It's fucking hilarious.

[Anonymous No.20268309]

why is the volume so painfully low?

[Anonymous No.20268330]

>>20267995
They have made at least $5 million pure profit from us witlh their virtual/fake Lition Technology AG last year and how did they use this money? What did we get in return? Nothing but bearshit.

[Anonymous No.20268340]

>>20268309
>why is the volume so painfully low
They have been exposed too many times

[Anonymous No.20268347]

>>20268330
>What did we get in return? Nothing but bearshit
That's an absolute win from their business point of view. Lohwasser is damn good at this game

[Anonymous No.20268367]

>mcap
>1.7 million
so uh, nobody is holding this? one person is holding this?
is anyone even developing this?

[Anonymous No.20268421]

>>20268367
>is anyone even developing this
They got a master student from Argentina working part time on it. Where working means copy pasting Quorum code and find replacing quorum with lition

[Anonymous No.20268959]

>>20268421
that's only the public github my dear retard, they have the good stuff in private repositories

[Anonymous No.20269085]

>>20268421
Who cares as long as it works and we get the mainnet solid...

[Anonymous No.20269151]

>>20267814
Sorry but this piece of shit project with a sub par team won't go anywhere. Promising once but my god the team is horrible.

[Anonymous No.20269186]

>>20268330
Haha yeah they already dumped on he market and tried to mask it with hiding the transactions under bridge TX ids. What a bunch of faggots really.

[Anonymous No.20269212]

>>20268309
Because they dump on the market when it goes up. With so many good and transparent projects there is no need to touch this gypsie shit.

[Anonymous No.20269261]

>>20269186
>they already dumped on he market
those were ecosystem tokens, they are supposed to be sold. And by selling at the peak they got way more ETH than what they would have got selling now. More resources for the ecosystem, kid

[Anonymous No.20269268]

>>20269151
>>20269212
>>20269186
You hope

[Anonymous No.20269332]

>>20269261
Yes, but that doesn't take away the fact they tried to hide it to not create FUD. These people have no idea about the does and don't in the crypto space and they're paying the price now. How many have you staked, child? Let's hope the mainnet won't fail again.

[Anonymous No.20269389]

>>20269332
>These people have no idea about the does and don't in the crypto space
that's true and that's why we can keep buying while it's incredibly undervalued
How many have you staked, child? Let's hope the mainnet won't fail again.
60k in a 12 month contract since January, ~75k waiting for more news on mainnet and trust nodes, might come already in September

[Anonymous No.20269406]

>>20269332
>Yes, but that doesn't take away the fact they tried to hide it to not create FUD

Yeah dude. How dare they hide a normal transaction when there is mouthbreathing retards like you who cannot read whitepapers like every other human and cry "SCAM1111!!!!" when they see a transaction from a project wallet you dont understand. Literally off yourselves

[Anonymous No.20269770]

I have about 60k locked 12 months. If they succeed that amount will already be good enough in the long run. If they fail, I would not have lost much. I'm waiting for some decisive news, for now it's been quite disappointing. Maybe I'll buy more if they reach an important milestone.

[Anonymous No.20269809]

>>20269770
>Maybe I'll buy more if they reach an important milestone.
There is no way they don't release the mainnet, you might just buy now instead of buying the inevitable pump after insiders get in in advance

[Anonymous No.20269909]

>>20269809
They already failed going mainnet once and don't look like to make any solid progress on the consensus issue. They focus much more on the energy than on the blockchain. Can't blame them ofc but I would not say it helps getting confidence in the near future prospects. I know it can't really get much lower than it is now, but what guarantee do we have they will succeed eventually?

[Anonymous No.20270080]

>>20269909
sure, technically we don't have a 100% guarantee they will manage

[Anonymous No.20270095]

>>20269770
>60k
not bad

[Anonymous No.20270294]

>>20270095
I decided to buy when I knew my wife was pregnant. I picked up a project with potential but still cheap enough, I'm not a gambler and didn't want to put too much money in it. Hopefully these 60k will be good enough to help my children have a good start in life.

[Anonymous No.20271379]

>>20267549
what a handsome male

[Anonymous No.20271804]

>>20271379
that's a female

[mikefrommoon No.20272061]

so any telegram rankeesh gang here who can tell us what is going on with shittion in the last few weeks?
why did they migrate to 14 new staking pools?
why are they sending the 1800ether to multiple new wallets?
why didn't they cashout anything from all that money?
what are they gonna do with that money?
mainnet v2 eta wen?

[Anonymous No.20272124]

is the coding still outsourced to 2 random Estonians?

[Anonymous No.20272450]

>>20267297
I have 330k staked, if the project gains more exposure I am a guaranteed millionaire, if not then life goes on.

[Anonymous No.20272534]

>>20267966
fucking nice pepe, saved

[Anonymous No.20272561]

>>20272124
no
>>20272450
>330k
seed investor?

[Anonymous No.20272581]

>>20270294
Godspeed my man

[Anonymous No.20272636]

>>20272561
No, dca over time. I'm up on the investment overall but I don't worry about it too much. The only way to make it in crypto is to spot a project that is worth it, buy early and hold no matter the fud and price fluctuations.