2020 predictions

[Anonymous No.20188888]

Btc dominance under 50%
1 trillion market cap
$100 link
Eth $2000
Defi booming

[Anonymous No.20188912]

>>20188888
$100 is FUD

[Anonymous No.20188935]

>>20188888
Checked

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

[Anonymous No.20188946]

>>20188888
Checked but link 100 is fud

[Anonymous No.20188970]

Thanks just bought 11link. Gotta start somewhere.

[Anonymous No.20188992]

>>20188888
Check’d

[Anonymous No.20189007]

>>20188888
NIMIQ is gonna steamroll its way to top 20 when OASIS is implemented. That, and the change to Albatross, will give it Visa-tier capabilities for payment processing.

[Anonymous No.20189041]

>>20188888
Correct

+ Smart contracts is the new buzzword all over town

[Anonymous No.20189042]

Marketcaps:
2 - VET
3 - ADA
7 - LINK
18 - RLC

Screencap this

[Anonymous No.20189049]

>>20188888
witnessed

[Anonymous No.20189079]

>>20188888
Very nice. $100 per LINK is fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD), though.

[Anonymous No.20189083]

>>20188888
Cheeeecked

[Anonymous No.20189087]

>>20189049

Ha the guy in the back is wearing Sergey flannel

[Anonymous No.20189099]

i am rich.

[Anonymous No.20189111]

>>20189099
In the near future brother

[Anonymous No.20189121]

>>20188888
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.
Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.
'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.
The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

[Anonymous No.20189132]

everyone who bought AMPL under 100 mil mcap is rich

[Anonymous No.20189166]

>>20189121
This is an acceptable try.

[Anonymous No.20189200]

>>20189132
Shilling is not welcome here

[Anonymous No.20189221]

>>20188888
>Eth $2000
LINK cucked ETH.

[Anonymous No.20189499]

>>20188888
You missed a few zeroes there.
At least $ 10000
>>20189099
>>20189111
And checkerino.

We're all in this together, literally.

[Anonymous No.20189644]

>>20188888
KEK=LINK

[Anonymous No.20189661]

>>20188888
>>20189099
>>20189111
>>20189166
>>20189200
>>20189499
>>20189644
>pee pee poo poo

[Anonymous No.20189782]

>>20189121
The winds of change are blowing. Someone will be the first company in line and get the first mover advantage. Everything is different now and old business models will be phased out.

[Anonymous No.20190119]

>>20189121
Companies that take advantage of the cost-saving, streamlining possibilities of crypto will leap ahead of those that don’t. I worked for a company in 1995 that was still using telex. E-mail existed then, and I offered to show them how to use it. When the boomers finally moved the WWII guys out at the top, they adopted the new technology pretty quickly. The same will happen with the new crypto model. It is inevitable, and as society moves from a HIGH trust society to a highly diverse, multicultural LOW trust society, the ability to find “trustFUL” partners diminishes, and the need for crypto and its trustless model is well accentuated.

[Anonymous No.20190140]

>>20188888
checkerino
But LINK short term moon is like 20 and ETH is a mess. Staking gets us to 500 tops.

[Anonymous No.20190166]

>>20190140
>ETH staking
But there could be a FOMO wave when it gets pumped by traders who see what just happened to ADA. We’ve now doubled up since the Shelley announcement.