/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.20084468]

TONIGHT

https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1278879913962098689?s=21

[Anonymous No.20084488]

>>20084468
>dumps
WHAT IS THIS WICKEDNESS

[Anonymous No.20084492]

>>20084468
WE

[46 !!y9pM1O7kKh0 No.20084503]

>>20084492
EJACULATE

[Anonymous No.20084504]

>>20084468
Why is this off brand dog gobbler exchange the first to run a nodule?

[Anonymous No.20084507]

Is chainlink not a scam ?

[Anonymous No.20084508]

>>20084468
WHAT WAS THAT WICK 5.78 HOLY

[Anonymous No.20084673]

>>20084468
>huobi
It’s cool that we’re getting well recognized players to give chain link the validation it needs/deserves
But btc/eth, btc/usdt, eth/usdt, link/eth
Don’t we already have these?
Someone explain to me, what’s the significance of this?
Is it just more security so users of potentially large scale projects can feel more comfortable?
Like if I’m building a defi app with an Asian base maybe I’d want to source my data more largely from huobi?

[42 No.20084683]

Jesus was right after all. This is the second coming. The center cannot hold. Trump will win 2020. Q predicted this.

[Anonymous No.20084694]

>>20084673
It’s to list DMG

[Anonymous No.20084755]

>>20084673
maybe, they are getting comfortable with running a CL node. then the next step is KRW related feeds for smart contract executed in korea and payouts in local currency

[Anonymous No.20085017]

>>20084683
Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.20085422]

>>20084468
We are making it THIS YEAR
THIS IS THE YEAR

[Anonymous No.20085716]

>>20084468
>Huobi

Literally who lmao

[Anonymous No.20085759]

>>20085716
topkek

[Anonymous No.20085768]

>>20084694
break it down for me

[Anonymous No.20085795]

>>20084468
Take this down

[Anonymous No.20085819]

Literally a json parser for price feeds
You link shills are completely retarded

[Anonymous No.20086017]

>>20084683
>Muh Trump

shut the fuck up retard

[42 No.20086050]

>>20086017
Trump is the god emperor and the second coming of jesus. Look at the numbers. Q sent me.

[Anonymous No.20086090]

is it true that sergio bascanov is actually related to satashi matamoshi?

[Anonymous No.20086560]

>>20086017
>it was her turn

[Anonymous No.20086662]

>>20085422
Lmao that picture is hilarious

[Anonymous No.20087488]

>>20084468
Holy shit.
Isn't Huobi one of the absolute biggest crypto exchanges out there?

[Anonymous No.20087828]

>>20084468
INDUSTRY STANDARD. Everyone will be using Chainlink in the future for every settlement.

[Anonymous No.20087859]

>>20085819
I 14x'd my investment

[Anonymous No.20087864]

>>20084507
No it is

Just getting bigger by the day

[Anonymous No.20088350]

Why does it say that it's making its data available through the Chainlink network AND running a node. Aren't they the same? How can you make the data available in the network if it's not through a node?

[Anonymous No.20088378]

>>20088350
what is an api
jesus

[Anonymous No.20088396]

>>20088378
Yeah precisely. So they have an api, that is not specific to the Chainlink network. The tweet is misleading, huobi setting up an api isn't entirely related to Chainlink. Huobi running a node is, though.

[Anonymous No.20088402]

>>20088350
>making its data available through the Chainlink network
Opening up their API's for other nodes to fetch data (like what binance and coin base did)
>running a node
durectly participating in the CL network.

Their node will (presumably) fetch data from their API, but theoratically they wouldn't have to.
Their node could fetch the data from another API (binance, coingecko, coin base, etc... which won't happen)
and other nodes can fetch data from their API (which will probably happen)

[Anonymous No.20088445]

>>20088402
What I was wondering was is there something specific to link in their api or not? Cause bandaid protocol or whatever could say huobi made their data available for their doracle or what not too

[Anonymous No.20088480]

>>20088445
To add to this. Would be great if Chainlink had some api requirements in place to make apis "Chainlink compliant". You would see data providers adopting the framework and making the access to data easier for the nodes

[Anonymous No.20088489]

>>20088350
You can help create an adapter, open up the API, help with general data integration, ...

In any case, Huobi is doing both: making its data available to CL, and running a CL node on mainnet.

[Anonymous No.20088513]

>>20084468
next up chainlink partners with jesus christ to bring decentralized prayers to the god

[Anonymous No.20088523]

>>20088445
>What I was wondering was is there something specific to link in their api or not?
That's not how it works, neither is it necessary (and CL would fundamentally flawed if this were the case). The Provider either opens up their API's or they don't (though the could open it up to distinct individuals by requiring a special key or whatever)
>Cause bandaid protocol or whatever could say huobi made their data available for their doracle or what not too
Yes, they could if the API is open to everyone/to them.
Huobi running their own node is the newsworthy bit.

[Anonymous No.20088531]

>>20086017
lmao cuck. go donate half your link to BLM

[Anonymous No.20088542]

>>20088480
As mentioned that's a design flaw. Imagine being a startup and trying to convince multi billion dollar companies they have to adapt to your API-standards.

[Anonymous No.20088589]

>>20088445
>Cause bandaid protocol or whatever could say huobi made their data available for their doracle or what not too
Even if an API is already open to anyone, it actually means something if the owner of that API specifically singles out Chainlink.

But again, Huobi is also running a Chainlink node.

[Anonymous No.20088591]

>>20088513
>dumps 10c

[Anonymous No.20088678]

>>20088589
>>20088542
Ok makes sense yes. It's just that it made me wonder if the coin base signed api thing could have been related to Chainlink requirement. But I might be reaching here.

Anyway, always seen Chainlink interesting from an node operator point of view but never paid attention to the data provider one. They'll surely want a piece of the cake when they'll see the profits node ops are making with their data, how will the money be redistributed? Will they just make their api pay to use as it is currently done now, with fiat and using the traditional financial system, or did Link put something in place for this? Would be cool if data providers incentives were settled using link too.

[Anonymous No.20088706]

>>20088678
>It's just that it made me wonder if the coin base signed api thing could have been related to Chainlink requirement
Coinbase signed API is definitely a major boon for Chainlink, as explained by Coinbase themselves (mentioning Chainlink by name), see pic.

Think of it this way: motorized cars caused roads to be massively improved as well. The nature of cars called for longer, straighter, better-paved, ... roads.
In the same way, Chainlink will cause APIs to be hugely improved: more decentralized, signed, better uptime guarantees, ...

[Anonymous No.20088828]

>>20088706
Ok interesting thanks. Looks like this feature might have been related to link then

[Anonymous No.20089014]

>>20088706
Guy is a moron
I’m beginning to understand that the large majority of “devs” involved in the crypto space have no concept of why building a robust system is important

For example
Let’s say I have an insurance app that pays out in ether and sources the price from Coinbase’s oracle

5 years from now, when the insurance actually pays out, coinbase could literally not even exist
Or it could experience a drop to 0 like link, or eth did back in 2017(ish)
What do you do about the contracts that are sourcing price data from you during the time this happens?
These elementary thinking faggots are a giant disgrace

[Anonymous No.20089029]

>>20084683
>>20086050
funny 42 parody

[Anonymous No.20089643]

>>20086017
how is it possible for anyone to be interested in making money to want Trump out? oh wait, you've probably invested three weeks of allowance in XRP...