[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 121 KB, 1610x896, LINKETH.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20061726 No.20061726 [Reply] [Original]

LINKUSD will hit at least $140 (0.1 ETH at ETH ATH price of $1400)

ETH at $5000 puts LINK at $500.

>> No.20061759

>>20061726
Sure it will. What’s the time course you expect

>> No.20061762

>>20061726
>worst case scenario I'll still be a millionaire
comfy

>> No.20061776

>>20061759
May/June of next year, IF the current trend continues to hold, which it may not. But I think by next year this time we'll see 0.1 LINKETH.

>> No.20061778

>>20061726

EPIC

>> No.20061810

>>20061776
There’s no way Bc this will mean I have 7million which will never happen

>> No.20061832

>>20061726
Delusional faggot
That will not happen

>> No.20061845

>>20061810
To be honest I think that is the biggest argument against it. Like fucking idiots here have 100k stack. So next year they’ll have 14M dollars? I highly highly highly doubt that. Maybe 5 years or 10 years but not next fucking year

>> No.20061879

>>20061810

Right, we aren't allowed to have life changed wealth that would be almost impossible to fuck up at that point. Once you hit 3 million it should be impossible to lose the principal, especially if you had the intelligence and determination to get to that point through research, hard work saving the initial buy in, and vigilance from holding through insane manufactured price fluctuation.

>> No.20061891
File: 258 KB, 220x220, tenor.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20061891

AND ETH GOES TO $50

>> No.20061922

>>20061845
sadly there no universal law that says it can't happen.

>> No.20061926

>>20061810
That is, if you can hold yourself together and sell at the exact top, which isn't likely despite your stack size and experience holding LINK.

>>20061845
I'm speaking on the LINKETH price, which could still mean LINKUSD price is wayyy below $140. But generally speaking I think you're right, but don't forget a lot of hands get shaky along the way, especially since most people are inexperienced with this sort of stuff.

>>20061879
A lot of us have definitely increased our chances with the cult-like edict of "never selling". I still think most people aren't wise enough to sell the top.

>> No.20061934
File: 45 KB, 962x562, 1446437267249.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20061934

>>20061845
>>20061810
there were a bunch of retards here with fucking enormous eth bags from towards the end of 2015 through 2016. my friend was one of them and sent me pic related in 2016

>> No.20061964

>>20061934
Jesus fucking christ, can you tell me what it was like for him? Did he end up making it?

>> No.20062009 [DELETED] 
File: 58 KB, 945x458, Screenshot from 2020-07-01 18-03-01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20062009

>>20061726

op, good, it will be more opportunity for a poor neet like myself to gain link

>> No.20062024

>>20062009
Take a long look at my chart and think about why you're retarded.

>> No.20062053

>>20061964
I dont want to give too much of his business away, ill tell what he doesn't mind being known. He's still deeply into crypto, got me into it, but he did sell a lot around june 2017 and some more around the top. He's doing quite well. I can only imagine the euphoria 2017 was

>> No.20062076
File: 5 KB, 300x300, 1568054053708.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20062076

>>20062009
>>20062024
Hint: it's a log chart lol

>> No.20062077

>>20062053
Fair enough. What are his thoughts on LINK? What would he define as a make it stack for LINK?

>> No.20062109

>>20062076
Do you know what a log chart is? If you're actually good at investing or trading you only think in terms of percentages.

>> No.20062164
File: 500 KB, 764x628, emotionstagesofabubble.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20062164

>>20061926

Isn't it basically impossible to sell the top though? I mean there are some volume indicators that might give you some indication the cycle is about to run its course and the 50% plus retrace is incoming but crypto is hard as fuck to time. In Jan of 2018 I sold everything at basically complacency, I was down around 25% from my personal ATH. I got in late in 2017 December and still made 1000% in less than 2 months so I was happy but not great at all in comparison to others.

I think the idea with LINK is that "never selling" is still a legitimate strategy. Lets say it hits $300 and then retraces to $80. The next pump it would probably go to $800-1000. If you are staking you can probably just live on the dividends regardless of price the fluctuations once it hits a certain floor. It just depends on personal cost of living I guess and emotional fortitude. Once you see seriously life changing money I suppose it will get much harder to hold but in my mind now I'm not selling at least 10,000 ever.

I could make arbitrary laddered sells and just forget about it but I have no idea how high is truly possible in this next cycle. 50, 100, 300, 500, 1000? I think over $100 should be doable in 12 months lets say I guess.

>> No.20062187

>>20062077
I bought link in 2018 on his recommendation. I don't know how much he holds, but if I had to guess since he thought it was worth talking about it's probably a fair few. I personally believe in a 10k make it stack but if you have more it would obviously be faster

>> No.20062209

>>20062053

The 2017 euphoria was unreal. It was legit as good as sex. It was hard to sleep because fucking everything was pumping 50-150% over night multiple days in a row. It felt like fucking cheat codes. It was one of the most exciting times in my life for sure

>> No.20062213

>>20061934
54 million usd. Fucking crazy.

>> No.20062225

Do you guys understand that this is positive for both Link and Ethereum right? You see, ETH did the same thing with btc last bull run. Ethereum had a run, made a top on the btc pair, and then people switched to btc, and this forced the corn price up, making Ethereum top the USD only after topping on the btc pair. Compare both charts. This means Link will top on ETH and then fall again, only to make a higher top on USD afterwards.

>> No.20062293

>>20061879
>>20061832
Some guy invested 5k into uber (seed) and turned that into 24 million. 100k stack, even at the lowest on exchange is 11k, but probably alot more. and it is TOTALLY foreseable to say that 20-30k investment could turn into 10 million. That is conservative. This is a fucking data network and much more!
rich people get these returns all the time, with crypto - now we have a chance

>> No.20062355

>>20062293
Uber doesn’t even make money too it valuation is fucking wonky.

>> No.20062385

>>20062355
Your loose butthole is wonky you stupid fucking faggot.

>> No.20062459

>>20062164
>I think the idea with LINK is that "never selling" is still a legitimate strategy. Lets say it hits $300 and then retraces to $80. The next pump it would probably go to $800-1000
It actually is a legit strategy. Provided you're not a fund competing with other funds for alpha. HODLing is certainly not a meme, provided you're holding the right projects.

>If you are staking you can probably just live on the dividends
Live off of is pretty risky, but for sure you could use the dividends to increase your stack, which adds to the incentive to hold during a bubble pop.

>It just depends on personal cost of living I guess and emotional fortitude
Basically this.

>>20062187
Has he told you anything about timing a sell?

>>20062209
'twas
t. bought ETH at $15 but fucked up a few times

>>20062225
I get what you're saying, but the relationship/market perception between BTC and ETH is different from ETH and LINK. So I disagree that it will play out the same way. The price action of LINKETH is very different to ETHBTC. But of course if LINKETH breaks trend, I'll consider what you're saying.

>>20062293
and what's more, these tokens have feedback loops like you wouldn't believe. It's hard to measure. You can lock up supply, borrow against that, long the same token, use flash loans, etc. The bubble is brewing. Only a matter of time. It'll be quick though. I bet we'll see at least two major bull-runs before it's an accepted asset class, which is encouraging.

>> No.20062599

Eth isn't going to $5000 though.

>> No.20062628

>>20061726
>0.1 ETH at ETH ATH price of $1400
how could you tell that?
with a fancy regression line?

>> No.20062646

>>20061776
>But I think by next year this time we'll see 0.1 LINKETH
source: a regression line

>> No.20062662

>>20062628
What do you mean? I merely stated that at 0.1 ETH, and ETH at $1400, LINK would be $140. Never said it has to happen.

>> No.20062678

>>20061891
how much yo' like to laugh at Linky's sventures you anon.. how much you like it...
wonda where are your buy orders

>> No.20062680

my daily 15% ample gains should keep up with link, otherwise I will hang myself

>> No.20062686

>>20062646
>t. took one course in stats and probability
The trend is your fucking friend and don't forget it.

>> No.20062716

>>20061879
>we aren't allowed to have life changed wealth
you are obstacoling the process with this tought
Things manifest into reality when there is no mental process to obstacolate it

You don't have to let negative toughts to deviate. Focus on it. Just feel it NOW. Link is to 100 usd and you made it. Start feeling it from now with all yo' being
Don't let negative toughts deviate

>> No.20062753 [DELETED] 
File: 2.75 MB, 200x150, vincemcmahon.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20062753

>>20062293
mein gott

>> No.20062816

>>20062716
>obstacoling
>obstacolate

>> No.20062913

>>20062459
I asked him about targets for link once and he started laughing and said "don't listen to me, I sold way too much eth around $400"

>> No.20062940

>>20062913
Kek. Seems like a dope guy.

>> No.20062973

>>20062716
based deobstacolator

>> No.20062981

I’m not gonna make it with 10K link will I...

>> No.20062985

>>20061934
>>20062913
What rank was he in 2017 for eth wallets do you think? Like was he a top 1000 eth wallet, or top 5000?

Trying to draw parallels between top eth wallets then and top link wallets now

>> No.20062993

>>20062716
1 mil is not enough that leaves me with 700k after taxes

>> No.20063070
File: 8 KB, 193x261, images (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20063070

>>20061726
I learned my lesson with link: NEVER bet against autism energy. I could have put 15k into link when it was 19 cents but the autistic memes and shilling turned me off it. I admit it frens, I was wrong and you were right. It is too late for me to make it but you guys enjoy making it while I sit here watching and wishing I would have listened to the autists like uncle asscrack and whale fucker

>> No.20063326

>>20062981
Depends what your targets are, could wait for the run post 2024...

>> No.20063508
File: 10 KB, 231x218, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20063508

>>20062985
Well, 54k eth when the eth supply was around 1/4 of link's circulating supply means that on supply alone he had the equivalent of 216,000 link. That's a top 250 wallet

>> No.20063540

>>20063508
Looks like us 10K stackers aren’t gonna make it if a top 250 wallet didn’t make it...

>> No.20063640

>>20063540
>>20063508
So the equivalent of 216,000 LINK was worth 54 million at top of last bullrun.

That means at top of this bullrun, 1 link will be worth $250 if it follows ETH path. 10k link = 2.5 million

>> No.20063920
File: 911 KB, 3292x1748, 216.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20063920

>>20063508
>>20063640


216....

>> No.20064131
File: 122 KB, 1080x337, 20200702_002511.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20064131

>>20063920
https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/d6ulh8/ama_initiative_for_cryptocurrencies_and_contracts/
>arij216

>> No.20064155
File: 122 KB, 991x695, 1584625334105.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20064155

>>20063640
thats 1.75 after taxes for me, pretty sure thats enough to live on dividends

>> No.20064183

>>20062209
I remember. Although I have more now. I tried to tip the chik fil a employ $100. And also was having a ball on the ski slopes. Little did I know two year depression ahead

>> No.20064219

>>20063070
kek its ok fren you still have time

>> No.20064234

>>20061726
You brainlets think you're just gonna go in a straight line? I dumped 80k link and still have 50k but come on.

Buy some Suterusu to compound your gains.

>> No.20064264

>>20063640
Thats a really retarded (speculator) way of looking at things, and relies completely on something that a) wont happen and b) turns this into a complete normie ponzi scam.

You guys seriously don't understand even a fraction of what REAL steak, not hurr hold our coin we print you hyperinflated rewards for it. CL will be returning at least 100usd/per link per year in a relatively quick timeframe after staking is available/the network is ready for real industries not pajeetdexes and scamfi.

500/y/l wont be unreasonable in 3-5 years, at '20s dollar pre brrrr effects being felt.

>> No.20064306

>>20064264
This of course wont be evenly distributed, so you'll have to get lucky and be in the top pools or sell off to people in those pools, at a substantial markup (they'll be making 300/l/y and youll be making 25-35)

>> No.20064313
File: 287 KB, 1548x882, E5964BDD-8912-45C7-9EB4-97AB84C4B8B6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20064313

>>20063640
>1 link will be worth $250 if it follows ETH path.

It’s either going to be way above this or peak at a mundane price. Nobody ever calls tops accurately

>> No.20064329

>>20064264
>CL will be returning at least 100usd/per link per year
what makes you think so?

>> No.20064469

>>20064264
You think Chainlink will generate more than 100 billion dollars in fees per year?

>> No.20064481

>>20064469
Yes

>> No.20064501

>>20064481
Reason?

>> No.20064502

>>20061726
>[pick any coin] will go up when btc and eth go up
wow must be your first day lol stupid fucking faggot

>> No.20064513

>>20061776
>IF the current trend continues to hold, which it may not
WOW GUYS IT MIGHT GO UP AND IT MIGHT GO DOWN!!! GENIUS!!!

>> No.20064542

>>20064501
do you know what link does?

>> No.20064561

>>20064264
Bro you think I’m going to be making 50,000,000 a year!?!?

>> No.20064603

>>20064542
Paying 100 billion in fees is a lot different than securing 100 billion in value

>> No.20064639

How to use a Chainlink node to mass produce one-time pads:

>Dice tower with hooked up to a digital dice scanner that relays the results of the rolled dice
>the dice scanner vibrates slightly to move the dice along after they've been scanned
>dice go into a hopper with a conveyor system that sends the dice back through the contraption
>use an arbitrary assortment of dice for maximum entropy
>use mixicles to obfuscate the OTP

>> No.20064771

>>20064329
The easiest one to explain to you drooling moonboys is online gaming (gambling). 60b market projected to double to 120 by '23. Could literally be taken over today, with verifiable randomness, currency converter free feeds, and the paypal adapter. Current bookmakers/shady chink rigged casinos pay out the ass in processing fees. Overhead is like 75-85% of revenue.
>>20064469
undiluted calcs, but yeah. You retards dont understand the scale of things and what the automation/cost of "doing business" or arbitration is outside mommy's basement
>>20064603
You fucking incompetents in every fucking thread with your "muh store of value". This isnt nigger bitchcoin, this actually does something. Derivatives and high value bank transfers arent just going to let some air from sirgays fatass represent trillions of dollars, it's all about functionality and revenue from processing jobs. CL nodes are the new miners, from the big man himself. Instead of giant chink farms with private dam generators it just depends on how big your stack/pool is.

>> No.20064846

>>20064771
>You fucking incompetents in every fucking thread with your "muh store of value". This isnt nigger bitchcoin, this actually does something.

Retard, if you don't know what securing value is then don't respond to me. I am talking about the total value of collateral which must be put up. Check your ego

>> No.20064849

>>20064639
Just use lava lamps bro
https://blog.cloudflare.com/randomness-101-lavarand-in-production/
Seriously tho im kinda drunk aren't you just referring to vfr?

>> No.20064872
File: 72 KB, 1280x720, mmmmmmmm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20064872

>>20064846

>> No.20064885

>>20061726
Take this down

>> No.20064890

>>20064849
VRF is for algorithmically produced random functions that are verifiably random on-chain. They're good for ensuring randomness that can be pointed to. One-time pads are a different beast. Theoretically a message encrypted with an OTP can never be retrieved except with that key, because the encryption cipher is the length of the message; huge entropy to disentangle.

>> No.20064915

>>20064603
Securing 100b in value is nothing. Literally can see it happening almost overnight when staking and shit goes live

>> No.20064962
File: 76 KB, 1080x1350, 676db5945ccc82d811ac0ab3016d7b68.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20064962

>>20064846
These transfers, built by boomers that hate new tech, already have insurances and systems put in place. The entire point of a decentralized network of tens to thousands of nodes is that IT WILL NEVER FAIL. Much more likely to have an outside traditional insurance for most of the value, and the nodes only putting up a small portion for penalizing. This is why I dont bother hand feeding you retards, because every day it's some dumb nigger redditor that thinks this is XRP. It's not, that shit doesnt work. Jews dont want to give random computer bits trillions of dollars of value for no reason, so it's not happening without force. That force is automation from SCs making regular businesses impossible to compete. That revenue and the valuation (10-8%apr) of that semi passive income source will be plenty to cover those requirements.

Cashflow, not faggot mcmansion "muh implied value".

>> No.20064994

>>20064962
Chainlink still gets to eat everyone else's lunch though, right? Smart contracts are an order of magnitude cheaper than business-as-usual and are a better product to boot.

>> No.20065028

>>20064603
how much do you think all enterprise trust assurance professionals (lawyers, actuaries, accountants, escrow agents, and their infrastructure cost in fees annually?

>> No.20065053

>>20064962
I'm all in chainlink. I just don't think 100 billion in FEES is coming soon. Assuming the fee is 5% of the collateral, that means 2 trillion in collateral on the network. I'm not saying it won't come eventually but fuck you with your moonboy faggot hopium.

>> No.20065057

>>20064962
oh i remember you anon, still hope you get some time with your picrel when yiu make it

>> No.20065064

>>20063070
You fell for the LINK-is-a-meme-meme

>> No.20065070

>>20061726
price of a cup of coffee

>> No.20065090

>>20061726
Belongs in /42g/ unironically all LINK threads do

>> No.20065170
File: 59 KB, 1033x1280, crop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20065170

>>20064994
Yeah, SC's will cost fractions of cents to run on actual non-shit networks and the only other cost to a business is data (CL). You can charge 95% of what it currently costs a business in human capital (always the highest expense) and that company would crush every competitor.
>>20065028
This guy knows. Start doing math on how much all the nigger and women hires around you at your wageslave cost. Then do the math on the HR and lawsuits they cause regularly.
>>20065053
STOP DOING DUMBASS PERCENTAGES OF NOTHING YOU FUCKING NIGGER. How much does it cost a business to do a credit default swap? In upfront and maintenance accounting/payments? Call me a faggot again, but i've read through thousands of pages of documents to find out...i've done the research.
>>20065057
thx bby, i dont like the cow but it was the only clothed set I had available/too lazy to find more for you homos.

>> No.20065195

>>20065170
Yeah yeah I've seen enough of your fat cow-posts over many months to know you are the most potent hopium dealer on all of /biz/, and the most deluded.

>> No.20065220

>>20065170
Are you that anon that gave us insights into trucking & shipping as industries ready to be disrupted by SCs? He too posted thicc brappers

>> No.20065279

>>20065053
Read >>20064771
>The easiest one to explain to you drooling moonboys is online gaming (gambling). 60b market projected to double to 120 by '23. Could literally be taken over today, with verifiable randomness, currency converter free feeds, and the paypal adapter. Current bookmakers/shady chink rigged casinos pay out the ass in processing fees. Overhead is like 75-85% of revenue.
That's including a payment never fucking up, and hand/table never freezing/crashing, and CL can come in at 50% and anyone that doesnt immediately switch to compete will get rewards/rakebacked to death in months. Oh yeah and provable verifiable backend data showing that there's no cheating involved. With one touch paypal/whatever third party payment app or banking app connectivity and desposit/withdraw, instantly. You used to wait 3 weeks to get a check from a Turkish or German bank and then waited 3 more weeks for it to clear in the US, and half the time they had to be reissued because the bank account got raided by whatever agency.

>> No.20065372
File: 311 KB, 1024x1280, tumblr_pw77huiA5Q1rdafndo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20065372

>>20065195
lol, stick to your meme lines and "if we have another bull run X" then you fucking jabroni.

>>20065220
Yeah, that shit takes way longer to type out and it's not like I save the numbers. I have to google for 5 minutes every time...something these faggot redditniggers apparently dont know how to do (that and reverse image search). 700b industry in the us, 1.2t world (trucking only, never bothered to find good numbers on merchant marine, dont know the proper technical terms to find real data). Anyone thats dealt with either side of shipping or receiving goods/warehousing should know how much paperwork and fat office women can be replaced with some basic automation.

>> No.20065391

>>20065372
>>20065279
You assume technology moves much faster than it actually does. I assume in 2018 you were predicting Chainlink would be a trillion dollar mcap by 2019.

>> No.20065396

>>20065372
So, $500/link/year, huh? Is that your pie in the sky bound?

>> No.20065485

>>20061934
People from /biz/ did get insanely rich off of ETH, the New York Times even did an article about one guy who admitted he went all in after reading about it here. I wouldn't be surprised if LINK eventually causes something similar to happen.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/13/style/bitcoin-millionaires.html

>> No.20065541

>>20065391
Sure, I'll give you that...and unfortunately I got tired of /pol/ demoralization one day just before mainnet and learned about CL. Dont feel bad,
i played poker when btc was ten cents and never held any/realized even back then it doesnt do anything, and does that nothing poorly.

Thats why gaming is my go to, it's available now. You could make a SC for blackjack and shop it as a POC today. Most other shit involving real world IoT still needs a lot of physical hardware/integration to function (trucking is pretty close, but rednecks cant into computers and still struggle with e-logs at an executive level)

>>20065396
Hard to say, especially with ISDA stuff and the wide range of what it costs and no available data on OTC trades/swaps. Dont think 500 is unrealistic in 5-8 years though. Again, that wont be evenly distributed.

>> No.20065612

>>20065396
Then you've got the 5 trillion dollars a year in insurance premiums paid globally. Which, as gay as I think it is, will explode with third world crop insurance (or any really). Some ideas need to be developed for things like de-cent car insurance claims...but that's a small drop in the insurance bucket.

>> No.20066247

Link is a useless scamcoin.

>> No.20066301

>>20066247
LINK is the golden ticket. You sir are addicted to fudding.

>> No.20066425
File: 61 KB, 1280x592, 15347706499583.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20066425

>>20065485
>almost put $1k in when it was 50c, basically the VERY bottom
>my dumb brain decided buying it was too hard
So close bros. So fucking close. Sure I would have probably sold too early, but fuck man.

>> No.20066528

>>20062662
Eth is going beyond 10k this bullrun, meaning link is going over 1k

>> No.20066624

Is 200 link enough to make it?

>> No.20066694

>>20066624
how does 2k sound?

>> No.20066713

>>20066624
how does $1000 sound?

>> No.20066733

>>20061726
WEW lad

>> No.20066735

>>20061726
>LINKUSD will hit at least $140 (0.1 ETH at ETH ATH price of $1400)
So never then, ETH is going to take a while to hit ATH

>> No.20067343

>>20064962
Based. I remember you. Trucking, right?

>> No.20067407

x20 in bull run, after that exit scam

>> No.20067445

>>20065170
>now i find out you dont have a sickness for the thickness
I thought you were my nigger....But youre still a fren

>> No.20067810

Triple digits will take years of organic growth. Bullrun doesn't matter because they don't hype. Couple of crypto Twitter douchebags won't make a difference. The next bullrun will not be the same one we saw 2017.

>> No.20068023
File: 70 KB, 500x500, BE3EF4F2-C8C1-4A88-AE86-28FD0098F5D4.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20068023

>>20067810
>> Triple digits will take years of organic growth. Bullrun doesn't matter because they don't hype.

Talking out your fucking asshole. I was on the sidelines last bullrun, but I saw what went down. There’s ZERO fucking rules.

In a full on Normie-powered FOMO bullrun NO REASON WHATSOEVER APPLIES. Absolute chink fucking shitcoins went from pennies to double digits OVERNIGHT.

Just go look at the history. To think when LINK breaks $5 it’s impossible to suddenly hit $25 is retarded. Once it breaks double digits all bets are off.

You don’t know shit. You don’t want to be like me watching rockets go off then you’re left holding your cock in your hand for three years waiting for your turn.

You better get your fucking ducks in a row.

>> No.20068045

>>20068023
preach