LINK not breaking $5 is bad

[Anonymous No.19990798]

This is the 3rd time that chainlink approached $5 and didn't break it. This is really bad news as it shows that there is enough buy pressure to keep it in the $3-4 range but not enough buying pressure to break through $5. I fear that for the next year or two, this is as high as we're going to get.

[Anonymous No.19990897]

shut the fuck up you braindead moron
all price action before steaking and collateral is meaningless

[Anonymous No.19990922]

>>19990897
fpbp

link is going straight to 1000$

[Anonymous No.19990967]

>>19990798

Somewhat true but this time BTC fucked it up, Volume was good too, BTC $500 candle just broke the momentum

[Anonymous No.19990975]

I was thinking there was a shortage of FUD today. Thankfully this guy put me out of my misery.
Selling stack now.

[Anonymous No.19991009]

>>19990897
>muh staking
>muh collateral
these are unironically priced in

[Anonymous No.19991066]

>>19990967
Volume was great. News was great. But it wasnt meant to be so they tanked BTC. Fucking bullshit

[Anonymous No.19991133]

>>19991009
wait, is that real?

[Anonymous No.19991150]

>>19991009
staking is not priced in but literally everything else

[Anonymous No.19991159]

>>19990798
chainlink needs a market cap of 1,700,000,000.00 in order for a link to be worth more than 5 dollars. unless you have 80 million to bump into this coin...??

[Anonymous No.19991174]

>>19990967
>>19991066
All markets were hit, dumb dumb. Did BTC crash the S&P too?

[Anonymous No.19991217]

>>19991174
Yes

[Anonymous No.19991783]

>>19991159
You think 80 million is a big number?
*shakes head*

[Anonymous No.19992047]

>>19990798

who cares

long games is that price goes up because usage not mouth breathers and goldman cucks speculating on it

[Anonymous No.19992805]

>>19992047
>muh usage
that doesn't increase the price at all

[Anonymous No.19993397]

>>19990798
But just imagine once it does. Easy shot to at least $7.