[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 4 KB, 376x134, 4144564a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19919456 No.19919456 [Reply] [Original]

>he doesn't know about enclaves
>he hasn't read the 2001 masterpiece Xtremweb: A generic global computing system (yes Gilles has been humbling toiling away since the 90s on decentralized cloud computing, and is one of the most cited scholars in the field)
>he doesn't own at a minimum 10k barrels of digital oil
>he trades flavor of the month coins on uniswap instead of holding value

>> No.19919642

>>19919456
What should i buy RLC or FTM ?

>> No.19919682

>>19919456
>he doesn't know about the endless parade of SGX vulnerabilities
Wew would hate if my coin's entire value prop relied on that

>> No.19919707

>>19919682
If that's the case all of computing is doomed.
>>19919642
RLC is better IMO.

>> No.19919708

>>19919682
>>19919456
This, GNT is honestly is better than RLC.

>> No.19919728

>>19919708
>GNT
No one is going to buy your bags anon

>> No.19919806
File: 72 KB, 720x960, 16359820252515339024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19919806

>>19919708
>>19919682
Lei Zhang in my opinion is basing his choice on an assumption. That assumption is that Intel will get it's act together and release a future version of SGX which is not vulnerable to the current attacks which render the current versions of SGX insecure. So yeah of course it's a bet on Intel, but I think iExec needs a backup plan because it's not wise to pin all bets in one company.

I even tend to agree that sooner or later Intel will get SGX right, but this will be in a future chip which isn't released yet. iExec will not be able to guarantee data privacy with current SGX in my opinion.

>> No.19919839

>>19919806
I'm sure they have a backup plan but I'm also sure they know SGX is going to be fine.

>> No.19920230

>>19919456
exscuse me gentleman
how could they solve the problem of latency?
Being decentralized I'd say there is latency

>> No.19920256

>>19920230
FOG computing

>> No.19920259

>>19919806
>agree that sooner or later Intel will get SGX right
so why will they need iExec then?

>> No.19920268

>>19920230

Not all applications need super fast latency, just security, stability and throughput. Any tech anons want to chime in?

>> No.19920414

>>19920230
fastest supercomputer today is a decentralized one, folding home to solve protein folding.
So shut the fukc up cuck, decentraized computing isnt the future it's the present

>> No.19920508

>>19920256
>FOG computing
literally a buzz word as answer

>> No.19920586
File: 91 KB, 770x515, 939CFAA4-895F-4B28-8534-24EA313F369F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19920586

Resistance is futile

>> No.19920639

I come from the future and I'm wondering why some of you aren't all in on RLC? In my time it already is valued at $60 per token.

>> No.19920640

>>19920508
More adoption = less latency

>> No.19920933

>>19920639
this is how i know you're lying,
in 5 years RLC will be 100$ minimum
faggot

>> No.19921161

>>19919806
>iExec will not be able to guarantee data privacy with current SGX in my opinion.

Yes they can with trusted TEE workerpools

Public workerpools will only handle the standard deterministic tasks

>> No.19921221

>>19920933
1.5 years max

>> No.19921693

>>19920268
gaming would need it

>> No.19921712

>>19920414
>fastest supercomputer today is a decentralized one
which one sir?

>> No.19922424
File: 53 KB, 220x171, tenor.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19922424

>>19920586
Indeed