Explain

[Anonymous No.19917497]

Wtf is happening with this piece of shit?

[Anonymous No.19917530]

>>19917497
its 2017 again bro

[Anonymous No.19917620]

discord pump and dump

[Anonymous No.19917800]

>>19917497
The spring is fully compressed. Soon.

[Anonymous No.19917899]

we are winning

[Anonymous No.19917907]

>>19917497
this is the 3rd stage of 5 pumps FUCKING CAP THIS

[Anonymous No.19917924]

>>19917620
It's been steadily making new highs since it bottomed out a few months ago.

[Anonymous No.19917995]

>>19917497
Everyone wrote it off as a "piece of shit" two years ago, but the team never stopped. Now the realization that it's still alive it starting to hit as they released v2 of the protocol, surpass $1 million in requests processed, and are being integrated into several other crypto service like Gilded, Multis, and Gnosis Safe. Lol, can you believe someone made a FUD campaign over eating mozzarella?

[Anonymous No.19918097]

Wait. Let me get this straight. I held this shitcoin since 2017 and I sold it all about 2 weeks ago, just in time for it to come alive all of a sudden?

[Anonymous No.19918313]

>>19917995
oh stfu. The token still has no use case. No staking or rewards. No scalability. The team still is an incompetent team with nothing to show for

[Anonymous No.19918766]

>>19918313
It has plenty of use, gained scalability in v2, and staking was just recently added to the official development plan.

[Anonymous No.19918779]

>>19917995
Ah you’re Gil from Gilded Finance. You were just on the Bad Crypto Podcast. That’s why Req is pumping (Gilded is funded and built on Req). Little does the lay public know that Req is down 98% and absolutely worthless as an asset. Muh token burn. Muh req team lost funds w leveraging their ico money. Muh Robbin Mazurel the biggest idiot marketer in crypto

[Anonymous No.19918862]

>>19918766
Ok Gil

[Anonymous No.19919003]

Hey dum dums this is the 3 month chart, as much as you want to shit on REQ is has had steady growth for 3 months straight. It went from 90 sats to 280 sats. You can't deny something good is going on at least right now. Let your bias blind you from easy profits you idiots.

[Anonymous No.19919048]

>>19919003
>low trading volume, mostly below $300k
>pump on low liquidity means jack shit

[Anonymous No.19919086]

>>19917497
YOU GOT CHEESED HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.19919124]

Its still under ico price. And under what I bought .04. This shit sucks, fuck off.

[Anonymous No.19919132]

>>19919124
>>19919048
>Mad they didn't buy at 90 sats

[Anonymous No.19919212]

>>19918766
>gained scalability in v2
how does it scale?

[Anonymous No.19919235]

>>19917497
wouldnt it be funny if this went past ATH?

[Anonymous No.19919431]

>>19919235
like link? yea but it’s not as memeable and people hate the team. French lazy tards

[Anonymous No.19919451]

>>19919132
lol I sold most of my Req holdings between 700-2000 sats. I still have some but have already accepted this project is a failure and the team has never and will never amount to anything. They are completely inept and had the worst reputation at YCombinator

[Anonymous No.19919547]

>>19918766
link me where they talk about adding staking cant find it

[Anonymous No.19919950]

>>19918766
>>19919547
There isn’t any substance behind their staking talk. They’ve been saying that shit since Sept. 2017 (check whitepaper). The REQ french fag team is full of shit

[Anonymous No.19920137]

>>19919212
From the website for v2

"That's because the bulk of the data is saved on IPFS (see below) instead of on the blockchain. What is stored on the blockchain is the hash (the proof of the data). That way, it can't be modified or manipulated. Transactions are batched and added to IPFS in bulk, which enables high throughput."

[Anonymous No.19920351]

>>19919950
It was only talk before, but now it's been added to the website.

https://request.network/en/token/

Check item 3

[Anonymous No.19920563]

>>19917497
I still can’t believe I had 100k of this and held all the way to $1.20 but didn’t sell. Finally sold at 30 cents thank fucking god

[Anonymous No.19920591]

>>19920351
means jackshit until they implement anything staking related. knowing the team it’ll take them 3 years, if that.

[Anonymous No.19920628]

>>19919451
>Still mad he didn't use that big brain of his to buy at 90 sats

[Anonymous No.19920944]

You forgot about YCombinator. YC business tactics are EXTREMELY aggressive. YC doesnt fuck around with their startups. They will push Request down the throats of the normies in Silicon Valley and they will use it like addicts. They made Airbnb, Dropbox, Twitch etc mainstream and they will make Request into Venmo/PayPal 2.0

[Anonymous No.19921046]

Probably a whale wanted to exit
Token is useless

[Anonymous No.19921667]

>>19920628
motherfucka look up and read my other posts. dumped most of my req at 700-2000 sats. i know the Req team personally. they are imbeciles.

[Anonymous No.19922363]

It's a nice pump and dump, but the team have absolutely refused to give the token value and will dump on you idiots as soon as it hits a certain SAT level.

[Anonymous No.19922517]

>>19921667
>Still seems mad he didn't buy more at 90 seeing as he is so smart

[Anonymous No.19922798]

>>19917497
i bought this shit as my first coin at like 60c, held when it doubled because i listened to retards here and on reddit
still have like 5k of this garbage

[Anonymous No.19922873]

>>19917497
>2020
>REQposting
I REQUEST A REFUND

[Anonymous No.19923736]

>>19922363
>>19922517

This. They changed all the token release schedules without being transparent. Devs and founders have quit and dumped their holdings early.

They even told your asses last AMA they hired a market maker (to pump and dump on your asses). Look, I’m trying to do you guys a favor and tell you not to trust this team ever. Also don’t get caught holding bags of this useless token

[Anonymous No.19924560]

Bunch of bitter larping retards in here like in every REQ thread.

[Anonymous No.19924639]

>>19917995
>Everyone wrote it off as a "piece of shit" two years ago, but the team never stopped.
It was a piece of shit then and is a piece of shit now.
What purpose does the REQ token serve? None. There is literally no economically rational reason to hold it other than hope number go up.
>>19918766
>gained scalability in v2
No it did not. It is still an unscalable hot mess. It's like they didn't even keep track of all the l2 solutions on ethereum.
>>19919003
>the price is higher therefore it is a valuable investment
This is the intelligence level of REQ investors.
>>19923736
>They even told your asses last AMA they hired a market maker
The MM is probably the one making these shitty threads. Surely nobody is stupid enough to organically think that REQ is a good investment in 2020?

[Anonymous No.19924942]

Dont buy this shitcoin. The symbol is basically indian Ruppee symbol you dumbfucks.

[Anonymous No.19925047]

The FUD is quite bullish

[Anonymous No.19925114]

So much bitterness. Good thing is, no one of you has to buy and it's better that way. This project deserves true believers, not a bunch of whiny bitches ready to dump as soon as they see a single red dildo. And especially not the ones who think that token's value only comes from staking and other bullshit schemes.

[Anonymous No.19925209]

>>19920944

This is an old copypasta from a million threads. YC is dope but I already lost when I bought REQ at $0.12

[Anonymous No.19925706]

Wow its not even in the top 100. This the kind of project where you won't be getting your money back. Its probably gone.

I'd take the L and by LINK or something DEFI related. LEND/SYX.

[Anonymous No.19926009]

>>19925114
>This project deserves true believers
Religious belief in a project and making money doesn't go together too well. If you still don't see why this project is a steaming turd, just let it sink in they played with leverage to increase the rest of their ICO stack and instead got liquidated.

[Anonymous No.19926237]

>>19917620
link pls

[Anonymous No.19926264]

>>19924639
> What purpose does the REQ token serve?
let me rephrase this
> What purpose does any token serve?

[Anonymous No.19926309]

>>19926264
Deflecting because you don't want to answer?
>What purpose does any token serve?
Depends on the token. LINK allows me to pay nodes to fulfil off-chain data queries. REN allows me to run a darknode.
Answering that question is really easy when the project has value.
Now you try and answer it for REQ.

[Anonymous No.19926318]

>>19924639
Agree; req will always be shit

[Anonymous No.19926335]

>>19926264
Tokens on eth? Most are worthless; just ETH in a different coat; actual assets though like xmr .. now they are valuable and serve purpose

[Anonymous No.19926349]

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOO MY REQ TOKENS IN MY WALLET RANDOMLY GOT BURNT WTTFFf?????

[Anonymous No.19926355]

>>19926309
dont give a shit about req, link, ren, stonk, dmg, hot and all the other biz shitcoins.
you guys just make me laugh when you try to justify the existence of your erc20 tokens when none of them serve any purpose.
buy eth FULL STOP

[Anonymous No.19926376]

>>19926355
That's bullshit and you know it. Stake-and-slash tokens like REN and LINK do serve a valid business as staking collateral. In fact, ETH 2.0 is literally copying that model. If it is worthless for tokens, then ETH 2.0 is worthless.

[Anonymous No.19926422]

>>19919547
https://request.network/en/token/

Request invoicing is going to be a VERY interesting product that will receive feature upgrades in later release which include real cross-currency. The team is making strides and their customers are happy. Almost no one out of 4chan cares about these FUD memes as proven by the multis, gnosis safe integrations and the fact that Maker is a happy client.

Stay mad because you bought high, it was propped up too early by 2017 ico mania, but now it's gaining value and your vitriol won't stop that.

[Anonymous No.19926427]

>>19926355
>dont give a shit about req, link, ren, stonk, dmg, hot
If you think all of these things are the same then you are of the same intelligence level as REQ investors.
Obviously ETH is king but you're an idiot if you think all ERC20s are useless. If you don't understand LINK/REN for example, you don't truly understand ETH. The point of ETH is to enable things like LINK/REN... wtf did you think the world supercomputer was supposed to be used for if not trustless decentralized solutions that provide value to people?

[Anonymous No.19926446]

>>19926422
>multis, gnosis safe integrations and the fact that Maker is a happy client.
Explain how any of these things translate into value for token holders. The burn mechanism is clearly not enough. These integrations are too little too late.

[Anonymous No.19926461]

>>19926422
Daily reminder that the REQ team gambled with their ICO money on leverage and got liquidated.

Daily reminder that Robbin called interested partners after procrastinating for two years.

This token still is a dumpster fire and it is going nowhere.

[Anonymous No.19926521]

>>19926446
They will add value through staking, discounts, etc. as soon as it's relevant, what's the point of adding staking before there's a lot of usage? They're assessing client needs based on actual usage, not based on your autistic staking fetish.

These things will be added as soon as they're needed.

>>19926461
For a survey, no need to meme too hard about this. I'm sure your friend's chinese dropshipping website was devestated by the e-mail.

[Anonymous No.19926536]

>>19926376
Are you implying that the ETH devs did not come up with the staking/slashing model but copied a team of litteraly 4 devs when they are over 2000 active devs? do you even make the effort to keep yourself informed on ethereum?
Please, at least read everything that's here for starters: https://vitalik.ca/ (not saying he came up with everything nor is the main dev)

>>19926427
> If you don't understand LINK/REN for example, you don't truly understand ETH.
Can't believe you actually wrote this. Do you realize how stupid it sounds?
> Obviously ETH is king
At least we can agree on this fren

[Anonymous No.19926931]

>>19926461
Kek
They lost $5m worth of eth when it dropped below $100. So it's now around $12m of eth.
The hilarious part is they took the loan to pay salaries after raising $50m... And cashing out around $30m
Now they only have $5m left... Remember this is a finance project
This stuffed pig is still getting drained by the team and i doubt the project lasts another year
https://etherscan.io/address/0xdd76b55ee6dafe0c7c978bff69206d476a5b9ce7#internaltx

Enjoy your mozzarella

[Anonymous No.19927464]

>>19926931
They have years of runway and millions more dirty pajeet

[Anonymous No.19927552]

>>19926521
>They will add value through staking, discounts, etc. as soon as it's relevant
So there is nothing adding value at the moment, and you are hoping the team comes up with a good reason in future. Good luck with that.
>They're assessing client needs based on actual usage, not based on your autistic staking fetish.
I never mentioned staking. Stop seething at straw men. Don't be mad at me because I made you realize you invested poorly.
>>19926536
>Can't believe you actually wrote this. Do you realize how stupid it sounds?
Dunning Kruger. The fact that you didn't get what I wrote shows your lack of intelligence, not mine. LINK and REN are two of the best examples of what you can build on Ethereum. Trustless and decentralized networks. In your mind, what is the point of Ethereum, other than building decentralized networks that provide value? What does adoption of Ethereum look like, if not people building cool and valuable shit on top of it? Can't believe you admitted to being such an unsophisticated investor.

[Anonymous No.19927781]

>>19927552
>LINK and REN are two of the best examples of what you can build on Ethereum.
They're just not. You throwing around buzzwords doesn't prove anything.
Some "cool and valuable shit" would be DAI and its ecosystem. You're just trying to sound knowledgeable so people buy these worthless tokens. That's it.

[Anonymous No.19927853]

>>19919003
Growth on non existent volume is bearish.

[Anonymous No.19927931]

>>19927781
>You throwing around buzzwords doesn't prove anything.
You invested in ETH and you think "trustless" and "decentralized" are just buzzwords?
>Some "cool and valuable shit" would be DAI and its ecosystem.
Sure, Maker is great. It works because it is a trustless and decentralized network. Funny you mention the ecosystem... Maker will use LINK oracles for the LINK/USD price feed, and they are integrating REN to provide BTC collateral in MCD.
Maker recognizes that both of these projects are valuable components of the ecosystem... perhaps that will make you realize you are missing something here. I get it. Maker gets it. Why don't you?
>You're just trying to sound knowledgeable so people buy these worthless tokens. That's it.
I don't care what tokens people buy. Good job ignoring the point because you know I'm right.

[Anonymous No.19928234]

>>19927853
Not if the volume rises as it grows simpleton.

[Anonymous No.19928483]

>>19928234
Kek

[Anonymous No.19928505]

>>19928483
Buy low

[Anonymous No.19928548]

Bought and sold this shit at 30 cents. My best trade of Jan 2018

[Anonymous No.19928661]

I'm still bagholding about 2700 of this fucking token since 2017 that I bought near $1 each. Fuck I got so fucked on this coin.

It's okay though because I hold 10K link I got a at 33 cents...

[Anonymous No.19928788]

>>19928661
Lol same here, but more link

[Anonymous No.19930352]

>>19917800
>>19917899
>>19918766
>>19920944
>>19926355
>>19926422
>>19928788
witnessed

[Anonymous No.19931098]

>>19928661
Are you me?