[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 17 KB, 250x250, chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19821080 No.19821080 [Reply] [Original]

What is a realistic true valuation for LINK?

>> No.19821084

$0.12 (12 cents of United States currency)

>> No.19821086

$2

>> No.19821091

didnt read, not selling

>> No.19821098

>>19821080

0. it is a scam

>> No.19821103

probably like 12-20 bux desu

>> No.19821134

>>19821080

Right now about $4. In 3 years about $50. In 5 years $200. Peak value is 1k 10+ years out

>> No.19821136

>>19821080
Depends on the scale of your knowledge of the possibilities.

>> No.19821163

>>19821080
$1000

>> No.19821178

>>19821134
fud. We're about 2 years out from $1000

>> No.19821183

>>19821080
$1000 per link.

>> No.19821197
File: 429 KB, 334x739, 66B2BD1D-9A3C-4B00-A8DB-D062EB5A5A54.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19821197

>>19821080
Endgame value? $360,000 per link, if the derivatives market cap stays the same for the next 20 to 30 years

>> No.19821205

>>19821178

fud, $1000 EOY

>> No.19821211

>>19821080
$1.50. No reason it should be at a $1b cap right now while shit like VRA is under $5M.

Verasity has more actual users, and a bigger use case. Maybe the market really is irrational.

>> No.19821243

>>19821080
bout three fiddy

>> No.19821249

Somewhere between 1000 and 86000

>> No.19821253

$1000 per token

>> No.19821277

>>19821249
>gay YR Doe
what Kek is trying to say here, is that LINK is worth between $1000 and $86000, but 2020 is a very gay year and the singularity got postponed due to AIDS

>> No.19821302

>>19821277
Checked

>> No.19821341

>>19821249
Why would it be valued at $1,000, much less $86,000? I’ve seen some reviewers say maybe $10 (which is decent)
I’m not seeing any reason that it should be more than $400 though, and that’s with bullish sentiments. Where’s the $1,000 figure coming from?

>> No.19821348
File: 54 KB, 621x377, 5DB3AD81-EA46-42D2-B972-ED633F89CB19.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19821348

>>19821341
Fat protocol theory, look it up or sell early.

>> No.19821365

>>19821080
pre or post USA? (statues were ironically my capture )

>> No.19821376

5% of global GDP.

>> No.19821438

>>19821341
Anyone saying $10 is some greedy fuck daydreaming about it being some arbitrary for no great reason except that if it hits $10 then their initial investment becomes that much bigger

small-minded people, I tell ya, and they'll sell early as fuck

>> No.19821475
File: 213 KB, 686x676, Psyop1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19821475

>>19821438

I can't even make head or tails of what the fuck you're trying to say you fucking retard.

Seriously, my reading comprehension is pretty fucking high, but I feel like I'm having a stroke reading that retarded "sentence".

>> No.19821482

>>19821341
Coming from us knowing what the fuck we're talking about. But sell at $10, please.

>> No.19821490

>>19821438
They were just pricing based off of what Bitcoin is going to do because a lot of coins move with it, but if a coin genuinely has some great ideas, it should do better. I don’t understand what makes Link unique though, I don’t understand a lot of the technical stuff involved with it. >>19821348
What’s fat protocol theory? Why would that pump it to $1,000+?

>> No.19821514

>>19821490
When you watch coins "follow bitcoin", which is "following" the DJIA, you're actually witnessing money enter and exit the cryptocurrency market as a whole. 2 years ago, you would see every coin get demolished anytime bitcoin MOVED and everyone thought they had that pattern nailed down too. It's constantly changing

>>19821475
I just worked 15 hours and I left one word out of my sentence

>> No.19821540

>>19821514
Yeah, I felt like BC was kinda like the Dow. I saw stuff with Omisego talking about getting scaled with ETH, and that looked promising too, right? Like offering an alternative to Gas for transferring ETH?

>> No.19821564

>>19821490
Two understand LINK you need to understand also philosophy along with tech.

I’ve gone on a reading spree ever since i’ve invested into it, the best way to explain it is via tragedy of the commons.

When you have a thin protocol, it allows apps like google/fb/amazon to dominate because of the way they store information in lieu of free service and maintain a monopolistic practice. It snufff out innovation.

In fat protocol, no app value can dominate the protocol value, so the wealth remains with the protocol. When more people create, the protocol becomes more valuable starting this feedback loop, the tokens become more valuable in turn.

>> No.19821603

>>19821564
So the value remains with the protocol, not the app
And you think that LINK (or the Blockchain?) could overthrow FAG? I’m not disagreeing, but that’s a pretty bold claim. It also looks like it relies on LINK becoming adopted mainstream, in place of FAG?

>> No.19821652

>>19821603
No FAANG will be involved with web 3.0, and they’ll move onto block chain. Because if they don’t they’ll be eaten alive by competitors.

Google cloud/amazon web services/facebook apis make massive amount of money, CL can reduce the cost of API calls significantly, like 1500x reduction.

>> No.19821665

>>19821490
If u dumb like me buy based on best memes. Link have prettiest pictures therefore buy. grug like

>> No.19821666

>>19821603
I read some more stuff on it, and it looked like to relied on how much money is entering the market, and what place LINK holds by then. It ranged anywhere between $20-$1,600 from what I saw.

>> No.19821670

Don't care. Still voting for Link.

>> No.19821686

>>19821665
Lmao you’re not wrong. I’ll at least wait until it has a good RSI

I’m sorry guys, a lot of crypto stuff goes over my head. I got the OMG coin being scaled to ETH, I think you guys might be into something with $1,000+ LINK.

>> No.19821707

>>19821080
$4

>> No.19821722
File: 256 KB, 600x661, 47D2F193-B503-474D-8239-B4300EA481F6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19821722

>>19821482
>Coming from us knowing what the fuck we're talking about. But sell at $10, please.

>> No.19821749

>>19821080
10-15

>> No.19821762

Read the whitepaper. It specifically says the price of a cup of a coffee.

>> No.19821784
File: 238 KB, 492x325, D7q0JmVU8AAzG6O.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19821784

$1k link
$100 stakenet
$1 bitbean
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxoE5PTa7Yw

>> No.19822125

>>19821686
Check out this take. Coin Bureau just does excellent reviews.
https://youtu.be/-pUR9WPIrX0

>> No.19822138

it's literally a worthless scam, true value is about 0.1$

>> No.19822265

$1000 eoy, it's not hard idiot

>> No.19822499
File: 251 KB, 500x758, 300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19822499

>>19821080
300$

>> No.19822558

>>19821211
kys pajeet

>> No.19822641

>>19821080
between 20c and $1

They dont have a working product. By giving them a range between 20c to $1 i think is fair.

>> No.19822689

>>19821277
>between $1000 and $86000,
when

>> No.19823062

>>19821205
this

>> No.19823304

>>19821080
>eth token
>value
You are all delusional.

>> No.19823309
File: 28 KB, 460x421, image0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19823309

81,000 per link

>> No.19823419

>>19821080
Somewhere around 1 billion.

>> No.19823421

>>19821080
1 LINK = 1 Big Mac.

>> No.19823487

About a cup of coffee if we’re being honest

>> No.19823526

>>19822558
Don't respond to them dude.

>> No.19823603

>>19821098
This. Not even joking.

>> No.19823619

It's crazy were at 4.00

I would have expected maybe .80 a couple years ago

>> No.19823705
File: 100 KB, 1080x1839, beans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19823705

>>19821784

Based and beanpilled

>> No.19823720

>>19821205
fud, $1000 by end of October

>> No.19823743

>>19821098
this
>>19823603
also not joking

>> No.19823767

>>19821080
The price of a big mac in the year 3000 which is 1000 USD

>> No.19823825

>>19821197
This

>> No.19824065

>>19821475
Hes saying people that say it will go to 10 dollars are being greedy and are choosing the number 10 arbitrarily out of greed and if it even does go to 10 dollars they will sell much earlier

>> No.19824253
File: 361 KB, 1567x1253, 1581667269463.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19824253

>>19821564
This.
Centralization of networks/data is something that is tremendously inefficient and therefore has no theoretical reason to persist in the long term. Its existence is a consequence of the fact that primitive networking protocols were not made with the functions they would eventually perform in mind, which meant they unfortunately had what we can now see as imperfect implementations, to say the least.
This combined with the explosive growth of the Internet causing demand to vastly outpace technology which led us to the Frankenstein monstrosity of Big Data and the API industry, greedily washing its hands in the flow of every data transfer operation in the world. Companies like Amazon and Facebook made their fortunes overnight almost exclusively in playing this middleman role for information by developing makeshift, prototypical application-layer solutions to fundamental problems. That power is inevitably coming off their hands just as fast as it got there, and all the NEETs who bought linkies will be the ones to have the unearned fortune of tech billionaires by indirectly washing their cum-soaked hands in that money instead. This is one of those things that will look completely obvious in retrospect, yet nolinkers will still deny it because they don't want the feeling of buying Bitcoin at $1 instead of $0.1.

>> No.19824453

Link being more expensive than a cup of coffee defeats the purpose of the coin.

>> No.19824620

>>19823720
fud, $1000 by June 20th, 2020 5:52AM (GMT-4) standard time

>> No.19824650
File: 133 KB, 1000x665, cup'o'link.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19824650

>>19821080
ahem.
tink tink

The Best. Part. of. WAKING. UP.
can't afford a cup!

>> No.19824706

>>19821080
Currently 0, cause it's not used anywhere

>> No.19824861

>>19821341
400 is the per link per year return in about 3 years, before full commercial adoption completes and before turd worlders finally get their shit colored hands on SC tech and instantaneously move up to second worlders because of it.

>> No.19824872

>>19821080
$10 fair value

>> No.19824947

Everyone saying $1000 or $81,000 (lol) are gaybois, because if they actually believed that they would be pouring literally everything into CL right now, they would be leveraged to the hilt, because it would be retarded not to be. But they aren't, they're just memelords

>> No.19825308

>>19824947
>he thinks we're joking when we say we're selling our houses, working at McD's and going starved homeless for linkies

>> No.19825339

>>19824947
>Implying I haven’t dumped everything I have into this
The fud on this board is so fucking lazy now

>> No.19825379
File: 1.46 MB, 2880x1800, 1590146022459.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19825379

>>19824947
>because if they actually believed that they would be pouring literally everything into CL right now, they would be leveraged to the hilt, because it would be retarded not to be. But they aren't, they're just memelords
You couldn't be further from the truth.

>> No.19825910

Whatever a cup of coffee costs

>> No.19825950

>>19824947
I unironucally know someone that got the fever over a token and did this, did max withdrawls on every credit card he had, leveraged all his home equity and all his savings, he bought in at 2 cents, it went 10 and i begged him to take his initial investment off table, but he had the fever believing sky was limit, it was going to 10 dollars, etc...pump ends, token is .004c now, he is totally ruined. No joke, this is a 55 yr old established dude. Sad.

>> No.19825961

About $1770
Ask me how I know

>> No.19825965

>>19825910
Literally the only person who understands

>> No.19825973
File: 2.34 MB, 3000x2098, 1590472853338.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19825973

The links will need to go beyond 1keoy to ensure informational flows around the globe.

>> No.19826023

>>19825961
akashic records?

>> No.19826062

>>19824947
>Everyone saying $1000 or $81,000 (lol) are gaybois, because if they actually believed that they would be pouring literally everything into CL right now
Been doin this for two years now baby I just can't stop

>> No.19826067

>dopamine running low
>curtains closed
>vitamin d depleted
>feeling the depression coming on
>"w-we're going to be rich a-arent we??"
>breathe a sigh of relief
>other anons are reassuring you you're going to make it
>ten minutes pass
>the feeling has worn off
>time to make another thread
>"link price prediction thread"
>yeah that's nice... look at all those numbers
>put all the posted numbers and multiply them with your stack
>haha wow, thats a lot of money
>imagine what all you could do with that money
>maybe i'll finally have sex...
>sun peeks through the curtains
>you hear your parents waking up
>hehe, fucking wagies
>the depression comes back
>the dopamine rushes dont last as long as they used to
>time to make another thread
>"is 300 link enough to make it?"

>> No.19826069

>>19821080
Ask again on the 21st.

>> No.19826084

Wow, carefully read through this thread and I can say with almost absolute certainty that 98%+ still have no fucking clue what Chainlink is. Like, absolutely clueless kek. I guess we really are early

>> No.19826211

>>19826084
Anyone who has so much as brushed up against the public or private sector procurement, acquisitions, contracting and fintech industries know how bad it wants BLOCKCHAIN and SMART CONTRACTS

We gon make it.

>> No.19826687

$120

>> No.19826817

>>19821197
If true even 30 link is a make it stack

>> No.19826923

288

>> No.19826966
File: 55 KB, 1141x827, Link_gl2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19826966

>>19821080

2.30 . . ish

>> No.19826971

>>19821080
Currently? $0, as it provides no value to anyone. In the future? I could see it at best collateralizing simple low-stakes legal agreements...so maybe $10-$20, and steaking could provide a nice $2k a year or so.

>> No.19827011

>>19825950
He should have bought chainlink instead

>> No.19827022

>>19826966
honestly I hope it dips that hard. I'm coming into some money soon, and I want to upgrade my stack

>> No.19827602

>>19826067
literally me

>> No.19827756

>>19821080
$1000

>> No.19827815

Just based off of a bullrun I could see us reaching $100-300, but with usage building over the next 5 years who knows.

>> No.19827897

>>19821080
1k eoy

>> No.19828019
File: 41 KB, 500x480, 1514597283856.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19828019

One Thousand US Dollars

>> No.19828027

>>19821197
Wow I'd be a billionaire a couple times over.

>> No.19828790

>>19821341
>reviewers

>> No.19828860

>>19821197
this is true, but people like >>19826817 are neglecting purchasing power. what did being a millionaire in 1980 get you compared to being a millionaire today? in the future, having a million dollars will be like having 250k today.

>> No.19828871

>>19826067
i unironically hold 5k in link but this is hilarious

>> No.19828878
File: 36 KB, 400x500, 1557154763920.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19828878

*AHEM*

ONE CHAINLINK ERC-20 TOKEN (WITH ERC-677 CAPABILITIES) WILL BE WORTH EXACTLY, AND I MEAN EXACTLY (NOT A PENNY MORE OR LESS!) ONE THOUSAND (1000) UNITED STATES FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES BY THE END OF THE CALENDAR YEAR.

>> No.19829022

>>19826067
Kek

>> No.19829030

>>19821348
>Truth in ID

>> No.19829125
File: 7 KB, 222x250, 1553451479040s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19829125

>>19826067

>> No.19829285

>>19821080
0.025

>> No.19829628

>>19821348
>truth

>> No.19829689

>>19821080
Isn't link just another eric20 token?

>> No.19829743

>>19821080
Less than 32 mil mcap

>> No.19829816
File: 21 KB, 400x600, pants.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19829816

>>19829743
Who wears short shorts?