/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.19819016]

Would you rather work a job that pays 50k but you only do about 2-3 hours of actual work per day; stress free and remote(work from home)
or
job that pays 100k but you work in cubicle with fellow wagies and must work 8-10 hours per day

[Anonymous No.19819236]

>>19819016
Screw stress

[Anonymous No.19819263]

>>19819016
this is too easy. the 50k for sure 2-3 hours from anywhere i want? sign me up, i'm set

[Anonymous No.19819282]

>>19819016
50k, 2-3 hours a day, stress free and remote.
The easiset choice ever. The only reason why I want to make is not to worry or stress.

This. >>19819236

[Anonymous No.19820306]

>>19819016
>Would you rather work a job that pays 50k but you only do about 2-3 hours of actual work per day; stress free and remote(work from home)
This isn't even a choice for people on this board. Even in a big city you can easily keep your expenses under 50k a year so I would use this excess income to invest in other passive income streams or just spend it on cool shit.

[Anonymous No.19820343]

>>19819016
low stress, for sure

[Anonymous No.19820408]

Nigga I already make 50k in a cubicle in an 8-10 hour day. What the fuck is this choice? Literally only morons would pick the 100k option cause objectively even if you wanted more money you can make over 100k in 8-10 hours if you just spend 2-3 hours working from home and then put effort into a side business/freelance work with all the spare time you have. Literally nobody would pick the 100k option but someone with no real skills.

[Anonymous No.19820787]

>>19819016
>work a job that pays 50k but you only do about 2-3 hours of actual work per day; stress free and remote(work from home)
This is unironically me since covid

[Anonymous No.19820794]

>>19819016
50k and move to west virginia

[Anonymous No.19820886]

>>19819016
I'd take option 1 even if it was 30k and adjusted for inflation over the years. (3% increase each year)