[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 153 KB, 1080x810, Screenshot_20200619-115748__01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19805663 No.19805663 [Reply] [Original]

literally oracle big wig telling you to get your fucking ducks in a row

are you autists listening??
chainlink is going straight to the fucking moon
show me one crypto project that has such fucking support by the biggest companies in the world.

>https://twitter.com/ian_keane/status/1273723307645435908?s=20

>> No.19805682

*yawn* never going to happen

>> No.19805690

>>19805663
i still sold half my link stack at a 40x because i wanted a guaranteed half mil in case we go down.

put 1/4 of it into DMG because they're frens.

>> No.19805693

Since 2017. Companies shilling cryptos make me uneasy. That guy's probably genuine though. Just something about it reminds me of topping cryptos

>> No.19805695

why would he give a shit if im making it?

>> No.19805724 [DELETED] 

>>19805663
stop posting him retard. it's imbarassing normie literal brainlets like him are on the project. makes me consider dumping my stack each time i see his tweets ngl

>> No.19805733 [DELETED] 

>>19805693
"oracle digital" has nothing to do with oracle retard. this is literally just a delusional brainlet talking bullshit

>> No.19805768

Ian Keane is literal nobody. He doesn’t even work for Oracle corporation. he has meme job at UK branch of Oracle and definitely he has no power over corporate.

>> No.19805793

>>19805693
>topping cryptos
holding LINK is literally "topping" crypto
every other coin is being a sub pig bottom

>> No.19805800

>works for a company called ORACLE
lmao these LINK scammers can't even come up with original names for their fake companies

>> No.19805807
File: 26 KB, 611x276, ian keane oracle product management.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19805807

>>19805693
>>19805768
Ian Keane has nothing to do with Oracle integrating Chainlink.
He says so himself in pic related, and that slide saying "Chainlink integration Q3" was made and presented by someone else.

Ian is a pretty senior figure at Oracle, but the Chainlink integration was a decision made much higher up than Ian.

>> No.19805818

>>19805690
Holds all this time. Sells when we finally have near certain confirmation that it's happening. What has happened to biz.

>> No.19805835
File: 371 KB, 1080x1601, PicsArt_06-19-01.07.04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19805835

Ian Keane knows

>> No.19805849

>>19805663
I've made peace with the fact that big daddy bitcorn runs this show and until it goes up chainlink could partner with and alien civilization and it wouldn't budge $4.58

>> No.19805860

>>19805807
i hope you’re right anon. ian keane is meme at this point if higher figures are dealing with this integration, this makes it much more bullish.

>> No.19805873

>>19805663
>>19805807
Based Ian. I kinda liked Fernando, but his shill was too relentless. This guy is more restrained, but also cool, I like him

>> No.19805881

>>19805860
His tweet is absurdly bullish, with meme lingo
Is he just mocking /bz/?

>> No.19805930

>>19805860
The guy behind the "Chainlink integration Q3" slide is Joost Volker.

Watch Ian Keane's presentation he did last month: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwVdsTkt22E
He talks about a lot of interesting things, and is often very blunt on the topic of Chainlink.

>>19805873
>>19805881
Both Fernando and Ian are genuinely excited about Chainlink.
Neither had final say in Chainlink's integration.

>> No.19805943

>>19805663
>There will come a time when we will stop saying 'it's happening tonight'
>and we'll start saying "it's happening every night"
powerful

>> No.19805949

Is Oracle intergration really happening in Q4?

>> No.19805966

>>19805943
I just hope the thing happening every night isn't unrelenting soul crushing despair
Unless that's happening to other people then it's funny

>> No.19805980

>>19805800

Please dear God be bait. I mean it sure worked on me. This is bait, it has to be.

>> No.19805993

>>19805930
>Joost Volker
> Director Cloud Platform Business Development

not a bad title

>> No.19805997

>>19805966
once $10 breaks, we don't stop till $369

>> No.19806000

>>19805663
>>19805663

Fuck do these guys know what they doing to my brain? I've been holding since 2017 FFS. I know we will take off but the tension is building we feel so close yet its so hard to know. Its only the beginning of the end

>> No.19806047

>>19805997
I'm all for that man
If the folks who claim they astrally projected and saw link as $300+ in July are right then everything will be great, lol

>> No.19806067

>>19806000

>wah wahh ive been holding for 3 years and only made massive gains with more to come in the next years why am i not rich yet reee

What a baby

>> No.19806075

>>19806047
That wasn't july iirc, just 2020
They may have not noticed the . or , though, Link has regularly been around 3.70 this year

>> No.19806099

>>19806067

I'm not complaining but its definitely been one hell of a rollercoaster ride is what I'm saying.

>> No.19806114

>>19806099
Did you watch Ian presentation in may, he literally said LINK is to block chain, what the fire wall was to the early stage in internet.

>> No.19806170

>>19806114

Yea I watched the whole presentation live, it was probably one of the best I've seen as a general explanation of the 4th Industrial revolution and where we are headed. An excellent introduction for normies for sure.

Yes, however things weren't always this certain with LINK. Even back when I was DCAing in 2017 and early 2018 you really had to read between the lines. Even though it was clearly the direction the space as a whole needed to go, the company could have still failed potentially. Its basically just been a confirmed waiting game since Mid 2019.

>> No.19806188

>>19806170
I like his explanation about fat and thin protocols, this is the first time we’ve been able to invest into a protocol and we’re gonna be rich from it. Will prob create higher returns than any fucking stock.

>> No.19806207

>>19805930
>Both Fernando and Ian are genuinely excited about Chainlink.
I had no doubts about that, I'm excited myself, so I understand others getting excited too, specially when they have access to information unavailable for the mortal realm

>> No.19806218

Hehe just full gas pandering to autismos with memes to pump his bags. Cringe but somewhat based at the same time.

>> No.19806240

>>19806188
>>19806188

Yes, its going to be fucking ridiculous. As a network we won't be bound by the higher limits of what current companies have reached with their MCAP valuations.

Trillions seem impossible to most people but this is truly a whole new asset class in terms of value production.

Its like what Sergey said about "What if we could have invested in HTTPS? Now that would have been cool!"