what went wrong?

[Anonymous No.19798407]

[Anonymous No.19798443]

I didn't buy enough

[Anonymous No.19798455]

On a swing, need it back to 43 from 45 for another cheeky 50 stinkies

[Anonymous No.19798492]

scam that's all

[Anonymous No.19798589]

>>19798407
where do i start.

1) they used swift and other logos on their marketing misleading people to buy the token.
2) The team dumps 1million link on heads a month just like Ripple
3) The only usage is when the chainlink team makes a price feed contract and shoves it down a defi projects throat. Everyone that thinks chainlink has customers. Lets see how many customers stick around when they have to start charging.
4) you said what went wrong...what went wrong is you are still holding after it went from 30mil to 1.5 billion. The money has been made on link. There are better projects with a hell of a lot more upside.

Do you want me to continue?

[Anonymous No.19798642]

>>19798407
Still need more

[Anonymous No.19798655]

>>19798589
Yes, please do.

[Anonymous No.19798779]

>>19798655
5) Chainlink claims to be decentralized yet team holds more than half the supply
6) Chainlink claims to be decentralized but runs every single chainlink oracle contract (what happens if chainlink forgets to fill up eth or link?)
7) Chainlink is all big on "oh were blockchain agnostic" meanwhile there is no other blockchains getting 1/10 the traction as Ethereum. Blockchain agnosticism is a meme.
8) The link token was supposed to be needed due to erc677 transfer and call. Not one customer is using transfer and calls as they are only pulling prices from reference contracts ran by centralized chainlink team.
9). It's been over a year since main net. The biggest customer is some dopey defi platforms. Yet sergey will use swift and facebook libra on slides.

Shall I continue?

[Anonymous No.19798789]

>>19798589
>>19798779
Based. Keep going.

[Anonymous No.19798845]

>>19798789
10.). Type in $link on twitter, you won't find a more cringe community. I keep seeing "we're so early" from soccer moms from Chattanooga. Meanwhile most OG link holders have moved on.
11.). If Chainlink is doing so well, ask any of the customers for the info on what they are paying to use chainlink. You will never get an answer because they are using for free. They have to pay by advertising they use and pay for chainlink.
12. Meanwhile none of the "sponsors" have to even hold the link token...so what's the point?
13. Speaking of link token many think they will get to stake their link, they won't. Staking may come to the pre-selected nodes but it won't mean much to the 99% of holders.
14. Speaking of 21 nodes, why only 21? There are 100+ more on chainlink node listing sites that still to this day don't have any usage. Meanwhile those operators are losing money in infrastructure costs...muh demand

Shall i go on?

[Anonymous No.19798926]

>>19798407
memes descended into frenposting

frenposters do not make it

they have cursed LINK

death to frenposters

[Anonymous No.19798929]

>>19798407
SERGAY BETRAY

[Anonymous No.19799166]

>>19798845
no more then ok. Just imagine thinking you're early to a project that went from 30mil to 1.5 billion with nothing more than some price feeds ran by a centralized entity and given for free all while the token isn't even needed for this service. If you hold link today, good chance you werent holding early and you now have an OG's bags...congrats

[Anonymous No.19799180]

>>19798443
fpbp

[Anonymous No.19799183]

>>19798845
More

[Anonymous No.19799202]

>>19798845
No more please I can’t take any more

[Anonymous No.19799209]

>>19799183
sergey always having the same shirt should be enough

[Anonymous No.19799216]

>>19798407
Nothing i earned alot. onto Sta i guess

[Anonymous No.19799267]

>>19798407
Nothing went wrong, many people 20x'd their investments. You're just late to the party.

[Anonymous No.19799339]

>>19799166
>youhavenoideahowbadthingsreallyare.jpg
The kicker is that, despite how shit Chainlink is, without it Ethereum would be a useless husk

[Anonymous No.19799400]

>>19799339
compound and maker operate just fine without chainlink and both require oracles. Makes you think.

[Anonymous No.19799428]

>>19799400
both of them are bending the knee tho

[Anonymous No.19799451]

42 posting

[Anonymous No.19799557]

>>19798589
>>19798779
>>19798845
>>19799166
Based

[Anonymous No.19799631]

>>19799428
Once again, they are running just fine and using oracles without link. So would ethereum really be a "useless husk" without link? no.

[Anonymous No.19799699]

>>19798407
Buy the dip

[Anonymous No.19799711]

>>19799631
Maker did not run fine in March

[Anonymous No.19799740]

>>19798407
it's not 1k USD yet

[Anonymous No.19799743]

>>19799631
Maker literally got people life savings liquidated because of faulty oracles.

[Anonymous No.19799757]

>>19799711
it ran better than chainlink did in February -
https://blog.synthetix.io/update-on-xag-pricing-incident/

[Anonymous No.19799779]

>>19799743
Every Chainlink oracle is ran by the chainlink team. They select the nodes, pay the nodes link (don't know why, maybe to keep face), and pay the eth gas. If Chainlink messes up (they did with synthetix and forgot to fill up eth on heartbeats) and the oracles fail.

[Anonymous No.19799786]

>>19799757
>$36,000 loss vs Maker $8.1M

[Anonymous No.19799798]

>>19799779
kek I give you facts, and you spout this meme nonsense to me.

who the real schizo?

[Anonymous No.19799800]

>>19799786
both are faulty oracles. Chainlink is centralized whether they pay 21 nodes or 200, Chainlink is the centralized point of failure

[Anonymous No.19799808]

>>19799798
what's meme about what I just posted

[Anonymous No.19799826]

>>19799808
>every chainlink oracle is ran by the team

[Anonymous No.19799868]

>>19799800
I honestly can’t believe you faggots are still on with this whole Link thing. The world is fucking finished. I have a lot of link and been in since early 2018 and I don’t even give a shit anymore. I mean don’t get me wrong... it’s not like I don’t want it to go to $1,000 but who gives a shit at this point? It isn’t like your going to be able to have fun like early Bitcoin dudes who got rich did. I’m actually driving while writing this and just looked over and someone is wearing a mask in their car while driving. ITS FUCKING OVER.

The unironic hilarious part about this is I actually envy newfags who have gotten in in the past 4-8 months who might only have 3,000 link or less... they are pozzed they got in late but now it’s all fucked and the joke is on us OG link marines with 10’s of thousands of link.

Remember when a lot of us oldfag link marines were always saying this has to be too good to be true? Well it turns out it fucking was too good to be true. Because the world is unironically fucked.

The ONLY fucking possible salvation from all of this is if Chainlink ends up being so fucking valuable that you can trade a portion of your stack is to not get the inevitable vaccine, or to trade a portion of it to not be slaughtered by the Jews.

Link is only potentially about survival and not lamborghinis anymore.

[Anonymous No.19799910]

>>19799631
They have shitty subhuman protocols and will bend the knee when we tell them to, but they can keep running their monopoly bullshit just fine on their own sure. Anything useful will require link, like not requiring trusting some trust fund retards with the overall smart contract security.

Seething nolinkers stay poor

>>19799779
Kek

>>19799868
Based

[Anonymous No.19800103]

>>19799826
Every chainlink price feed is ran by the team. Yes there are 21 nodes ran by pre-selected entities but they are all paid for by chainlink. All it takes is chainlink to mess with a contract or forget to pay eth or link and the network fails. its not hard to understand.

[Anonymous No.19800124]

>>19800103
Now you’re being pedantic. When there is enough volume of consequence they will act accordingly, but you know chainlink is the only thing doing what it’s doing providing a verifiably random data source.

$1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.19800215]

>>19800124
lol. $1.5 billion dollar price feed, chattanooga soccer moms shilling, chainlink team centralized point of failure. Just be happy when you get $7 eoy anon. that about all you're going to get.

[Anonymous No.19800256]

>>19800215

[Anonymous No.19800284]

>>19799400
Why does band literally copy everything chainlink does but with no partnerships?

[Anonymous No.19800290]

>>19800284
this. His last name even has "coon" in it; automatically a turd-world scam.

[Anonymous No.19800295]

>>19800256
In december 2017 it was easy to be buying link based on speculation alone considering sergey was visiting sibos. How one buys link now at $5 and sergey having no name crypto projects do live streams with him is unreal.

[Anonymous No.19800304]

>>19800215
For someone with such a doomsday opinion that's still a pretty good gain senpai. I'm convinced. I'm all in

[Anonymous No.19800321]

>>19800295
i don't know why you keep argueing no one is selling their stacks, the best FUD you guys got now is $4.

[Anonymous No.19800351]

dr:ns

[Anonymous No.19800352]

>>19800304
sure, if you like traditional gains.

>>19800321
only one selling their stacks is Sergey, 500k every 14 days on your head brad garlinghouse style. At least garlicbread had a quarterly report about his dumping.

https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xf37c348b7d19b17b29cd5cfa64cfa48e2d6eb8db

[Anonymous No.19800360]

>>19800295
Oracle q3 integration.

[Anonymous No.19800399]

>>19800360
tell me more about how oracle will use chainlink let alone crypto anon. Maybe chainlink makes them an adapter for their barren wasteland of a blockchain suite and it just sits there doing nothing just like 99% of chainlink nodes listed on market.link.

[Anonymous No.19800501]

fudding chainlink as an addiction
>yes
fudding chainlink to acquire more
>yes
fudding chainlink because you're an on-the-clock-psyops-glowie
>of course, why not?

fudding chainlink when these kinos now exist?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufVyX7JDCgg
weforum.org/great-reset

[Anonymous No.19800615]

>>19800399
Why are you so angry?

If you hate chainlink so much just dont buy it?

[Anonymous No.19800686]

>>19800615
what the fuck does Ian know??

[Anonymous No.19800711]

Futures

[Anonymous No.19800945]

>>19800686
see>>19800360

[Anonymous No.19800977]

>>19800615
Pretty sure we've been saying Tonight, every night since 2017. How new is this asshole?

[Anonymous No.19801008]

>>19800615
Imagine being a highly successful adult white male with a family and still repeating retarded /biz/ memes. Dream come true.

[Anonymous No.19801052]

>>19801008
Not dreams, providence.

[Anonymous No.19801998]

>>19800399
lol

[Anonymous No.19802046]

>>19798845
burak?

[Anonymous No.19802302]

>>19801998
>no mention of chainlink at all
>strawgrasping because sergey won a contest in 2017
>thinks XRP and Ripple will be obsolete, meanwhile more and more banks signing up to RippleNet and Ripple cloud in 2020
>Brazil literally became first user of RippleCloud less than a week ago
the absolute state of Link shills

[Anonymous No.19802320]

>>19802302
https://blogs.oracle.com/financialservices/driving-payments-innovation-through-swift-gpi-universal-confirmations
>has a blockchain adapter to future-proof the bank for SWIFT’s ambitious modernization plans
Hmmm

[Anonymous No.19802337]

>>19802320
>no mention of chainlink at all

[Anonymous No.19802347]

>>19802337
>blockchain adapter

[Anonymous No.19802370]

if u cant small punt here, u dont deserve to make money from the market.

2.5 year low.

The shilling is non-stop. This is the hype cycle folks. happens once every two years.

"All of those pieces — Imagine if we could distribute this aid through Ripple or through stablecoins of some kind or something else." -
Brian Brooks OCC
https://cointelegraph.com/news/new-head-of-us-bank-regulator-talks-bringing-crypto-to-dc-with-cointelegraph

$XRP moon it.
RIP $LINK

Grab sui stack before its too late.

high fud = high pump. they know that. why u rekon link pumped hard as it did?

shit coins can and will pump. you just wait for 2 year bottom. its simple fact.

$LINK marines know this truth. they are one of the only coin army that consistently jumps from coin to coin and securing constant profits.

Bancor BNT moonboys owe everything to the linkie stinkies. now they will flow their profits into the xrp. some now, some later. we always need top buyers

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/XRPBTC/CharPlyM-3-decent-reasons-to-try-an-XRPBTC-long/

[Anonymous No.19802374]

>>19802347
>strawgrasping

[Anonymous No.19802394]

>>19799216
What is STA? Keep seeing this

[Anonymous No.19802395]

>>19802374
We will see. Good luck with your investments, anon

[Anonymous No.19802407]

>>19802347
Nolinkers will die in the next 3 months, just sit back and relax.

[Anonymous No.19802412]

>>19802395
>

[Anonymous No.19802422]

>>19802412
Cope

[Anonymous No.19802447]

>>19802407
Watch as this ends up being nothing at all.
>muh gozillion gojillion trillion dollar derivatives
>t. every crypto shill point in existence

>>19802422
Sold LINK at $3.50.
nice projecting

[Anonymous No.19802452]

>>19802407
>just wait 3 months
Kek, imagine buying this 1 year ago and seeing a 0% return.

[Anonymous No.19802454]

>>19802407
God I'm so comfy and my stack ain't even huge

[Anonymous No.19802462]

>>19802447
>Sold LINK at $3.50.
lol

[Anonymous No.19802470]

>>19802407
I mean relying on a slide meant to shill doesnt mean it will actually be worth anything

[Anonymous No.19802483]

>>19802462
>you didnt buy link early at all
>you didnt hold link till 4+
how much farther will goalposts go? are you going to lie about chainlink integration in SWIFT again?

[Anonymous No.19802513]

>>19798407

YOU HAD 3 YEARS

[Anonymous No.19802535]

>>19802370
XRP bagholders have to be the saddest cunts in crypto. It's not even funny any more. YOU HAD TWO YEARS (to dump)

[Anonymous No.19802552]

>>19802535
Just saw a pic recently how MOST XRP bagholders are currently in the red, they have to shill to get someone to buy those bags

[Anonymous No.19802560]

>>19802552
feels so comfy holding LINK.

[Anonymous No.19802653]

>>19802535
>buy high, sell low
>>19802552
yeah, a lot of those 2018 XRP buyers are hoping to LINK. LINK is getting all the dumb simp money now; the type of people who bough XRP in the top.
Meanwhile, 2020 XRP buyers are gaining, buying off the bags of the 2018 buyers who are switching to link.

How does it feel to be the new simp coin?

[Anonymous No.19802678]

all of the smart anons sold and retards bought the memes.

[Anonymous No.19803158]

To be honest, 2-3 months after main net I said if Chainlink doesn't have any serious integrations in 6 months time it's a failed project.

They're now looking at handing out "grants" to use the software and hoping it will catch on through "positive feedback loops".

At most we have a couple of defi platforms who see almost no use outside of crypto speculation. We've had "hundreds" of teams say they will use the token but 99% of them are as good as vaporware right now. Where are the integrations?

[Anonymous No.19803178]

>>19802678
/thread

[UncleOldfag !!zCrZ/jkI3nx No.19803306]

>>19803158
I've only warned you for three years now

Imagine believing what bagholders make up on this Cayman Islands laundering board. None of the breadcrumbs, from assblaster to drunk anon, were ever real. There's not one usage of Chainlink in the real world.

[Anonymous No.19803328]

>>19803158
t. never been involved in software development and startups.

[Anonymous No.19803647]

>>19798589
name those projects bigger than bringing offchain data to blockchain o wait ur trolling

[Anonymous No.19803777]

>>19802407
where's that from?
thanks fellow marine for making the hold feel comfy. Link marines are my senpai can't wait to meet my fellow biz ppl at the yacht party

[Anonymous No.19803844]

>>19803777
Ch ch checked. I'm unironically shooting for 777 link soon.
T. latefag who is trying his best

[Anonymous No.19803896]

LINK now is a normie's coin and all the made-up partnerships revealed to be fake. From now on, there won't be any more reason for LINK pumps and it will be crabbing until the next bull run when it might go up as the other large MC coins.

Better sell now and put it on a low MC promising project instead of day dreaming and delusion.

[Anonymous No.19803957]

>>19803896
https://mobile.twitter.com/sheila_warren/status/1273786793448468480

[Anonymous No.19803972]

>>19803777
Checked

[Anonymous No.19803984]

>>19803957
>hnnnngg.jpg