The Evolution of FUD

[Anonymous No.19790481]

Basically. Its the evolution of FUD.

First, we went for the team. The guy with a philosophy degree and an unsolvable problem he claimed to solve? They had no presence. Zero. Was easy pickings

Then, they started communicating. Infrequently, but they did. Blog posts here and there. Cryptic. Towncrier out of nowhere. People in disbelief, but again, it died down, and FUD prevailed.

Then we attacked the tech. Easy does it. Few were technical about LINK then. Any kind anons who were and gave us layman info were drowned out by the FUD memes and pastas. It was either technical FUD (so you wouldn't understand & be dissuaded) or so hilarious you would get distracted and leave it.

Then all the tech started being announced, so onto the tokenomics. This went on for a while, as Sergey et al. would never in their life discuss tokenomics ever. They did it once, in the white paper. That's it. It is all there. Read or don't read; they don't care. It is not for YOU.

On and on this went, the FUD running a parallel in ingenuity. Eventually, the tokenomics trickled down in layman terms into neat paragraphs that anyone could understand.

Google. Coinbase. Oracle. DocuSign. It was clear. Anyone with an internet connection and 5 minutes due diligence could find out the truth. So what's next? How do we FUD Chainlink when it's so fucking evident its all true? ALL OF IT

We don't. We FUD you. The person. How suicide stacks were always 10k. Give or take 40,000 USD by today's standards. You start to think its not worth it, no way you can buy that.

Chainlink has been fudded at EVERY stage with the fud changing focus ALONGSIDE IT. The one thing that won't be factually proven by chainlink now is your stack. You think you'll NEVER have enough.

Why bother? Here look, this shitcoin just went x 3. Look at this shiny one. X 5. Can you be next anon? Chainlink? Nah, useless. Sure it'll be 10usd SOMEDAY. But is that what you want? Or do you want the rockets and moons that your dreams fuel?

[Anonymous No.19790513]

whats your point?

[Anonymous No.19790546]

>>19790513
>whats your point?
brainlet spotted.

[Anonymous No.19790628]

>>19790481
>>19790546

Nigger

Also suicide stacks were always 10k

[Anonymous No.19790648]

>>19790481
The best FUD is actually fat Sergey because it's true and he will die of heart attack before he can finish the project.

[Anonymous No.19790672]

>>19790546
you could have just answered me if you already typed out this paragraph

[Anonymous No.19790734]

Sergey is Satoshi, so LINK will destroy BTC

[Anonymous No.19790829]

>>19790734
BASED

[Anonymous No.19790849]

>>19790628
The stacks changed as the prices changed. Most people are priced out to even get close to 10K LINK.

We are in a Great Depression 2.0

LINK is the way to prosperity in a post-covid world.

[Anonymous No.19790858]

>>19790849
Am I retarded for buying 10K link at avergae price of 3.95?

[Anonymous No.19790878]

>>19790672
Sorry didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

[Anonymous No.19790907]

>>19790878
I still dont know what you want to say with this thread exactly, a conclusion

[Anonymous No.19790920]

>>19790858
>Am I retarded for buying 10K link at avergae price of 3.95?
Even more retarded to miss a seat in the 4th Industrial Revolution.

[Anonymous No.19790953]

>>19790907
>I still dont know what you want to say with this thread exactly, a conclusion
the thread is a brief overview of the fud construction surrounding LINK over the years. What more spoon-feeding do you require, my poor malnourish street shitting Pajeet?

[Anonymous No.19790965]

>>19790907
He needs his daily does of attention

[Anonymous No.19790972]

>>19790965
>He needs his daily does of attention
it's dose, not does.

Brainlet spotted.

[Anonymous No.19791014]

>>19790953
so you dont have a point, you just summarized stuff, but there is no conclusion or thought added to it

what a boring thread

[Anonymous No.19791064]

>>19791014
>so you dont have a point, you just summarized stuff, but there is no conclusion or thought added to it
>what a boring thread

you must have missed the boat and you're SALTY.

DISDAIN FOR NOLINKERS.

[Anonymous No.19791082]

>>19791064
i have a fat bag from 2018 i just dont see the point of your thread

[Anonymous No.19791095]

>>19790481
go build something you bored incel

[Anonymous No.19791140]

The real FUD is the TIME it will take for Chainlink to have enough ORGANIC usage to push the price $100+, because as we have seen, any kind of hope for a speculative bull run had been crushed.

[Anonymous No.19791155]

>>19791082
Then shut up and hold. Fudding Link in 2020 is the definition of insanity.

[Anonymous No.19791169]

>>19791082
>i have a fat bag from 2018 i just dont see the point of your thread
describe a fat stack. if your stack is bigger than mine, i will kiss your feet at the yacht party.

[Anonymous No.19791181]

>>19791095
>go build something you bored incel
I am building something Salman.

[Anonymous No.19791183]

>>19790481
I'll give you the ultimate fud because it's true.

Useless product dreamed up by some russian jew neet who browsed here and fudded other tokens to get started with daddy's money.

He's a total buffon and an idiot. But most of all, it's a useless product that no one fucking uses or will ever use. Ever.

[Anonymous No.19791225]

>>19790628
if suicide is 10k, than what is the min. make-it stack?

[Anonymous No.19791235]

>>19791225
200k.

[Anonymous No.19791239]

>>19791183
False. Chainlink is the only coin working with Google, Oracle and Swift. DYOR.

[Anonymous No.19791275]

>>19791225
No one actually knows what the suicide stack is...

Based on the address there might be only 5000-7000 people with more than 10K LINK. We’re still in stealth/awareness phase.

[Anonymous No.19791293]

>>19791225
100k

[Anonymous No.19791345]

>>19791155
where the fuck did I fud?
>>19791169
its 20k link, for me its a fat stack, im from a poorfag eastern yurop country

[Anonymous No.19791403]

>>19791275
>Based on the address there might be only 5000-7000 people with more than 10K LINK. We’re still in stealth/awareness phase.
there's only 3200 addresses with more than 10k link
the bigger the stack, the higher the chance of splitting into multiple wallets
people with under 10k probably aren't splitting
people with 50k probably are
5 10k wallets might belong to the same person
so its almost definitely less than 3000 people with more than 10k links in the world

[Anonymous No.19791451]

>>19791403
People like to argue about stack on exchanges, which I think is fucking retarded for anyone familar with crypto. So I gave it a good estimate. Either way prob only one 1 out of 10 million people know what LINK is.

[Anonymous No.19791466]

>>19790481
Ha! Top post. The Evolution of FUD lolol

So true, too. I wonder if the Fud will continue even after we're all millionaires eg. Sergey's sold his soul to Google and CL will collapse tomorrow etc. The mind boggles. Meanwhile, we're all holding and planning our new lives. I can't wait. Easy street here I come .

[Anonymous No.19791524]

>>19791466
>Ha! Top post. The Evolution of FUD lolol
>So true, too. I wonder if the Fud will continue even after we're all millionaires eg. Sergey's sold his soul to Google and CL will collapse tomorrow etc. The mind boggles. Meanwhile, we're all holding and planning our new lives. I can't wait. Easy street here I come .
Dubs, check em.

[Anonymous No.19791570]

>>19791082
Sure you do Rankeesh. Now get out of here and go back to shilling fantom or ghost or whatever is the new spooky x named flavor of the month shit coin.

Nice analysis OP. What do you reckon could be the next FUD approaches? I tend to think that fud in here will be tatgeted toward staking when staking goes live. As at first not everyone will be able to stake, pajeet will say what's the point of holding link if you can't even stake it? As for twitter and reddit, I think the cycle you described might start again on there.

[Anonymous No.19791611]

>>19791239
ask me how i know you're a paid chainlink shill

Vitalik is actually smart and knew about the oracle problem way before Sergay even was into it. But he acknowledged that its an actual Computer Science Problem that is impossible to implement in the real world without lot of sacrifices and work arounds. And Vitalik had actual principles besides money and therefore didnt went the route to spend his next years in something that he knew is basically born dead on arrival.

Besides, Vitalik a lot of people also think like this about the Oracle Problem. And then Sergay the philosophy major came around and saw that there will be money to make on this and jumped on the ship and attribute himself to it.
All sergay did, is to build a KYCed, pseudo decentralized, permissioned webscraper aggregator that takes the median of API calls that he prays to sell to some legacy players that have tech illiterate boomers. He knows his solution is shit. This is the fact of chainlink today, but you got to give it to him he actually made chainlink an industry standard indeed with subtle meme magic and pretty genius marketing targeting autists. This was sufficient enough for him already. But again how much can you weigh this in? A ''industry'' constitueing of shitcoin PnD pajeets and chink 100X leverage casinos, being a industry standard there is nothing I would show off anywhere

[Anonymous No.19791653]

>>19791611
Beautiful, but did not read.

[Anonymous No.19791696]

>>19791570
>Nice analysis OP. What do you reckon could be the next FUD approaches? I tend to think that fud in here will be tatgeted toward staking when staking goes live. As at first not everyone will be able to stake, pajeet will say what's the point of holding link if you can't even stake it? As for twitter and reddit, I think the cycle you described might start again on there.

Staking will indeed be the new fud. Many people will not have the access, the capabilities/resources /connections in order to have the necessary conversations to get this going.

The only recourse that a smart but dedicated incel has to rely on are the new nuggets of gold that will be dropped along the way.

Here's a sample of the new misinfo ready for brainlets in the image attached.

We are getting close.

[Anonymous No.19791931]

>>19791696
Lol, what the hell is this? Where did you get that?

[Anonymous No.19791969]

>>19791696
The fuck is this?

[42 No.19791980]

>>19790481
>How do we FUD Chainlink when it's so fucking evident its all true? ALL OF IT
>We don't. We FUD you. The person
Mfw

[Anonymous No.19792013]

>>19791611

Refute this

[Anonymous No.19792033]

>>19791403
can confirm I have multiple 10k wallets

[Anonymous No.19792172]

>>19792013
You cant, 1000eoy

[Anonymous No.19792201]

>>19791155
>Then shut up and hold. Fudding Link in 2020 is the definition of insanity.


BASED MAN IS BASED

[42 No.19792259]

>>19791403
>so its almost definitely less than 3000 people with more than 10k links in the world
now how many have decent stacks of linkpool shares?

[Anonymous No.19792537]

when is the next chainlink dip

[Anonymous No.19793173]

>>19792259
fuccc

[42 No.19793196]

>>19793173
mfw I was shilling the linkpool ICO to everyone at the time
those were the days when 1 LP share was 1 ETH

[Anonymous No.19793300]

>>19791611
Also refute this

[Anonymous No.19793451]

>>19791403
I've never understood this splitting malarky. I've got a 6 fig stack on a single trezor. if I split it to multiple wallets that's multiple seed phrases I have to secure, & a greater chance I'll loose one. and if you're splitting cause you're scared eth will be hacked...well...

[Anonymous No.19793477]

>>19793451
I can see big enough value you want to split it, but LINK $4 right now. If this thing was like $100 you bet your ass i’m splitting wallets.

[Anonymous No.19793490]

>>19793196
literally missed out of LP by one day.

[42 No.19794165]

>>19793490
sorry bro
you should probably load up on some before staking is announced

[Anonymous No.19794763]

>>19794165
Thanks 42. Going in on DMG and use those bags to load up on a LP.

[42 No.19794777]

>>19794763
>Going in on DMG and use those bags to load up on a LP.
God speed and good luck marine

[Anonymous No.19794818]

>>19793196
eth was like 600$ at the time. it made(still makes)more sense to buy more link. iirc link was between .30 and .50

[42 No.19794956]

>>19794818
>it made(still makes)more sense to buy more link
there were times when linkpool ICO was more profitable than buying link at the time
linkpool shares have been paying out dividends (in chainlink) to shareholders for over a year now
I only had to sell a portion of my shares to cover my initial investment

The point of me shilling linkpool isn't to get rich buying and selling now, but to be the first in line when public staking is announced.
Neet nodes will follow but most will not be able to compete for the premium contracts like linkpool can

[Anonymous No.19794982]

>>19791466

Look at r/buttcoin for the answer to that, There are legit BTC multimillionaires and still a bunch of faggots FUD. It's the nature of being supreme, it inspires envy and hate.

Looking forward to all the asspain on r/fuckstink

[42 No.19795007]

>>19794982
>It's the nature of being supreme, it inspires envy and hate.
it's not strong men that are a danger to the world
but weak men that pose the greatest risk to civilization

[Anonymous No.19795027]

>>19794956
>inkpool shares have been paying out dividends
barley anything. i just purchased 5 lp and am barley getting a good payout.

>>19794956
>The point of me shilling linkpool isn't to get rich buying and selling now.

yeah no shit

[42 No.19795028]

>>19795007
>weak men that pose the greatest risk to civilization
the Neil Druckmanns of the world

[Anonymous No.19795046]

>>19793477
mate at 5.50 I'll have a million+ $ on a single trezor. thinking of splitting it makes me more nervous cause that's 2 private keys & 2 seed phrases to secure instead of one. am I crazy in thinking it's safer NOT to split?

[42 No.19795081]

>>19795028
>the Neil Druckmanns of the world

[42 No.19795138]

>>19795081

[Anonymous No.19795144]

I have 50k link on coinbase and about 15k on binance and another 5k on Gemini

[Anonymous No.19795161]

>>19795144
also 10k is a make it stack
1k suicide stack

100k is fuck you money.

Og from etherdelta days

[42 No.19795183]

>>19795138

[Anonymous No.19795319]

>>19790648
t. 2017 diehard link marine, saw it all, never sold, but this unironically hit me hard bro.

[Anonymous No.19795416]

This Season.........

The Evolution.....

[Anonymous No.19795432]

of..........

[Anonymous No.19795449]

......FUD

[Anonymous No.19795498]

>>19794777
Kek speaks.

[Anonymous No.19795521]

>>19791293
Wrong, I feel like I don’t have a make it stack and I have 500k

[Anonymous No.19795584]

>>19795046
Honestly you’re not wrong, more wallets means for more surface attacks. Right now my set up is a ledger, and when my portfolio reached a certain amount I went to buy a laptop which stays offline 24/7 has only connected to the internet like once in the last year.

[Anonymous No.19795622]

>>19791931
>>19791969
The inevitable evolution of propaganda.

[Anonymous No.19795696]

>>19795584
I get it, that might be over kill but I understand. I'm considering getting a bank safe deposit box to store my seed in

[Anonymous No.19795740]

>>19795696
It overkill until you lose your money. My 24 seed phrase has never seen the light of day, it kept in a vault in a location only I know.

Best to assume everything is compromised.

[42 No.19795775]

>>19795740
>Best to assume everything is compromised.
based

[Anonymous No.19795799]

>>19795046
But if you split your stack between multiple wallets, you limit the amount of losses that you can incur from a single breach of security. If one wallet becomes compromised, you'll only lose a portion of your stack. If your entire stack is in one wallet, you could lose 100% of it

[Anonymous No.19795850]

>>19795799
If you're expecting a "breach in security", what's the point of even having a hardware wallet? None. You just massively increase your attack exposure with multiple devices/seeds.

[Anonymous No.19795876]

>>19795740
his many people know you own link/crypto though? not a single person I know knows, but my parents know I have crypto & I'm already regretting that. when link moons I'm planning on playing it where I say I made some money on crypto & cashed it all out, but only actually cashing out a little, giving them some, and then pretending I don't own any anymore. I'll never say anything about link even when link is as well known as Google (can you imagine?) & will deny all knowledge of it

[Anonymous No.19795937]

>>19795876
Egh that some fucked up family dynamics you got there, my family knows I have crypto I invested it for them, but there financially illiterate so when LINK moons i’ll be the custodian of the funds. Not letting them spend it on hermes and louis vuiiton bags.

[Anonymous No.19795950]

>>19795799
this >>19795850 - security breach like how? you leave your seed lying around? storing crypto isn't like storing cash in a bank account or gold in a safe

[Anonymous No.19796015]

>>19795937
you obviously don't know what happens when a single person acquires extreme wealth. good luck dealing with your family after that happens & they know - they'll change trust me. the way I'm doing it is to be able to get rid of all my families worries about money, without fucking them or our relationship up through jealously, greed, envy etc. my family are happy right now, they don't need massive wealth to improve their lives

[Anonymous No.19796096]

>>19790648
That’s what stopped me from buying in at $0.40. Imagine coming full circle and buying 500 stinks for 1900...

[Anonymous No.19796410]

>>19796015
Egh my family a bit different and weird. I was gonna put the proceeds into a trust and let them become beneficiaries. I’m still gonna demand executive power because I know they’re spending habits.