/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.19748059]

>OMG will reach a new ATH this month
How do I create my own space company to compete with Elon once I make it?

[Anonymous No.19748190]

>>19748059

You can’t compete with Elon because he gets to cuddle with Grimes every night.

[Anonymous No.19748244]

how much OMG to make it?

[Anonymous No.19748336]

>>19748059
Tell us why you think it’ll make a new ATH anon

[Anonymous No.19748516]

>>19748336
Because anon, it goes a little something like this

>exchanges accumulate OMG tokens (highest ever volume for last 4 months)
>mainnet fee currently based on % of OMG so OMG price cannot increase too much
>fee will change to % of ETH this week
>once the fees change, OMG token is free to increase
>exchanges pump the token price
>all the OMG they bought for less than $2 they can use to pay 1/3rd ETH chain gas fee
>if OMG is pumped 10x they pay 1/10th the fee cost on top of the 1/3rd rate
>total rate would be 1/30th the normal ETH fee rate in this scenario
>exchanges save 96% of transactions fees for all ETH based tokens including tether and ETH

[Anonymous No.19748585]

>>19748516
Thanks anon, had seen that pasta couple of times but still not sure if I should have a make it stack. Just higher volume doesn’t tell shit honestly, it’s obv the CB listing. Any crumbs on which exchanges would be participating?
Also, why this month?

[Anonymous No.19748687]

>>19748585
apparently Bitfinex is the only exchange to say they'll use OMG for tether so far. How much to make it faggots?

[Anonymous No.19748720]

>>19748687
Yeah I don’t get the “exchanges have been suppressing the price, will allow it to increase now” rationale if it’s only Bitfinex. But then again, finex and tether are huge - so any breadcrumbs appreciated OP

[Anonymous No.19748888]

>>19748585
The Coinbase listing happened on 21st May. The volume has been consistently above 100 million per day since March (which is very high for a token with a similar market cap and no use at the time).

Bitfinex definitely are because they are integrating tether with OMG as per the announcements (bitfinex and tether are owned by the same people). I believe other exchanges are also accumulating. Namely Coinbase - they added OMG before the working product even came out. Most of their tokens are ethereum based, and if they added OMG in May, they will have had a good look at the product (as per their token criteria) and probably access to test it as well. If they had that much access and decided to list it, it would make sense for them to take advantage of the potentially massive saving in fees and transaction time.

Not only that, but coinbase deleted a tweet at the end of May saying they were adding support for tether (which was once direct competition of their own failed stablecoin product). If they are adding tether, that’s quite a change in tone from the past. I wonder why tether suddenly seems attractive to coinbase - could the fact that potential 96% savings and faster transactions have something to do with it?

I’m not saying any of this is 100% certain, but the pump in volume really is huge. We already know hat bitfinex will take advantage of the fees and so will want to pump OMG as much as possible. This also reduces supply as bitfinex holds the tokens to pay the fees. If bitfinex can pass 96% savings for all ETH transactions onto users, the extremely competitive world of exchanges will try to catch up - if they aren’t already.

[Anonymous No.19749058]

>>19748888
checked, how much to make it OP?

[Anonymous No.19749080]

op said that this shit would happen last week already
it didn't happen
fuck this retarded theory

[Anonymous No.19749102]

>>19748720
>>19748687
I would say 1000 OMG is a good starting point. 3000 is a great stack.

70% of OMG is owned by the top 100 holders, most if not all of which are exchanges (exchanges own multiple addresses each). If just one exchange holds their tokens to pay fees instead of offering them to sell, this will reduce token supply significantly leading to a price increase.

[Anonymous No.19749116]

>>19749058
1k, 3k for lifelong Thai ladyboy slave harem

[Anonymous No.19749142]

>>19749080
The fees haven’t changed yet. The COO said it would happen sometime in the next week, and he said that on 5th June. Stop fucking acting like it’s been months already, if you can’t wait two weeks for something in crypto maybe you should head to the casino instead

[Anonymous No.19749677]

>>19749142
You sure people don’t know it yet? Also why hold the token if it’s just the fees that change but there is no staking still?

[Anonymous No.19749902]

>>19749677
People don’t know it because the price hasn’t moved since this was revealed in a very lowkey Q&A in 5th June. This has barely been discussed on the OMG reddit even, which is filled with autistic dweeb bag holders. There was 1 thread about it at the time which hit a few comments, probably because it’s hard to understand the mechanism behind the potential price increase. What isn’t hard to understand is this - exchanges can save 90%+ on all ETH fees by simply accumulating OMG, drying up supply and using them to pay fees.

The fees have to be paid in OMG until staking is released. It’s an artificial way of giving the tokens value until staking. But artificial or not, value is value.

[Anonymous No.19750243]

>>19748059
HOLY FUCKING SHIT 40 transactions in the last 24 hours and it's sitting at ONLY $215m marketcap, OMG is so UNDERVALUED right now

[Anonymous No.19750250]

>>19749902
Thanks anon, that helps actually. Who’s getting those fees that are paid out in OMG? The team?

[Anonymous No.19750460]

>>19750243
It’s not a public network yet you retard, they’re still testing different token transfers on it. Check the fees, once it switches to ETH based that is when it will go public with tether/bitfinex

[Anonymous No.19750597]

>>19748888
read and checked

[Anonymous No.19750606]

>>19750250
At the moment the fees are going to be paid to “watchers” which are basically stakers without the staking mechanism. Watchers stake tokens to watch and approve transactions rather than power transactions. The fees are paid to watchers. The OMG team themselves will act as significant watchers I believe. Once the mainnet goes public details of exactly how to become a watcher will be known. I’m not actually planning to become a watcher myself as I think the rise in token value will be substantial enough

[Anonymous No.19750836]

>>19750460
>It’s not a public network yet
Face it, no one is using it. When do you expect real volume anyway? 1 month from now?

[Anonymous No.19751106]

>>19750836
Like I said, it’s not available for use by the public yet. You see the ETH rootchain hash isn’t integrated yet? They are still fucking testing it you moron.

Bitfinex has already confirmed they will be transacting all their tether trades on OMG Network, we already know there will be substantial real volume so your fud is useless I’m afraid.

Sweetie, you can’t even figure out whether a mainnet is live or not, maybe crypto isn’t for you bud, maybe try a lemonade stand instead?

[Anonymous No.19751317]

>>19751106
>Like I said, it’s not available for use by the public yet.
sure, it has a low amount of transactions because the public mainnet isn't public yet!
>Bitfinex has already confirmed they will be transacting all their tether trades on OMG Network
cope, they only said they will add it as a choice (like 6 other blockchains) when you deposit/withdraw funds to/from bitfinex

[Anonymous No.19751382]

>>19748059
Ath was like $40 i feel like a little looting dirty nigger at these prices

[Anonymous No.19751758]

>>19751106
what is an eth rootchain hash and what does it mean

[Anonymous No.19751970]

>>19751317
>sure, it has a low amount of transactions because the public mainnet isn’t public yet!
Yes that’s correct, glad you understand the internationally renowned payments provider wants to test their product before goes public

> cope, they only said they will add it as a choice (like 6 other blockchains) when you deposit/withdraw funds to/from bitfinex
No they didn’t. They confirmed all their tether transactions will run through OMG. You don’t understand how tether works? It runs on different block chains, but the most popular one by far (and growing in popularity) is through ETH. All of bitfinex’s tether goes through ETH and will go through OMG as they have confirmed themselves. Bitfinex and tether are owned by the same people, so having bitfinex on side is huge for tether adoption.

Your fud attempts are hilarious I’ll give you that, I hope whatever shitcoin you’re trying to PnD that OMG makes irrelevant moons anyway bro

[Anonymous No.19752135]

>>19751758
It means the mainnet blockchain is not currently sending its blocks to the ETH main chain. Once that link is established, the blocks created by the OMG child chain will be added to the ETH parent chain for confirmation. The current mainnet is not connected because they are testing it’s ability to produce blocks for various scenarios. Most testing has already been done in the ropstein testnet, they are just completing due diligence as you would expect for an enterprise solution.

[Anonymous No.19752831]

>>19752135
I guess this makes sense if you can rely on coinbase having done their due diligence. Had honestly written this one off but assume they know some stuff
Is it true that the fee structure should happen soon? Where did they say that? Just seems odd that people didn’t notice that if true

[Anonymous No.19752844]

>>19751970
>They confirmed all their tether transactions will run through OMG.
You can repeat it as much a you want but it won't make it true. If you want to shill your favorite shitcoin you should at least show a proof of your claims


You know what? Let's pretend all exchanges around the world use the OMG network to transact USDT. Do you know how much you will get per year per token? USDT transfers generate (approximately) $2.43m in fees each month. If you use the OMG network that would be $2.43m/3 = $810k in fees each month. So $810k*12= $9.72m in fees per year. With 100m OMG staked that would give you a return of slightly less than $0.1 a year, for a token.
https://ethgasstation.info/
>b-but staking is not that important, exchanges will still buy OMG to pay less fees
You don't know that. You are assuming that the spike in volume means that
1) the volume is legit whereas the top exchange for OMG are BKEX, DragonEX, Bione, Sistemkoin (pic related is what the volume on binance looks like)
2) exchanges are buying OMG tokens to use it, and the volume surge on Binance in May isn't speculators trading the pump. You have absolutely no proof that exchanges are willing to risk buying OMG. If you want to show me that the exchanges wallets are getting bigger it could also be because people have been moving their OMG to exchanges to sell the pump.
OMG is NOT going to reach ATH this month let alone this year.

Also the fact that you think 3k is a "great stack"
just means that you are a deluded moonboy (and a poorfag) emotionally attached to your bag.

[Anonymous No.19752901]

>>19751970
Anyway we will be fixed by the end of the month. If OMG doesn't reach $2 (not even 10% of its ATH) you will never post again on this board, okay?

[Anonymous No.19752946]

>>19748059
Coinbase = liquidity event for underwater VC bags

[Anonymous No.19753034]

>>19752831
The COO said it in a video Q&A with messari. The Q&A wasn’t passed around a lot, but it doesn’t even matter how many people know - the point is that the current fee structure shackles OMG price below $2 which is why the pump can’t be priced in yet

[Anonymous No.19753039]

>>19752844

Heh I’m an ardent OMG supporter but I completely agree with what you say.

[Anonymous No.19753627]

>>19748059
how confident are you that it will reach ATH this month?

[Anonymous No.19753703]

>>19752844
https://mobile.twitter.com/bitfinex/status/1267421929142661125

>all that bullshit calculation stuff
This isn’t about staking at all retard haha, it’s about utilising the cheap fees on the network and paying them with the OmG token, the higher the price of the token the more the exchanges save. I couldn’t give a shit what staking rewards will be once I’ve made 10x on this pump.

>you don’t know that, i-it could be For any of these bullshit reasons
Yeah, I’m sure the volume mysteriously tripled in March just because exchanges were buying it to dump it. Your whole reasoning there doesn’t make sense because exchange volume =/= blockchain volume. It’s the BLOCKCHAIN volume that has increased which can only mean exchanges or wallets outside of exchanges are buying/selling. Like I said before, I don’t know for sure what the reason for the volume increase is because all we can do is speculate, but it’s highly probably that it’s exchanges accumulating because the token will be used to pay for fees and exchanges can save 90%+ on transactions using it like that, you’re suggesting that the volume could be from people buying to sell the pump, but the volume increased long before any pump happened. That doesn’t make any sense shithead.

OMG is going to hit ATH within the next 30 days because exchanges can literally save boatloads of money doing that. They have motivation, they have the means to do it, and so far the volume tells a story that fits very nicely with that theory.
>i-it could be this!
>i-it could be t-that!
Desperate

[Anonymous No.19753833]

>>19753039
I agree with the staking calculation, which this thread and the imminent pump have nothing to do with. Whether or not staking will deliver 10 cents per year initially is irrelevant for the current token model.

If it does though, crypto prices rely much more on speculation than actual current staking rewards. Take ETH for example, tether represents 33% of all volume on ETH, which in his scenario would mean that OMG would be worth 1/3rd (fee ratio) of 33% of ethereum. Speculation could also be that because anything that runs on ETH can also run on OMG faster and cheaper, whether ETH 2.0 or not. This would put OMG’s price at 1/9th of ETH which would be $26 ironically enough which is almost exactly the previous ATH. This fudster doesn’t understand crypto currency, probably because he’s a shill if loopring or starkex or some other project that is way inferior and behind OMG for scaling ETH.

[Anonymous No.19753919]

>>19753627
$7-$10 EoM, $30+ in July

It’s not how confident I am in whether it will reach ATH, because if exchanges are going to use it as intended it certainly will - they have the means to give it 10 or 20 times the market cap it currently has.

What matters is whether exchanges are going to do what I think they are. No one knows for sure, but the volume fits the theory, exchanges have huge motive, there’s signs of this thought being had by exchanges already (bitfinex migration, coinbase listing before product launch), and exchanges are easily capable of it. If the glove fits...

[Anonymous No.19754011]

Why are Fees cheaper when OMG price is High?

[Anonymous No.19754142]

>>19748059
>>19753703
>https://mobile.twitter.com/bitfinex/status/1267421929142661125
God I feel bad for you. Bitfinex also supports USDT transactions on 6 other blockchains including ETH, EOS and TRON. adding support for a blockchain =/= moving all of their transactions to this particular blockchain.

>It’s the BLOCKCHAIN volume that has increased which can only mean exchanges or wallets outside of exchanges are buying/selling
Of course it can NOT mean that people are moving their OMG tokens to sell them as the price went up.
>but the volume increased long before any pump happened
pic related

>but it’s highly probably that it’s exchanges accumulating
>fits very nicely with that theory
>i-it could be this!
>i-it could be t-that!

this single link is invalidating your whole theory https://etherscan.io/token/0xd26114cd6EE289AccF82350c8d8487fedB8A0C07#tokenAnalytics

you can keep posting images of people laughing if it makes you happy though

>>19753833
>Take ETH for example, tether represents 33% of all volume on ETH, which in his scenario would mean that OMG would be worth 1/3rd (fee ratio) of 33% of ethereum
ETH is FAR from being used only for transactions so your comparison doesn't make sense
>probably because he’s a shill
I'm not shilling any crypto

>>19753919
I see you're already going down from "it will reach ATH eom" to "it will reach $7-$10 eom".
Just NEVER post again on /biz/ if it doesn't reach $7 by the eom ok?

[Anonymous No.19754254]

>>19754011
Because at the moment the fees are 5% of an OMG. When they switch to fees based on 1/3rd ETH gas, every OMG token’s price is unshackled from the fee model. Anyone holding it as it goes from $2 to $20 will have paid $2 for $20 worth of fees. This is compounded 300% by the fact that the fee rate will be 1/3rd of ETH gas fee. Therefore, if an exchange owns 1 OMG at the moment of fee change and pumps it 10x by keeping it to pay for fees, they can pay for 30x as many transactions because the fee drops to 33% and the token they use to pay the fee has risen in value 10x.

[Anonymous No.19754623]

>>19748059
stop sppoonfeeding retards OP

[Anonymous No.19755072]

>>19754142
>bitfinex also supports USDT transactions on 6 other blockchains, adding support for a blockchain =/= moving all their transactions to this blockchain
Actually in the case of the move to ETH it is true. The huge majority of tether transactions now occur on the ETH blockchain because it has the best combination of speed, low cost and reliability. The OMG network utilises the same security and reliability as ETH while offering a fraction of the fees and 1000x tps. Therefore it stands to reason that tether transactions will migrate to OMG over time and make ETH through OMG child chain the primary mode of transaction. The move from Omni to ETH happened in a few months, the move to OMG is a far simpler transition and will be faster.

>that zoomed out chart
Here’s a link showing volume by month which clearly shows the increase in volume from March
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/OMG-USD/history?period1=1497571200&period2=1592265600&interval=1mo&filter=history&frequency=1mo

>this single link is invalidating your theory
The link clearly shows the volume increase per month, so I’m not sure why you posted it. The blue bars represent the amount of OMG transferred and doesn’t take into account the current price of OMG, which is why it looks like there was more volume at the beginning in 2017. Adjusted for USD/BTC or ETH price the volume is higher than ever over the last 4 months. You can’t even read etherscan properly mate it’s embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.19755312]

>>19754142
> ETH is FAR from being used only for transactions so your comparison doesn't make sense
Yes it does. Everything that ETH will be used for will run on the blockchain, any games, smart contracts or DeFi projects will always be run via transactions of some sort on the blockchain. OMG will therefore be able to scale ANYTHING that runs on ETH ever. It’s the principle theory if a child chain to produce blocks of transactions of the same nature that the parent chain does. You obviously don’t understand how this scaling solution works so why not read up about it and then try finding faults.

>I’m not shilling any crypto
You’re fudding OMG from a position where you don’t understand how it works, how the price is affected or even how to measure volume properly in the context. I can only think that you must be butt hurt by OMG in some way

[Anonymous No.19755342]

>>19754142
> I see you're already going down from "it will reach ATH eom" to "it will reach $7-$10 eom".
Just NEVER post again on /biz/ if it doesn't reach $7 by the eom ok?
When did I say ATH eom?

Jimmies: rustled

[Anonymous No.19755583]

>>19755072
>Therefore it stands to reason that tether transactions will migrate to OMG over time.
I never denied that, I said that you were lying when you said that bitfinex announced that they would move all their volume to the OMG network. They will first see if it works well and ONLY if there is no problem they will slowly move their volume to the OMG network. Well then you just need to hope that a cheaper solution with the same security/scalability doesn't see the light of day.

>Here’s a link showing volume by month which clearly shows the increase in volume from March
Are you mentally challenged?
you told me >>19753703 less than two hours ago :
>exchange volume =/= blockchain volume. It’s the BLOCKCHAIN volume that has increased
and now you link me the fucking volume on EXCHANGES

>The link clearly shows the volume increase per month, so I’m not sure why you posted it
Listen, it shows that the volume spiked in MAY when they announced the MAINNET RELEASE, and not in MARCH like you are saying.

>The blue bars represent the amount of OMG transferred and doesn’t take into account the current price of OMG, which is why it looks like there was more volume at the beginning in 2017. Adjusted for USD/BTC or ETH price the volume is higher than ever over the last 4 months.
jesus fucking christ dude
8m omg transferred*$20 per OMG = $160m volume
55m omg transferred*$1.5 per OMG = $82.5m volume

[Anonymous No.19755606]

>>19755342
>When did I say ATH eom?
in the original post? >>19748059
at this point you are just embarassing yourself

[Anonymous No.19755986]

>>19755342
One of the most blatant chinkscams. And that's saying a lot.

[Anonymous No.19756080]

>>19755583
> I never denied that, I said that you were lying when you said that bitfinex announced that they would move all their volume to the OMG network. They will first see if it works well and ONLY if there is no problem they will slowly move their volume to the OMG network. Well then you just need to hope that a cheaper solution with the same security/scalability doesn't see the light of day.
Mostly agreed, but bitfinex have already tested it and liked it, they are already shilling it as cheaper and faster in order to bring in more users for their exchange so are already committed.

> and now you link me the fucking volume on EXCHANGES
That isn’t on exchanges though is it? It’s compounded monthly volume in usd, not omg which is what’s really important here

> Listen, it shows that the volume spiked in MAY when they announced the MAINNET RELEASE, and not in MARCH like you are saying.
Cope. I didn’t say there wasn’t a spike in May because of coinbase/mainnet announcement. I said the volume increased for the last 4 months to a level not seen that consistently ever before. That is completely true according to etherscan as well, usd volume is higher than ever and the trend started in MARCH like I said.

> jesus fucking christ dude
8m omg transferred*$20 per OMG = $160m volume
55m omg transferred*$1.5 per OMG = $82.5m volume
What the fuck are you even talking about here? Show me a 4 month period where OMG volume in cold hard $ as it has been since March this year
>protip: you can’t

[Anonymous No.19756153]

>>19755606
> in the original post? >>19748059 (OP) #
Jesus CHRIST dude you actually thought I’m posting from June 2020 and not July 2020 with my OMG Network powered geniusfone from my Thai fucking palatial digs
>my fucking face when

[Anonymous No.19756189]

>>19755986
Seething

[Anonymous No.19756672]

>>19756080
>That isn’t on exchanges though is it?
It is.

>Show me a 4 month period where OMG volume in cold hard $ as it has been since March this year
From july 2018 to October 2018. If you think I am wrong then you should go back to middle school to take math classes
>>19756153
...
Just leave if it doesn't reach $5 in July, for the greater good

[Anonymous No.19756695]

>>19756080

[Anonymous No.19757095]

>>19756672
the absolute state of getting BTFO'd by logic in your own shilling thread. Hopefully these die now.

[Anonymous No.19758513]

>>19754254

do you have a twitter account

[Anonymous No.19758602]

>>19755986
wait, are you saying i shouldn't buy this token?

[Anonymous No.19758688]

i actually think OP is on to something

[Anonymous No.19758722]

>>19758688
That's the CTO of Bitfinex AND Tether btw

[Anonymous No.19758735]

>>19748516
>fee will change to % of ETH this week
the same story was said last week, and the week before that.
It's the equivalent of the XRP insiders claiming specific dates/times pumps will occur, but never materializing when the date comes.

[Anonymous No.19759088]

>>19758688
thx, just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.19759188]

>>19758735
except it was announced in a Q&A by an OMG team member it would be switching fee models in the next week or so. It’s coming soon, very soon.

[Anonymous No.19759219]

>>19748059
Plasma is dead. Vitalik said it was a bad idea. OMG is just a shitty old version that conned you with an ICO

[Anonymous No.19759254]

>>19759188
> in the next week
I am 99% certain that next week, it will be "next week" it is coming.

[Anonymous No.19759322]

>>19748059
Theres like 2 weeks left, you think it's going past $20 bucks in 2 weeks? How big of a bag are you holding?

[Anonymous No.19759583]

>>19759254
I’m 100% certain you will be roping yourself when OMG hits $20 in the next few months.

[Anonymous No.19759599]

>>19759219

Thats wrong

[Anonymous No.19759730]

>>19758688
PRICED IN

[Anonymous No.19759821]

Very tough sell OP. Not only is the network volume going to be insignificant, it’s going to be another 2 years of “research” aka comfortable living on 250k salaries compliments of the ICO fundraisers until staking starts and there’s actual token utility. 2017 pump and dump coins are pointless, omisego especially IMO

[Anonymous No.19760005]

>>19753919
Ive seen you post this shit every day for a week and im so damaged from 3 years of "soon ;)" that i just cant believe its true.

But i do have over 30k of these stupid fucking things, so i do hope youre right anon.

[Anonymous No.19760051]

>>19760005

No you don't.

[Anonymous No.19760103]

>>19760051
Ive done nothing but accumulate for literally 3 years. Why would this be suprising?

[Anonymous No.19760148]

>>19760051
I do.

And im still down on my initial investment.

[Anonymous No.19760701]

>>19759821
>pointless
Only enterprise ready scaling solution for ethereum. Show me another

[Anonymous No.19760791]

>>19756672
Regardless of the method, you can clearly see a rise in $ volume to levels not seen for such an extended period of time. This is very telling of a period of accumulation.

There is literally nothing wrong with OPs theory and it actually makes a lot of sense, which is why I’m in. I’m also in because it’s the ONLY enterprise scaling solution for ethereum currently on the market, at a time when ETH is putting through 92% full blocks. We know it will roll out capable of scaling 2 of the top 3 crypto’s by transaction volume and market cap, and its market cap is 200 mill ffs.

I’m BALLS DEEP in OMG now because what else has this much promise and calculable upside for the next few months? If you can answer that question and provide better theories than this and the ETH related price theory then I’m all ears.

[Anonymous No.19760828]

>>19748059
Buterin's only two advisor coins
OMG and KNC
KNC is legit
wonder if OMG will be legit as well

[Anonymous No.19760876]

>>19759730
Lol this >>19758735
is why it’s not priced in, because everybody got butthurt in 2018 when they didn’t deliver and now refuses to see the massive upside, even though the evidence is mounting up that the price will explode soon

[Anonymous No.19760922]

>>19760051
nah, he does. he showed me his private key

[Anonymous No.19760924]

>>19760828
OMG is definitely legit, just look at the working product. This is why you should get in, because sentiment still seems to be that they couldn’t possibly build anything or be a legit token, when in fact they’ve already built it and are implementing it as we speak. This coin is unironically miles below where it’s current valuation should be

[Anonymous No.19761310]

>>19760051
>>19760922
I do, I did, and im still down on my intitial investment.

[Anonymous No.19761424]

>>19760876
>>19760924
Maybe the ones who dont get it arent supposed to

[Anonymous No.19761594]

>>19761424
Thanks anon, gonna try building towards a make it stack of at least 1k

[Anonymous No.19761874]

>>19761594
4k to get rich. 10K to be absurdly rich. 20K to have 10 Thai hookers at your service for the rest of your life. 1k will get you a nice chunk of cash, but it’s not “fuck you” money.

[Anonymous No.19761921]

>>19761874
4k stack is all you think? what time frame

[Anonymous No.19761943]

>>19748059
what connection does Omise working with McDonalds Thailand have with the OMG token OP? thanks in advance

[Anonymous No.19762031]

>>19761943

[Anonymous No.19762040]

>>19761921
I would get 4K within the next week if I were you, 1.50 is a good price to get into.

[Anonymous No.19762277]

>tfw top 1000 wallets keep accumulating
I hope this moons before I lose my rank

[Anonymous No.19762299]

>>19762277
Nice digits anon. Can you post same sauce/screenshot of those wallets accumulating

[Anonymous No.19762349]

>>19762299
I dunno if you can find that historical data but I've been keeping my eye on ethplorer and the cutoff has gone from 7k to 7300 in the past two weeks.

[Anonymous No.19763400]

>>19748059
my heart's been broken too many times.

[Anonymous No.19763543]

Imagine holding omg past 2017.
I feel sorry for anyone still deluded thinking this Asia hustle will make them rich. It was literally gooks who took pictures with vitalik that cashed out on a bunch of idiots who didn’t sell in time

[Anonymous No.19763588]

>>19763543
imagine not accumulating this gem that has a fully functioning mainnet and a better use case than 99% of crypto companies out there.

[Anonymous No.19763649]

>>19763588

There’s no point in accumulating it. The people that made money were the team , advisors, and traders that sold it for big profits in 2017.

Mainnet is a meme and most projects don’t see any impact on release. Dozens of coins had main nets in 2018 to 2019 released and they’re still at 90%+ losses.

Reality is you were the dummy that held them after hype. Had you taken profits and moved that to other investments you wouldn’t be significantly at a loss. That’s assuming you were deluded to have actually held this gook scam for years

[Anonymous No.19763853]

The plasma paper was a pump.

This is the worst scam in crypto.

[Sage No.19764087]

>>19748059
Just let this thread die already. Sage goes in all fields.

[Anonymous No.19764223]

>>19759188
Link?

[Anonymous No.19764258]

>>19763649
>he thinks I'm at a loss even though I did hold after all these years

It's called DCA, brother. It was at .50-.70 cents for a few months, I'm currently way up on my investment.

This project is far from a scam, it has a real use case and it will be used by one of the worlds biggest exchanges this month. Tell me again how it's a scam if this is happening? Stay poor, you don't deserve this coin.

[Anonymous No.19765712]

>>19764258

>6 posts by this ID
>holding digital coins in a non profitable startup in Thailand
>mfw hertz stock was .4 cents and shot up to 7 bucks during bankruptcy

Not gonna argue with you. You will hold it to 0