/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.19637596]

Hear me out.
What if Craig Satojeet is actually working with glowniggers and (((them))) to establish BSV as the new world reserve currency?
It'd be the ultimate way to keep anyone with more than two braincells out of adopting it before the big nose tribe can transfer their wealth.
They're distracting us with the real Bitcoin and projects like LINK, making BSV seem like an absolute scam.
Think about it, some early miner went through the effort to discredit Craig, yet somehow the price didn't move.
Full disclosure, I own 0 BSV and don't plan on acquiring any, just a thought.

[Anonymous No.19637620]

>>19637596
How about the simpler explanation that he’s a con artist who sees easy marks?

[Anonymous No.19637647]

>>19637596
>MILF id

[Anonymous No.19638060]

bump

[Anonymous No.19638094]

>>19637620
Who is he scamming?

[Anonymous No.19638159]

>>19638094
Desperate kids who somehow think that crypto will somehow save them from the system, which is to say people who buy crypto. It’s easy money

[Anonymous No.19638171]

>>19637596
It's all one global system & everyone just copies the code.

[Anonymous No.19638456]

>>19638159
>who somehow think that crypto will somehow save them from the system
That applies to most people buying ANY crypto. I'd say even moreso than those who somehow decide to buy BSV instead.

[Anonymous No.19638650]

>>19638456
Yes, that’s my point. The whole space is scammy as fuck and slimeballs like Craig see the opportunity. There’s money to be made

[Anonymous No.19638793]

>>19637596
It's obviously true.

[Anonymous No.19639338]

>>19638650
in a world of scams bsv actually works... $.00012 tx fee, 20K tx per second proven on mainnet, more on testnet... not sure what more you want

[Anonymous No.19639369]

July 6th.

[Anonymous No.19639426]

>>19637596
>Craig Satojeet
>Satojeet
Hard kek

[Anonymous No.19639690]

>>19639338
Maybe a secure network that cannot be BTFOd by one btc mining pool 51% attacking it?

[Anonymous No.19640203]

>>19639690
tell me, if it demonstrably works 10,000 times better than btc using the original code, then what the hell have core developers been doing?

implementing RBF and pushing small blocks to actively kill the network potential and utility.

why? businesses will always act in a way that aligns with their profit seeking intent. look into how blockstream plans to make money.

[Anonymous No.19640263]

Wrong. Craig works for the British government as a spy posing as a fake Satoshi to lure the real Satoshi out of hiding by doing the absolute dumbest shit that Satoshi would never do. If the real Satoshi steps up he/she will be arrested on the spot and interrogated for ruining centralized banks.

[Anonymous No.19640437]

>>19637596
youre giving that scammer credit for actually being a retard.
thats what low iqs do anyways, they always give more power to the full on retarded and the more scammy and jewish it looks the more retards flock to it.

[Anonymous No.19641479]

>>19640203
I'm not going to act like I know the technicalities behind why bitcoin is a slow piece of shit. The code is open source and has been worked on by some of the best cypherpunks for the past decade, surely they're not all in on the conspiracy to keep bitcoin slow without any merit.
Clearly they're banking on having the most secure chain out there and solving issues like high fees via second layer solutions.

You still didnt' address that BSV can never work for as long as BTC miners can fuck with their network.

>>19640263
This could also be it.

[Anonymous No.19642364]

>>19640263
>he still doesn't know who satoshi is
Banks are already in, anon

[Anonymous No.19642457]

>>19642364
>couldn't quite get his thumb up in time

[Anonymous No.19642653]

>>19641479
tell me why they haven't fucked with it

[Anonymous No.19642808]

>>19642653
https://fullycrypto.com/bsv-hit-by-block-reorgs-in-two-separate-51-attacks
https://blocking.net/1932/bsv-suffers-51-of-attack-costs-for-only-6500/

[Anonymous No.19642834]

>>19642457
satoshi didnt get his legendary thumb up...

[Anonymous No.19642873]

>>19642834
>ZzZ id
anybody feeling sleepy?

[Anonymous No.19643107]

>>19642808
>no double spend attack occurred during the block reorg.
so i ask again
why haven't they fucked with it

[Anonymous No.19643114]

>>19642873
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[Anonymous No.19643278]

>>19637596
>that id

[Anonymous No.19643515]

>>19643107
How do you double spend on a chain that nobody fucking uses? It's not some mystery. If they have the same hashing algo as BTC, they can get fucked.

[Anonymous No.19643739]

>>19643515
yes thank you, now you can stop stop talking about muh 51% attack
nobody with 1000ph of hardware is going to risk going to jail for something so retarded

[Anonymous No.19643797]

BSV is more bad than Link

[Anonymous No.19643886]

>>19643739
So that's your solution? The chain is so useless that it's not worth attacking?

[Anonymous No.19643937]

>>19643886
for now, obviously, and the risk reward ratio is not good
miners aren't communist retards like greg, they are profit oriented

[Anonymous No.19643973]

>>19643886
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmVMdeI6TL8
here you can learn all about it, a new video by satoshi all about security

[Anonymous No.19644009]

>>19637596
Pic related, I assume.

I feel like (((they))) would be smarter than to use some gay ass segwit token as the world reserve currency.

[Anonymous No.19644040]

>>19643937
>for now
That's not a long term solution. With how hated Craig is, people will attack the chain just out of spite if BSV ever manages to gain some traction.

[Anonymous No.19644111]

>>19637596
I think glowniggers are smart enough not to get into bed with this fucking clown. If they are trying to do new world currency shit, they'd do better than to put this scam artist at the front of it. This is why I bought into LINK. If glowniggers are doing something, I'm buying into it because it will probably moon.

[Anonymous No.19644149]

>>19644111
You're probably right. They'll most likely create a new blockchain based stable coin, which will need oracles.

[Anonymous No.19644162]

>>19642364
looks autistic af in that pic. definitely satoshi

[Anonymous No.19644167]

>>19644040
so again, why haven't they done it already while the chain is weak?

[Anonymous No.19644217]

>>19644167
Give us an answer instead of questions

[Anonymous No.19644227]

BSV has the decentralization of one (1) bag of potatoes, and its name is Calvin Ayre.

I know, it's weird to give bags of potatoes names, yet here we are.

The moment Calvin decides he's wasted enough money believing Craig Wright's lies, the entire BSV ecosystem collapses.

[Anonymous No.19644330]

>>19644167
You've got to be trolling at this point. CURRENTLY it's not worth attacking it, as soon as it becomes worth doing so, there's plenty of people who WILL do it.
It HAS been done already, to prove that it is possible.

[Anonymous No.19644426]

Everything about BSV is a scam. I look into these projects when they claim to do something I think would be technically hard like storing arbitrary data on the blockchain effectively while handling stuff like scale and CP.
They said they did that, turns out it relied on miners choosing to donate disk space, the data wasn't even really stored immutably on chain. So they made.. absolutely nothing.

[Anonymous No.19644747]

>>19644330
you don't seem to understand and i've already said why they would not
>as soon as it becomes worth doing so
so when it gets to btc size? why hasn't btc been attacked, surely it's worth it?
use brain...

[Anonymous No.19644911]

>>19644747
Now I'm convinced you don't understand how mining works. Firstly, BTC is much less likely to be attacked since it's more profitable to be a good actor than a bad one. Secondly, unlike for BSV, there isn't another network already larger than BTC which can switch at a moments notice. Finally, BTC has been around for a very long time, so the bad actor would have to 51% attack for a VERY long time to mess with some older transactions that deal with huge amounts of BTC. It's game theory. Attacking BTC isn't profitable or easy.

[Anonymous No.19645201]

>>19644911
NO YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND
hash is based on price, it follows the money
there is NO MONEY in attacking bsv
MINERS ALREADY RISKED BUILDING A FARM, WHY WOULD THEY RISK GOING TO JAIL AND COMMITTING CRIMINAL ACTS TO LOSE IT ALL
ALL THE EVIDENCE WOULD BE STORED ON THE OTHER 10 NODES
THEY WOULD CAUSE DAMAGE WHICH COULD JUST BE FIXED WITH A FORK
the cost of attack also goes up with price, so "when it's worth it" is a retarded statement
and bsv also has the same historical years of transactions you total retard

[Anonymous No.19645307]

>>19639690
this is so huge but so often overlooked
same for BCH sadly

[Anonymous No.19645340]

>>19642364
WHERE'S MY FUCKING MEME SHIRT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.19645379]

>>19645201
>>GOING TO JAIL
>chinks
>going to jail
kek
also
>implying a 51% attack is illegal
it literally isn't

[Anonymous No.19645908]

>>19645201
>hash is based on price, it follows the money
Yes, unless someone wants to be a dick to Craig.

>bsv also has the same historical years of transactions you total retard
Imagine calling someone a retard when you have sub room temp IQ.
BSV was FORKED. If you held BTC during the fork you were sent the same amount of BSV on the day of the fork. Now which is a more recent event, the day of BSV fork or BTC inception?

[Anonymous No.19646311]

>>19645307

Chart of BCH is at all time low. You can't find an easier stop loss than this with a potential 3x.

Bitmex adds BCHUSD on June 16th.

Their founder shills it. It's obvious it will pump huge to fill their trading desk shorts and then dump to oblivion. I sure will ride that rocket up. Will you?

https://twitter.com/CryptoHayes/status/1267313504085671936

sexiest fucking chart that exists - https://gyazo.com/288e8093c488bced4c2f734b53b56ef7

[Anonymous No.19646532]

>>19645908
>he doesn't know the entire chain is replicated during the fork and are exactly the same with a change of exchange ticker
come on...