/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.19600815]

Every HR department is filled with giga-leftist thots.

I can't stand this shit.

[Anonymous No.19601023]

HR and Finance are the enemy
Finance will lie there’s no money for it
HR will lie there’s no law for it

[Anonymous No.19601059]

Accumulate link and disregard women, especially if they work for HR
We’re having a two hour long black lives matter zoom discussion on Wednesday. Wish they’d just lay me off so I can get unemployment.
50k link holder.

[Anonymous No.19601088]

>>19600815
Start your own business or trade and you won't have to worry about HR thots and niggers

[Anonymous No.19601109]

>>19600815
I had an interview with HR for a technical job literally just 3 days ago and she said "why do you want to work here?" My response "Inclusivity and real diversity here". HR lady goes into a 5 minute talk about how they have loads of people of all races and genders at their company and how wonderful it is that I'll be getting involved with their groups (think Black Engineers, Young Professional Native Americans", etc.). I'm white.
I think I played it really well though.

[Anonymous No.19601162]

>>19600815
That tranny on the bottom left is nightmare fuel.

Are these what Brazilians look like? They're whiter than white Americans.

[Anonymous No.19601220]

Every woman ever is a whore.

[Anonymous No.19601305]

>>19601220
Hello? Is this the based department?

[Anonymous No.19601375]

>>19601162
I would fuck that thing in the ass and suck its cock for a job at that firm.
Hell, is there anywhere I can sign up to do this?

[Anonymous No.19601423]

>>19600815
no shit, you have to be the kind of person to give a shit about HR and genuinely hate fun to get a job in HR

[Anonymous No.19601429]

>>19600815
If you're a leftist, in today's current cultural climate, it's means you're a normie conformist who doesn't question much (and I'm not saying the right is any better, just different problems). That sort of personality is extremely desirable when it comes to getting into and excelling in the workforce in general, but often in the corporate environment too.

Conforming has an extreme amount of benefits, in the sense that you'll have many tangible things to show that you're progressing through life (like you're own home, or whatever). But, my goodness, do you just have to force yourself to be a complete fucking zombie who will buy into whatever any authority figure says.

[Anonymous No.19601498]

>>19600815
conservatives are a liability in any compliance department because the public and the courts are liberal.

so you guys get the shit jobs digging ditches where nobody is likely to sue our company for your retarded and backwards political and religious views.

[Anonymous No.19601536]

You need to lay off the women bashing. A woman in a position in power frightens you incels don't they?

[Anonymous No.19601558]

>>19601498
dilate

[Anonymous No.19601566]

>>19601536
I beat women.

[Anonymous No.19601567]

>>19600815
You can easily avoid having your fate decided by them by not being a pathetic fucking wageslave, ya know?

[Anonymous No.19601592]

>>19601566
stunning and brave

[Anonymous No.19601665]

>>19601429
>normie conformist who doesn't question much
Exactly the opposite (though there are exceptions to the rule). Leftists are the ones who advocate change, they fight against the status quo and the established norms, or in your words don't question much. Look up the definition of liberal, distilled it's really just someone who wants change.

It's obviously not as simple as being on the left or the right, there are a spectrum of policies to break down - fiscal and social. But to say that the left doesn't question much is preposterous considering most of the intelligentsia has typically been "left" and it's much more difficult to find intellectuals that are on the right.

As for the corporate structure, it has to do with protecting your company from a legal perspective. Also trans rights are eerily reminiscent of gay rights, we've done this before. Conservatives won't win this down the road and trying to legislate sexuality is a lost cause.

[Anonymous No.19601716]

>>19601665
Trans rights are not equivalent. It's not naturalistic falacy to assert that homosexuality is a more normal behavior than mutilating your real genitals into neo genitals that are non functional and abusing hormones to satisfy a sexual fetish.

[Anonymous No.19602025]

>>19601665
>leftists question the status quo
>the status quo is leftist

it comes as no surprise that indoctrinated “liberals” (an insult to the word) truly believe they are advocating for change (in reality, they are “fighting“ the sanitized battles already pre-framed for them by their superiors) or that their dominance of academia is due to merit as opposed to extortion and intimidation

“modern leftists” are disgusting on an intellectual level because there is no intellectual progress being made, every leftist movement is tribal, regressive, and destructive, they are the dogma-beating ideological zealots of our time and the saddest thing is that they will never know any better

[Anonymous No.19602313]

>>19601665
To take my experience from covid-19, it's those on the left who firstly made claims of discrimination against the Chinese, when proposals were put forth to start taking action against covid-19. In the early days of covid-19, among the videos I watched about it, I watched Stefan Molyneux's (and, yeah, I know he has his issues), he was actually among the earliest to be concerned about it, and he would frequently address left-leaning media outlets or politicians in European countries, or the US, who were against taking measures to control, out of concerns of discrimination.

Then, things started to get more serious in terms of deaths and spread, and lockdowns started to be ordered. The initial push back against this usually came from right leaning (although though not exclusively) people, who questioned the validity of the WHO, the rate of infection (R-naught values), the amount of hospital deaths being attributed to covid-19 in hospitals with potential financial incentives, hospitals being empty. They even started to protest to go back work, seeing that businesses and jobs were getting hit hard. Continually, left leaning people would be against and you should just "listen scientists and the data", and hydroxychloroquinone was politicized because Trump mentioned it. A whole bunch of stuff, and of course it wasn't left/right leaning people exclusive to either group.

Then, all of a sudden, this George Floyd stuff. Left leaning people were so heavily against disagreeing with the scientists/doctors/data, but all of sudden didn't give a shit about social distancing and went out and protested this, as the media worked up everyone.

From that example, it seems to me certain left leaning people are more likely to conform to authority (whether they be cultural, scientific -and not all scientists I should mention, or political).

Discrimination based on race or sexual preference were, and to an extent, are still issues, but they're manipulative tools now.

[Anonymous No.19602357]

>>19601716
This will ultimately be established scientifically as we uncover more secrets of the brain, but as it stands we know very little about how our own brains function. Associating with the opposite gender however is extremely boring in the grand scheme of things, considering the vast complexity, nuance and wonder of the universe it's really not interesting. It's mostly based on aesthetics - notice how there is much less vitriol towards gay/trans rights for biological women. This is at least in part due to the fact that men simply get uncomfortable more so from a visual standpoint (this can be summed up simply by the fact that you don't see men getting as grossed out by lesbians). It's aesthetics.

If there are people that are biologically attracted to their own gender, I don't think it's a stretch to say there are people that identify with their own gender. So to say that men cannot identify as women or vice versa is really just taking a shot in the dark, again, relative to the wonder of the universe it's just not terribly uninteresting especially when we simply don't understand the science yet.

[Anonymous No.19602397]

>>19600815
>>19601023
>>19601059
>>19601088
>>19601109
>>19601162
>>19601220
>>19601305
>>19601423
>>19601429
>>19601498
>>19601558
>>19601566
>>19601592
>>19601716
>>19602025
>>19602313
>>19602357

[Anonymous No.19602538]

>>19602025
No, this is getting too caught up with words and partisan politics. It's sports mentality - rooting for your team and loathing the other blindly. It's not as simple as left vs right. It's more nuanced than that. There is stupidity on the left, just as there is stupidity on the right; the stupidity is usually found on the extremes. But we need each side to keep the other in check. A world with only those on the "right" or the "left" would be disaster. Each side curbs the other and a balance is met. This psychological political structure is found in most modern governments because it works.

To oversimplify it, if the "left" gets away with too much - we enter a non-pragmatic, idealist world that ignores too much of what has worked in the past. If the "right" gets away with too much, we simply don't evolve ethically or socially. You need only look at countries that are more authoritarian and ultra conservative to see how backwards they are.

You need both sides.

[Anonymous No.19602574]

Why do you think corporate culture went so PC and faggy? Men don't care to be little hitlers about that shit, squarely in the female domain.

[Anonymous No.19602588]

>>19601109
>Young Professional Native Americans
Where do you live? Wyoming? Native Americans are literally only 0.2% of the population.

[Anonymous No.19602601]

>>19601220
Not my mother

[Anonymous No.19602751]

>>19602538
I don’t care about the political spectrum or the neat aphoristic reality you inhabit. If I’m going to borrow your worldview for a moment, then at the moment there is FAR too much “left”, whatever that is supposed to be, which has translated to intellectual suppression. Your “left” is obsessed with imaginary divisions in society, and if one even questions the precepts behind “modern leftist” positions they are immediately accused of being anti-society and ostracized. There is no ethical conversation taking place, there is browbeating assisted by corporate stoogery. It is social de-evolution
>>19602357
case in point is this blather about “science” when racial genetics is a forbidden topic outside of epidemiology and gender theory is literally pseudoscience invented and perpetuated by charlatans

[Anonymous No.19602771]

>>19602313
First off the media is dogshit. Kids should be taught at an early age that the media sensationalizes everything as much as possible - it's an entertainment business.

But what's interesting is, the media doesn't sell to us - they sell to the advertisers (corporations). We live in a plutocracy where we are fed to an extent what to believe. These are two important things to keep in mind.

As for Covid, again, the media is going to play the "you're always wrong, we're always right" game with Trump, because he plays the same game. Trump and the media keep sinking to lower lows. They're both incompetent for the most part.

On this point I think it's funny and very telling that the media is stuck with playing the "Trump didn't prepare well enough" card and have to stick to their guns, even though the continuously evolving evidence points more towards an momentous overreaction if anything to the pandemic, costing us trillions for no good reason. And Trump has downplayed the virus, then gets serious, and now downplays it again. It's a dance they do that's hilarious to watch.

As for Floyd, I think most reasonable people on the left and right now understand how overblown this pandemic was and understandably don't care about social distancing.

[Anonymous No.19602828]

>>19602771
I think social distancing is good and so are masks but I don't like how draconian some shutdowns were like NJ and NY where even now you can't have a meal fucking outside

[Anonymous No.19603018]

>>19602751
On the whole I don't think that there is too much intellectual suppression though, or that we are regressing in some way (see Steven Pinkers Ted talk). Though I concede that there are times when the left absolutely do suppress and hurt things like free speech which is one of the worst things imaginable considering it's the reason the US has become so successful. But obviously in 2020 we are more able to have debates and conversations then we ever were before in history. Again, it's the extremes that are causing most of the trouble however and they're not exclusive to either party. There are so many topics to discuss however, that considering yourself a leftist, or someone on the right is intellectually damning.

Racial genetics is an interesting topic - but I don't think that anyone on the 'left' or the 'right' is mature enough to discuss it publicly. I don't think it's political more than it is an existential topic. Typically people are too philosophically stupid and emotional to think in these terms.

As for gender theory being a pseudoscience, you'd have to point me to a particular theory. I'm sure there are mistruths and downright lies in this field because it's such a controversial and charged subject that is based on morality, religion etc. I would only look at empirical evidence here, and again the science is so new so it's essentially conjecture and semantic games.

[Anonymous No.19603052]

>>19602828
Agree, precaution is prudent. But I think it's safe to say that what we've done to mitigate the virus was unnecessary, the economic toll will reverberate for years and the economy is inseparably linked to quality of life. Don't watch the news, look at the numbers and take things in context.

[Anonymous No.19603082]

>>19601665
Not sure if top tier bait or not

[Anonymous No.19603178]

>>19603018
You are blind if you look at the current intellectual milieu, see cancel culture and ideology suffusing discourse, and believe that it is in a good state. Sure, no one is being burned at the stake for their beliefs, but that doesn’t stop the mob from marking out dissenters and hounding them from their livelihoods in the name of conformity

>As for gender theory being a pseudoscience, you'd have to point me to a particular theory
the work of John Money

semantic games are not science, falsifiable theories are. The field is full of activists who seek out specific outcomes that are convenient for the question of class warfare, distorting their own results while dismissing hard evidence that the sociological phenomenon of gender does not have a biological component vis-a-vis brain structure, despite the many doctored and non-replicable reports ardently claiming otherwise. The foundational precepts of the theory are incorrect and didn’t even hold true in the seminal study defining the concept of gender.

That we recommend mutilating “treatment” as a result of bad science is terrible enough, the subversion of science and suppression of free idea exchange is a dangerous path. Read about Lysenko if you want to see what happens when the biological sciences are subverted by far left ideologues

[Anonymous No.19603205]

>>19600815
That chick in the top left is hot

[Anonymous No.19603516]

>>19603178
Again, I think that there are travesties in terms of stifling free speech but I don't think it's as is generally thought. There are more anecdotal issues then there is a widespread problem. Relative to history and the rest of the world, you can pretty much speak your mind and find a supportive/non-supportive audience. To take a particular subject (trans rights definitely seems to be the recurring theme), you have to understand that for the entirety of human history the "right" HAS had it's way on this point. They've been losing for all of history. Trans' are only now entering the public sphere and being given a voice.

Importantly, I understand they might be wrong, their beliefs might be bullshit - but we are only now even able to have the discourse. And again I can't help but see gay rights happening all over again. But I certainly don't want there to be no pushback, that's why both sides are important lest we get ahead of ourselves. We are going to make mistakes along the way. The fact of the matter is that if you are willing to accept that the brain is complex enough to be sexually attracted to the same gender, then I can't see why you can definitively say that there are people that cannot identify (even perhaps in some abstract way) to the opposite gender. I am willing to label an XX chromosome as biological female, XY as male, but look at klinefelter syndrome, life isn't black and white. There are things we still don't understand about gender, sexuality and the inner workings of the brain - we've only just begun.

[Anonymous No.19603866]

>>19603516
I don’t care about what trans people want to identify as or that “the right” through history have generally been the suppressor of free discussion until now. Both of those claims are irrelevant to the discussion, and they are pre-arranged “class issues” that average people are goaded into fighting over when they have no meaning whatsoever.

You are flatly wrong with your assertion that because “the right“ no longer controls speech that we should be satisfied with the direction of discourse. Scientific thinking is actively being suppressed and subverted, such that is LESS free than it was following the Enlightenment. We are going backwards, even if you personally believe it is anecdotal, you would be incorrect.

Whatever mystical beliefs you hold regarding race, gender, etc., I don’t care what they are. What I want is a society that doesn’t feel the overwhelming need to FAKE scientific results, LIE about imaginary constructs, push false narratives for ideological reasons, and generally contribute to the erosion of truth. This is not a magical-thinking question of “balance” between “two sides”, this is the steady destruction of free thought while we sleep. And the major guilty party here wittingly or otherwise are those organized under the “modern left”

[Anonymous No.19603898]

>>19603205
>chick
u see that jaw line bruh

[Anonymous No.19603941]

>>19601023
yeah but with 1 mile you get water in gallons but in kilometres you get it in liters. so Fuck you.

[Anonymous No.19603942]

>>19602828
New York’s death rate compared to infection rate is incredibly bad too. Places like Sweden and New Zealand are doing much better and they aren’t draconian.

[Anonymous No.19604270]

>>19603866
It may surprise you but truth is probably the thing I care about most in this universe. It's everything. And the Enlightenment was certainly one of the greatest boons in human civilization. I've read many books from that period.

We seem to diverge in our opinion on the general trend of societal discourse which is fine. I will happily agree that there are times when this modern left goes to far, but I think that you're giving the right far too much credit for being these disciples of scientific evidence - this is preposterous. And again, morons on both sides. IMO powerfully intelligent ideas, peoples and trends rise up organically and aren't easily swayed by the media or control mechanisms. In the end, even if it takes a while, the truth always wins.

[Anonymous No.19604441]

>>19604270
>truth is probably the thing I care about most in this universe. It's everything.
> And the Enlightenment was certainly one of the greatest boons in human civilization

Pick one, and only one, you slimy little 110er.

[Anonymous No.19604519]

>>19602397
This meme loses all power when you use it this way, just a tip.

[Anonymous No.19605647]

>>19601429
If you define people's politics and beliefs on a dumb tribalistic left/right, YOU are the brainwashed normie conformist

[Anonymous No.19605974]

>>19602397
Hitler did nothing wrong.

[Anonymous No.19606017]

>>19601429
But... but... Jordan Peterson said liberals are the free thinkers and conservatives are the conformists

[Anonymous No.19606025]

>>19605647
I agree that tribalism of "my team is better than yours" is not really worth it, but people can be classified in groups based on their broad views. I do try to see why anyone has a certain view, and I'm distrustful of authority which is either too controlling, or favors certain groups over others (whether that be based on beliefs, class, race, or whatever). But I believe in the importance of empathy, regardless of what other view I have.

[Anonymous No.19606034]

>>19601498
I’m a conservative atheist, what does that make me?

[Anonymous No.19606234]

>>19602313
Good shit