Is there no hope?

[Anonymous No.19345927]

> BTC is old technology mostly at the hands of the Chinese
> ETH is non-scalable and smart investments are a meme, dooming it to failure long-term
> LINK's price has been crabbing for 1+ year, so the market's decided how much it's worth
> NANO has highly promising tech, but it already mooned around 2017 and now no one cares about its existence apart from nerds

Is the only way out investing in low marketcap shitcoins /biz/?

[Anonymous No.19345980]

>>19345927
>BTC is old technology
jesus
it's very early in it's adoption curve nigga we are barely innovatory set early adopters will come after us.

[Anonymous No.19346002]

>>19345927

Why, yes, after an old age comes decay and death.

It had glorious life. Now it is time to die.

[Anonymous No.19346069]

>>19345927
Sell crypto, buy gold.

[Anonymous No.19346137]

>>19346069
Thanks bought 100k Bitcoin Gold

[Anonymous No.19346151]

>>19345927

People will still want to trade them regardless, so I'm investing in the new Orion exchange next month. It'll allow you to trade much cheaper than anywhere else. orionprotocol.io for those interested. Has a BNB like token that you can buy soon.

[Anonymous No.19346191]

>>19346069
the only reason i'm not selling my meme metals is they are hard to sell and hard for me to get right now. and also becasue they might just be a bit better than cash right now.

[Anonymous No.19346913]

>>19346151
FUCKING RETARDED AUTISTIC SHILL KILL YOURSELF
>LE ANOTHER EXCHANGE XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
FUCKING
KILL
YOUR
SELF
FUCK YOU
FUCK OFF
FUCKING FAGGOT
>MUH NEW EXCHANGE PLS BUY SIR
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

[Anonymous No.19346964]

>>19345980
Meanwhile android started about the same time and is used by most of the world. I mean how much time a software need to be considered useful? It's been 11 years.

[Anonymous No.19347238]

>>19345927
BSV is our last hope! Oh wait, I forget about this faggot Craig...
Yep there is no hope.

[Anonymous No.19347292]

There is hope
called Polkadot

[Anonymous No.19347336]

>>19346964
Android is legacy software tech, blockchain isn't. The infrastructure isn't there yet.

[Amoonymous No.19347350]

Check out Statera.... This shit is just getting started. Your chance to get in early on an interesting coin that will skyrocket any time soon.

[Anonymous No.19347357]

>>19346913

There is no need to get upset. It's made by the guy who designed Waves dex. You can see the history of waves for yourself. Alexey Koloskov is the guy.

[Anonymous No.19347384]

>>19346964
im no master at these things but not the same comparsion.
one is used to take pantypics and post bs 2 sentence toughts on sm.
the other wants to be something lil bigger....

[Anonymous No.19347394]

>>19345927
LINK is almost 40x ICO, brainlet. Soon it will be 250x. The days of 1,000x in a year or two are over. Now you have to work for it. I bet you don't hold any Suterusu either.

[Anonymous No.19347854]

>>19347394
I unironically am staked with SUTER and am holding LINK.

[Anonymous No.19347895]

>>19345927
Only XMR is missing from your list.
Just be patient and don’t a /biz/ or reddit addiction. Time will do the rest.

[Anonymous No.19348421]

>>19347357
i'm so glad niggercoin killed waves

[Anonymous No.19349472]

>>19345927
Nano is obviously the chosen one

See here: >>19342537

[Anonymous No.19350390]

>>19345927
>technology
who cares, people are in for short ponzi and laundering

[Anonymous No.19350395]

>>19345980
lol.

Literally everyone and their mother on the planet knows what bitcoin is. If it has not been adopted yet, the fuck do you want me to do?

[Anonymous No.19350417]

>>19345927
uhhhh buy hex. its literally that ez. the gains you ask for...the gains you deserve

[Anonymous No.19350419]

>>19345927
yes

[Anonymous No.19350425]

>>19345927
>BTC is old technology
>11 years old

[Anonymous No.19350742]

>>19349472
everyone will know this in the next 30 days

[Anonymous No.19351076]

>>19350395
it's not about knowing what it is.

[Anonymous No.19351092]

>>19346964
well ipv6 has been out there for like 30 years or so. we all know it's the future of the internet yet adoption is fringe at best.

[Anonymous No.19351191]

>>19350742
You keep saying this cryptic anon, can you give me a hint? I am well endowed when it comes to my Nano stack, but I want to know what you have been implying.

[Anonymous No.19351218]

>>19351092
what are you talking about my ip regularly registers as ipv6 and all of my web hosting services also use ipv6 as well

[Anonymous No.19351292]

>>19351218
i saying about 99.9% of all services and networks still use ipv4 lately there has been some adoption of ipv6 but it causes more problems then it solves so far to the point that me and most people i know (we are devs) simply disable the ipv6 stack on the network adapter.

[Anonymous No.19351385]

>>19351292
it seems like ipv6 is a necessity as ipv4 addresses will eventually start overlapping

Hey as a dev what do you think about IPFS

[Anonymous No.19351621]

>>19351385
the thing is nat works wonderfully
we ran out of opv4 space a long time ago.

so yeah adoption of new technology can take it's damned time. even when it's good tech. adoption is all about pressing need and advantage.

[Anonymous No.19351659]

>>19345927
>NANO shill thread

[Anonymous No.19351672]

>>19351385
>what do you think about IPFS
not much, i'm glad if we can fucking stream a file to a mobile client without any issues in the simplest way humanly possible.

[Anonymous No.19351730]

>>19345927
>Hands of the chinese
Dear fucking lord almighty. Bitcoin is not at the hands of the chinese. Bitcoin is minded heavily by the chinese, then sold for profit. Most mining occurred by non-chinese entities years ago. Why is this meme still being promulgated here?

[Anonymous No.19351771]

>>19351191
not an insider. don't want to imply false hope. do with that what you will.

[Anonymous No.19351775]

>>19351659
>Nano derangement syndrome

[Anonymous No.19351823]

>>19351771
hmmm well I am faithful, and yes I do follow Jung and synchronicity... I should have listened to the fortune cookie that basically told me to buy Link, but I didn't have enough faith to follow through at the time. Hope you know something I don't.

[Anonymous No.19351851]

>>19351672
shame, IPFS seems promising but I feel it is still missing something to help streamline everything along

[Anonymous No.19351968]

>>19351730
>BTC being controlled by China is a meme
maximum cope by Dec 2017 buyer

[Anonymous No.19352050]

>>19351968
Yeah ok dickwad. Whatever you say.
>can't form an argument
>Just says cope and seethe constantly
>cries himself to sleep because no one on 4chan or in real life listens to him
Cya cuntflap.

[Anonymous No.19352079]

>>19346964
Android has a use case

[Anonymous No.19352110]

>>19351730
Because >80% of the hashpower is now in China? Eat a bat chink

[Anonymous No.19352151]

>>19345927
OP here responding to myself. 42 replies later no one has a decent argument against what I said. Especially about ETH, no one even tries to disprove what I said. Crypto is on a path to certain death, unless saved by an altcoin that overcomes the limitations of the big four. That is why I think buying and holding is a retarded idea currently.

[Sage No.19352183]

>>19352050
Based and rekt that nerd

[Anonymous No.19352194]

>>19352050
guess I nailed that one. here you go fren, see for yourself.
https://lmgtfy.com/?q=china+control+of+btc&pp=1

[Anonymous No.19352239]

>>19352194
Listen, I do this for a living, you don't.
From your faggy link:
>Chinese miners control 66 percent of global bitcoin computer power. China's bitcoin miners now control two-thirds of the crypto network's processing power, research showed on Wednesday. And a growing share that is likely to benefit the country's miners.

This confirms nothing you have said, and everything I Have said. So goodnight my little Rectal Prolapse.

[Anonymous No.19352312]

>>19352050
we say cope and seethe not as an insult, but as a description. we've actually done research on this for years and know the answers. you're spouting talking points like all the other newfag 2017 sycophants. the reason i know this is because i was doing the same thing in 2014-2017. then i saw BTC for what it is, a massive turd that survived on hype. money can be made with any crypto and good timing. i choose to invest in coins where timing isn't as important and inevitably is most likely. after all these years, NANO is the only one i see that can fulfill the original promise at which BTC failed. seethe harder faggot.

[Anonymous No.19352339]

>>19352239
do what for a living? shill outdated talking points?

[Anonymous No.19352519]

>>19352239
what fucking limitations are there for nano, that it is mostly populated by nerds? pro-tip, the nano community has the closest resemblance to the original btc community. nerds make the world go round.

[Anonymous No.19352520]

>high profile hedge fund managers speak in support of holding btc in their portfolio
>JP Morgan and other banks shit on btc while estimating its value at 11k
>a third of newly mined btc bought directly by crypto hedge
>retail interest in btc as possible store of value rising
>year on year return on btc outperform all other assets (unless you bought at ATH)

But doesn't break 10k yet so it's dead.. Hmm

[Anonymous No.19352622]

>>19352520
>Buy the whole ethereum and btc production of the year
>Buy puts and short futures
>sell the living shit of both shitcoins to crash the market cuz is the easiest thing to do in a lawless and retarded market like this.
>????
>profit

People thinking this is bullish deserve the rope

[Anonymous No.19352656]

>>19351851
building the future is hard work and there is too much patching the roof to do in the meantime.

[Anonymous No.19352659]

>>19352520
>high profile hedge fund managers speak in support of holding btc in their portfolio
Do you mean the one from Girlsdoporn? Why should I give a shit about what high profile hedge fund managers do as a retail investor? We are playing with different rules. And many of them have different opinions, Warren Buffet for example hates BTC.

>a third of newly mined btc bought directly by crypto hedge
This means absolutely nothing. That is the purpose of crypto hedge, I'm surprised they're not buying more.

> retail interest in btc as possible store of value rising
Peak retail interest was in Dec 2017, and has dropped since, now it is normalised at 8-9k.

>year on year return on btc outperform all other assets (unless you bought at ATH)
Until now, I'm sure it has. But it's very unlikely to regain public stature after the 2018 crash.

[Anonymous No.19352673]

>>19352520
BTC's usecase has been reduced an on boarding mechanism for fiat into alt markets and for whales pumping and dumping on newfags. then they cash out into hard assets. this is why it will crab forever until the gamblers lose interest and miners drop out because no fees and reduced gains from halvings.

[Anonymous No.19352682]

>>19352656
but censorship necessitates decentralized file and web hosting, and we are only seeing more of this as time goes on.

[Anonymous No.19352813]

>>19345927
>crypto coins
>is there hope?

Crypto coins = digital currency

Central bankers love the idea. You are actively trying to win inside the matrix. You are seeking the next step in the current system, but you're looking in the exact place they want you to. You are stuck within their frame.

Sounds like you are starting to see you're caught up in a box. A dead end. Congrats. This is good. Cognitive dissonance may lead to a paradigm shift if you are willing.

If you put in the work (the intellectual honesty + logical brain power to sort through possibilities), you may come out a little closer to truth.

It's on you though, because chances are, no matter what I say, it won't much matter. And I can't write enough here anyway.

Seek opposite views. Listen to uncomfortable opinions. Understand where others are coming from.

My only suggestion is to learn a little bit about the history of money, currency, and payment methods.

Youtube (if it's still there, otherwise try bitchute): Money Masters - It's 3-4 hours long but worth it if you're serious.

Good luck.

[Anonymous No.19353003]

>>19345980
It's been ten years

[Anonymous No.19353253]

>>19346964
Linux started in 1991 and it took until the 2010's until the masses started to use it via Android.

[Anonymous No.19353498]

>>19352673
If I could make even 50% on going all in on btc I would just cash out and put it into a hard asset like real estate. A colleague made 100x in 2017 and he's still heavily invested in crypto but he would like to go into property investment if he makes a bit more. This makes me wonder if most btc holders are just in it to cash in for fiat and other assets after making it.
Some people fundamentally see its use case as a cash alternative however and in that case there is no need to sell for fiat

[Anonymous No.19353554]

>>19352682
>but censorship necessitates decentralized file and web hosting
dunno about that. i was into shit like that like a decade ago. nobody cared. and we are still around. i stopped using bittorent like a year ago.

[Anonymous No.19354046]

>>19353498
exactly, most are in it for more fiat. when i first got into BTC, the community was all about self-control of money. then, in early 2017 news started coming out about VC and hedge funds entering. the narrative began to shift to store of value (because everyone realized it was unusable for daily purchases) which started the talk of forks. bch and bsv made billions out of nothing, people saw enormous opportunities, greed magnified and lots of normies got burned. pic related is why i got into crypto, BYC failed. the only one with a legitimate shot at achieving pic related is NANO. imagine being on 4chan in 2020 and still shilling coins with middlemen and gatekeepers.

[Anonymous No.19354048]

>>19345927
XMR

[Anonymous No.19354182]

>>19354046
>pic related

[Anonymous No.19354815]

>>19345927
NANO is a scam.
>>/biz/thread/16596049

Basically some guy thought it would be funny to hire a whore on reddit's dime. So he comes up with this "Nano" thing to take those faggot's money.

[Anonymous No.19354978]

>>19345980
he doesn't know what blockstream did lol Cope

[Anonymous No.19354982]

>>19354815
>>>/biz/thread/16596049
ok nano fudder *pats head*

We had a Nano thread last night that reached max capacity. A single individual posted 60 times trying to FUD it and saged it in every single post. Some miner scum. Take that for what you will. >>>>19342537

[Anonymous No.19355008]

Sorry full link: >>>>19337201

[Anonymous No.19355222]

>>19345980
I can't belive such stupid people exist. Please be larp.

[Anonymous No.19355976]

>>19345927
>Those who know do not speak; those who speak do not know