[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 89 KB, 1191x894, BAND.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19341306 No.19341306 [Reply] [Original]

BAND is unironically going to usurp LINK.

>> No.19341323
File: 122 KB, 1024x680, 1576045884758m.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19341323

>BAND is unironically going to usurp LINK

>> No.19341347

I'm unironically thinking about buying some

>> No.19341382
File: 301 KB, 1080x1346, Screenshot_20200526-014852_Crypto Market Cap.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19341382

>>19341347
even though im a shill. not sure about buying now. It just reached an ATH. Really good chart technical wise tho.
But i just think the team is more dedicated to the tech itself than link. Chainlink does nothing but announce partnerships with literal whose, while band is making technical breakthrough after breakthrough.

>> No.19341421

Sure smells pajeet in here

>> No.19341448
File: 177 KB, 1024x694, Mahatma-Gandhi-Motivational2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19341448

>>19341421

>> No.19341465

>>19341306
>TRON is unironically going to usurp ETH.

>> No.19341488

>>19341465
TRON unironically does nothing at all. The ceo knows no code. It has no purpose and it start as an ERC20
A much more realistic comparison would be NEO since BAND is developed by chinks

>> No.19341493

>>19341306
sirswow! very moneyyyy sir! but i have the better solution! i make search engine and replace google sirs! very easy develop 1 search bar in website! hahahaha GOOGLE BTFO sir!

>> No.19341522

>>19341493
LINK = AltaVista
BAND = Google

>> No.19341528

>>19341382
Do they have a working product?

>> No.19341540
File: 9 KB, 259x195, .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19341540

>>19341522
Lmao pajeet

>> No.19341552

>>19341382
literally every single crypto chart looks like this. Initial quiet release, good speculative pump, correction, then a slow bleed.

Go look at charts, anon. Every single chart you see will look like this. Give me one counterexample off the top-100. Oh, your example is LINK? Any others? A single other chart? No?

You need to go back.

>> No.19341562
File: 3.35 MB, 480x270, 1590419602676.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19341562

>>19341306

>> No.19341577

>>19341306
>imagine not being in BAND, ARPA, and ALGO right now

>> No.19341605

>>19341528
BAND has only been out since November and staking is about to come out. It took chainlink 3 years, and not chainlink has staking yet. Again
LINK = AltaVista
BAND = Google
>>19341552
BAND has been out since november. Thats 5 months of gradually building. Far from initial pump.
Mind showing me a chart where crypto gradually goes up in 5 months sinc eits release?
>compare LINK
ok. Link went up to 40 cents in its 1st month, crashed to 20 cents, shot up to 1+ then crashes to 17 cents for all of 2018

BAND is objectively healthier

>> No.19341613

>>19341540
Hey, doesnt chainlink have those SWIFT connections and knows a kike named ari juels? Wouldnt link be more connected to the jews then
>>19341562
not an argument

>> No.19341616

>>19341306
Remind me of a time when chinks didn’t scam the white man and actually created something with intrinsic value and I’ll consider buying into this

>> No.19341617

>>19341323
this is a horrifying pic

>> No.19341627

>>19341616
Its chink, but in a good way.
I seriously think BAND is going to be to LINK what NEO is to ETH

>> No.19341640

>>19341605
this is witnet all over again

>> No.19341658
File: 50 KB, 938x579, 098f23h09f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19341658

>>19341640
this looks nothing like BANDs chart at all. >>19341382
try again. btw, BAND is ranked 137, while witnet is 1000+

>> No.19341663

>>19341448
>>19341488
>>19341522
>>19341605
>>19341613
>>19341627
literally seething

>> No.19341678

>>19341663
aww, are you mad i didnt reply to your stupid webm? heres a free (You)

>> No.19341693

>>19341605
>>19341605
Chainlink has literally partnered with everyone and has Mixicles. I'm happy there is competition though but I think that Band will always have less than 5% of the market.

>> No.19341740

>>19341627
>Its chink, but in a good way
>it’s like NEO to ETH
That’s a yikes from me

>> No.19341745

>>19341693
>partnered with everyone
except they lie about most shit like SWIFT being a contest, Google being a blog post, EEA being a payed membership and oracle getting data from fake companies (look it up). Meanwhile, BAND is getting partnerships before LINK in a lot of cases. They got KAVA first. They got fantom first

>> No.19341772

>Chink team
Thats gonna be a nah from me dawg

>> No.19341774

>>19341693
also, mixicles is literally vaporware if you understood the whitepaper

>> No.19341905

>>19341613
You must be band jedi? Go blogpost on twitter faggot

>> No.19342068
File: 2.87 MB, 320x240, get a load of this faggot.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19342068

>>19341382
>Chainlink does nothing but announce partnerships with literal whose, while band is making technical breakthrough after breakthrough.

This is laughably bad fud. You need to go back.

>> No.19342302

>inb4 bends the knee

>> No.19342395

>>19341658
same bullcrap witnet iexec mobius and all those pseudo projects claiming they will also do decentralized oracles.

chainlink who have been working non stop on it since 2014 is still struggling to implement them, yet you think a bunch of chinky gooks coming out of nowhere will just repace them?

staking is a meme without usage, that's why shitcoins like tezos are useless crap.

just like with the many projects like KOMODO and tbtc claiming they can code decentralized oracles in few lines of code.
many don't understand how really complex the task is.
chainlink github is being #1 in activity for the last year.

those chinks will just be another shitcoins that claim they are better than link, and end up partnering with them because they underestimate the task

>> No.19342582

>>19341382
can you give me few examples of technological breakthroughs?

>> No.19342683

>>19341745
yawn

>> No.19342762

>>19342683
>>19342582

remember how hard iexec oracles were shilled here? with the digital oil bullcrap and all the memes?

remember how witnet was also shilled with all the memes?

history repeats itself yet again, some retards trying to force another meme into eexistence. BUT it won't happen, OP can try all he likes, eventually it will end up like all those dead end projects, some pajeets making a quickbuck on retards and most retards losing all their life savings and sweating the fuck up and losing their mind blindlessy shilling their bags while knowing they got gooked

>> No.19342804

>>19342395
>>19342762
>tl dr; false equivalent
BAND protocol has a shit ton more work done on it than either of those projects. RLC's doracles were an after though shilled by link fudders; not their main tech.
>NO NO THEYRE THE SAME
really. Show me all the work the rlc put into doracles and see how it compares to BAND progress

Chart reflects tech, and BAND has had steady growth since november. Its clear whales are starting to notice it

>> No.19342856
File: 29 KB, 664x656, lmao-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19342856

oh wowz, i really fucked up fomo'ing into BAND today. No whales accumalating it at all

>> No.19342885

>>19342856
>cannot even spell "accumalating"
high IQ post, really. kek.

>> No.19342941
File: 206 KB, 750x1280, 6FFF0E3F-500E-4369-B47B-4C0B04E3A429.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19342941

Can’t trust a group of chinese men.

>> No.19342954

>>19342395
Lol the dev activity with LINK is nowhere near #1

>> No.19342956

>>19342941
>Standford
>MiT
holy fuck, im more convinced than ever to hold BAND now.

>> No.19342963
File: 253 KB, 2338x838, chainlink most github commits during past 3, 6, and 9 months cryptomiso.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19342963

>>19342954
Except it is.

>> No.19342986

>>19342963
and? 99% of it is complete bullshit. Most github activity for the past year yet not staking?
>NO. ITS SUPER IMPORTANT SHIT
really? mind describing the very important things being done?

>> No.19342992

>>19342986
>99% of it is complete bullshit
lmao, dat cope

Also, stop switching IDs.

>> No.19343006
File: 116 KB, 600x417, David-and-Cyrus-mobius-600x417.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19343006

>>19342956
>>Standford
>holy fuck, im more convinced than ever to hold BAND now.

Yes sirs, same as Mobius sirs, good token sirs.

>> No.19343013

>>19342992
>cope
how am i coping? literally what work is exactly being done in the github? And if its such important work, why does the team never tweet about it?

>> No.19343027

>>19343006
Mobius started in 1000+ rank and ended in 1000+
BAND is already rank 134

>> No.19343032

>>19342804
can you give examples from those works and its technology, i’ve failed to find online. please i am waiting

>> No.19343042

>>19343032
here you go boss
https://twitter.com/bandprotocol

>> No.19343055

>>19343013
>how am i coping?
Coping with the fact that Chainlink actually is #1 in terms of dev activity.

>>19343027
Sirs, the point was Stanford sirs. Very good team sirs.

>> No.19343083

>>19342986
>99% of it is complete bullshit.
Dude, just stop. You don't have to be a LINK fanboi to see you are grasping at straws.

>> No.19343091

>>19343032
They have none

>> No.19343095

>>19343055
>#1 in terms of dev activity.
and what is this super special and important dev activity being done? Is it actually something important or busy work?
If its not busywork, why cant you show ke the important thing being done?
Staking wont even be out till 2021, yet it has the #1 activity? does that make sense?

>> No.19343101

>>19343095
lmao, dat cope

>> No.19343110

>>19343083
what is this important github activity? Did they finally get T sigs done? Did they ginally get mixicles done? Is the collateral system finally coded?
they are the #1 activity on github!

>> No.19343122

>>19343101
>still cant show me this super important github activity
k

>> No.19343134

>>19343110
>>19343122
You're really not doing a good job shilling Band by trying so desperately to move the goalposts.

>> No.19343147

>>19343134
holy shit. im literally only asking what specific work is being done in github and you cant show me.

why are you so offended by this question?

>> No.19343164

>>19343147
obviously he can't deliver what you are asking. worst shill ever kek.

>> No.19343178

>>19343147
Why would I have to show you anything?
I proved that Chainlink is indeed #1 in terms of dev activity.

The rest is you moving the goalposts.

>> No.19343217

>>19343178
i never denied activity. that was literally different guy. I dont give a fuck if its #1 or #10. All i know is
T SIGS (no set release date)
STAKING (maybe 2021)
MIXICLES (no set release date)
NO KYC (no set release date)
COLLATERAL SYSTEM (no set release date)
oh, but chainlink made sure to create a random number generator :DDDDD

meanwhile, BAND is less than a year old, already releasing shit, and linkies comparing it to its 3 year old dinosaur of a project. pretty lame

>> No.19343236

>>19343217
>i never denied activity. that was literally different guy
lol well good then.
No need for you to get this butthurt over Link being #1 in dev activity.

>meanwhile, BAND is less than a year old, already releasing shit
Well Chainlink is already handling hundreds of millions of USD worth of DeFi smart contracts, and growing.
So there's that.

>> No.19343632

>>19343217
you dont't seem to grasp how big VRFs are. you really think they implemented them out of their ass?

chainlink are unironically working with hundreds of teams, they get feedback and decide on whats more important and urgent to implement depending on their partners needs.

there are so many things happening in the background that we don't know of yet. VRF came out of the blue to us external viewers, but for them it's an important feature the spaces needed.

VRF arn't just justed to pick random numbers, they have many usescases

VRFs ensure:
>Public auditability
>Quality control in manufacturing processes.

What are they used for?
>financial audit
>Randomized clinical trials
>Legal metrology
>Random judges for court cases
>Eliminating bias in randomized security checks

source:
>https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Presentations/usages-of-public-randomness/images-media/20191106-NIST-ITL-Science-Day-poster-Beacon--ts-20191118.pdf

think for a second, chainlink is bringing real world data to the blockchain, blockchain main uses in 90% of the projects out there revolve around quality controls and public auditability


VRFs are essential.