Another blantant lie

[Anonymous No.19041404]

Remember, Linkers are like Niggers. They lie cheat and steal like its their first language. Linkies still like to claim R3 corda uses link when there is absolutely 0 documents or statements by R3 saying corda uses LINK. All linkers have is their lying developer who said on a podcast saying corda could use link. And if you google Consensys R3 om google, surprise surprise, 0 results. All that happemed was Consensys cuck CEO invested millioms in corda (no ownership) in 2018

Fuck you linkers. Youre a bunch of dirty glow niggers

[Anonymous No.19041513]

99.9% of this board doesn’t know what Corda is.
And no, there’s no use for link.

Also

> https://docs.corda.net/docs/corda-os/4.4/key-concepts-oracles.html

t. a certified Corda dev

[Anonymous No.19041584]

>>19041513
its funny how linkies keep on lying about it. I keep seeing these fucking glow niggers saying theyre with r3 all the time and i dedicated a whole thread calling them out on it

>>/biz/thread/S18880055

[Anonymous No.19041738]

>>19041513
also could you explain in skme technical detail why corda will never needink to finally put an end to these conspirsting fuckers

[Anonymous No.19041865]

>>19041738
Because corda is a centralized (private) enterprise blockchain and therefore has no use for a decentralized oracle like chainlink (even though chainlink is technically not decentralized because they choose who gets to run a node)

[Anonymous No.19042369]

>>19041865
saying corda is centralized (which it is) gives the linkies boners because they feel they can save it and that Corda needs the shitlink network

[Anonymous No.19042399]

This has nothing to do with chainlink

[Anonymous No.19042416]

wake up you idiots enterprise copied all of it and they dont need your magic shitcoins

qnt dead
link dead

[Anonymous No.19042497]

>>19041865
how does a contract on corda securely retrieve data from outside the corda blockchain or interact with software outside of the blockchain?

[Anonymous No.19042664]

>>19042416
explain

[Anonymous No.19042683]

>>19041404
>>19041513
>>19041584
>>19041738
>>19041865
>>19042369
>>19042399
>>19042416
>>19042497
>>19042664
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

[Anonymous No.19043124]

>>19042497
how does chainlink do it? Chainlink will always be inherently be centralized. You try to band aid the solution via shit like T sigs, town crier and mixicles. Those wouldnt exist if link was inherently decentral

[Anonymous No.19043152]

Is the an entire thread of shills fudding link to each other for fucks sake

[Anonymous No.19043185]

>>19042683

This

[Anonymous No.19043186]

>>19041404
Swift is another lie. They are all delusional. Some actually believe triple digits price for link which is insane and impossible

[Anonymous No.19043341]

>>19043152
>t.

[Anonymous No.19043482]

>>19041404
>>19041513
>>19041865
>>19042416
>>19043124
>>19043186
Excuse me sirs, is this the certified Stand Against Linkie Tards (S.A.L.T.) support group meeting thread?

[Anonymous No.19043553]

>>19043482
did you come up with that term in your tranny discord?

[Anonymous No.19043727]

>>19042497
You just write an oracle
https://docs.corda.net/docs/corda-os/4.4/oracles.html

[Anonymous No.19043772]

>>19043186
I remember when people said ETH hitting a $1000 was impossible. A year later, it was over a $1000. Stay poor.

[Anonymous No.19043861]

>>19043727
>just write our own instead of using an established standard endorsed by the likes of Google, Oracle, ETH, ... with tons of features at the click of a button

haha yeah

[Anonymous No.19043896]

>>19043772
>I saw on TV that that guy won the lottery
>I'll now spend all my Wagie money on tickets and I'll be rich in no time!

[Anonymous No.19044307]

>>19043861
>tons of features
What features? Decentralization doesn't count. Besides, if you write it yourself you don't have to pay for it.
>at the click of a button
I don't think chainlink has corda integration yet. Chainlink is for Ethereum

[Anonymous No.19044399]

>>19044307
>What features?
Reputation, staking, enclaves, mixicles, threshold sigs, VRF, ...

> if you write it yourself you don't have to pay for it.
You can run a Chainlink node for free too.

>I don't think chainlink has corda integration yet.
Your point?

[Anonymous No.19044543]

>>19041404
>shills his shitcoin with the n-word
yikes, I know what I won’t be buying

[Anonymous No.19044753]

*blows smoke in your ugly face*

Problem, nolinker?

[Anonymous No.19045045]

>>19044399
>bullshit bullshit and more bullshit thats not finished nor require a token
Explain how T sigs, something whose only job is to get rid of outliers in an average, require a token. Go ahead and reference whatever whitepaper youre getting this shit from
>reputation
Chainlink reputation is worse. A bad fee gets penalized thousands at most while a contract gaurantees millions.
>free
LMAO. If it was free there would be no point in a token at all. Money has to come from somewhere to pay for staking and gas. Doesnt matter if running a node is "free" the whole point of a link token is a fee needs to be payed.

[Anonymous No.19045100]

>>19041513
you misspelled t.discord tranny


ANOTHER KNEE BENT

[Anonymous No.19045116]

>>19045045
>T sigs, something whose only job is to get rid of outliers in an average
lmao, that's not what T sigs do.

> A bad fee gets penalized thousands at most while a contract gaurantees millions.
Depends how much is staked.

> If it was free there would be no point in a token at all
You can run a Chainlink node yourself for free.
Getting other people to trust your node will be another matter though lol.

[Anonymous No.19045244]

>>19045116
>i have no idea what t sigs are
gotcha
>depends
nope. If it depends it can be done manually with a contract. With chainlink it puts everything on autopilot ajd wont have the gauranteed insurance.
>Getting other people to trust your node will be another matter though lol.
And you literally just described why chainlink is utterly useless compared to Corda.
congrats :^)

[Anonymous No.19045410]

>>19045244
>p-pls talk to me

[Anonymous No.19045448]

>>19045410
who are you quoting?