IBM destroy CHAINLINK hopes

[Anonymous No.19040842]

Unlucky stinky linky holders, IBM is taking over

https://www.coindesk.com/ibm-blockchain-to-offer-decentralized-smart-contract-option

[Anonymous No.19040879]

>>19040842
NOOOOOOOOO you cant just make your own oracle solution you have to use sirgay's team of literally whos and pornstars NOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.19040908]

>>19040879
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

[Anonymous No.19040999]

>>19040842
If not a bait, you don't seem to understand what Wolpert is doing

[Anonymous No.19041016]

>>19040999
Dont care, link is kill

[Anonymous No.19041360]

*wink wink, amirite, op?

[Anonymous No.19041467]

>>19040842
Anon, you do realize smart contracts need oracles, right?

[Anonymous No.19041474]

>>19040842
>hyperledger only
cringe, eth is king

[Anonymous No.19041500]

oh no what did chainlink permabull john wolpert mean by this chainlink is finished

[Anonymous No.19041551]

Can only get this hard

[Anonymous No.19041707]

>>19040842
You brainlet. This is bullish for Link

[Anonymous No.19041906]

>>19040842
>not realizing ChainLink and Hyperledger have been partnered for a long time
You posted hopium and tried to use it as fud. I would put money on the fact that you own 10k+ LINK.

[Anonymous No.19041956]

>>19040908
Relax dude