A Failure, A Success, Don't Care or Don't Know

[Anonymous No.18939885]

Good thoughts, bad thoughts, scamy thoughts, bewildered thoughts, inspirational thoughts, bizfag thoughts, OG thoughts and innovative thoughts all are welcomed.

[Anonymous No.18939958]

>>18939885
I think the project is overall well run, it has a clear idea, the software is working and the team seems competent and not chinks.
But the concept is too complex for normies. I don't know who is going to use that. I have a node running but I don't know if it is worth it. On the other hand it just requires to check in every few weeks so my investment is acceptable.

[Anonymous No.18940562]

>>18939958
Fair. Throw anything and throw more on this people.

[Anonymous No.18941660]

How many nodes are you guys running? 2 humans here.

[Anonymous No.18941772]

>>18941660
1 and 6 epochs old. I thought about it but I don’t want to spend that much time making flips (4 required) and don’t want to stress about short flips potentially killing a node because I have to spend too much time on one.

[Anonymous No.18941830]

I did a back of the napkin calculation on Idena the other day. Say in 5 years or so, it has 100 mil users. That would be pretty widespread adoption, comparable to popular social media sites. If the mining and flip creation reward for a month provided enough DNA to just pay for the cost of running a node (cheap 5$/month VPS) then the price of 1 DNA would have to be around 340$, which 3000x more than today. If the reward is more than that, say 50$ a month (not a lot to westerners but actually meaningful to poors in Africa and India running a node on their phones) then it would be 30000x.

[Anonymous No.18941977]

>>18941660
2 Humans
4 Verified
5 Newbies

unironically.
next validation is a sunday, so normie frens will be free to validate whether or not they're back to work from coronachan

[Anonymous No.18942481]

>>18941977
Based farmer anon

[Anonymous No.18943144]

>>18941977
Oh my, Is that some kind of human farm you are running there. Is it ethical or not, good or bad?

[Anonymous No.18943858]

>>18939958
It's about as good of a normie coin as you'll ever see that isn't centralized piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.18944024]

>>18939958
Oh really can i have some team members names

[Anonymous No.18944061]

>>18944024
You don't need them if you actual knew how to review code faggot

[Anonymous No.18944106]

>>18944061
They have something to hide?

[Anonymous No.18944142]

>>18944106
Anonymous teams are better then non-anon aside from eth, look at bitcoin and monero, two god tier coins made by anonymous people.

[Anonymous No.18944521]

>>18944024
More scams have had teams with devs/PR listed and VCs/angel investors than anon teams, prove me wrong

[Anonymous No.18945165]

>>18939885
pic related

Very clear that the method of human validation does not work for most people. Biggest issue is probably the timezone, for me this is why I had to quit running a node. Was hard waking up in the middle of the night, middle of the work week makes it much worse.

[Anonymous No.18945762]

>>18945165
I would have made the validation last time but my node crashed overnight and it couldn't sync fast enough when I rebooted it in the morning

[Anonymous No.18946040]

>>18945165
What would you do alternatively to realize PoP to make sure its compleltely different individuals?

[Anonymous No.18946157]

>>18945165
Current system is fine. Neets gonna neet.

[Anonymous No.18946190]

>>18945165
people treat missed validations as if they are actual failures. I've missed validations because I couldn't be arsed with it. Your own graph proves it -- out of all failed identities, Suspended and Zombie are but a fraction. A ton of people miss validation the first time on purpose but then make up for it for the most part when suspended, and even more so when zombie as you can clearly see in your graphs.

What this means is that 75% of failed validations are like that on purpose and the vast majority of them get remediated the next epoch as 2nd or 3rd failures due to missing only occur what looks like 5% of the time?

For me the network is working perfectly. Late submission is a tad too many, but the other two are fine.

[Anonymous No.18946429]

>>18943144
as long as the DNA flows steadily, who cares?

[Anonymous No.18946439]

3 epochs old idenafag reporting in
>1 verified
>1 vps awaiting validation

I only have ~300DNA and feeling pretty shitty when I think about early adopters with hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of DNA...

Hoping the VPS and Verified accounts can help me out before Idena moons, but I am scared that I’m going to miss out and not make it. Can late adopters even make it??

[Anonymous No.18946481]

>>18946439
there's less than 10k validated nodes right now, if widespread adoption is millions of people you are still a very early adopter

[Anonymous No.18947825]

>>18939958
>I don't know who is going to use that. I have a node running but I don't know if it is worth it. On the other hand it just requires to check in every few weeks so my investment is acceptable.
This alone gives it value. A blockchain run by the everyman, where nodes approximately 1 node = 1 human. If they can manage to implement sharding, Idena will compete for the highest node count of any blockchain.