/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.18856343]

Has any coin seen that level of constant, consistent, dedicated FUD before?

[Anonymous No.18856401]

This is now a comfy link thread. Like in the old days. We are all going to make it anon. 1keoy is fud.

[Anonymous No.18856406]

No because never before have discord "wolf of wall street" retards with 20k link microstacks paid pajeets pennies a day to shitpost on here.

[Anonymous No.18856565]

>>18856406
Lol if they're actually doing this. Pretty pathetic

[Anonymous No.18856568]

>>18856343
sergay betrayed us all, we were supposed to be all in this together

[Anonymous No.18856575]

>>18856406
If anyone's paid to post on here it's the Link fudders.

[Anonymous No.18856586]

>>18856575
lmfao thats just sad.

[Anonymous No.18856602]

>>18856586
>lmfao thats just sad.
>STOP FUDDING OUR RELIGION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.18856609]

>>18856343
yes cardano.

[Anonymous No.18856614]

>>18856586
https://i.imgur.com/e1u6Oap.jpg

sirs pls this is very real and organic, you must sell your link tokens now

[Anonymous No.18856617]

>>18856602
If anything's a religion, it's Link fudding.

[Anonymous No.18856625]

>>18856614
>>18856617
>collecting single copypasta posts and pasting them all in one pic
You're working or you're a fucking retarded cultist

[Anonymous No.18856626]

Don't care, didn't ask plus I sold.

[Anonymous No.18856640]

Thanks to you fucking linkers i needed to add a new buzzword to the filter every fucking day. Now i see your downfall with joy.
GET REKKT SHITCHAIN STINKLINKERS

[Anonymous No.18856642]

>>18856602
You know what's fucked up? Now a lot of times when I say or type something I imagine it quoted in greentext with a soijack and become incredibly self conscious about saying anything

[Anonymous No.18856645]

>>18856625
>NOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST EXPOSE OUR INORGANIC FUD CAMPAIGN

[Anonymous No.18856664]

>>18856406
Is 20k enough to make it bros?

[Anonymous No.18856670]

>>18856343
>w-w-we are failing because of all the FUD
Nice cope but the scam is being outed. No retard, let alone a respectable company - will buy into something held for 60% by the team who steadily dump it.

[Anonymous No.18856672]

>>18856642
>You know what's fucked up? Now a lot of times when I say or type something I imagine it quoted in greentext with a soijack and become incredibly self conscious about saying anything
basically like this

[Anonymous No.18856680]

>>18856568
>>18856602
>>18856625
The discord tranny fudder is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a pajeet, faggot, kike, spammer, it all runs of him like water off a raincoat. But expose their spam posts in one image and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've been found out."

[Anonymous No.18856700]

>>18856343

Why, this is precisely how to dump bags on newfags on binance.

This scam is brilliant from the psychological point of view, not mathematical.

Russkies are good at psycho and media scams.

[Anonymous No.18856715]

>>18856670
>>18856700
Chainlink in 2017:
>we will sell tokens to fund the project

Fudders in 2020:
>HAHA THEY'RE SELLING TOKENS TO FUND THE PROJECT

[Anonymous No.18856717]

>>18856664

How does 2000 million dollars sound to you?

[Anonymous No.18856732]

yeah man, they're playa hatin HEX the same way, but even harder. HEX has also outperformed link ten times as fast.

[Anonymous No.18856747]

>>18856680
based and goebbels-pilled.

[Anonymous No.18856758]

>>18856715
The amount they are selling right now is enough to set up over a thousand JSON parsers.

But without FUDing. This can all be sorted out if somebody took the effort of asking the team what the selling is done for. If a company does some shit like this they will explain it at some point. The team could say they are hiring certain people for certain projects etc. They didn't though and just keep dumping coins while telling people to hold. Which in itself is not a scam but it could very well be a scam.

[Anonymous No.18856768]

>>18856758
>The amount they are selling right now is enough to set up over a thousand JSON parsers.
lmao, what about the network?

>if somebody took the effort of asking the team what the selling is done for
They told us that in 2017.

[Anonymous No.18856775]

>>18856645
>>18856680
The chainlink cultist is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a pajeet, faggot, kike, spammer, it all runs of him like water off a raincoat, one can expose their spam posts in one image and you will be astonished at how he denies, despite his injuries, the countless times he's been turded on by his alleged saviour Sirgay.
He seems to enjoy the 500k turds, to seek for them, he knows that deep down he doesn't deserve any gain, any victory, he keeps holding his flanneled shitcoin because he likes to feel miserable.

[Anonymous No.18856776]

[Anonymous No.18856786]

>>18856775
>cultist
If anyone's a cultist, it's the Link fudder.

[Anonymous No.18856809]

>>18856786
>He forget to mention that for every single post in that pic there was a chain mouth-ass link shill thread
UH OH

[Anonymous No.18856816]

>>18856343
Dr;nb

[Anonymous No.18856820]

>>18856776
The cherrypicked screencaps and opinion of literal whos trump
>Google
>Microsoft
>Oracle

Yes yes sirs sell sirs

[Anonymous No.18856825]

>>18856768
>they told us that in 2017
Jesus Christ you fucks are gullible. What are they using the money for right now at this moment? We are entering a depression namely so it might be a good idea to get some financial prospects from the team. Don't you have a right to see the books as an "investor"?

[Anonymous No.18856856]

>>18856825
It feels like the team can just do what they want without conversing with investors. Again, might not be a scam but you guys are behaving like simple monkeys trading shiny marbles whilst having no idea what those marbles do or what happens above. What are the montly expenditures of the team for example? Do they make revenue apart from selling tokens?

[Anonymous No.18856871]

Y E S

[Anonymous No.18856894]

>>18856343
I've seen you make this thread at least 20 times. Aren't you tired?

[Anonymous No.18856908]

>>18856809
That shit gets posted in reply to anything remotely Link-related.

>>18856825
>>18856856
>LINK Tokens are not securities, investments or currency,
and are not sold or marketed as such.
t. Chainlink white paper, 2017.

Imagine being this much of an entitled newfag lmao.

[Anonymous No.18857021]

>>18856908
Nigga Ik now. But still. Why the fuck is this not communicated? It would make token holders feel more secure thus stabilizing the price or making it higher. Yet they don't and nobody questions them. What if they need to keep selling and selling they keep running the project until it is gone or the price drops too much. It's like the FED printing money (but different).

Just ask them what they are doing!

[Anonymous No.18857099]

>>18856908
>anything remotely link related
Say that there are 2500 cultist shill threads a day

[Anonymous No.18857171]

>>18856343
>antshare vibes

[Anonymous No.18857183]

>>18856343
Bitcoin cash

[Anonymous No.18857198]

When the fud reaches its peak as it looks like now, pump is close.

[Anonymous No.18857205]

>>18856642
Same but with gigachad and I end up feeling based and redpilled

[Anonymous No.18857226]

>>18856575

That is one person. He is a fucking weirdo. I called him out and he admitted it.
He hasnt been posting for a few days tho, or I didn’t come here much so have not noticed

[Anonymous No.18857242]

>>18856602
Yeah, I'm so glad I came inside you.

[Anonymous No.18857404]

>>18857021
>I know
>but I still called Link a scam
lmao

[Anonymous No.18857425]

>>18857099
If anyone's a cultist, it's the Link fudders.

[Anonymous No.18857493]

>>18856856
>It feels like the team can just do what they want without conversing with investors.
Yes that's literally how it works, and if you think holding Chainlink tokens makes you an "investor" you're a fucking retard. They don't need or want your money.

[Anonymous No.18857502]

>>18857183
This actually.
>>18857198
I just partially bought back in for this reason.

[Anonymous No.18857550]

>>18857404
>being this delusional
The potatoes/tomatoes of what kind of asset a LINK is doesn't matter. What does matter is that these people are doing shit affecting the tokens without telling the tokenholders what (with whom they are in this together aren't they?). Instead of asking yourself "why did they choose to liquidate this much right now when we want 1000 EOY?" you just sit there complaining about FUDDING with the argument that "they said so in 2017!".

Just ask them to explain this shit. I myself would not feel comfortable putting money in something this legally flimsy where the only thing you have as a security is the word of a Russian national with the head office in the Bahama's.

>>18857493
>They don't need or want your money
So why are they selling tokens to people like you? They do need your money otherwise they wouldn't be selling, dumbfuck.

[Anonymous No.18857595]

>>18857550
you:
>WE INVESTORS DEMAND AND DESERVE ANSWERS

also you:
>ok so what if we're not investors, WE STILL DEMAND AND DESERVE ANSWERS

[Anonymous No.18857639]

>>18857550
You are not a shareholder. They literally told us exactly what they are doing with the money. It has been confirmed to not be a security by the SEC. ok I think that covers all the obvious shit that you don't understand, you can stop posting now.

[Anonymous No.18857652]

>>18857595
Yes you should. This is why crypto will never take off. It needs more security built in before any adaption can happen. Either by having no team (bitcoin) or by having some form of legally binding agreements towards coin owners. What you guys are doing is just gambling and hoping the team of your coin of choice is not scamming you.

[Anonymous No.18857665]

>>18857550
They don't need YOUR money specifically, newfag. Muh investors. Want to know what projects had GREAT investor engagement? Roadmaps! Hype twitter posts! Updates! VeChain. I suggest you go all in.

[Anonymous No.18857721]

>>18857652
>It needs more security built in before any adaption can happen.
The security measures built into Chainlink are going to be groundbreaking. For starters they're working on enclaves with both Ari Juels (THE global authority) and fucking Intel itself.
What the fuck are you talking about.

[Anonymous No.18857746]

>>18857665
>>18857639
Just know that Sergay has everything he needs to scam you guys without repercussions. If you can live with that then that is your choice. Again, not saying he will but I think it would be wise to find out a bit more about what the team is doing with the money they get from selling tokens, that's it.

[Anonymous No.18857776]

>>18857746
>Just know that Sergay has everything he needs to scam you guys without repercussions.
Nothing changed in this respect since 2017.

The only thing that changed since then are Chainlink's connections/partnerships/integrations with half of crypto as well as some of the biggest companies in the history of the world.

[Anonymous No.18857879]

>>18857776
Just be warry of the dumb money entering. Could make it volatile. Good luck guys, hope you get a profit out of it. Personally I don't like Sergay and his cronies so I don't wish him the best.

[Anonymous No.18857907]

>>18856343
Yes, eth before tokens.
Look at companies bending knees to chainlink, once everyday. Only swingers and disctrannies care about current price, because it's their living.
It's not a name of companies who will shoot chainlink to stratosphere, it's usability.

[Anonymous No.18858015]

>>18856758
take a look at pic related. you think a 2 man team, one of whom is a heavy marijuana smoker & the other who doesn't even know how to code and is overweight bejng addicted to McDonald's- you think a bedroom outfit like that can manage all these relationships simultaneously? They're going to need to scale up in big way before the network is profitable.

[Anonymous No.18858044]

>this absolute level of delusion
>cringe link cultists in full defense mode

[Anonymous No.18858069]

>>18856343
No this was the reason i bought some time after sibos because i got curious why so many people who said it was shit was giving it so much attention so i thank them

[Anonymous No.18858073]

>>18858015
Would be a good moment for them to do some press on it:
>he guys we are making progress and need a bigger team so we are liquidating some coins. So you know. We need a ... a ... and a .... for next years.
But instead nothing.

[Anonymous No.18858167]

the FUD is unironically trying to save you guys. I want you inkies to consider one, just 1 thing:
Why isnt LINK at $10 yet? think about everything it has
>Oracle
>Google
>Microsoft
>SWIFT
>BSN
>OpenLaw
>Ethereum Allianoce shilled it
>TRON partnership
>Mentioned in Government documents, Bill Gates foundation, etc
LINK also has outstanding technology never seen before
>Tsigs
>Town Crier
>Mixicles
I could go on.

But heres the thing. Everyone knows how great chainlink is. The whole entire world worships link, from og crypto gurus to e thots. Nobody doubts LINKs importance except 10 angry people on /biz/. No one, absolutetly no one in the entire world doubts chainlink at all.

And thats exactly why it wont moon. In simpler terms, you are priced in. There is no more shock or surprises that could happen to chainlink. Elon Musk could namedrop chainlink tomorrow, and it would still be under $5. Your coin is almost too perfect at this point. Theres not much else that could happen. There is no journey left. Sure you could wait for commercial use to pick up the price like what Oracles doing, but that is 10 years away from actually affecting the price because Sergey designed it in a way to have loads of throttle before requiring a price increase with collateral.

You already won. No one doubts LINK anymore. Its priced in

[Anonymous No.18858240]

>>18858073
I’m so happy you are never going to buy link

[Anonymous No.18858245]

I’m sure all of these fudders have my best financial interests at heart

Thx guiz

[Anonymous No.18858246]

>>18858167
This is actually extremely high quality fud. Well done anon. Why aren't pajeets using this?

[Anonymous No.18858282]

>>18857721
Nothing he is either fussing or a Twitter/reddit new fag who thinks the chainlink team owes him an explanation for what was said several years ago

[Anonymous No.18858316]

>>18856664
20k is top 1% holders lol

[Anonymous No.18858338]

>>18858240
And I am sad for you as LINKIES don't understand the stock market or how to vet an organisation. You guys need to learn how to read a financial document. Living on hopium never pays of in the end.

[Anonymous No.18858379]

For anyone around when ETH was mooning, was it all positivity or were people trying to fud it hard like crabs in a bucket?

[Anonymous No.18858382]

>>18858246
In the mind of a pajeet, not a single shred positivity can be shed on link.

[Anonymous No.18858400]

>>18858246
Concerned fud is unironically the only FUD i nearly fall for.

[Anonymous No.18858426]

>>18858338
paying pretty fucking well so far lmao

[Anonymous No.18858428]

>>18856642
Don't be a faggot, it helps.

[Anonymous No.18858437]

>>18858379
>or were people trying to fud it hard like crabs in a bucket?
You have no idea.

>muh BTC already has smart contract capability
>muh premine
>muh autistic Vitalik
etc.

Bitcoin maxis were pretty much the majority of posters back then. It was a completely different world.

[Anonymous No.18858448]

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit.

[Anonymous No.18858456]

>>18856642
Kek. Fuck it

[Anonymous No.18858658]

>>18858448
DR;NS

[Anonymous No.18858752]

>>18856343
yes, xcm

[Anonymous No.18858830]

>>18857746
Tbf people have asked them, and the only remote answer that's been given so far is being told to look at the last line of their mainnet blog post, which is about expanding the team in 2019.

[Anonymous No.18858864]

>>18856680
HOLY BASED

[Anonymous No.18859039]

>>18858830
Alright nice, keep doing that. If they don't need to explain stuff they won't so as a community you should be on that shit.

[Anonymous No.18859057]

>>18856642
lmao so true

[Anonymous No.18859286]

>>18856642
Its mostly overweight fags with gyno posting it so it really shouldnt bother you

[Anonymous No.18859618]

>>18859039
idrc atm. ik they're legit enough to not scam, and that it's crossed to the point of price awareness of rocketing to the top 3. that's good enough for me to hold on to my late 17/mid 18 bags desu.

[Anonymous No.18860418]

It's literally pumping right now though

[Anonymous No.18860469]

oho

[Anonymous No.18860612]

>>18857879
you're so new it hurts, lurk before posting on here.

[Anonymous No.18860707]

Is 300 linkies enough to make it?

[Anonymous No.18860717]

>>18860707
3million 2026

[Anonymous No.18860765]

>>18860707
How does 300 000 000 € sound?