/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.18719064]

>out of 5 million tested, 1 million have the virus
>which means millions and millions of people probably have the virus and haven't tested for it
>which means the deathrate is probably closer to the common flu, if not lower

How are bears and happeningfags coping right now?

[Anonymous No.18719135]

>ww3 literally to commence any minute now
>not happening

wew lad glow harder

[Anonymous No.18720239]

>>18719135
le glow in le dark lol

[Anonymous No.18720348]

>>18719064
>which means millions and millions of people probably have the virus and haven't tested for it
yes you sub nigger tier dumbfuck, because there is no selection bias for who gets a fucking test, eh retard??? jesus fuck

[Anonymous No.18720371]

>China claiming no infected people anymore
>"It's all ok!"

[Anonymous No.18720394]

>>18719064
>>which means the deathrate is probably closer to the common flu, if not lower
Already way higher you retarded donkey, try to keep up

[Anonymous No.18720411]

Reminder social distancing is only justified in the effort to keep your max active cases below the carrying capacity of your hospital.
Given that is true you should be accelerating the exposure between low risk demographics to minimize the time to which her immunity is achieved.

The way they are treating this virus is a happening in itself.

[Anonymous No.18720438]

>>18719064
we've already doubled the normal flu death rate in the US, and that was in 2 months instead of a year.

the reality is this fucker hasn't even gotten started yet.

[Anonymous No.18720449]

>People getting tested aren’t the ones showing symptoms or in close contact with confirmed cases

[Anonymous No.18720471]

>>18720348
what if i told you that the random antibody tests show the same thing? who's the nigger now?

[Anonymous No.18720581]

>>18720411
>herd immunit
reminder to the reddit dumbfuck. there is no evidence nor any reason to expect people to gain lasting immunity from reinfection. there is however published evidence showing zero to fleeting (and only partial) protection for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the literature, and there is historical prescedent for no protection from reinfection with another human coronavirus H229E which causes respiratory tract infections.
>in summary
you do not know what the fuck you are talking about

[Anonymous No.18720597]

>>18720471
they don't dumbfuck.

[Anonymous No.18720616]

>>18720581
stay inside for the rest of your life then.

[Anonymous No.18720617]

>>18720449
wait is this real?

[Anonymous No.18720649]

>>18720581
>there is no evidence for immunity
then why the fuck would you advocate a vaccine

[Anonymous No.18720651]

>>18720616
your butthurt is pretty funny

[Anonymous No.18720662]

>>18719064
You’re nothing but a dumb hoax nigger.

[Anonymous No.18720691]

>>18720649
i have not done so, however just because natural infection might not confer protective immunity does not mean tht a cleverly designed vaccine cannot confer protection. it is worth a try

[Anonymous No.18720737]

>>18720597
https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/20/l-a-covid-19-antibody-study-adds-further-support-for-a-higher-than-suspected-infection-rate/

''...antibodies for COVID-19 in between 2.8 and 5.6% of the population of LA County, suggesting that between 221,000 and 442,000 individuals had the infection — up to 55 times more people than have been confirmed via testing''

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200424/more-data-bolsters-higher-covid-prevalence

''Hard-hit New York, the first state to do its own antibody testing, found an estimated 13.9% prevalence rate statewide, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Thursday. The rate was even higher in New York City, at 21.2%.

The state randomly tested 3,000 people who were out shopping. Cuomo said the results may be high because they tested people who were out, not people who are isolating at home.''

''Before releasing those patients, though, they had to be tested. Out of 87 patients total, 50 tested positive—and none had shown any symptoms.''

''And a new analysis of widespread testing in the town of Vo, Italy, found that 43% of people who tested positive showed no symptoms. Neither report has yet been peer reviewed.''

at least take 5 minutes out of your day to research something before showing your retardation.

[Anonymous No.18720746]

>>18719064
I love the Coronavirus data because Happooners/click-bait news get so excited about how contagious the virus is, then they realize that those outrageous numbers show how truly harmless the virus really is.

[Anonymous No.18720748]

>>18720691
>No you can't get immunity from exposure to a disease with a trivial case fatality rate for your age you have to pay us for this vaccine
this is one of the biggest shill comments I've ever seen.
kys.

The inflection point was reached under 100k deaths countries without social distancing have shown no difference to those with social distancing

[Anonymous No.18720779]

>>18720748
In fact countries with social distancing have worse results

[Anonymous No.18720791]

>Out of 87 patients total, 50 tested positive—and none had shown any symptoms.
Imagine pic related holding nothing.

[Anonymous No.18720793]

>>18720691
>>18720651
>>18720597
>>18720581
>>18720348
I literally don't understand this line of thinking. Just absolute fucking nonsense and you stick your head in the ground when >>18720737 data is presented showing how fucking stupid you are.

Sure signs of schizophrenia.

[Anonymous No.18720821]

>>18720471
What if I told you one of those "random" studies recruited using ads on facebook and another went around asking people if they wanted to be tested for covid antibodies.

Those "random" studies, are just as prone to self selection as the swabs.

[Anonymous No.18720851]

>>18720737
"randomly testing" is not the same as "randomly asking if they want to be tested for CoViD19" The bottom line is that these are not controlled double blind studies. They are highly prone to self selection.

[Anonymous No.18720861]

>>18720793
if we killed 56k with an infection rate somewhere between 6 and 22% then we can expect anywhere from 1/4 million to 1 million deaths.

this is an underestimate though because both infection rates are taken from extremely large cities, and one of them represents the very worst exposure in the US.

so realistically another 1-5 million deaths in the US are possible, GOING OFF THE STATISTICS SHOWN.

[Anonymous No.18720947]

>>18720779
Sweden 225 deaths/mm
USA 171 deaths/mm

I know, math is hard. Go blow a fucking sand nigger.

[Anonymous No.18721053]

>>18720947
wow look at all those countries above sweden you absolute faggot

[Anonymous No.18721066]

>>18720449
is that real

[Anonymous No.18721083]

>>18721066
it's more real than the need for social distancing

[Anonymous No.18721103]

>>18719064
you're making the assumption that all countries only test people who have symptoms. this was the case at the start of the pandemic, but it isn't anymore; precisely to prevent the fallacy in your post from occuring.