>>18562498
potentially yes, the question is whether the likely rate of infection will cause an overload for a given area's health care, or become so rampant as to effect essential services.as population is lower, so is healthcare capacity and so on. You could end up with the same problem, just with smaller numbers, or an actually smaller problem.its really difficult to model.
Lower population density played a big part in the Swedish approach, which looks to be failing. so do you roll the dice and risk the shutdown of critical services, or quarantine and prop up the economy as best you can?
>In the opinion of most qualified, and most sane people around the world, its the latter. But of course, a bunch of retards waving their guns around in colorado may know better...