[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 1.05 MB, 1316x772, 1586626084525.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18415294 No.18415294 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.18415299
File: 120 KB, 852x782, 1577686162544.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18415299

>>18415294
$1000 eoy

>> No.18415303

>>18415294
$10-30

>> No.18415311

>>18415294
WTF THAT PICTURE STOLE MY CHAINLINK
DON'T CLICK

also my prediction? $1

>> No.18415322
File: 27 KB, 1092x1037, 1561946370665.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18415322

>>18415294
Just high enough so that you can *almost* make it, but not quite high enough, so you don't sell yet, then it will crash 90% and 1k suicides EOY

>> No.18415346

>>18415311
Lol I have no idea how this happened. I made the LINK Photoshop myself , but I never put that blurry covid article thumbnail over it. .what the fuck?? This is the weirdest shit. Any comp sci / graphic design anon here who can explain?

>> No.18415412

>>18415346
must be a 4chan glitch? weird...

>> No.18415437

>>18415294
Based photo

>> No.18415460

>>18415346
i think it's a bug in 4chan's code where 2 images were posted with the same timestamp (or the image shrinking compute job finished at the same time as another image) and there was a "collision" of the result.

>> No.18415481
File: 104 KB, 1046x914, 1584115050760-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18415481

>>18415460
>>18415412
Weird shit. Someone should tell gookmoot

>> No.18415497

>>18415294
This picture made me hate women?$1000

>> No.18415508

>>18415437
based on what?

>> No.18415559

look I found the post in this thread, image posted at the exact same time >>18414109

>> No.18415596

>>18415559
Based 4chan detective. This is actually pretty interesting. Someone should contact the 4chan developers

https://www.4channel.org/contact

>> No.18415621

>>18415481
he probably knows but it's so rare that it doesn't matter. when you look at the image url that 4chan makes, it's the same as the milliseconds since January 1, 1970 - it's just a timestamp. but since it's used as a unique key it means that if 2 images are assigned the same timestamp (same millisecond), then only one will "win". you could probably fix it by assigning each image a random ID that is truly unique...there are many ways to do this better but 4chan is probably running on crappy code from 12+ years ago that no one gives enough of a shit to actually fix