/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.17983534]

Chainlink andBsv is the chad bizfolio

[Anonymous No.17983709]

>>17983534
Based

[Anonymous No.17983735]

>>17983534
Yes

[Anonymous No.17983757]

>>17983534
>he doesnt know BSV is a scam

[Anonymous No.17983772]

I'm gay and I still think talking about crypto is cool.

Crypto is so fucking over face it retards.

NO NEW SCAMS

[Anonymous No.17983807]

>>17983534
With BSV adoption, LINK won't be needed. 1000 suicides EOY.

[Anonymous No.17983810]

>>17983757
> He doesn’t know the segwit fork is a fraud

[Anonymous No.17983826]

>>17983807
50/50 for personal blockchain agnosticism among link and bsv sounds nice already.
Chainlink can migrate from erc/667 to Bsv lmao.

[Anonymous No.17983836]

>>17983757
Segwit isn't Bitcoin.

We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures. Each owner transfers the coin to the next by digitally signing a hash of the previous transaction and the public key of the next owner and adding these to the end of the coin. A payee can verify the signatures to verify the chain of ownership.

[Anonymous No.17983848]

>>17983836
BTC is a fraud
BitCoin Sv is the original whitepaper protocol

[Anonymous No.17983855]

>>17983735
Based

[Anonymous No.17983873]

>>17983826
Data will already be on chain so what value will LINK be adding?

[Anonymous No.17983889]

>>17983757
>he doesn't understand the tech of btc yet

[Anonymous No.17983906]

>>17983889
Based

[Anonymous No.17984805]

Buy BSV. Just fucking buy it you stupid cucks. I'm tired of this den of imbeciles. At the absolute minimum read the bitcoin whitepaper. Compare it to BTC and BSV. There's your answer.

[Anonymous No.17984929]

>>17984805
>CALVINAIR

Is there a more perfect name for a business? Fucking brilliant imo

[Anonymous No.17984956]

>>17983873
New data will be, but what about all the exabytes of data that aren't on chain?

[Anonymous No.17985073]

>>17984956
You will be incentivized to move your data on chain. Won't be long before it all moves on chain. LINK will have a limited run with providing data. TEEs are the best use case left.

[Anonymous No.17985085]

>>17983534
All in LINK. BTFO you Faketoshi shill.

[Anonymous No.17985880]

[Anonymous No.17985966]

>>17983873
>>17984956
Hand over the data.

[Anonymous No.17986143]

>>17983534
Btc, xmr, eth, link, tezos, atom are the chad coins. Should have 80-90% of your portfolio in these.

The chad shitcoins are qnt, rlc, ocean, rsr and my hidden gem I think will do really good once the Tzero exchange is online. Flo. 10-20% of your portfolio is these.

[Anonymous No.17987806]

>>17986143
BTC- kill
ETH- DOA- 2.0 is fundamentally fucked
Tezos-I like but it's going to pay royalties to Tokenize
Atom- neither know about nor care

The shitcoins you selected are just that.

There is going to be one major winner and that is BSV. There is nothing you can do about it. The market will eat shit and get what it deserves. You had two years.

[Anonymous No.17987915]

>>17987806
Bsv can’t do everything at most it’s just a shitty version of Bch

[Anonymous No.17987975]

>>17987915
You're coming from a place of ignorance. Its use case is almost limitless. BSV's backers go far beyond multinational companies. But again, you were warned and you will reap what you sow.

[Anonymous No.17989354]

>>17983836
lmao you never opened bitcoin code in your life

[Anonymous No.17989367]

>>17984805
beg in all fours or no buy

[Anonymous No.17989380]

>>17983534
I consider them hedges to each other

[Anonymous No.17989399]

>>17983534
and ZANO. But you aren't going to find anyone willing to sell them sadly

[Anonymous No.17989464]

>>17987806
Thoughts on LINK?

[Anonymous No.17989497]

>>17983534
scamstink and bitshitv are the virgins portfolio

[Anonymous No.17989614]

>>17983534
correct. add BNB for good measure.
t. 80/10/10 LINK/BSV/BNB

[Anonymous No.17989624]

>>17983772
AAAAAAAAAAAAAA ITS ALL A SCAM N000000000

[Anonymous No.17989637]

>>17983836
nobody cares what the "real bitcoin" is, dumb boomer

[Anonymous No.17989642]

>>17989614
Lmao binance won’t be an exchange pretty soon mr. chink shill. CZ is going to jail eventually. You should have sold at $40 dummy

[Anonymous No.17989663]

>>17989637
Yet...

[Anonymous No.17989682]

>>17989663
never. these stupid forks were designed to suck money from retards who felt bad about missing out on bitcoin. you got suckered. now kys

[Anonymous No.17989729]

>>17989682
They always seem to perform though

[Anonymous No.17989751]

>>17985073
You're missing the use case as a verification layer for BSV, ensuring that the data that gets written is independently verified.

[Anonymous No.17989826]

>>17985073
Smart contracts on the BSV blockchain will constantly need to be fed off chain data. If you're smart enough to hold BSV you should also be holding LINK, especially because LINK is more or less a closed network of corporations and banks right now. When it goes live they'll be incentivized to pump the price as high as humanly possible to spend less tokens per transaction. BSV will reach a million, but it will happen slower because of organic growth in utility

[Anonymous No.17989883]

>>17989614
If BSV succeeds (it will), Binance fails

[Anonymous No.17990541]

>>17989464
BSV is not a closed system. Live data of any sort can be brought on chain in real time. When the ultimate goal is billions of tx/s there can only be one winner (1 million + this year). Bear in mind smart contracts already exist on BSV and Craig has applied to patent nearly everything related to the technology. A small percentage of bizraelis will get very rich. Everyone else will be left with bags of shit. Link is great but the odds are stacked against it. On the small chance it succeeds it will migrate to the BSV chain.