CHAINLINK

[Anonymous No.17745942]

WE WON
https://twitter.com/lemiscate/status/1238179745336045570

[Anonymous No.17746033]

>>17745942
literal who with no users

[Anonymous No.17746060]

Sergey just killed Makerdao

[Anonymous No.17746276]

>>17745942
wtf did i just read

[Anonymous No.17746315]

>coin no one used instead of tether uses scamware whose tech is currently failing right now

[Anonymous No.17746326]

>>17746276
It's called, "English," Manvinder.

[Anonymous No.17746344]

>>17745942
I sold.

[Anonymous No.17746359]

LEND is another worthless governance token

[Anonymous No.17746401]

>>17746276
read the whole thread. makerdao is a complete fraud and chainlink proved to be highly reliable in such an eventful day.

[Anonymous No.17746434]

>>17746401
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

[Anonymous No.17746469]

>>17746434
nobody got justed by that, quite the contrary.

[Anonymous No.17746476]

>>17745942
chainlink is confirm kill. RIP Jason Parser.

[Anonymous No.17746516]

>>17746401
Isn’t this the purpose of chainlink, making node operators responsible?

[Anonymous No.17746525]

>>17746469
>chainlink proved to be highly reliable
>fails during the first major dump of the crypto recession
>20+ a transaction

just fuck off. your coin's tech is the worst fucking thing in the world and didnt solve any problem at all.

[Anonymous No.17746555]

>>17746401
I did and still don't know what exactly happened.

[Anonymous No.17746603]

>>17746555
>this piece of shit is not AS a big piece of shit as this low market scam coin no one uses, therfore we win

thats his whole argument for this thread

[Anonymous No.17746660]

>>17746434
wow now that chainlink is up and running we're about to see a whole new level of FUDding

[Anonymous No.17746677]

[Anonymous No.17746703]

>>17746660
>our roller coaster has had 2 wheels fall off and a support beam broken on the first day
>UP AND RUNNING!

[Anonymous No.17746719]

>>17745942
>link literary did not provide eth price for 6 fucking hours
>"WE WON"

[Anonymous No.17746736]

>>17746525
>fails because ETH is a clogged shitcoin
>blame link
The absolute state of you nulinkers.

[Anonymous No.17746750]

>>17746677
holy shit that guy is pathetic

[Anonymous No.17746795]

Yes, the CEO of a pajeet scamcoin just approved chainlink. $10000000000000000 tonight

[Anonymous No.17746828]

[Anonymous No.17746965]

>>17746736
this desu
if link was pushing through with $100k gas they'd FUD that

oracles not updating during ETh congestion is a nothingburger

[42 No.17747095]

>>17745942
>WE WON
mfw

[Anonymous No.17747281]

>>17746736
>nuLinkers
ive held LINK since 2017 and sold +3. never buying back, sorry
>ETH'S fault
LOL. Got any proof for that? Orrr, did Link just fuck up during the first recession and blaming it immediately on ETH. Eitherway, if ETH price feed can fuck up like this, then that means LINK is no help at all.

also
>20+ a transaction
WHO THE FUCK WOULD PAY FOR THIS LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

[Anonymous No.17747324]

>>17746660
been up and running for a year, literally 0 users, cause no developer will ever use KYC oracles in production.

>>17746736
kek Chainlink is like 2000 lines of code implemented on ETH. It's literally nothing. No clue what they've done with $40million.

[Anonymous No.17747334]

>>17747281
I can't even believe how dumb you are

[Anonymous No.17747365]

>>17747334
>proves your coin is worthless

>y-youre stupid!

[Anonymous No.17747424]

>>17746677
What a fucking pajeet.

[Anonymous No.17747448]

>>17746828
Look at that tranny lel

[Anonymous No.17747463]

Is it normal to just become more indifferent toward fud the longer you hold. 18k since 0.45

[Anonymous No.17747481]

>>17745942
bruh it dropped to zero how the fuck is that resilient.

[Anonymous No.17747514]

>>17745942
>Winning

[Anonymous No.17747564]

>>17746315
>>17746434
>>17746525
>>17746603
>>17746703
>>17747281
>>17747365
>there are now """""competitors""""" on /biz/ fudding against Chainlink
>"LOOOOOOOL"
Looking forward to having the Bandaid Protocol join us as a future node operator on the Chainlink network.

[Anonymous No.17747631]

>>17747564
>makedao
>bandaid
wow, dying scam companies that knew they were fucked since day 1 are joining the shitlink team!? such a feat!

[Anonymous No.17747781]

>0.12 down since that was tweeted

oh ho ho ho
no no no no
nnnmnmnnmnmNMMMH
AHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.17747905]

>>17747564
Chainlink is centralized oracles. They are literally 5 years late to the party with their KYC centralized oracles. That shit has exited since 2015. That's why they have 0 users.

[Anonymous No.17747924]

>>17747324
>2000 lines of code
>more code = better
found the pajeet

[Anonymous No.17747932]

>>17747905
Goddamn Rajesh, just copy paste! Stay on fucking script or you're not getting paid.

[Anonymous No.17747941]

>>17747905
Weak fud.

[Anonymous No.17747997]

>>17747924
kek learn to code, maybe you won't have to lose 50% of your life savings in 1 day cause you "invested" in a centralized scam with 0 users.

>>17747941
>t. seething linker pretending everything is fine

[Anonymous No.17748044]

>>17745942
absolutely based

[Anonymous No.17748136]

>>17746434
>entire system grinds to a halt
>MakerDAO caught hanging with their ass in the wind
>only spark of light in the dark is a number of heroic Chainlink nodes paying out the ass to continue to provide services
>"th-this is BAD"

fucking cope lmao

[Anonymous No.17748170]

>>17747997
I bought at 0.45 pajeet
good code is compact and elegant, like Bitcoin

[Anonymous No.17748222]

>>17747281
Breathe more than twice per minute, your brain needs oxygen.

[Anonymous No.17748231]

TOP KEK LOOK AT THIS DUDE

https://twitter.com/BAND_Jedi

This is the gayest and most painfully obvious astroturf account I've seen in a while. The absolute state of Bandaid Protocol's marketing department

[Anonymous No.17748280]

>>17748136
im not sure if stinkies realize, but Makerdao was a worthless shitcoin not being used by anyone. no one, not a single soul gave a fuck about makerdao. it was an experimental project that failed.
And already, just from 1 day of recession, LINK is failing and ranking up the transaction prices greatly. Who the fuck in their right mind would own a chainlink? Imagine spending TRANSACTION FEES for something you could get for free.
chainlink isnt even decentralized. It takes the fucking average of things. Even the data feeds today werent accurate, because it wasnt a matter of link feeding the correct one, it took the average.


oh, and your coin's HQ is located in the caymen islands. What is your possible excuse for that?

[Anonymous No.17748285]

>>17746719
gas congestion.

[Anonymous No.17748302]

>>17748170
>He thinks bitcoin is 2000 lines of code
>He thinks he is an astute software investor
>t. seething linker pretending everything is fine even though he just lost half his life savings

[Anonymous No.17748319]

So while there was no trusted answer for several hours (as the 14/21 requirement was not met), some nodes continued to provide input thereby keeping the system going?

[Anonymous No.17748353]

>>17745942
WHO THE FUK

[Anonymous No.17748358]

>>17748280
>Chainlink proves more reliable than Makerdao
>"b-b-b-but makerdao was always shit anyway ;____;"

That's one way to copen't.

[Anonymous No.17748394]

>>17748319
How the nodes are used and how many is up to the user.

[Anonymous No.17748425]

>>17748394
And how many nodes are KYCed is up to Sergey Nazarov.

[Anonymous No.17748472]

>>17748425
>muh KYC

Flopping all over my yacht's deck.

[Anonymous No.17748545]

>>17748472
>Linkers: Sergey invented the genius consensus algorithm known as KYC. This is why his coin is worth $2 billion marketcap.

[Anonymous No.17748559]

>>17748545
You seem upset.

[Anonymous No.17748585]

>>17748559
>t. seething linker pretending he's not mad he just lost half his life savings

[Anonymous No.17748608]

>>17748585
You cute.

[Anonymous No.17748661]

>>17748608
>3 years
>$2billion marketcap
>0 users
>0 decentralized oracles
>Linkers: This is bullish!

[Anonymous No.17748767]

>>17748661
Well it just blew DAO out of the water.
That's huge, in case you didn't realize, DAO was considered a golden standard long before Chainlink started making waves.

DAO uses unknown feeds for its medianizer, and these feeds failed.
Unknown though, so good luck finding out what happened without having to trust whatever Maker claims happened, and good luck holding them accountable through financial penalties (staking) or even directly (KYC).

[Anonymous No.17748795]

>>17748767
how did maker feeds fail? they worked pretty well

[Anonymous No.17748843]

>>17748795
Nobody knows. That's a large part of the problem.
With Chainlink everything is operating out in the open.
Chainlink performed better, and if it didn't we would know exactly why.
That's why Chainlink is ahead.

[Anonymous No.17748905]

>>17748843
the auction fail had nothing to do with oracles, the guy is just spinning bullshit
there was simply no one else bidding on these liquidations

[42 No.17748962]

>>17748843

[Anonymous No.17748994]

>>17748905
>the auction fail had nothing to do with oracles, the guy is just spinning bullshit
haha ok buddy
How about the fact that DAO's price feeds gave a price 30 USD higher than the actual price?

See >>17746828
and the thread in OP

[Anonymous No.17749045]

>>17748994
>How about the fact that DAO's price feeds gave a price 30 USD higher than the actual price?
that's by design, it's delayed by one hour
https://community-development.makerdao.com/makerdao-mcd-faqs/faqs/oracles
>In addition to this, the Oracle Security Module(OSM) safeguards the process by delaying price-feed data for one hour. This allows MKR governors and other stakeholders the time to identify bugs or attacks on the price-feed system. An OSM is active on all Oracles in the Maker Protocol.

[Anonymous No.17749166]

>>17748994
the fact that the guy behind bzx didn't even know that >>17746828
just proves he's an incompetent idiot
not surprising since bzx lost so much eth due to very stupid bugs
like hey if you are creating a defi dapp, at least learn the basics of how makerdao works

[Anonymous No.17749220]

>>17749045
>>17749166

At the time of the price output by MakerDAO, the price was 30 dollars off.
This is not a feature, it was a failure.

Their one hour system is not about giving the ETH price from one hour prior, it's about leaving 1 hour between updates.

[Anonymous No.17749223]

>>17748585
He wont give a concise answer because hes a retarded linky

[Anonymous No.17749309]

>>17749220
again, it's by design.
>by delaying price-feed data for one hour
>delaying
the idea is that the collateral ratio is high enough so that the price can't drop in one hour to make a previously overcollateralized vault/cdp undercollateralized.

This held, the only part that failed are liquidation bots, an entity external to the system. It won't happen again because it was a simple matter of not enough bots ran by people, now that one (?) guy made millions many people are going to look at it

[Anonymous No.17749363]

>>17746326
translate it to curryscript plz sir

[Anonymous No.17749443]

>>17745942
Oh amazing another announcement on twitter go ahead and keep deceiving other silly stinkies

[Anonymous No.17749504]

>>17748767
>DAO was considered a golden standard long before Chainlink started making waves.
stopped reading. No one on the entire planet gave a shit about DAO or used it commercially

[Anonymous No.17749590]

>>17749504
True, DAO has been a shitstorm since it began. hacking, lost founds, and some library being deleted. plainly stupid

[Anonymous No.17749677]

>>17745942
>you just win

[Anonymous No.17750298]

>>17745942
I just typed in aave aave into google and African vernacular English came up. Am I missing something?

[Anonymous No.17750310]

>>17749309
No.
Maker's oracles failed to pass along the price because (most likely) their gas price didn't take.

Read the OP, Zeller is a legit MakerDAO expert.

[Anonymous No.17750351]

>>17749504
>>17749590
fucking lol, cope fagwads

[Anonymous No.17750390]

>>17750310
The drop to $130 happened in less than one hour. The guy is not an expert, he's a bullshitter

[Anonymous No.17750433]

>>17750390
Look him up, buckaroo.

Also,
>However, things became complicated today as the Ethereum network became congested leading to oracle’s price updates not going through with the gas price they chose.
https://messari.io/article/makerdao-gets-stress-tested-as-eth-price-plummets

[Anonymous No.17750518]

>>17750433
>Look him up, buckaroo.
muh argument from authority
he didn't even know about the one hour delay
>https://messari.io/article/makerdao-gets-stress-tested-as-eth-price-plummets
this guy is wrong too, one guy was buying the collateral for a price of 0, how could an oracle updating too slow cause that?

[Anonymous No.17750527]

>>17750351
>MakerDAO was irrevelevant shitcoin used by no one
>YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS YES IT WAS

wait, whose the one coping again?

[Anonymous No.17750565]

>>17750518
>muh argument from authority
>he didn't even know about the one hour delay
Him being Marc Zeller, and you being an anonymous 4channeler, indicates that it's probably you who's missing something.

>this guy is wrong too
So you're smarter than Marc Zeller, bZx, and Messari.
Good job anon.

[Anonymous No.17750577]

>>17745942
> 39% in red
>WE WON
choose one faggot

[Anonymous No.17750598]

>>17750565
>Him being Marc Zeller
>t. Marc Zeller
nobody cares about you faggot, go suck a black cock

[Anonymous No.17750614]

>>17745942
>have to keep the ponzi going

[Anonymous No.17750619]

>>17750565
>MUH MARC ZELLAR

[Anonymous No.17750625]

>>17750565
you could be arguing with Zeller right now and not even know it

[Anonymous No.17750651]

>>17750598
>>17750619
>>17750625
No need to seethe@me lads.
Just cope.

[Anonymous No.17750671]

>MUH MARC ZELLAR
>MUH MAKERDAO

[Anonymous No.17750678]

>>17750651
cope about what?

[Anonymous No.17750705]

>>17748170
just a side note

>good code
there is no such thing

[Anonymous No.17750706]

>>17750678
About the fact that Maker's ETH price feed failed.

[Anonymous No.17750710]

>>17750678
MARC ZELLAR SAID CHAINLINK IS GOOD.

COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE

[Anonymous No.17750718]

>>17750706
but it didn't, the one hour delay is a well-known design choice.

[Anonymous No.17750801]

>>17750718
>but it didn't
It did.
The prevailing theory is that the gas price was simply set too low.
But because the 14 feeds are unknown by design, we have no way of knowing.

This is why Chainlink is ahead: not only did it perform better, but if something did go wrong we would know instantly because Chainlink operates out in the open.

[Anonymous No.17750828]

>>17750801
mind telling us how MakerDao is a gold standard and what well known entity sources were actually using DAO at all?

[Anonymous No.17750843]

>>17750801
show me the dropped or pending transaction on etherscan
oh wait you can't, because nothing like that happened and maker feeds worked exactly as they were designed to do
>the prevailing theory
is that you're a faggot

[Anonymous No.17750884]

>>17745942
.001 today
one tenth of a penny per link.

enjoy that gap being filled. all the way down. to one tenth of a cent. you'll get to one cent. then only have to lose 10x from there.
enjoy the journey.

all the way back down to .001

[Anonymous No.17750950]

>>17750843
I'm just an anon on 4channel lil buddy, I gave you three sources itt already, look it up for yourself.

[Anonymous No.17750985]

>>17750950
why do you keep ignoring me >>17750828

lmao. all i just want to know what big significant entity in the world relied on makerdao at all or why it was important.

how are you not able to answer this?

[Anonymous No.17750990]

>>17750828
>mind telling us how MakerDao is a gold standard
Besides ETH itself, MakerDao is the second backbone of DeFi.
Picrel.

[Anonymous No.17751039]

>>17750990
but who was relying on it? What big financial entity said
>i couldnt get anything done without the oracles from makerdao

?

[Anonymous No.17751060]

>>17751039
there there, anon

[Anonymous No.17751094]

>>17751060
>uhhhh, no one
okay LMAO.

if no one was using MakeDao and it was the gold standard before, why would people all of a sudden need chainlink???

[Anonymous No.17751114]

>>17751094
MakerDao is the gold standard in DeFi.
Cope.

[Anonymous No.17751138]

>>17751114
who the fuck was using defi? like wot, was there any big financial institution relying on makerdao oracles?

[Anonymous No.17751141]

>>17751094
>why would people all of a sudden need chainlink???
Ask Oracle, Google, Swift, ...

[Anonymous No.17751150]

>>17750950
>sources
>one faggot on twitter writing a theory he pulled out of his ass
>another faggot repeating the same story on his site
literally the only source is the makerdao and the ethereum blockchain
1. the one hour delay is by design
2. there's no proof of any dropped transaction

[Anonymous No.17751186]

>>17751141
>google
you mean that blog on twitter that everyone lied about being a partnership?

[Anonymous No.17751216]

>>17751150
This is not about the one hour delay.
You realize you can monitor feed activity in between the hourly updates, right?

I gave you three sources itt, look it up.
No need to lash out at anons on 4channel, what happened happened.

[Anonymous No.17751247]

>>17751138
>>17751186
I will never not get untired of this seething.

[Anonymous No.17751266]

>>17751216
>what happened happened.
yes, and Link failed to update ETH price for 6 hours.
No need to blame it on congestion. What happened, happnened

[Anonymous No.17751277]

holy fuck, the amount of asshurt nolinkers is amazing.

[Anonymous No.17751299]

>>17751266
Well it was congestion, pure and simple.

There's some truth to the fact that ETH can't scale, for now.

[Anonymous No.17751309]

>>17751216
idiot
>Another explanation is that the amount of liquidation and the high price of DAI (ppl hedging by selling ETH to get DAI leading to > 1$ DAI) emptied out their DAI reserve. they were then unable to participate in the auctions.
>another explanation
he doesn't have a clue, he's just trying to leverage link holders to pump his token (lend)
that's literally all that's happening here
he's not an expert
he has no clue

[Anonymous No.17751312]

>>17751247
>google totally endorsed chainlink
>"actually, it was a random journalist that noted chainlink"
>SEETHE, COPE, U MAD????
>>17751277
> -50%
poor no linkers! i cant believe they didnt lose half their money!!!

[Anonymous No.17751352]

>linkies still have not rebutted how ChainLink's hq is located in a well known tax haven, the caymen islands

are we just going to ignore this for the rest of time?

[Anonymous No.17751364]

>>17751312
>I bought in my stack after 2017
Yikes kiddo. Cope. Please keep cope posting.

[Anonymous No.17751393]

>>17751309
>he doesn't have a clue
That's the point anon.
MakerDao uses secret price feeds; so unlike with Chainlink it's impossible for anyone outside of the two top dudes at Maker who actually know the identities of the feeds to know exactly what went wrong with the feeds.

He's listing the possible scenarios he (as a MakerDAO expert and code contributor) can think of.
But we'll have to wait for the postmortem by Maker to know what it was exactly.

[Anonymous No.17751405]

>>17751364
how is anyone coping. LINKies are down 50% today.

wouldnt no linkers be coping if link actually went up?

[Anonymous No.17751417]

>>17751393
argggh
but nothing went wrong with the feeds!
eth collapses from $160 below $130 in less than one hour
that's it

[Anonymous No.17751437]

>>17751364
btw, i bought in 2017 and sold at 3+ LMAO

[The Devil !!y9pM1O7kKh0 No.17751448]

>>17747095
Could you imagine some rebel group in the middle east, 20 years from now using a Tesla truck for their insurancy? Powered by decentralized chainlink oracles.

[Anonymous No.17751462]

>>17751405
It's pretty weird, yes.

>>17751417
>but nothing went wrong with the feeds!
Something definitely went wrong with the feeds.
You're not smarter than the three sources I gave itt.

[Anonymous No.17751468]

>>17751393
>secret price feeds bad
glad to know chainlink is more vulnerable to hackers

[Anonymous No.17751474]

>>17745942
>https://twitter.com/lemiscate/status/1238179745336045570
> -36.80%

Christ this is fucking pathetic.

[Anonymous No.17751482]

>>17751462
that's the problem with argument from authority, you are unable to discuss the merits, you just default to 'that guy smart, I trust him'

[Anonymous No.17751489]

>>17751437
You must be asshurt to keep responding.

[Anonymous No.17751490]

>>17751352
LINKIES ARE STILL IGNORING THIS LMAOO

[Anonymous No.17751499]

>>17751352
I'M STILL IGNORING THIS LMAOO

[Anonymous No.17751505]

>>17751468
Are you literally retarded or just a talentless troll. Get lost idiot

[Anonymous No.17751506]

>>17751482
Like I said, there is no need to lash out at anons on 4channel.
I'm here to bathe in the tears, not spoonfeed midwits like you.

[Anonymous No.17751520]

>>17751489
>must be asshurt to respond
>*proceeds to respond*

do linkies just have sub room temperature IQ? I feel like LINK could go down to 40 cents and they still be saying "coping nolinkers"

[Anonymous No.17751545]

>>17751505
>lets have everyone see how Chainlink works so anyone can exploit a system that processes trillions of dollars of information
>WHAT COULD GO WRONG!

[42 No.17751553]

>>17751448
>Could you imagine some rebel group in the middle east, 20 years from now using a Tesla truck for their insurancy? Powered by decentralized chainlink oracles.

[Anonymous No.17751552]

>>17751468
>Chainlink worked better and is more transparent than Maker
>"this is BAD ;_____;"

[Anonymous No.17751557]

>>17751520
>27 posts later
Ok kiddo.

[Anonymous No.17751564]

>>17751545
>28 posts YIKES.

[Anonymous No.17751583]

>>17751499
checked and kekked

[Anonymous No.17751585]

>>17751506
>im here to bathe in -50% off link

>>17751557
>>17751564
>linkies are mad by mere posting now

Make that 29 posts. Seethe niggers

[Anonymous No.17751614]

>>17751585
Kek based

[Anonymous No.17751622]

Holy fuck this guy really hates link lmao. Wtf

[Anonymous No.17751624]

The absolute state of anti-LINK shills. Take your fucking meds lmao

[Anonymous No.17751666]

They get paid 0.02 cents per reply. Sage and report

[Anonymous No.17751673]

>THIS GUY REALLY HATES LINK
>HE REALLY MISSED OUT NOT GETTING DUMPED 50% TODAY
>STOP POSTING SCHIZO
(30 posts by this ID)
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.17751702]

>>17751673
What?

[Anonymous No.17751723]

>31 POSTS
>THIS ID HAS POSTED 31 TIMES
>HOW CCOULD HE POST 31 TIMES!

still waiting for the answer to this >>17751352

[Anonymous No.17751733]

>>17748136
>>only spark of light in the dark is a number of heroic Chainlink nodes paying out the ass to continue to provide services
>he doesn’t even realise the implications of transaction fees rocketing when shit goes sideways
>still thinks this is totally fine and absolutely nothing to worry about that the people this network relies on will be the first to take it up the ass
Yup nothing to worry about, will certainly incentivise institutional investors who are generally pretty risk averse to rely on link to handle their multi-billion transactions and price feeds when they could probably just invest in making one for their own if they really saw the need for it rather than rely on some relatively obscure project based on the Cayman Islands

[Anonymous No.17751735]

>>17751673
>Link dumps into oblivion
>still feels the need to desperately and obsessively fud Link

Tell me about your father anon.

[Anonymous No.17751763]

>>17751735
Tell me why ChainLink HQ is located in the caymen islands, a well known tax haven anon

[Anonymous No.17751789]

>>17751763
Tell me why all the major companies in america are incorporated in Delaware?

[Anonymous No.17751794]

>>17751733
>he doesn’t even realise the implications of transaction fees rocketing when shit goes sideways
Nobody said ETH as it is right now is ready for primetime Chainlink use.

>>17751763
So retarded boomer anti-crypto bs in the US doesn't affect it.

[Anonymous No.17751834]

>>17748231
>me retire

[Anonymous No.17751859]

>>17751789
>being located in Delware is highly suspicious
the absolute state
>>17751794
>So retarded boomer anti-crypto bs in the US doesn't affect it.

oh, you mean ChainLink wants to go against SEC ? okay, makes sense

[Anonymous No.17751883]

>>17751859
The US govt is retardedly against crypto. A lot more so than Europe.

[Anonymous No.17751927]

>>17751883
>Chainlink
>number one goal is to be adopted by US based corporations and entities
>is completely against following US law
makes sense.

[Anonymous No.17751984]

>>17746525
to be fair the high gas prices were the fault of the ETH 1.0 network, all of those problems are solved with ETH 2.0 which is happening very soon. but please sell all of your Chainlink, it is literally worthless.

sincerely,
Schloppy aka MadDoggo

[Anonymous No.17752000]

bros, how long till the next 6 hour halt on prices? I want to see Linkies spout
>IT WAS ETH'S FAULT
again. lol

>>17751984
>CHAINLINK DINNUDU NUFFIN

[Anonymous No.17752010]

>>17751927
>number one goal is to be adopted by US based corporations and entities
And that's going swimmingly lol.

[Anonymous No.17752042]

>>17746677
>>17746750
honestly, time to dox this nigger.
will report findings.

[Anonymous No.17752056]

>>17752010
SWIFT
>gave permission for Chainlink to use their logo in slideshows without ever mentioning in their papers
GOOGLE
>one codemonkey developer mentioned chainlink once in a blog post that all the shills said was an official partnership
ORACLE
>god knows where Linkies got this idea
ON SLAUGHT OF SHITTY CRYPTO INCLUDING TRON, POLKADOT, DAO
>congrats on this, serious

[Anonymous No.17752064]

>>17752010
actually the Cryptocurrency Act of 2020 which was just introduced this month is set to pass by the end of April.
in that legislation it enshrines Smart Contract technology as being legally robust at which point when it passes... stinkies will win yet again and faggots like you will do the self sudoku.

[Anonymous No.17752071]

>>17746828
holy shit
fudders look like THAT?
no wonder they are so fucking salty, they are justed by default

[Anonymous No.17752103]

>>17752071
>I don't get fudders, LINK prices are so low they can easily hop on it or is it because they have no money to invest?

[Anonymous No.17752117]

>>17751794
>Nobody said ETH as it is right now is ready for primetime Chainlink use.
>>17751883
>>17752010
Kek this anon will just say anything to cope huh, and I plan to buy back in the next couple days as well.
>not selling at 4.20+
Imagine lmao

[Anonymous No.17752267]

>>17746434
Couldn’t you just use another node operator?