/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.17632056]

What the fuck is happening?

[Anonymous No.17632065]

>>17632056
I sold

[Anonymous No.17632068]

>>17632056
One last shakeout to ~3.50 before the climb to $10.00+

[Anonymous No.17632078]

Retesting supports, we shot up from 4.20 to 4.96 in two days.

[Anonymous No.17632080]

>>17632068

[Anonymous No.17632086]

It was good memes, you didn't really risk your bitcoins, at the all time high? Oh no anon

[Anonymous No.17632087]

>>17632056
I assume you don’t look at other charts besides link?

[Anonymous No.17632116]

>>17632056
corona mutated and got into link.

[Anonymous No.17632119]

>>17632056
It's over

[Anonymous No.17632128]

>>17632116
Load ze corona FUD into ze blockchain

[Anonymous No.17632132]

>>17632078
You'll be at $3.96 in two hours.

[Anonymous No.17632142]

>>17632056
how new are you? link is attached to btc. btc crash = link crash. new faggot.

[Anonymous No.17632147]

>>17632132
We may retest the 3.80 range tommorow if 4.20 breaks. Depends on BTC of course.

[Anonymous No.17632156]

>>17632056
goodbye

[Anonymous No.17632238]

>>17632142
incredibly incorrect and you faggots are nowhere to be found when Link pumps like a madman with no relation whatsoever to the rest of the market.

[Anonymous No.17632260]

>>17632238
you're going to be in for a surprise if you think that the eth/btc pairs are going up more.

[Anonymous No.17632279]

>he didnt sell

Oh nonono

[Anonymous No.17632293]

the market still has no idea what the value of a link is, newfags were FOMO'ing like usual and are now getting justed as they should

even thought LINK might seem like the surest thing in the world when it's pumping, people will lose confidence in it if the price continues to drop (and it will)

I aim to rebuy at 35-40k sats range

[Anonymous No.17632533]

>>17632056
I wonder if an oracle token with no current use case will be useful in the next 6 month with Coronavirus quarantine everybody.

[Anonymous No.17632654]

Target set at $1.80

[Anonymous No.17632669]

>>17632056
It’s pumping, but inverted
This is inversely bullish

[Anonymous No.17632711]

I failed to sell at 4.8, now I just hate myself more than before, since I started trading it's that constant feeling

[Anonymous No.17633144]

>>17632669
Kek

[Anonymous No.17633322]

>>17632056
Buying dip. Corona virus spook. People are selling to stock up on supplies since the stores are price guaging and people are retarded. Take advantage lads.

[Anonymous No.17633453]

>>17632711
Every time, I do it every time

[Anonymous No.17633475]

One of the worst things about being on /biz/ this long is the realisation that we will have the same posts at every price.
I naively thought we would have some sort of perma-euphoria once we passed $1, but it looks like link will be $500 and people will be crying about buying at $550.

[Anonymous No.17633499]

It's all so tiresome. The event is in less than twelve hours. Discord trannies are dumping because they love psyops

[Anonymous No.17633502]

>>17633322
I'm waiting for low $3. hopefully lowest at my pay day so I can get more link.

[Anonymous No.17633534]

>>17632056
That’s it anon, it’s over
LINK over $4 a coin
I AM FINANCIALLY RUINED

[Anonymous No.17633543]

>>17632056
Apocalypse Mode Extra

[Anonymous No.17633547]

>>17632068
How many more "last shakeouts"?

[Anonymous No.17633561]

Cant wait to pick up more on the cheap

[Anonymous No.17633660]

>>17633547
one too few to get rid of me

[Anonymous No.17633682]

>>17633547
possibly infinite, every new price range we trade at will have shakeouts, and thus last shakeouts.

[Anonymous No.17633747]

>$4.17

[Anonymous No.17633786]

>>17632056

looks like a healthy correction anon

[Anonymous No.17633915]

>>17633543
based

[Anonymous No.17634319]

>>17632142
>linked to btc
>link is uncoupled now! when it pumps
Make up your minds faggots.

[Anonymous No.17634354]

>>17632068

[Anonymous No.17634397]

>>17632056
It's done. Chainlink is finished. Once and for all this time. Better get out now before this motherfucker drops to the bottom of the sea.

[Anonymous No.17634625]

>>17633475
You value chainlink at 186+ billion?

Feels like very few people on Biz are savvy enough to know that you watch market cap, not coin/stock price.

Thats nearly 4 times the value of General Motors, a company which turned a 6.5 billion dollar profit last year.

The reason so many suicidal food service workers get royally fucked by Biz-induced FOMO is they have absolutely no awareness this.

[Anonymous No.17634658]

>>17632056
Where's the best place to purchase links?

[Anonymous No.17634660]

>>17632056
Sell, you weak handed bitch

[Anonymous No.17634743]

Not selling.

[Anonymous No.17635104]

>>17634625
>savvy
>crypto
>market cap

[Anonymous No.17636172]

>>17632056
>KYC oracles
>0 users
>$0
simple as that

[Anonymous No.17636189]

>>17633475
Average $200bil marketcap company
>100k+ employees
>1mil+ customers
>$5bil+/y profit

Chainlink
>20 employees
>0 users
>$0 profit

[Anonymous No.17636217]

>>17632056
Make some money while link is dropping and then buy the dip:

BTW: fuck buccaneer. clear scam. If you want to try something thats not a dodgy 2 day old "private coin" then I'll throw you a line:

Buy this on fork delta, you wanna buy an order thats about 0.000690 ETH per TRUE.

Then go on an exchange that has it like okex or use Uniswap, on uni swap it goes for about 0.00128 ETH / TRUE. So when you sell you're multiplying your money. Dont buy for a price too low though on fork delta as if the difference is too big and you randomly are selling fuckloads on their exchange theyre gonna catch on and take back the funds, (on an exchange at least Ive had it happen to me, not sure if Uniswap works like this)
Link is: https://beta.forkdelta.app/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=66042ec7ea1201a5d6cdbfbb178089224180c124-1583650203-0-AXcyrrWFo5r22B2kXU2akd4Sv9HuB7x0pyPZ_tXSUd9i1wGR5gc0LDvPhXs4LARLmI-lSIjULIwUTPz8WbfmXcWCZGXsI0DKlY_WAqgl5PhNcLW01p9GkVHUUXAeJJuNN4B6BUtFytN5Q6xKGEASQuT-K0VFY5nhGONBJUdgiecx-OVR9SEBlKeKLRfWicph3airlbgAFv8fznag3Uue0iszBBT9uHsbRLsJbnWm8U1tHXyCvkWf9m2WqFnoj-foS08CFD1La7n5lpN7pQcD0PJcYZoXs7e9W6iEx9L-ssBDB_sL_5DAWymvgh_B8bmNE47-ghmtdexuLn9dj4N1aPc#!/trade/0xa8bdc8882987a3ed83d8030f08d64479f1eff731-ETH

Enjoy senpai.

[Anonymous No.17636231]

>>17636189
>>17636189
>$0 profit
$50+ Million with 35 Million from ICO for some price feeds
650,000,000 tokens held by Sergey to still dump at will, not to mention the previous "profit" of dumping multiple 700k tokens on investor's heads. All its profits comes from scamming these gaslighted faggots.

[Anonymous No.17636237]

>>17636189
thanks to chainlink, soon the average $200bil marketcap company will also have 20 employees

[Anonymous No.17636248]

>>17636189
Chainlink Confirmed backed by big companies... something is obviously brewing

[Anonymous No.17636255]

>>17636237
Most of them will relocate to Guatemala and start thriving bean picking enterprises.

[Long Live Link No.17636362]

links not going below $4 screenshot

[Anonymous No.17636364]

>>17636362
48k is the bottom
new ath mid april

[Anonymous No.17636387]

Are the rumors true? Did Jason Parser resign from chainlink?

[Anonymous No.17636430]

>>17632056
It's being a market after a 12 month rise of 2,000%. Did you think it would go up forever? Sell for FRM.

[Anonymous No.17636593]

>>17632056
Well what did you expect?
>Oracle last month
>Microsoft, Ernst&Young, and AMD last week
>Digital Asset on Monday

Of course we're going to dump into oblivion.

[Anonymous No.17636617]

I have a money reload incoming and I'm topping off my stack. I hope it keeps dumping until I get my funds.

[Anonymous No.17636655]

>>17634625
Chainlink is more like Visa than General Motors.

[Anonymous No.17636940]

>>17636189
>>17636231
God I love seeing this brainlet fud.

Protip: Chainlink's source of income was only ever meant to come from the 30% of the token supply allocated for themselves.
Chainlink was never meant to "turn a profit" beyond that.
It's not a conventional company, they're building a decentralized protocol.
And the better Chainlink does, the further that 30% stretches.

>price checker
*price oracle.
General oracle, in fact.

[Anonymous No.17636948]

>>17636940
at the conference earlier today I had to go to the bathroom,
while I was standing at the urinal conducting my business as usual I hear
one of the stall doors open. Suddenly a man walks up to the urinal next to me, I found this weird because I'm at the leftmost urinal and litteraly all the others were free, futhermore the fact that he didn't do anything, he was just standing there right beside me with his dick hanging out.
"psst", "psst hey"
I realize that he is trying to get my attention, but being weirded out I just ignore him.
"pssst, you ! yes you !"
as I reach for my zipper he forcefully grabs my arm and states "you wouldn't be interested in solving the coracel problem ?!"
taken aback by this abrupt maneuver I try to pry myself while stuttering "problem? I don't want any problem..." - but his iron grip won't let go and he keeps on repeating "THE CORACLE PROBLEM, CORACLE". Becoming afraid I cry out "Let go of me!" he then cackles maniacally and says "dont you see, WE ARE CHAINLINKED TOGETHER". I then once again try to pull myself lose but instead slip on the floor and fall down.
As I lay there under the urinals he bends down and whispers into my ear "thanks for your time, see you next year" before finally letting go of my arm. He then calmly walks over to the stall he came out of, turns around, look straight at me with his dead eyes and quickly flashes what I think was supposed to be a thumbs up.
He enters the stall, slams the door and puts the lock on.
As I stumble towards the exit I hear him snickering as I pass the stall.

[Anonymous No.17637011]

>>17636237
based and underrated.

[Anonymous No.17637304]

>>17636940
so by your own admission it's literally a funding token. The only reason it exists is so that Sergey can eat his fill on your dime?

[Anonymous No.17637366]

>>17637304
You need a crypto-based asset to facilitate compensation/staking/penalties.
A proprietary token is the best solution for this since it means as little external price and supply influence as possible.

[Anonymous No.17637382]

>>17637366
They couldn't get rich by having just used ETH. Gotcha.

[Anonymous No.17637404]

>>17634625
Please explain why market cap is relevant to crypto.

[Anonymous No.17637440]

>>17637382
>dude, just use an extremely volatile asset dependent on a million external factors to implement staking within a separate network

[Anonymous No.17637447]

>>17632068
kek imagine actually thinking this

[Anonymous No.17637449]

>>17634625
>You value chainlink at 186+ billion?
>Thats nearly 4 times the value of General Motors

Does GM's market cap reflect a proportion of the value of various financial markets?

[Anonymous No.17637478]

>>17637449
this

you also cant stake your GM shares to make more GM shares

[Anonymous No.17637482]

>>17636655
>compares stocks to worthless tokens
With stocks you actually own part of a company. With chainlink you just own a worthless token used for nothing

[Anonymous No.17637498]

>>17637482
>the token used as the sole means of exchange and value retention (staking) within the standard oracle protocol that finally enables mainstream smart contracts
>"worthless and used for nothing"

[Anonymous No.17637518]

>>17636189

You are comparing company shares to tokens. For example General Motors shares are not meant to be used in the network, link tokens are.

[Anonymous No.17637619]

>>17637498
>no current usecase
>trust me
>the whole world will use it in the future
>I just know
>Every state is going to accept chainlink
>no competition by companies
>noone will just copy this shit in 2 weeks

[Anonymous No.17637627]

>>17637498
Answer his question then. What's the current use case of LINK tokens?

[Anonymous No.17637633]

>>17637619
>no current usecase
Except for the current usecases, right?

>noone will just copy this shit in 2 weeks
Why would they when they can just use Chainlink?

>>17637627
Check the contracts and blockchain.

[Anonymous No.17637664]

>>17637633
They maybe want money, power and control?

[Anonymous No.17637671]

>>17637664
>They maybe want money, power and control?
And why would they "copy" Chainlink when they can simply use it?

[Anonymous No.17637689]

>>17637671
It is centralized (65%) and companies like Facebook want to establish their centralized coins.

[Anonymous No.17637698]

>>17632056
You had enough time to sell

[Anonymous No.17637704]

>>17637633
So just crypto derivatives? What happened to SWIFT and the financial derivatives market?

[Anonymous No.17637705]

>>17637689
>It is centralized (65%)
Token ownership has nothing to do with centralization.
You cannot affect a single oracle computation by holding the majority of tokens.

Also, what are you implying, that they'll mint their own tokens?

>and companies like Facebook want to establish their centralized coins
1) what does that have to do with smart contracts?
2) Libra relies on a basket of real-world assets and currencies, and therefore will need oracles

[Anonymous No.17637708]

>>17637689
you've been my favorite poster the past 2 years

[Anonymous No.17637713]

>>17637704
>So just crypto derivatives?
What?

>What happened to SWIFT and the financial derivatives market?
Why?

[Anonymous No.17637809]

>>17637705
>Token ownership has nothing to do with centralization

[Anonymous No.17637815]

>>17637809
Well explain how it does.

[Anonymous No.17637818]

Can any CHADlinker marine drop few ChainLink to a poorfag please
0x9dAC36196381531c82afef11Cb590569982Ce026

[Anonymous No.17637861]

>>17632711
imagine being an absolute spastic like you. fucking coronavirus newfag. it is the everything bubble being popped. it's over

[Anonymous No.17637878]

>>17637815
Sirgay owns 300,000,000 tokens. If moonbois are right and chainlink is worth 1000 eoy, Sirgay is the richest man in the world (300 billion)
>there is incentive to copy centralized systems
>wealth inequality is irrelevant
>whales don't have any power over the market

[Anonymous No.17637900]

>>17632293
Lmaoooo 3 years and they still haven’t realize it “potencial” no you are just fucking delusional. Mark my words it will never go beyond 5$

[Anonymous No.17637909]

>>17637878
You completely failed to explain how this has anything to do with "centralization".
gj

[Anonymous No.17637923]

>>17637909
the tokens are centralized in his wallet.

[Anonymous No.17637930]

>>17637923
How does this "centralize" the oracle network?

[Anonymous No.17637954]

>>17637930
no idea

[Anonymous No.17638036]

>>17636940
>KYC oracles in fact
>0 users in fact
>$4bil market cap in fact

[Anonymous No.17638051]

>>17637366
that must be why Chainlink hasn't even started working on decentralization/sybil resistance and making the token useful 3 years and $60mil wasted.

When are you gonna admit they are scammers? When it's 10 years in and they've accumulated 1000 "partnerships", still 0 users and still 0 decentralized oracles?

[Anonymous No.17638054]

>2020
>still bothering to argue with LINK fudders
lmao

[Anonymous No.17638060]

>>17637633
>Check the contracts and blockchain.
I did check, literally 0 users except for wash transactions

[Anonymous No.17638063]

>>17638060
>I did check, literally 0 users
lmao, why would you just lie on the internet like that?

[Anonymous No.17638065]

>>17637704
Swift was a fake partnership, just like every Chainlink partnership.

[Anonymous No.17638079]

>>17638065
>Its all fake why are you making money while I lose its not faaaaaaaair no no no no please its fake dont buy sell sell sell

[Anonymous No.17638080]

when teemo said 16$ in 4-6 weeks is when i sold. he always comes in at the top and spills his bull cum and probably sells then. have you seen the whales unloading at around 5$? you think they would sell 100s of thousands of link if they thought it’s gonna go double digits anytime soon ?

[Anonymous No.17638085]

>>17638080
these whales are literally the incels posting on this board lmao they don't know any inside info

[Anonymous No.17638090]

>>17632056
I don't know anon. Couldn't possibly have anything to do with btc dropping like a sack of shit again.

[Anonymous No.17638097]

>>17638080
A whale sold 1 million LINK at 1300 sats. It was the lowest sat wick LINK has ever had.

[Anonymous No.17638098]

>>17637930
Sergey KYCs every single oracle personally. If he doesn't, then the network gets overrun by sybil attacks. No, more "time" and more "users" doesn't fix this. There is NO CONSENSUS other than Sergey's KYC.

Let's say they decide to stop scamming and actually implement some kind of decentralized consensus algorithm based on stake, then they have 65% of all tokens available, which means they have ultimate control, just like before.

How about you learn to code and realize Chainlink is nothing but a scam? Why do you think Vitalik will never mention Chainlink? Cause he knows it's a centralized scam and is ashamed of it.

Did you ever stop to think why the Chainlink test net has been out for 2 years and there's still not a single user in production?

Linkers compare LINK to ETH but Ethereum had a mainnet with THOUSANDS of users 12 months after collecting the ICO funds.

When Ethereum reached $5billion market cap, it had tens of thousands of users. How many does Chainlink have? 0.

[Anonymous No.17638109]

>>17638098
>Sergey KYCs every single oracle personally. If he doesn't, then the network gets overrun by sybil attacks. No, more "time" and more "users" doesn't fix this. There is NO CONSENSUS other than Sergey's KYC.
>Let's say they decide to stop scamming and actually implement some kind of decentralized consensus algorithm based on stake, then they have 65% of all tokens available, which means they have ultimate control, just like before.
>How about you learn to code and realize Chainlink is nothing but a scam? Why do you think Vitalik will never mention Chainlink? Cause he knows it's a centralized scam and is ashamed of it.
>Did you ever stop to think why the Chainlink test net has been out for 2 years and there's still not a single user in production?
>Linkers compare LINK to ETH but Ethereum had a mainnet with THOUSANDS of users 12 months after collecting the ICO funds.
>When Ethereum reached $5billion market cap, it had tens of thousands of users. How many does Chainlink have? 0.

[Anonymous No.17638114]

>>17638063
It's a fact.

Sergey lied about Swift, Google, Oracle, DocuSign, being decentralized. Also a fact.

[Anonymous No.17638120]

>>17638114
>It's a fact.
>Sergey lied about Swift, Google, Oracle, DocuSign, being decentralized. Also a fact.

[Anonymous No.17638121]

>>17632056

reality checks, faggot

[Anonymous No.17638132]

>>17638109
>>17638120
>t. seething linker pretending everything is ok

[Anonymous No.17638147]

>>17638098
>Sergey KYCs every single oracle personally
Again, this has nothing at all to do with centralization.

>If he doesn't, then the network gets overrun by sybil attacks.
So long as the many other security measures being developed aren't implemented, sure.
But many clients will want kyc nodes regardless, so it's a neat option to have.

>they have 65% of all tokens available, which means they have ultimate control
How?
Are they going to "buy" all the stakes put out by all the other nodes (including kyc nodes, like you said)?
Owning the majority of tokens has zero bearing on node operation.
Just because Bezos owns many billions, doesn't mean shit for how much bread costs at my local baker.

[Anonymous No.17638152]

>>17638132
>t. seething linker pretending everything is ok

[Anonymous No.17638153]

>>17638114
>Sergey lied about Swift, Google, Oracle
They all made the announcement first lmao.

[Anonymous No.17638164]

Is it even worth debating this shit anymore.... Shouldn't we just be patient? So many nufags here now. Fucking cancer.

[Anonymous No.17638179]

>>17638147
>Again, this has nothing at all to do with centralization.
Again, learn to code, you're incorrect

>So long as the many other security measures being developed
Again, learn to code, they have no plan on ever developing it, otherwise they would have released a technical whitepaper on it. (no the original white paper is not a technical white paper)

>How?
Again, learn to code, you're like a monkey trying to read a book. You're so out of your depth you have no clue what you're talking about.

>>17638153
>They all made the announcement first lmao.
How about you improve your IQ brainlet? It's a fake partnership because it's just marketing. It's a blog post, with no action after. That has been proven. It's been 10 months since those blog posts with still 0 usage.

>>17638164
It's been 3 years. Zero users. Zero decentralized oracles. No activity from any of the partnerships. How long are you gonna wait for the first user? 10 years? Ethereum had thousands of users 12 months after collecting ICO funds.

[Anonymous No.17638190]

>>17638179
>10 posts by this ID

[Anonymous No.17638195]

>>17638179
>>>17638147
>>Again, this has nothing at all to do with centralization.
>Again, learn to code, you're incorrect
>>So long as the many other security measures being developed
>Again, learn to code, they have no plan on ever developing it, otherwise they would have released a technical whitepaper on it. (no the original white paper is not a technical white paper)
>>How?
>Again, learn to code, you're like a monkey trying to read a book. You're so out of your depth you have no clue what you're talking about.
>>>17638153
>>They all made the announcement first lmao.
>How about you improve your IQ brainlet? It's a fake partnership because it's just marketing. It's a blog post, with no action after. That has been proven. It's been 10 months since those blog posts with still 0 usage.
>>>17638164
>It's been 3 years. Zero users. Zero decentralized oracles. No activity from any of the partnerships. How long are you gonna wait for the first user? 10 years? Ethereum had thousands of users 12 months after collecting ICO funds

[Anonymous No.17638198]

>>17638179
The "learn to code" guy is the laziest fudder of the past year.
Truly do not bother.

[Anonymous No.17638200]

>>17638190
Looks exactly like the Theranos, Bernie Maddoff, Bitconnect, Enron, etc. chart.

Congratulation. I really hope you "never sell"

>>17638195
>t. seething linker pretending he didn't get BTFOed

[Anonymous No.17638203]

I just swing trade link since it's so volatile, I average about 10% on each swing, around 10 transactions a month. I almost always double my money by the end of the month

[Anonymous No.17638204]

Munger knew

https://youtu.be/Aa54bSxbbEU

[Anonymous No.17638205]

>>17638200
>>>17638190
>Looks exactly like the Theranos, Bernie Maddoff, Bitconnect, Enron, etc. chart.
>Congratulation. I really hope you "never sell"
>>>17638195 (You)
>>t. seething linker pretending he didn't get BTFOed

[Anonymous No.17638215]

it's all so tiresome

[Anonymous No.17638222]

>>17638200
>11 posts by this ID

[Anonymous No.17638224]

>>17638198
you're a non-programmer investing in software projects you don't understand. Congratulation. Don't listen to literal software engineers. Keep believing non-technical blog posts written by Sergey.

[Anonymous No.17638229]

>>17638224
>you're a non-programmer investing in software projects you don't understand. Congratulation. Don't listen to literal software engineers. Keep believing non-technical blog posts written by Sergey.

[Anonymous No.17638249]

>>17638222
I'm not mad a this chart at all. I bought Bitcoin and ETH in 2015. I already have my gains. I've seen 50+ literal scam coins do 50x like Chainlink over the years. It's just another one of them. Nothing special. And yes, all of them had "partnerships".

Unlike you late adopters I have no emotional attachment to random shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.17638250]

Just finished shorting stinkies from 4.86 to 4.25
Going long now with a limit order @ 4.5
Feels nice taking your lunch money while you "marines" just take it up the asshole

I listen to this while I do it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiWqzxfZCSc

[Anonymous No.17638255]

>>17636237
Based

[Anonymous No.17638257]

>>17638249
>I'm not mad a this chart at all. I bought Bitcoin and ETH in 2015. I already have my gains. I've seen 50+ literal scam coins do 50x like Chainlink over the years. It's just another one of them. Nothing special. And yes, all of them had "partnerships".
>Unlike you late adopters I have no emotional attachment to random shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.17638260]

>>17638249
Why are you still here if you're that rich?

[Anonymous No.17638261]

>>17638249
>I'm not mad a this chart at all

[Anonymous No.17638272]

>>17638260
Not rich, only have $400kUSD and still have a programming job. But I've never touched a scam coin, and never will.

>>17638261
>t. seething late adopter who has to chase scams with 0 users.

[Anonymous No.17638281]

>>17638249
>I have no emotional attachment to random shitcoins.
That is the key of trading crypto. Don't get attached to your coins and play it safe. Buy low, sell high and never look back. Or short high and buyback low.
Always make sure to have stop loss orders proportional to your limit sell/buy.

[Anonymous No.17638283]

>>17638272
>>>17638260
>Not rich, only have $400kUSD and still have a programming job. But I've never touched a scam coin, and never will.
>>>17638261
>>t. seething late adopter who has to chase scams with 0 users.

[Anonymous No.17638296]

>>17638272
You could have had $10 mil if you bought LINK.
AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAH

[Anonymous No.17638298]

>>17634625
>you watch market cap, not coin/stock price

For mature markets, yes. Crypto isn't even in its teens yet. AAPL went from a hasbeen in the 90s to a 1.25 TRILLION market cap today, and electronics as an industry was already three times as old as crypto is today.

[Anonymous No.17638331]

>>17633475
This is funny because it's true.

[Anonymous No.17638566]

>>17638080

lol we are the whales nufag

[󠛡 No.17638574]

>>17638080
>have you seen the whales unloading at around 5$?
no because it didn't fucking happen you analjester

[Anonymous No.17638593]

>>17638224
I’m a software engineer and I’m all in link, now what

[Anonymous No.17638607]

>>17632068
Dumb linkoid

[Anonymous No.17638619]

we just need to cool off before the next rally
anyone else getting margin calls? dumb brokers don't know about $1k eoy

[Anonymous No.17638629]

>>17632068
get real
if the price of LINK falls to 3.50 nobody will ever have faith in this garbage again

[󠛡 No.17638643]

>>17638629
...it was $1.6 three months ago you imbecile

[42 No.17638817]

>>17633475
>I naively thought we would have some sort of perma-euphoria once we passed $1, but it looks like link will be $500 and people will be crying about buying at $550.
This is why most will sell way too early.
>pic related
Most people have a hard time conceptualizing long term concepts.

[Anonymous No.17638832]

Link is not a magical asset that just keeps going up eventually you idiots.
Sergey failed, its over.

[Anonymous No.17638840]

>>17638832
>Link is not a magical asset that just keeps going up eventually you idiots.
>Sergey failed, its over.

[Anonymous No.17638854]

>>17632056
>runs on Ethereum
>Ethereum doesn't scale

On retards buy it

[Anonymous No.17638866]

>>17636217
Do not fall for this scam he's trying to trick you with two different coins

[Anonymous No.17638890]

>>17638832
you had 2 years

[Anonymous No.17638949]

>>17637878
Imagine believing Forbes on who has the most money. Good goy.

[Anonymous No.17639187]

After countless fireside chats and talks, and nothing to show for it, you’d be stupid to be confused about it tanking. There’s no value and it’s still too much

[Anonymous No.17639219]

>>17639187
you missed the boat, cope

[Anonymous No.17639231]

>>17638250
>poorfag amounts
Heh nice lunch money, kid.

[Anonymous No.17639255]

>>17639219
It’s overvalued and I don’t own a single link. You’re missing the boat on selling

[Anonymous No.17639268]

>>17638250
>bragging about $75
kek, saved
thanks for the laugh pajeet

[Anonymous No.17639276]

>>17639255
>I don’t own a single link
because you missed the boat retard
>It’s overvalued
okay, retard

[Anonymous No.17639384]

>>17638051
>Chainlink hasn't even started working on decentralization/sybil resistance
Chainlink has been decentralized since day 1 of mainnet, and there are tons of security measures being built, all it takes is taking a look at github.

[Anonymous No.17639395]

>>17638036
>0 users
Do you actually expect people to believe this?
Baffling.

[Anonymous No.17639416]

>>17638854
>helps ETH scale to high heaven

[Anonymous No.17639428]

>>17639276
Seething stinker losing all his sats on a shit token

[Anonymous No.17639470]

>>17639428
>Chainlink
>losing sats

based schizo

[Anonymous No.17639562]

>>17639470
Check since last week brainlet. You’re losing all your money in this scam

[Anonymous No.17639578]

>>17639562
We’re all in since 2017 why does checking since last week matter?

[Anonymous No.17639581]

>>17639428
>>17639562

[Anonymous No.17639591]

>>17634625
It’s hard to compare a car company to a tech company that doesn’t sell a physical product. Most tech companies trade between 25-35x EBITDA (the real number people care about, not net income or “profit” as you described) and car companies usually trade around 10x EBITDA. Tech company’s EBITDA margins typically hover between 35-55% of top line revenue, and trade at 10-15x top line revenue, so if Chainlink followed that pattern that means they’re raking in about $150-$200m in annualized revenue and $45-$85m in annualized EBITDA. But this is crypto so we can cut those midpoint numbers in half to ~$90 rev and ~$35m EBITDA meaning they’re trading at about 16x revenue and 42x EBITDA which when compared to other tech companies is realistic. When TSLA had its run up they traded at 72x EBITDA so it’s not like these multiples are far fetched for any single company to achieve.

t. investment banker for BB who’s autistic and spends too much time on pitchbook

[Anonymous No.17639749]

>>17637900
It will.

[Anonymous No.17639752]

holy shit im financially ruined

[Anonymous No.17639848]

>>17637900
screenshotted.

[Anonymous No.17639866]

>>17639591
whats the realistic ceiling for link?

[Anonymous No.17639974]

>>17638085
no you dumb faggot. /biz/ has been overrun by retarded newfags like you. the /biz/ whales are OG linkholders who left a long time ago.

[Anonymous No.17639986]

[Anonymous No.17640061]

>>17639974
ok big guy

[Anonymous No.17640076]

>>17639986
I just sold

[Anonymous No.17640100]

>>17638817
As long as people have an easy time discerning schizoid drive when it comes to their money, it's all good.

[Anonymous No.17640117]

>>17639581
Cope, you’ve lost $0.20 in 2 hours top kek

[Anonymous No.17640123]

>>17633682
This...If you can take the fluctuations you will get whiplash. Lol Swing Linkies who take profits on the way up but always keep 10K no matter what are the real winners. Adjust that number for your own comfort etc maybe 5K, 15K, 20K etc. I've got my hold stack and swing with leverage on my swing stack. The only alternative is to stop looking at the price and come back at the end of the year

[Anonymous No.17640126]

>>17632056
Back to 1.80 then 80 cents will be the price for the rest of its lifetime

[Anonymous No.17640154]

>>17640123
can't*

[Anonymous No.17640161]

>>17639866
About 1.85

[Anonymous No.17640329]

>>17632056
I've never seen so many people, who I assume have been diagnosed clinically retard, that can't understand crypto fluctuates wildly in value in a short time frame. FFS go look at ETH's historical charts. When the money snek was coiling up for the run to 1400, it bounced from around 320 back to almost 180 3-5 times. Not all of the cycles were that bad but many 30%-50% swings in a small amount of time (months). As of now LINK is following that trajectory for the most part. Those who don't have patience will not make it. These are the same people who will sell everything at $20 or maybe $50 but they won't see the last 1000x+ this space visibly has left to offer.

[Anonymous No.17640335]

>>17640126
post short

[Anonymous No.17640420]

>>17640117
>you’ve lost $0.20 in 2 hours
It's very natural after an announcement tying Chainlink to Microsoft, Ernst&Young, and AMD.

If you think it's dumping now, wait until people realize there's that conference tomorrow with Oracle and Digital Asset.

[Anonymous No.17640603]

>>17640420
Link for info on the conference? I can't find anything

[Anonymous No.17640659]

>>17632056
Sergey exit scamming on you Nazi incels.

COPE

[Anonymous No.17640664]

>>17639974
No, we stay here

> 40,000 LINK

[Anonymous No.17640709]

>mfw sold at $4.5
Get fucked linkies. It's over for you. Next stop: $1

[Anonymous No.17640735]

>>17632132
sheeeit..

[Anonymous No.17640753]

>>17633322
this times a million. don't be a fag and not listen.

[Anonymous No.17640782]

i'm selling lol fuck this shit

[Anonymous No.17640797]

>>17640782
Lol buy high sell low my dude

[Anonymous No.17640804]

>>17632056

[Anonymous No.17640805]

>>17634625
>comparing Link to a fucking car company
Jesus Christ you can’t be this dumb unironically

[Anonymous No.17640807]

>>17640782
Selling the bottom again?

[Anonymous No.17640832]

>>17633547

[Anonymous No.17640854]

>>17640807
>he thinks this is the bottom

[Anonymous No.17640869]

>>17640797
>>17640807
Lol this is going sub $3.00, possibly near $1.80 even. Fucking retards

[Anonymous No.17640876]

I did it again.

[Anonymous No.17640900]

>>17640869
$4.75 in 2 days

[Anonymous No.17640907]

>>17633499
What event?

[Anonymous No.17640937]

and..WALLAH!!!
Link will never be below $4 ever again!

[Anonymous No.17641020]

>>17640869
God I hope so, I want to buy more cheap linkies.

[Anonymous No.17641055]

>>17639974
fucking cringe why do newfags like you who clearly showed up yesterday post such fucking cringe with full confidence

[Anonymous No.17641068]

i have been holding 10k links since 2017 when it only cost me about 2,300 dollars .

i could care less what happens.

[Anonymous No.17641278]

>>17639866
I had no clue anon. I’m hoping to sell my stack between $30-$75 then retire between now and the next 2 years.

[Anonymous No.17641398]

>>17640329
It is smart that you understand this. It is not wise that you think there's a point in trying to educate the retards.

Those of us who understand this will not sell. A nulinker is so not just for the size of his stack but because he fails to understand where we are headed and will sell early.

[Anonymous No.17641420]

>>17639866
0
(2-500 per link per year staking, market decides what that's worth...my estimate is literally bout tree fitty)

[Anonymous No.17641448]

FOMO is real

> eurofag

[Anonymous No.17641477]

>>17632068
Lol each one is supposedly the last shakeout. The majority who can push price down without needing to be in a group of 1000+ people are few as they can easily profit financially from forcing prices down and buying it back up. What happens when the big players stop caring or cash out?

[Anonymous No.17641480]

>>17641420
Kek says 420, although that's only to the top 10/20 stake pools...putting us at 1.2k-2k I guess. But with a minimum of like 25k link to make top returns

[Anonymous No.17641695]

DID ANYBODY ELSE SEE THAT WTFFF

IM NEVER FUCKING SELLING AHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.17641837]

>>17641695
Did you buy the dip??!!! I did it was fucking tasty, however don't get too excited we could still drop sub 4 in the short term again, but yes DR, NS