[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 592 KB, 601x669, creggy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17609413 No.17609413 [Reply] [Original]

CSW is not satoshi but BSV is the real bitcoin. Imagine in 5 years being called a conspiracy theorist when you try to explain that the real bitcoin is this other one but then craig is actually a secret agent or evil genius or something who reversed changes in the protocol so that he could destroy the real bitcoin and lead to a centralized chain that the government controls blah blah blah... Ok I guess I'll pay in cash sorry to trigger you

>> No.17609469

Bitcoin is obsolete anyway. Ethereum is faster, has lower fees, and does more.

>> No.17609493
File: 345 KB, 2048x1536, 1583421635860.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17609493

>>17609469
Nice try.

Bitcoin SV Transaction Fees (vs BTC)
It is currently...
1,761.93x
more expensive
to transact on Bitcoin (BTC) in USD.

>> No.17609529

>>17609493
Probably because nobody is really using BSV for anything.

>> No.17609593

>>17609493
no blockchain is cheaper than the other because you choose how much you pay for fees, retard

>> No.17610424

>>17609593
no hooker is cheaper than any other because you choose how much to pay, retard. You literally will never pay less than what you want

>> No.17610595
File: 99 KB, 204x240, 2020-03-06_1736[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17610595

>>17609413
Craig Wright is unironically Satoj
dont like it? STIFF

>> No.17610632

>>17609469
ETH is a dysfunctional shitcoin, it's not faster at all, doesn't have remotely as low fees as Bitcoin (BSV), and doesn't scale at all
meanwhile, Bitcoin has fully functional smart contracts which actually scale

>> No.17610652

>>17609529
wrong, that's true for BTC, since the network implodes if anyone actually uses it, but Bitcoin (BSV) scales perfectly well, transaction fees would remain at a fraction of a cent even with gigabyte blocks today

>> No.17610686
File: 23 KB, 398x398, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17610686

>>17609529
wrong, that's true for BTC, since the network implodes if anyone actually uses it, but Bitcoin (BSV) scales perfectly well, transaction fees would remain at a fraction of a cent even with gigabyte blocks today

>> No.17610962

>>17610424
cope
your analogy is trash