[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 41 KB, 641x530, 6C22DB49-FC22-4E90-8667-DB68C4D4A5DA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17578371 No.17578371 [Reply] [Original]

so assuming staking is a 5% return and LINK price is $1k.

(1000x8.8633) = $8863 is the NPV of 12 months of staking.

Simply put when link hits $1k, good luck finding an available LINK token on the market.

>> No.17578391

Wouldn't that be the time to Sell your stack and go in some more 'safe' investments like rentels?

.t nonlinker

>> No.17578400

>>17578371
If there's no risk involved in staking then how could it be profitable?

If there is risk involved then I don't think the demand for LINK will be as high as you think

I'm just saying, I don't think it will be like "buy LINK and stake it for free money". There has to be some sort of catch or risk

>> No.17578405

>>17578391
No it going to severely deplete the market supply.

>> No.17578414

>>17578371
where does the 8.8633 x 1000 come from? 5% annual return at 1k would be 50 bucks per link per year

>> No.17578418

>>17578400
The risk is if your node operator lies, you will lose your LINKs it again based off of game theory.

>> No.17578434

>>17578414
Yea this is calculating present value of future cash flow for 12 periods.

>> No.17578444

>>17578418
If you stake with link pool or coinbase; you won’t lose anything really.

>> No.17578456

>>17578400
For fucks sake can newlinkers and nolinkers STOP making assertions about link when they literally know nothing about it?

The staking model will be based on collateral. In order to lose your linkies (through downtime for example) you’d have to be a serious fuck up who had no business running a node anyway.
Autist NEETs like myself will stake on linkpool who will take a 25% cut but have promised to pay any damages out of their own funds, not your personal Linkies.

That’s enough spoonfeeding for you cunt.

>> No.17578459

>>17578444
Yea I guess, we’ll have to see the environement im gonna let the whales accumulate and test first though.

>> No.17578469

>>17578400
Also, the beauty of the Chainlink network and collateral system is that smartcontract creators remove all the risk from themselves and put it onto the node operators.

>> No.17578472

>>17578456
But you need LP shares to stake on LinkPool right? So it's prohibitively expensive

>> No.17578489

>>17578472
No, the LP shares simply put you to the front of the queue. They will open LP up to others once everyone with LP shares has been able to stake, and when they have demand.
You need to lurk here for at least 3 months before posting. You clearly know absolutely nothing.

>> No.17578492
File: 269 KB, 787x544, wtfwtt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17578492

>>17578371
Is that 5% per year? Per month? Per week? Per job? Which one and why?

>> No.17578509

>>17578489
Well you are right, I don't know anything about the inner workings of Chainlink staking, because I never bothered to look into it, but now I do. Thanks for the spoon feeding.

>> No.17578538

Copypasta from 2018:

Oraclize charges 1c minimum and claim to do "thousands" of jobs per day. If they do 2000 jobs per day, they make $7000 per year, minimum.

Many companies see billions of API requests per day. These are companies like Facebook, Twitter, Google, Netflix etc.

Docusign says for their API that "You may not exceed 1,000 API requests per account per hour". This gives us an idea of how many requests a node might get. So 1000 per hour is 24,000 a day, times 1 cent per job is $87,600 per year per node operator. With 19,000 node operators (Sergey's number- he stated he had that many people interested in running nodes) serving 1000 API requests per hour you'd be earning 84 grand a year passive income from your node

>> No.17578554

>>17578538
Is that from one token though?

>> No.17578555

implying people staking don't sell.

>> No.17578618

>>17578538
>>17578554

Actually this makes more sense now, so as blockchain becomes more adapted these nodes will represent cash flow which will then drive the market price of the token.

So from an analytical standpoint someone would need to see if the cashflow providing from staking is greater than market price. Which will then move market price up and will repeat infinitely.

>> No.17578620

>>17578554
Your question doesn’t even make sense. Stupid newfags.

>> No.17578629

>>17578554
are you fucking retarded??

>> No.17578650

>>17578618
Look in the archives for discussion on Chainlink collateral determining token price

>>/biz/thread/S17556816#p17560891