[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 232 KB, 1410x744, Screen Shot 2020-03-02 at 11.39.18 pm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17533029 No.17533029 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.17533044

>>17533029
Even worse: There are people on this board that bought Request Network instead of Chainlink.

And I was one of them

>> No.17533252

>>17533044
Req and link used to both be $1 at the same time... top kekz

>> No.17533263

>>17533029
What happened?

>> No.17533272
File: 1.09 MB, 1125x1634, 1570912584178.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17533272

FUCKING

DO

UBER

>> No.17533717

>>17533263
https://www.reddit.com/r/EnigmaProject/comments/f6ix1z/the_enigma_mainnet_has_launched/

>> No.17533805
File: 262 KB, 684x1200, 1571779367766.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17533805

>>17533717
This reddit pain is delicious, so good

>> No.17533820

Falling in love with random chinkcoin

>> No.17534390

anyone know's the deal they got with SEC? I had participated in their ICO and then sold at a loss shortly after, wondering if I can get a refund

>> No.17534626

>>17533029
Anyone know, was there a specific reason why the SEC was going after ENG? Was it because they encouraged the publix to accumulate enough ENG to stake a node? Or is this part of a more generalized ERC20 crackdown?

Basically, should I expect that the same bullshit is going to come down on LINK eventually? Or did Chainlink team take better measures to protect themselves from SEC's wrath?

>> No.17534707

>>17534626
Chainlink is too big to fail and I'm being 100% serious. SWIFT and ISDA aren't going to want to wait another 5 years for someone to try to get this right again.

>> No.17534729

>>17533717
If that dude with 280k bought at ICO he had nearly $2 mil at peak.
Ouch.

>> No.17535376

>>17534626
Chainlink had a company in the Virgin Islands run the ICO. Chainlink is also based out of the Cayman Islands. Sec can’t touch them nor would they touch the catalyst of the 4IR.

>> No.17535401

>>17533044
I bought 50k JNT instead of link when they were both priced about the same

>> No.17535443
File: 386 KB, 907x924, 1547489211505.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17535443

I really think people bought Enigma just because something about Sergey intimidated them, made them resentful. They felt more comfortable with an ugly beta dork like the Enigma guy, and got a kick out of the idea that he would "beat" Sergey somehow.

>> No.17535507
File: 55 KB, 639x690, 1574748782305.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17535507

>>17533029
good riddance

>> No.17535590

>>17534626
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-37

>> No.17535624

>>17535443
Based, I agree. Beta males just couldn't handle the Serg

>> No.17535887

>>17533044
i bought FUN and ICX, ama

>> No.17535978

>>17534626
because their token didnt have any use in the network... they just came up with it after the fact. the main purpose was funding. chainlink has utility for the network and is even designed (erc-667) for that purpose. so the SEC will have a hard time claiming its not a utility token. the chainlink team has thought about this very seriously.

>> No.17536210
File: 461 KB, 1242x2688, IMG_2662.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17536210

Best financial decision of my life.