Vitalik

[Anonymous No.17441870]

Shill me on ETH, /biz/. Looking for something safe to put my money in.

[Anonymous No.17441908]

>>17441870
Yeah sorry its going to double digits. You retards still dont get it do you?

[Anonymous No.17441955]

>>17441870
You simply have to believe in it and visualize where it is in five or ten years. Was it worth it? Did it work? Did it scale? Did it ultimately..succeed? That’s something that you have to ask yourself and answer with your gut.

[Anonymous No.17441977]

>>17441955
wtf? was that real advice on /biz/? where am I?

[Anonymous No.17441996]

>>17441870
I have just over 32 ETH meme stack but that's all I'm putting into it. ETH 2.0 is happening this year

[Anonymous No.17441999]

>>17441870
ETH has no way to accrue value. Everyone figured this out 2 yeas ago. No one cares about the project anymore.

[Anonymous No.17442135]

>>17441999
Interesting. Why doesn’t it accrue value?

I was also looking at XRP and ChainLink.

[Anonymous No.17442510]

>>17441870
>internet 2.0

[Anonymous No.17442543]

>>17441999
HAHAHAHAHA atleast make the bait somewhat believable

[Anonymous No.17442735]

>>17442135
>XRP
XRP is undervalued imo because everyone hates it because it's centralised and goes against just about everything cryptocurrency was made for.
Ripple is also going public this year, which will probably raise the value of XRP.
It's a good idea to have a small stack of XRP, like maybe 10% of your portfolio, but don't go all in.

>Chainlink
Chainlink is a great idea in concept, if it gets a significant amount of normies actually using it rather than just holding it then it'll go off.
That means it's potentually high reward, but not 'safe' as you seemed to want in your OP.

>ETH
Eth is safe, a lot of people use it, a lot of people invest in it, it's proven and doesn't have any significant competitors in it's niche.

>Bitcoin
between 2020-2022 everyone should have at least 80% of their portfolio in BTC, the halving is happening this year and that always causes the price to go up, you should have bought BTC back in december, but at the minimum it'll x4 what it is right now.

[Anonymous No.17442823]

>>17441870

Chainlink has the highest potential return as it will be the defacto standard for oracles on many blockchains. Ethereum is one of many that the world will use.

[Anonymous No.17442855]

ETH a horse that good doesnt jumping haver that it have to be

[Anonymous No.17442861]

>>17442855
That settles it, buying ETH

[Anonymous No.17442877]

VITALIK HAS A HUGE COCK

[Anonymous No.17442975]

>>17442735
xrp is a deriskeable coin

[Anonymous No.17443198]

One possible intermediate option is focusing on sharding exclusively data availability, and relying on rollups to extend that to computation. This has been proposed separately by myself (only as an idea, not as an opinion that this is actually the best way to go), John Adler, Casey Detrio, etc etc... Data availability is less messy because data availability check protocols exist that are fraud-proof-free, and so work without network synchrony assumptions. This also means that there would not be risk of the chain needing to "go backwards" because some error is discovered after the fact; such regressions would exist but would happen at layer 2 inside of rollups and so would not affect consensus.

The existing phase2 work would still largely have a place within such a paradigm; it would just happen at layer 2 instead of layer 1.

If we don't shard anything at all as Eric recommends, then our scalability with rollups is capped to ~2500 TPS, which is nice but not high enough to Fulfill The Dream™, 5k EOY.

[Anonymous No.17443202]

>>17443198
can you link to eric talking about sharding