Why do americans think upper class and wealth is the same?

[Anonymous No.17395468]

In Europe, you can have 0 net worth and be upper class, and be some lame hiphop artist earning 200M per year and still never be it, since you need to get born into it

[Anonymous No.17395486]

You mean like the haughty retards who would rather burn in flames than stoop so low as to bend the knee? Basically unlike the subservient RLC cuks

[Anonymous No.17395489]

>>17395468
Because in America, people who are so unsuccessful as to be paupers are not coddled and told that their titles make them important. If you're "upper class" with zero net worth, you are a pauper.

[Anonymous No.17395605]

Check out Finnexus (FNX) if you are looking for low-risk investment with great returns because FNX tokens can be converted to USDT after the sale even if the price drops by 10 times

[Anonymous No.17395649]

>>17395468
If you have zero net worth. What makes you upper class? Are you saying that Europe has a class system like India?

[Anonymous No.17395734]

>>17395649
The way you behave primarily determines whether you are middle or working class in the uk. There are mannerisms, speech patterns, fashion, choice of entertainment etc endless unwritten rules that are near impossible to fake. It's like being the only sober guy at a party - other people will quickly notice you don't belong.
To make the transition from one class to another means completely reinventing yourself into a new version of normal, something which most people are extremely resistant to doing.

[Anonymous No.17395769]

>>17395468

Ooooh noooo btc is predictably going down again, following the obvious trendline it's been on for weeks.

[Anonymous No.17395789]

>>17395468
we never had royalty, lords, holdfasts or keeps.
we've only had the kind of wealth that freedom offers us.

SUCK MY COCK!

FLAGS! WE NEED FLAGS JANNIES! GIVE US FLAGS GODDAMNIT!

[Anonymous No.17395828]

>>17395734
So you're telling me if Charles, William or Harry started dressing and acting like wiggers they would be considered low class?

[Anonymous No.17395886]

>>17395649
being part of royal family, having an upper class name, being part of the house of lords, being the heir to some big castle or company for example. getting invited to the right parties, something a guy like Donald Trump or Elon Musk never will be

[Anonymous No.17395892]

>>17395789
>we never had royalty, lords, holdfasts or keeps.
¨

good answer actually!

[Anonymous No.17396083]

>>17395468
The American class system is based on race not titles.
1. Jews
2. Black Men
3. White Women
4. White Boomers
5. Hispanics
6. White Men
7. Black Women
8. Indians/Asians although this class is on the rise and will surpass white men in the next decade or two

[Anonymous No.17396102]

>>17395886
>something a guy like Donald Trump or Elon Musk never will be

And yet who among these two categories wields actual power, rather than power that's merely a deference to tradition?

[Anonymous No.17396115]

>>17396102
so? Has nothing to do with the question

[Anonymous No.17396118]

>>17395468
Do europeans really go onto anonymous imageboards and post retarded slide threads about americans?

[Anonymous No.17396139]

>>17395468
Everything is true except the last part.
>since you need to get born into it
Upper class can be top doctors and accomplished scholars in important institutions, and important businessmen which are a pillar of their community. It's not the money that makes these people upper class, but their position which is a high achievement naturally brings some degree of wealth and recognition to them. If you are not born into the upper class you can obtain a high position in society by extraordinary effort and become upper class yourself, but you are competing with people who have a head start since birth so although it's possible it really is uncommon.

[Anonymous No.17396374]

>>17396115
What good is ancien-regime upper-class status when that status is basically a fossil?