[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 49 KB, 263x317, 1582227216634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17354331 No.17354331 [Reply] [Original]

Why are people so opposed to big blocks?

Haven't they figured out yet that the reason enterprises and multinationals haven't adopted crypto yet is because they have no actual use for it? Big blocks and low fees changes that.

It's going to be a whole new gold rush and you're all complaining about political preferences and "decentralization" (as if you actually know what this means or what the implications are at scale)

>> No.17354361

Yes, big block sizes = more centralization, as smaller miners are pushed out.
jesus christ, people actually believe this guy is satoshi

>> No.17354375

>>17354361
Bitcoin has massive miner centralization lmao. The fuck are you talking about

>> No.17354377

what i find VERY IRONIC. Is the same posters always posting about big black dick, don't like big BITCOIN BLOCKS. BRING OUT THE BBB'S

>> No.17354459

“The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide. Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost. It never really hits a scale ceiling.” – Satoshi Nakamoto (April 2009)

>> No.17354534

>>17354361

Bigger blocks/smaller fees = more use cases = more parallelization = much more decentralized than anything we've seen before

BTC is a dead end, and is much more centralized than you think

>> No.17355413

>>17354534
if one miner mines and validates everything as noone else is going to run a 1000000TB farm with GB blocks every 10 min, just use a database. blockchain not needed

>> No.17355508
File: 67 KB, 431x634, toll-of-fraud.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17355508

big blocks result in centralisation. only one charlatan benefits from that

>> No.17355558

>>17355413
>noone else is going to run a 1000000TB farm with GB blocks every 10 min

They absolutely will because it will be profitable as fuck

>> No.17355722
File: 207 KB, 300x200, tenor.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17355722

>>17355558
Can you get one of the better shills here pls ... you suck

>> No.17356367

>>17354331
>Big blocks are the future
as in
>pouring more oil to the fire solves everything

>> No.17356409

>>17354534
>Bigger blocks/smaller fees
true
>more use cases
false, there is only one real usecase for bitcoin
>much more decentralized
false, bigger blocks don't help there
>BTC is a dead end
false it's the only real crypto as in trustless permissionless and secure thus publicly auditable and unconfiscateable

>> No.17357575

>>17356409

>there is only one real usecase for bitcoin

Imagine thinking this is true

>false, bigger blocks don't help there

Imagine being a communist

>> No.17357595

>>17356409
>one use case
so spit it out soi face make us proud

>> No.17357674

>>17354534
>Bigger blocks/smaller fees
lol
except you lose in fees to SegWit
cope