[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 17 KB, 212x237, descarga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17275696 No.17275696 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.17275705

the greatest biz scam of all time

>> No.17275707

Not /biz/ oldfags that's for sure kek. I stopped buying at $0,45 because it felt way too much to pay for it.

>> No.17275879

>>17275696
>BIG HIGH, SELL LOW
These are the rules, newfags

>> No.17275882

>>17275705
>the greatest biz scam of all time
this

>> No.17275894

>>17275707
I bought all of mine in the 30 cent range. I lost my source of income afterwards so I didn't add anything for like 2 years now.

>> No.17275899
File: 44 KB, 542x540, ChainLink.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17275899

>>17275707
I bought below the price of a Dollar, too, but I still crave for more.

>> No.17275905

>>17275696
People who will sell it at $47 for 10x profit while you continue to post pink wojacks and wonder why you never seem to make it

>> No.17275913
File: 176 KB, 512x640, brap59.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17275913

>>17275696
I've been buying this the last week. I have almost 1K now and planning on accumulating a 10K stack by eoy regardless of price

>> No.17275951
File: 67 KB, 704x600, raiblocks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17275951

>>17275705
>>17275913
BTW I had a 4K stack back in 2017 and besides BTC and ETH went all in on Raiblocks for $0.40 and sold for $36 so no regrets there. Should have bought linkies in the bear market but oh well.

>> No.17275964

>>17275696
basketball americans

>> No.17276050

>>17275696
I remember these same threads from when ETH hit $3, $5, $10, $30, $100, etc.

>> No.17276265

>>17276050
well this isnt eth just in between token

>> No.17276305
File: 9 KB, 364x138, Z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17276305

>>17276265
Link is what will make ETH actually valuable.

The EEA only exists because all these companies thought ETH already had Chainlink functionality.

>> No.17276335
File: 64 KB, 1017x1024, 1539815482485.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17276335

>>17276305
At this rate link wont even need eth and give few more years it can replace btc

>> No.17276352

>>17276335
>At this rate link wont even need eth
That was always the case, the white paper explicitly says Link is meant to be blockchain agnostic, which is taking shape right now.

>give few more years it can replace btc
There are no plans to make a proprietary Link blockchain, so no. Link isn't going to replace any blockchain.

>> No.17276359

>>17276305
sure. all the advisors, consulters and IT experts in all of those companies were all just roughly guessing and assuming the functionality of ETH, and not doing any research at all. they literally are all obsolete, and should hand all their positions to you.

>> No.17276395

>>17276359
ETH was sold on the strength of "smart contracts".
The possibilities for mainstream finance were always at the heart of the smart contract argument.

Also, oracles already existed at that time, so likely people thought moving towards external data was just a hop and a skip away.
Turns out the oracle layer needs to be developed to a high standard, needs to become a protocol in its own right.
This is what's happening now with Chainlink.

>> No.17276402
File: 151 KB, 441x570, 62f04ece5a7c7388e4ada1242b41661e.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17276402

better buy at 4,70 as 500$

>> No.17276423

>>17276395
Wtf duh sergay got it and those of us that spent the last 2 years fattening their stacks got it. Everyone else will bow to us.

>> No.17276444

>>17275899
$.62 a month before it hit $.19 gang